Development and Validation of Hematocrit Level Measurement in Dried Blood Spots Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Dried blood spots (DBSs) have gained recent popularity as a sampling method for therapeutic drug monitoring. For patients, DBS sampling has several advantages over venous blood sampling. However, technical issues primarily influenced by hematocrit levels, interfere with the implementation of this method in daily clinical practice. The results of concentration measurements of drugs that are influenced by hematocrit should be corrected for hematocrit levels. In this article, we developed a fast, nondestructive, near-infrared (NIR)-based method for measuring the hematocrit in DBSs. METHOD: Using a partial least squares algorithm, an NIR-based quantification method was developed for measuring hematocrit levels of 0.19-0.49 L/L. Residual venous blood of 522 patients was used to build this partial least squares model. The validity of the method was evaluated using 40 patient samples. DBSs were created by adding a small amount (50 µL) of blood on a Whatman filter paper and drying for 24 hours in a desiccator cabinet. The robustness was evaluated by measuring 24 additional samples with a high hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia (HIL) index. The hematocrit values obtained using a Sysmex XN hemocytometry analyzer were used as reference. RESULTS: The difference between hematocrit measurements obtained with NIR spectroscopy and a hemocytometry analyzer was <15% for the 40 samples. The accuracy (≤9%) and precision (≤7%) for all the quality control samples were within the acceptance criteria of <15%. The intraassay and interassay coefficient of variability was ≤3% and ≤6%, respectively, for the different quality control levels. There were no deviations in the measurements for the samples with high HIL indices. The stability of hematocrit in DBS was up to 14 days for all levels. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a hematocrit model using NIR spectroscopy. This nondestructive, accurate, and reproducible method has a short analysis time (51 seconds), and can be used to analyze DBS samples stored for up to 2 weeks in a desiccator cabinet.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Methotrexate in Plasma Using Ultra High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Necessary After Administration of Glucarpidase in Methotrexate Intoxications.

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is used to treat a variety of cancers. In all patients receiving HD-MTX, plasma MTX levels are monitored mainly to anticipate rescue therapy to prevent adverse events. We present 2 children treated with HD-MTX and afterward treated with glucarpidase at different time-points after their HD-MTX infusions. After the administration of glucarpidase, a nontoxic metabolite of MTX cross-reacts with MTX in the standard immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostics, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands) resulting in an artificially elevated MTX level. An artificially elevated MTX level results in unnecessarily long folinic acid administration, which decreases the effectivity of MTX. This grand round highlights the importance of measuring plasma MTX levels after the administration of glucarpidase with an ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry method instead of with an immunoassay.

Using fluorescence polarization immunoassay for determination of erythrocyte methotrexate polyglutamates, a quick and easy test?

BACKGROUND: The folate antagonist methotrexate (MTX) is the anchor drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The therapeutic effects of MTX are attributed to the intracellular levels of MTX, present in the cell as polyglutamates (MTX-PGs). We aimed to validate an immunoassay for the measurement of MTX-PG in erythrocytes. METHODS: Samples were analyzed by an adapted fluorescence polarization immune assay (FPIA) method on the FLx analyzer (Abbott). Cross-reactivity was determined in both plasma and erythrocyte pellet. In erythrocyte pellet, the imprecision, linearity, and lower limit of quantitation were determined. The method was compared with our in-house liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for total MTX-PG. RESULTS: For the adapted FPIA method, a linear range of 25-1000 nmol/L (R = 0.993) was obtained for total MTX-PG in erythrocytes. A coefficient of variation of <17% for interday and <8% for intraday imprecision was found and average recovery was 91%. Lower limit of quantitation was determined at 50 nmol/L total MTX-PG with a coefficient of variation of 15%. There was no significant proportional bias of the FPIA assay compared with our in-house LC-MS/MS method, but a (nonsignificant) constant positive bias was present [FPIA = 1.00 (95% confidence interval: 0.60-1.95) × LC-MS/MS + 31.00 nmol/L (95% confidence interval: -11.83 to 61.00)]. Results could be very different for individual patients as reflected in the poor R of 0.419. CONCLUSIONS: The FPIA method can be used to measure total MTX-PG in erythrocytes. Although there was no significant bias detected compared with the LC-MS/MS method, the FPIA method showed constant positive bias, probably because of interference from folates and MTX metabolites 2,4-diamino-N10-methylpteroic acid and 7-hydroxy-MTX. The correlation between both methods was average and resulted in large differences in individual patients, most likely because of problems during sample preparation.