Determination of OTNE-induced thyroid effects within an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) network.

Octahydro-tetramethyl-naphthalenyl-ethanone (OTNE) is a synthetic fragrance ingredient. OTNE was evaluated in repeated-dose toxicological studies. Target organs via oral and dermal routes were the liver and skin/liver, respectively. Effects were observed on the thyroid and thyroid hormones, suggesting hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis perturbation. We investigated the molecular initiating event(s) (MIEs), key events (KEs), and adverse outcomes of OTNE-induced thyroid perturbation within an adverse outcome pathway (AOP). Data were generated using new approach methodologies (NAMs) on human, mouse, and/or rat receptors exploring MIEs using in vitro receptor ligand-binding assays for androstane receptor variant 3 (CAR), farnesoid X receptor (FXR), liver X receptor alpha (LXRα), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha, delta, and gamma (PPARα, δ, and γ), pregnane X receptor (PXR), and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). These data inform an AOP network where CAR, FXR, and PXR activation serve as MIEs with thyroid perturbation occurring as secondary effects. These data represent a robust evaluation using NAMs for mapping OTNE-induced thyroid effects and identifying activation of receptor-ligand binding as MIEs in lieu of additional in vivo experimentation. These data indicate the observed thyroid effects are secondary to liver effects and the thyroid effects, therefore, should not be the basis for assessing potential OTNE-induced human health hazards.

Cashmeran as a potential endocrine disrupting chemical: What does the weight-of-the-evidence indicate?

Cashmeran is a fragrance ingredient. Risk assessments are available but have not focused on its endocrine disruptor potential. The objective was to evaluate Cashmeran as a potential endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC). The assessment was based on data from US EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard, the Danish (Q)SAR Database, in vitro assays, and in vivo studies. ToxCast assays related to estrogen, androgen, thyroid, and steroidogenesis modalities were Inactive at non-cytotoxic concentrations. In vitro assays demonstrated no estrogenic activity in a human cervical epithelioid carcinoma HeLa cell line and indicated only weak agonist estrogenic activity in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO)-K1 cells. In the same test, no agonist or antagonist activity was detected for human androgen receptor (hAR) and thyroid hormone receptor ß (hTHRß) binding. The Danish QSAR database didn't indicate any ED potential. There were no adverse endocrine related effects in either a 90-day repeated gavage dosing study or a reproductive and developmental screening study. Regarding ED potential for environment, the data from two limited environmental ED related studies on Cashmeran did not raise any concern. Data from in vitro and in vivo studies were considered for environmental ED concern. Based on the weight-of-the-evidence, Cashmeran is not expected to cause endocrine effects.

Probabilistic determination of the ecological risk from OTNE in aquatic and terrestrial compartments based on US-wide monitoring data.

OTNE [1-(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro-2,3,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)ethan-1-one; trade name Iso E Super] is a fragrance ingredient commonly used in consumer products which are disposed down the drain. This research measured effluent and sludge concentrations of OTNE at 44 US wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). The mean effluent and sludge concentrations were 0.69 ± 0.65 µg/L and 20.6 ± 33.8 mg/kg dw respectively. Distribution of OTNE effluent concentrations and dilution factors were used to predict surface water and sediment concentrations and distributions of OTNE sludge concentrations and loading rates were used to predict terrestrial concentrations. The 90th percentile concentration of OTNE in US WWTP mixing zones was predicted to be 0.04 and 0.85 µg/L under mean and 7Q10 low flow (lowest river flow occurring over a 7 day period every 10 years) conditions respectively. The 90th percentile sediment concentrations under mean and 7Q10 low flow conditions were predicted to be 0.081 and 1.6 mg/kg dw respectively. Based on current US sludge application practices, the 90th percentile OTNE terrestrial concentration was 1.38 mg/kg dw. The probability of OTNE concentrations being below the predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) for the aquatic and sediment compartments was greater than 99%. For the terrestrial compartment, the probability of OTNE concentrations being lower than the PNEC was 97% for current US sludge application practices. Based on the results of this study, OTNE concentrations in US WWTP effluent and sludge do not pose an ecological risk to aquatic, sediment and terrestrial organisms.

Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: general considerations.

Read-across has generated much attention since it may be used as an alternative approach for addressing the information requirements under regulatory programmes, notably the EU's REACH regulation. Read-across approaches are conceptually accepted by ECHA and Member State Authorities (MS) but difficulties remain in applying them consistently in practice. Technical guidance is available and there are a plethora of models and tools that can assist in the development of categories and read-across, but guidance on how to practically apply categorisation approaches is still missing. This paper was prepared following an ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology) Task Force that had the objective of summarising guidance and tools available, reviewing their practical utility and considering what technical recommendations and learnings could be shared more widely to refine and inform on the current use of read-across. The full insights are recorded in ECETOC Technical Report TR No. 116. The focus of this present paper is to describe some of the technical and practical considerations when applying read-across under REACH. Since many of the deliberations helped identify the issues for discussion at a recent ECHA/Cefic LRI workshop on "read-across", summary outcomes from this workshop are captured where appropriate for completeness.

An Integrated Assessment Scheme for assessing the adequacy of (eco)toxicological data under REACH.

REACH requires all available (eco)toxicological information, whether protocol studies, other experiments, or non-testing approaches such as read-across or (Q)SAR, to be collected and evaluated. However, guidance documents only limitedly address how adequacy of (eco)toxicological information can be assessed consistently and transparently. We propose an Integrated Assessment Scheme (IAS) for the evaluation of (eco)toxicological data. The IAS consists of three modules: (i) the reliability of the data; (ii) the validity of the methods the data are generated from and; (iii) the regulatory need of the data. Each module is assessed and documented using adjusted OECD principles for the validation of (Q)SARs. These adjusted principles provide a harmonised set of criteria for the evaluation of all types of (eco)toxicological data. Assessment codes, similar to Klimisch codes, are assigned to the evaluated information in each module. The coherent combination of the assessment codes of all three modules determines the overall adequacy of information for fulfilling the information requirement in REACH, and can serve as a weight in a Weight of Evidence procedure as mentioned in REACH Annex XI.

Weight factors in an Integrated Testing Strategy using adjusted OECD principles for (Q)SARs and extended Klimisch codes to decide on skin irritation classification.

The Integrated Assessment Scheme (IAS) defines weight factors for each piece of toxicological information under REACH in an Integrated Testing Strategy. This IAS is illustrated on skin irritation for Classification and Labelling (C&L) for five substances and using mostly (Q)SAR models. The models are the BfR Rulebase, Derek for Windows and TOPKAT, read across and pH-rules. The weight factors derived in the IAS show that for peracetic-acid and pentabromodiphenylether the C&L decision could be easily made. For bisphenol A additional information on read across was used to finalise a decision on C&L, while for methylphenyl-diisocyanate additional expert judgement was needed. For allylheptanoate only the TOPKAT prediction was in the applicability domain, which was insufficient on its own. Therefore, other non guideline testing information was used and in vitro testing results. The above examples on skin irritation information show how the IAS can aid in the decision making process and how it adds to the ToxRTool and the ITS of Hoffmann et al. on the same endpoint and similar methods.

The expanding role of predictive toxicology: an update on the (Q)SAR models for mutagens and carcinogens.

Different regulatory schemes worldwide, and in particular, the preparation for the new REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of CHemicals) legislation in Europe, increase the reliance on estimation methods for predicting potential chemical hazard. To meet the increased expectations, the availability of valid (Q)SARs becomes a critical issue, especially for endpoints that have complex mechanisms of action, are time-and cost-consuming, and require a large number of animals to test. Here, findings from the survey on (Q)SARs for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity, initiated by the European Chemicals Bureau (ECB) and carried out by the Istituto Superiore di Sanita' are summarized, key aspects are discussed, and a broader view towards future needs and perspectives is given.

A category approach for reproductive effects of phthalates.

In regulatory toxicology, the experimental assessment of reproductive toxicity is one of the most costly endpoints to perform. Categorizing chemicals is an approach that can be used to reduce animal tests in risk assessments of chemicals, for example, via REACH (Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals). The category approach was tested for reproductive toxicity with a group of 10 ortho-phthalate esters, with different side chain lengths. Three ortho-phthalates were used for testing the category. Phthalates with side-chain lengths C4 to C6 that are commonly known to cause reproductive effects were included, as well as the recently discovered mechanism that indicates antiandrogenic effects. The differences in physicochemical properties, absorption rates, and metabolism between the phthalates investigated could not fully explain the difference in reproductive toxicity. It was concluded that phthalates with the alkyl side-chain length from C4 to C6 produce similar severe reproductive effects in experimental animals. It is expected that phthalates included in the tight boundaries of the proposed category would all show severe reproductive effects, especially the antiandrogenic effects. Further testing might not be needed for phthalates within these boundaries. If necessary, limited testing could focus on the critical endpoints. Detailed mechanistic information is needed on phthalates to apply the categories for regulatory toxicology.