The EFEMEREYE Study: prenatal medication exposure and ocular anomaly occurrence in EFEMERIS health database.

PURPOSE: To describe ocular anomalies (OAs) in children and fetuses in a French general population, to estimate their prevalence, and to investigate a possible association between prenatal medication exposure and the occurrence of OA in utero or in early childhood. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study using the EFEMERIS cohort, a database containing pregnancies registered in Haute-Garonne and their outcomes. We collected OA descriptions of fetuses at the time of pregnancy termination or of children at birth and the results of eye examinations of children at 9 months and 2 years of age. RESULTS: The prevalence of overall OAs was 2.13%, of which 0.04% were congenital ocular malformations (COMs). A total of 2,968 cases and 136,619 controls were selected for analysis. There was a significant difference between the two groups with regard to prenatal exposure to medications for the digestive tract and metabolism, the cardiovascular system, and the respiratory system. Multivariable analysis revealed an increased risk of OA in children of mothers exposed to magnesium during and 1 month before pregnancy (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.11-1.38). CONCLUSIONS: This first pharmaco-epidemiological study on OA in France suggests that OA may be associated with exposure to commonly used medications. Given the rarity of COM, larger, international studies are warranted.

First trimester pregnancy exposure to fosfomycin and risk of major congenital anomaly: a comparative study in the EFEMERIS database.

PURPOSE: Fosfomycin trometamol has been recommended as first-line bactericidal antibiotic for urinary tract infections in pregnant women since 2015 in France. However, studies assessing fosfomycin safety in pregnancy are sparse. This study aimed to assess the risk of major Congenital Anomaly (CA) after fosfomycin exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a comparative study in EFEMERIS, the French database including expecting mothers covered by the French Health Insurance System of Haute-Garonne from July 1st, 2004 to December 31th, 2018. EFEMERIS contains prescribed and dispensed reimbursed medications during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. Logistic regressions have been conducted to compare three groups: (1) pregnancies exposed at least once to fosfomycin; (2) pregnancies exposed at least once to nitrofurantoin; and (3) pregnancies exposed neither to fosfomycin nor to nitrofurantoin, another antibiotic prescribed for urinary infections, before and during pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 2724 (2.0%) pregnant women received at least one fosfomycin prescription during the first trimester, 650 (0.5%) received nitrofurantoin during the first trimester, and 133,502 (97.5%) pregnant women were not exposed to fosfomycin nor to nitrofurantoin. First trimester pregnancy exposure to fosfomycin was not associated with an increased risk of major CA, compared to first trimester exposure to nitrofurantoin (2.0% versus 2.5%; ORa = 0.80 [0.44-1.47]), or to pregnancies unexposed to fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin (2.0% versus 2.1%; ORa = 0.97 [0.73-1.30]). CONCLUSION: This is the first large comparative study assessing fosfomycin safety in pregnancy. It does not exhibit an increased risk of major CA after fosfomycin exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Prenatal Drug Exposure in Children With a History of Neuropsychiatric Care: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Background and Objectives: Neuropsychiatric disorders in childhood after prenatal drug exposure raises concerns. Most of the published studies focused on psychotropic medications. This study investigated which prenatal medication exposure was associated with neuropsychiatric disorders in childhood. Methods: A case-control study, nested in the French POMME cohort, was conducted to compare prenatal medication exposure between children with a history of neuropsychiatric care (ages 0-8 years) and children in a control group. POMME included children born in Haute-Garonne to women covered by the general Health Insurance System, between 2010 and 2011 (N = 8,372). Cases were identified through: (1) reimbursement for neuropsychiatric care; (2) psychomotor development abnormalities specified on health certificates; and (3) reimbursement for methylphenidate or neuroleptics. Controls had none of these criteria. Prenatal exposure to each of the major "Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical" classes was compared between the groups. Class(es) for which there was a statistically significant difference (after Bonferroni adjustment, i.e., p < 0.0033) was(were) compared using logistic regression. Results: A total of 723 (8.6%) cases and 4,924 (58.8%) controls were identified. This study showed a statistically significant difference in prenatal exposure to nervous system drugs (excluding analgesics) between the groups [ORa: 2.12 (1.55; 2.90)]. Differences (not statistically significant at the 0.0033 threshold) were also observed for the ATC classes: Musculoskeletal, Genito-urinary System and Sex Hormones, Alimentary Tract and Anti-infectives. Conclusion: Through identification of children with neuropsychiatric disorders and of their prenatal medication exposure, this study provides guidance for the assessment of long-term neuropsychiatric effects after prenatal medication exposure, without focusing on psychotropic medications.

Topical sertaconazole during pregnancy and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome and major congenital anomalies: Comparative study in the EFEMERIS database.

INTRODUCTION: Topical sertaconazole is indicated in the treatment of vaginal or mucocutaneous fungal infections due to Candida and dermatophytosis. To our knowledge, there is no data available in the literature on the potential effects of sertaconazole during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential risks of topical sertaconazole use during pregnancy for the foetus and pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EFEMERIS database was used, which contained medications prescribed and dispensed to pregnant women in the Haute-Garonne region whose pregnancy ended between July 2004 and December 2018. We compared pregnant women exposed to sertaconazole at least once during pregnancy to unexposed. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) of major congenital anomalies and small gestational age at birth were estimated using logistic regression models. For other outcomes, hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by Cox regression models. RESULTS: The study included 16,222 pregnant women (15.0%) who were given sertaconazole and 91,976 who were not. Exposure to sertaconazole during pregnancy was not associated with increased risks of any of the investigated outcomes, including natural pregnancy termination (HRa  = 0.92 [0.78-1.08]), preterm birth (HRa  = 1.06 [0.95-1.17]) and small for gestational age at birth (ORa  = 0.78 [0.66-0.92]). No association between risk of major congenital anomalies overall and maternal exposure to sertaconazole during the first trimester was observed (ORa  = 1.01 [0.84-1.21]). DISCUSSION: This is the first study involving a large number of pregnant women to assess the potential risks of sertaconazole during pregnancy. This study does not indicate an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome and major congenital anomalies from exposure to topical sertaconazole.

Longitudinal Methods for Modeling Exposures in Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies in Pregnancy.

In many perinatal pharmacoepidemiologic studies, exposure to a medication is classified as "ever exposed" versus "never exposed" within each trimester or even over the entire pregnancy. This approach is often far from real-world exposure patterns, may lead to exposure misclassification, and does not to incorporate important aspects such as dosage, timing of exposure, and treatment duration. Alternative exposure modeling methods can better summarize complex, individual-level medication use trajectories or time-varying exposures from information on medication dosage, gestational timing of use, and frequency of use. We provide an overview of commonly used methods for more refined definitions of real-world exposure to medication use during pregnancy, focusing on the major strengths and limitations of the techniques, including the potential for method-specific biases. Unsupervised clustering methods, including k-means clustering, group-based trajectory models, and hierarchical cluster analysis, are of interest because they enable visual examination of medication use trajectories over time in pregnancy and complex individual-level exposures, as well as providing insight into comedication and drug-switching patterns. Analytical techniques for time-varying exposure methods, such as extended Cox models and Robins' generalized methods, are useful tools when medication exposure is not static during pregnancy. We propose that where appropriate, combining unsupervised clustering techniques with causal modeling approaches may be a powerful approach to understanding medication safety in pregnancy, and this framework can also be applied in other areas of epidemiology.

Initial data on the safety of metopimazine during pregnancy and the risk of major birth defects and pregnancy loss - An observational study using the EFEMERIS database.

INTRODUCTION: Metopimazine is an anti-emetic drug used to treat nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. However, no animal or clinical data are available regarding its safety in pregnant women. The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess the risk of birth defects and pregnancy loss associated with the use of metopimazine during pregnancy in a population-based cohort study. METHODS: The study focused on the EFEMERIS database including the prescription and dispensation of drugs for pregnant women in Haute-Garonne, France, between July 2004 and December 2017. This was an observational, retrospective, comparative study. Pregnancy loss and major birth defects were compared between women exposed to metopimazine during pregnancy and those with no exposure using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional risk models. RESULTS: Among 135,574 pregnant women, 11,402 (8.2%) were exposed to metopimazine during pregnancy, mostly in the first trimester (more than 70% of women). No association was found between major birth defects and exposure to metopimazine in the first trimester of pregnancy (ORa=[95% CI]=1.06 [0.92-1.23]). Pregnancy loss was negatively associated with metopimazine use during pregnancy (HRa [95% CI]=0.80 [0.72-0.88]), taking into account major potential confounders. Comparable rates were recorded between women exposed to metopimazine and those unexposed to the drug in terms of prematurity (6.7% vs. 6.4%), low birth weight (6.2% vs. 6.2%) and small for gestational age (1.2% vs. 1.4%). CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the wide use of metopimazine during pregnancy in France although no studies on efficacy or safety in pregnant women are available. The results of this study do not indicate any teratogenic effect or an increased risk of pregnancy loss of metopimazine.

Risk of Pregnancy Termination and Congenital Anomalies After Domperidone Exposure: A Study in the EFEMERIS Database.

INTRODUCTION: Domperidone is widely used during pregnancy, although the risks associated with pregnant women have not been adequately evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the rate of pregnancy outcomes and congenital anomalies between pregnant women exposed and unexposed to domperidone during pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing pregnant women exposed and unexposed to domperidone during pregnancy. We used the EFEMERIS database containing the prescriptions and dispensing of drugs to pregnant women in Haute-Garonne, who had a pregnancy outcome between July 2004 and December 2017. We compared pregnant women who were exposed to domperidone at least once during pregnancy to unexposed pregnant women. Logistic regression and Cox proportional risk models were applied. RESULTS: Overall, 13,964 pregnancies (10.3% of pregnancies) were given domperidone. A reduction in the number of pregnant women exposed to domperidone (2004: 17.1% to 2017: 1.2%) was noted. More than 75% of pregnancies were exposed to domperidone in the first trimester of pregnancy. The rate of natural pregnancy termination in pregnant women exposed to domperidone was lower than that in unexposed pregnant women (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.78 [0.71-0.87]). The malformation rate in fetuses/newborns exposed in utero (first trimester) to domperidone is comparable to that of unexposed fetuses/newborns (adjusted odd ratio = 0.89 [0.77-1.03]). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comparative study to enrol a large number of pregnant women exposed to domperidone. Data regarding the malformation rate following exposure to domperidone during the first trimester of pregnancy are reassuring. Women exposed to domperidone during pregnancy have a decreased risk for natural pregnancy termination, probably owing to an indication bias.

What changes in prescription patterns of antiemetic medications in pregnant women in France?

BACKGROUND: In France, few data are available on the prescription patterns of antiemetic medications in pregnant women. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe antiemetic medication prescriptions and trends over time. Can we observe significant changes in pregnant woman prescriptions in recent years? METHODS: We conducted a drug utilization study among pregnant women using data from the EFEMERIS database, including 135 574 pregnant women who had a pregnancy outcome between 2004 and 2017 in Haute-Garonne (France). RESULTS: During the study period, 40 028 women (29.5%) received at least one antiemetic prescription during pregnancy. Metoclopramide (56.6%), domperidone (34.9%), and metopimazine (28.5%) were the most commonly prescribed antiemetics, whatever the trimester of pregnancy. Prescriptions of ondansetron only concerned 53 women (0.1%). The prevalence of women who received at least one prescription for an antiemetic decreased from 32.5% in 2010 to 21.6% in 2017. This decline mainly concerned domperidone prescriptions (from 13.1% in 2010 to 1.2% in 2017). Metoclopramide prescriptions also decreased slightly (18.3% in 2010 and 14.0% in 2017). Metopimazine prescriptions increased lowly (8.0% in 2010 and 9.0% in 2017). CONCLUSION: This study showed a decrease of antiemetic prescriptions between 2010 and 2017, linked to the sharp decrease in domperidone use from 2011, probably related to warnings about the risk of cardiovascular adverse effects following exposure to domperidone. We could not observe real switches to other antiemetic medications. No switches to ondansetron could be noted either, with only rare exposure during pregnancy, contrary to other countries, like the United States.

Use of triptans during pregnancy? With caution!

We report cases, registered in the French national pharmacovigilance database, of fetal death and intrauterine growth retardation in women exposed to triptans during pregnancy. Triptans have vasoconstrictive properties and we wonder about their responsibility for these side effects. The use of triptans and other drugs exhibiting vasoconstrictive properties in pregnant women requires a careful benefits/risks evaluation.

Drug prescriptions in French pregnant women between 2015 and 2016: A study in the EGB database.

PURPOSE: To describe drug prescriptions in pregnant women in France and to identify teratogenic and fetotoxic drug prescriptions. METHODS: This study was carried out using data from Échantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires (EGB), a French national health database which includes 1/97th of the French population. Our study population included all pregnant women, aged 10 to 60, who were registered in the EGB and had a pregnancy outcome between 2015 and 2016. Drugs prescribed and dispensed to women during pregnancy and the 3 months before, were collected and described for each year and according to pregnancy trimesters. Prescriptions of major teratogen or fetotoxic drugs were described. RESULTS: We identified 18,279 pregnancies. Among them, 93% received drug prescriptions and dispensations during pregnancy with an average of 7.4±5.5 different drugs. "Alimentary tract and metabolism (75.4%)", "nervous system (64.0%)" and "blood and blood forming organs (58.7%)" classes were the most frequently prescribed to pregnant women. The 5 most frequently prescribed drugs were paracetamol (60.6%), iron (49.2%), folic acid (45.6%), phloroglucinol (44.0%) and colecalciferol (41.4%). The most commonly prescribed drugs included some that have not yet been well evaluated in pregnancy. Prescriptions and dispensations of teratogenic or fetotoxic drugs, as Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and retinoids were observed. Valproic acid prescriptions to pregnant women have become extremely rare. CONCLUSION: This descriptive study demonstrates that numerous drugs are prescribed and dispensed to pregnant women in France. These include drugs with a proven teratogenic or fetotoxic effect and many drugs that have not yet been well evaluated in pregnancy.

Impact of pregnancy on antidepressant treatment course: a population-based comparative cohort study in France.

The prevention of relapses and the treatment of depression during pregnancy are difficult challenges. The maintenance of antidepressants in pregnancy with its concomitant risks to mother and child needs to be weighed against those associated with not treating the disease. This study aimed at quantifying the impact of the occurrence of pregnancy on the course of antidepressant treatment among newly treated women (< 6 months). We performed a comparative observational cohort study using the nationwide French reimbursement healthcare system database. Women who conceived in 2014 and initiated an antidepressant at any time in the 6 months before pregnancy were compared with nonpregnant women newly exposed to antidepressants with matching on age, antidepressant exposure, history of psychiatric disorders, and area of residence. The primary outcome was a composite of antidepressant discontinuation, switch to another antidepressant, and concomitant use of antidepressants. The secondary outcome was the resumption of antidepressant during follow-up. We used Cox marginal proportional hazards models to compare time to outcomes between pregnant and nonpregnant women. The pregnant cohort included 6593 women, and the comparison cohort 29,347 nonpregnant women. In the period following the first month of treatment, pregnant women were more likely to experience treatment modification, and especially to stop receiving it, compared with nonpregnant women (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.58; 95%CI, 1.51-1.62). Pregnant women who discontinued treatment had a 41% decreased incidence of antidepressant resumption compared with nonpregnant women (aHR 0.59; 95%CI, 0.56-0.62). Pregnancy was a determinant of antidepressant treatment modification, and especially of discontinuation.

Prescription of antiepileptic medicines including valproate in pregnant women: A study in three European countries.

PURPOSE: To study patterns of antiepileptic drugs (AED) prescribing, particularly valproate, during pregnancy over a 10-year period in the UK, Italy, and France. METHODS: Data on pregnancies conceived after 1 January 2007 with outcomes before 31 December 2016 were extracted from four European electronic health care databases (380 499 in the United Kingdom (UK), 66 681 in France, and 649 918 in Italy [355 767 in Emilia Romagna and 294 151 in Tuscany]). Prevalence of AEDs with an ATC code starting N03A and clobazam (N05BA09) were stratified by country and calendar year. RESULTS: AED prescribing during pregnancy varied from 3.0 (2.8-3.1) per 1000 pregnancies in Emilia Romagna to 7.8 (7.5-8.0) in the UK, 5.9 (5.6-6.1) in Tuscany, and 6.3 (5.7-6.9) in France. Lamotrigine was commonly prescribed in all regions with a third of women exposed to an AED during pregnancy taking lamotrigine in the UK and France. Valproate was prescribed to 28.6% of AED exposed pregnant women in Tuscany, 21.6% in France, 16.7% in Emilia Romagna, and 11.9% in the UK. Over the study period, the prevalence of AED prescribing increased in the UK mainly due to increases in pregabalin and gabapentin, declined in France mainly related to decreases in clonazepam, and remained constant in Italy. Valproate prescriptions declined to a prevalence <1 per 1000 pregnancies in 2015 to 2016 in the UK, France, and Emilia Romagna. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in AED prescribing during pregnancy indicate the potential for further reductions, particularly of valproate. Increases in pregabalin/gabapentin prescribing, for which risks are not well known, are a cause for concern.

Did advice on the prescription of sodium valproate reduce prescriptions to women? An observational study in three European countries between 2007 and 2016.

OBJECTIVES: In November 2014, the CMDh (a regulatory body representing EU Member States) advised doctors not to prescribe sodium valproate for epilepsy or bipolar disorder in preg nant women, in women who can become pregnant, or in girls unless other treatments are ineffective or not tolerated. This study aimed to determine if this warning led to changes in prescription patterns. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort of 5.4 million women aged between 10 and 50 years identified in electronic health care data from United Kingdom, France, and Italy (2007-2016). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anti-epileptic drug (AED) prescriptions. RESULTS: The prevalence of women receiving AED prescriptions in 2016 varied from 12.2 per 1000 to 29 per 1000 in the four regions. The incidence of prescribing any AED (excluding clonazepam, gabapentin, and pregabalin) fell each year on average by 7.5% (95% CI, 7.0%-8.0%; Emilia Romagna), 9.6% (8.3%-11.0%; France), 7.1% (6.7%-7.6%; Tuscany), and 0.4% (0.2%-1.0%; United Kingdom). The relative odds of prescribing sodium valproate rather than any other AED decreased more after 2014 compared with before the end of 2014 in France (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98), Tuscany (0.81; 0.76-0.86), Emilia Romagna (0.83; 0.76-0.90), and the United Kingdom (0.92; 0.80-1.06; not statistically significant). CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that the CMDh warning did lead to changes in prescription patterns of sodium valproate in women of childbearing age. There were considerable differences in prescribing practice amongst regions of Europe.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions from the 6th month of pregnancy: impact of advice from health authorities.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used drugs. On June 2008 and February 2009, Dear Doctor Letters (DDLs) were sent by the French Health Authorities (AFSSAPS) to remind practitioners of risks with NSAIDs after the fifth month of pregnancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these letters on NSAID prescriptions during late pregnancy. EFEMERIS is a French database that registers drugs prescribed and reimbursed during pregnancy and outcomes between 2004 and 2015. We performed a descriptive study and a 'before-and-after' comparison of NSAID prescriptions between 3 June 2006 and 3 June 2008 ('before group'), and between 1 March 2010 and 1 March 2012 ('after group'). We carried out a Cochran Armitage trend test to check whether the rate of women exposed to NSAIDs varies linearly over time. We identified 948 (4.38%) pregnant women in the 'before group' and 678 (2.73%) in the 'after group' receiving at least one NSAID prescription in late pregnancy (P < 0.0001). Between 2006 and 2012, mainly prescriptions for morniflumate/niflumic acid (1.7% vs. 0.9%; P < 0.0001), ibuprofen (0.8% vs. 0.6%; P = 0.01) and ketoprofen (0.7% vs. 0.3%; P < 0.0001) fell significantly after DDLs. The Cochran Armitage trend test shows that the percentage of women exposed to NSAIDs in late pregnancy decreased significantly during the study period (P < 0.0001). This study highlighted a significant decrease in the percentage of women receiving NSAID prescriptions during late pregnancy after DDLs. This decrease is not linked to a specific women's profile or prescriber's medical discipline.

Pharmacoepidemiology in pregnancy.

Taking a medication is usually a challenge for a pregnant woman as the beneficial drug effect on the mother has to be considered regarding its potential adverse effects, not only for her but also for her unborn child. As medication use is common in pregnant women, by chance or necessity, it gives the opportunity to evaluate the consequences of prenatal drug exposure in real life through pharmacoepidemiological studies. This paper provides an overview of data sources, study designs and data analysis methods that can be used for pregnancy medication safety studies. In the future, the implementation of responsive international networks may be the keystones of drug evaluation in pregnancy.

Antidepressants during pregnancy: a French drug utilisation study in EFEMERIS cohort.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that exposure to some antidepressants (AD) during pregnancy could be associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations and neurodevelopment disorders for the child. We conducted a study to describe the use of AD during pregnancy in France. METHODS: We performed a drug utilisation study in EFEMERIS, a French cohort of pregnant women. At the time of the present study, 89,170 pregnant women, who were pregnant from 2005 to 2014 in Haute-Garonne were included. Prevalence and incidence of AD prescriptions during pregnancy, characteristics of AD users, and trends in AD use over the 10-year period were studied. RESULTS: During the 10-year study period, 1620 women registered in EFEMERIS (1.8%) received at least one prescription and dispensation for AD during pregnancy: 1363 during the first (1.5%), 591 during the second (0.7%), and 412 during the third (0.5%) trimester. A total of 2874 women (3.2%) got a prescription for an AD during the 3 months before and/or during pregnancy; 2187 of them (76.1%) stopped AD before pregnancy or during the first trimester. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors represented the most prescribed class during pregnancy (1.3%). A very slight decrease in the prevalence of AD prescriptions in pregnant women over time (1.7% in 2014 vs 2% in 2005) and some variations within classes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly, 2% of women received antidepressant drugs during pregnancy. This assessment encourages following research on these drugs including the potential risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children after an exposure to antidepressants during pregnancy.

Higher intake of medications for digestive disorders in children prenatally exposed to drugs with atropinic properties.

Childhood digestive disorders are a common occurrence and are sometimes unexplained. Maternal medication during the development of the foetus' digestive system may contribute to the increase in childhood digestive disorders, especially with drugs acting on the cholinergic system. This study investigated the association between prenatal exposure to drugs with atropinic properties and the use of digestive disorder medications in childhood (0-3 years). Children from POMME (PrescriptiOn Médicaments Mères Enfants), a French database of reimbursed drugs for pregnant women and their children, were included (N = 8 372). Each drug prescribed during antenatal life was assigned an atropinic score (0 = null, 1 = low, 3 = strong). The prenatal atropinic burden was calculated as the sum of atropinic scores of drugs prescribed. More than 30% (N = 2 652) of the children were prenatally exposed to atropinic drugs. They used significantly more digestive disorder medications than unexposed children (RRa = 1.11 [1.06; 1.16]). The strength of the association increased with the prenatal atropinic burden. Our results suggest long-term digestive effects after prenatal exposure to atropinic drugs.

POMME: The New Cohort to Evaluate Long-Term Effects After Prenatal Medicine Exposure.

INTRODUCTION: The POMME (PrescriptiOn Médicaments Mères Enfants) cohort has been implemented for the evaluation of the long-term consequences of medicine prenatal exposure. It holds anonymous medical information as well as information on medicine and healthcare reimbursement to the children, from the first day of intra-uterine life until childhood. OBJECTIVE: This article provides a description of the cohort regarding its structure and content and presents an outlook of the studies that could be performed with this new data source. METHODS: Data sources include (1) the French Health Insurance Database (medicines and medical care prescriptions and reimbursements to children and mothers during pregnancy) and (2) the Mother and Child Protection Centre Database (child health certificates at birth, 9 months of age and 24 months of age). Children born in Haute-Garonne (south-west France), over a period of 1 year (from 1 July to 30 June), are registered in POMME every 5 years. The cohort began on 1 July, 2010. RESULTS: To date, 8372 children have been recorded in POMME. They have reached 7 years of age now. Among them, 4249 (50.8%) are boys, 286 (3.4%) were from multiple pregnancies and 519 (6.2%) were born prematurely. They were prenatally exposed to 9.8 ± 6.1 medications. After birth, drug exposure was greatest in children aged 0-2 years. Children were mostly exposed to paracetamol, anti-infective agents and respiratory system drugs; 908 (10.8%) children presented with at least two signs of psychomotor development disorders. CONCLUSIONS: POMME provides an observatory study on drug exposure and medical care use in children. This innovative cohort would make it possible to assess the risk of the long-term consequences of prenatal medicine exposure.

Patterns of antidepressant use during pregnancy: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

AIMS: We explored the patterns of antidepressant use during pregnancy. METHODS: A cohort of women who started a pregnancy in 2014 was identified using data from the French reimbursement healthcare system (covering approximately 99% of the population). Antidepressant usage (initiated before or during pregnancy) was assessed. Explored changes in antidepressant treatment were: associations, switches, discontinuation and resumption of antidepressants during pregnancy. RESULTS: The cohort included 766 508 pregnancies (755 519 women). Antidepressant use during pregnancy was 25.7 per 1000 [95% CI: 25.3-26.0]. New use concerned 3.9 per 1000 [95% CI: 3.7-4.0]; the most initiated class during pregnancy was selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), while the most prescribed individual drug in second and third trimesters was amitriptyline, a tricyclic. Most changes were observed before pregnancy and during the first trimester: 63% of ongoing treatments in the year before pregnancy were discontinued before conception; 68% of treatments maintained after conception were discontinued during the first trimester; switches or antidepressant associations mostly occurred during the periconceptional period or during the first trimester. Regardless of initial antidepressant, switches to sertraline were the most frequent. Associations mainly consisted of a prescription of tri-/tetracyclic or mirtazapine/mianserin in addition to an SSRI. Discontinuation during pregnancy led to treatment resumption in 22% of pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that pregnancy was planned or the treatment especially adapted in accordance with existing recommendations in a large proportion of women under antidepressants or in whom such treatments have been initiated after starting a pregnancy.

Interest of the trajectory method for the evaluation of outcomes after in utero drug exposure: example of anxiolytics and hypnotics.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefit to take into account duration and intensity of drug exposure using the recently published method based on individual drug trajectories. This approach was used to define profiles of exposure to anxiolytics/hypnotics during pregnancy and to evaluate the potential effect on newborn health. METHODS: The study was performed in EFEMERIS database (54 918 mother-children pairs). An estimation of adaptation to extrauterine life was assessed using several criteria especially cardio-respiratory symptoms. A proxy variable called "neonatal pathology" was created. The occurrence of this event was studied using two approaches: The Standard Method comparing exposed and unexposed newborns, The Trajectory Method comparing the different profiles of exposure. RESULTS: Around 5% of newborns (n = 2768) were identified to be exposed to anxiolytics or hypnotics during pregnancy. Using the Standard Method, 6.2% of exposed newborns developed a "neonatal pathology" against 4.8% of unexposed newborns (odds ratios [OR] = 0.9[0.8-1.2], p = 0.7). With the Trajectory Method taking into account evolution of exposure during pregnancy and treatment intensity, four profiles of pregnant women were identified. A significant difference in the rates of "neonatal pathologies" was observed between profiles (p = 0.0002). Newborns of the two profiles exposed in utero to high constant level of anxiolytics or hypnotics were more at risk of developing "neonatal pathology" than unexposed newborns (OR1  = 2.0 [1.0-3.9] and OR2  = 7.6 [2.8-20.5]). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the interest of this method based on individual drug trajectories for the evaluation of outcomes in pharmaco-epidemiological studies and more specifically during pregnancy. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.