[The management and treatment of cystitis: same challenges, new strategies]. / Prise en charge et traitement des cystites : mêmes défis, nouvelles stratégies.

Cystitis is an inflammation of the bladder that is most often caused by bacterial infection and is the most common urinary tract infection. This lower urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most frequently encountered infections in women in outpatient practice. The concept of the urobiome, the microbiome of the urinary tract, has recently emerged and has improved our comprehension of the physiopathology of UTI. Recent studies have highlighted the potential limits of additional examinations used in our clinical practice. The emergence of delayed therapy is a novelty in the treatment of lower UTI; it likely allows for an overall reduction in antibiotic consumption while remaining an effective treatment. Alternatives to antibiotic treatment exist but most have yet to be tested in sufficiently powered randomized trials.

La cystite est une inflammation de la vessie, le plus souvent provoquée par une infection bactérienne, et est l'infection urinaire (IU) la plus fréquente. Par ailleurs, l'infection urinaire basse (IUB) est l'infection la plus souvent rencontrée chez la femme dans la pratique ambulatoire. L'étude de l'urobiome, le microbiome du tractus urinaire, a permis des avancées dans la compréhension de la physiopathologie des IU. Des études ont mis en avant les possibles limites des examens complémentaires utilisés dans notre pratique clinique. L'émergence du traitement différé (Delayed Therapy) est une nouveauté dans le traitement des IUB, dans le sens où il permettrait de diminuer la consommation d'antibiotiques tout en restant un traitement efficace. Les alternatives au traitement antibiotique existent, mais la majorité doit encore être validée dans des essais randomisés de meilleure qualité.

Baseline gene signatures of reactogenicity to Ebola vaccination: a machine learning approach across multiple cohorts.

Introduction: The rVSVDG-ZEBOV-GP (Ervebo®) vaccine is both immunogenic and protective against Ebola. However, the vaccine can cause a broad range of transient adverse reactions, from headache to arthritis. Identifying baseline reactogenicity signatures can advance personalized vaccinology and increase our understanding of the molecular factors associated with such adverse events. Methods: In this study, we developed a machine learning approach to integrate prevaccination gene expression data with adverse events that occurred within 14 days post-vaccination. Results and Discussion: We analyzed the expression of 144 genes across 343 blood samples collected from participants of 4 phase I clinical trial cohorts: Switzerland, USA, Gabon, and Kenya. Our machine learning approach revealed 22 key genes associated with adverse events such as local reactions, fatigue, headache, myalgia, fever, chills, arthralgia, nausea, and arthritis, providing insights into potential biological mechanisms linked to vaccine reactogenicity.

Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin.

Background: Current US Food and Administration (FDA) guidance recommends that the primary efficacy endpoint for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) clinical trials be a composite of clinical and microbiological responses. We applied these criteria to a previous clinical trial to determine the impact on treatment outcomes. Methods: We conducted a patient-level reanalysis of a randomized clinical trial of nitrofurantoin versus fosfomycin for treatment of uUTI in nonpregnant adult women. Women were included in the reanalysis if they had 2 or more signs/symptoms of uUTI and a single bacterial species isolated from baseline urine culture at ≥105 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. The applied primary efficacy endpoint-therapeutic response-required both clinical resolution of signs/symptoms and reduction of the infecting bacterial pathogen to <103 CFU/mL at day 14 post-treatment completion. Results: Two hundred eleven of 513 (41%) patients were eligible for inclusion in the reanalysis. Among these patients, 74% (76/103) and 69% (75/108) in the nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin groups, respectively, achieved clinical resolution by day 14. Similarly, 70% (72/103) and 67% (72/108) in each group achieved microbiological success at day 14. As such, 59% (61/103) and 57% (62/108) of women in each group met the primary efficacy endpoint-therapeutic success-at day 14. In comparison, 75% and 66% of patients in each group achieved clinical resolution at day 14 in the initial clinical trial. Conclusions: Applying current FDA guidance resulted in lower composite efficacy rates than clinical resolution alone as observed in the initial clinical trial. This may limit the ability to compare antibiotic treatment effects between historical and future clinical trials.

Antibody responses to recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-Zaire Ebolavirus vaccination for Ebola virus disease across doses and continents: 5-year durability.

OBJECTIVES: To report 5-year persistence and avidity of antibodies produced by the live-attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) expressing the Zaire Ebolavirus (ZEBOV) glycoprotein (GP), known as rVSV-ZEBOV (Ervebo®). METHODS: Healthy adults vaccinated with 300,000 or 10-50 million plaque-forming units of rVSV-ZEBOV in the WHO-coordinated trials of 2014-2015 were followed for up to 4 (Lambaréné, Gabon) and 5 (Geneva, Switzerland) years. We report seropositivity rates, geometric mean titres (GMTs), and population distribution of ZEBOV-GP ELISA IgG antibodies, neutralizing antibodies (pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization) and antibody avidity; the primary outcome was ZEBOV-GP ELISA IgG GMTs at 4 or 5 years compared with 1 year (Y1) after immunization. RESULTS: Among the 168 eligible vaccinees (Geneva: 97 and Lambaréné: 71) enrolled 1 year post-immunization, 146 (87%) remained enrolled at 4 years (Geneva: n = 88, Lambaréné: n = 58), and 84 (87%, Geneva) at 5 years post-vaccination. ZEBOV-GP ELISA IgG GMTs plateaued, with no declining trend from 1 year through the last time point assessed (1147.8 [95% CI 874.3-1507.0] at Y1 versus 1548.1 [95% CI 1136.6-2108.5] at Y5 in Geneva volunteers receiving ≥10 million plaque-forming units of rVSV-ZEBOV), their avidity matching that of ZEBOV convalescents. Live-virus neutralizing antibodies were detected for shorter periods and in fewer vaccinees (53/95 [56%] at Y1 versus 35/84 [42%] at Y5 in Geneva volunteers, all dose levels). DISCUSSION: Titres at Y1 emerged as a correlate of antibody persistence at Y5. The findings of persistent ZEBOV-GP ELISA IgG titres yet shorter-lasting, lower titres of live-virus neutralizing antibodies suggest the contribution of antibody-mediated protective mechanisms other than neutralization. Long-term clinical efficacy of rVSV-ZEBOV, however, requires further study.

REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the 'General Informed ConsENT'.

BACKGROUND: We assessed potential consent bias in a cohort of > 40,000 adult patients asked by mail after hospitalization to consent to the use of past, present and future clinical and biological data in an ongoing 'general consent' program at a large tertiary hospital in Switzerland. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all adult patients hospitalized between April 2019 and March 2020 were invited to participate to the general consent program. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from patients' electronic health records (EHR). Data of those who provided written consent (signatories) and non-responders were compared and analyzed with R studio. RESULTS: Of 44,819 patients approached, 10,299 (23%) signed the form. Signatories were older (median age 54 [IQR 38-72] vs. 44 years [IQR 32-60], p < .0001), more comorbid (2614/10,299 [25.4%] vs. 4912/28,676 [17.1%] with Charlson comorbidity index ≤ 4, p < .0001), and more often of Swiss nationality (6592/10,299 [64%] vs. 13,813/28,676 [48.2%], p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that actively seeking consent creates a bias and compromises the external validity of data obtained via 'general consent' programs. Other options, such as opt-out consent procedures, should be further assessed.

How to use biomarkers of infection or sepsis at the bedside: guide to clinicians.

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. In this context, biomarkers could be considered as indicators of either infection or dysregulated host response or response to treatment and/or aid clinicians to prognosticate patient risk. More than 250 biomarkers have been identified and evaluated over the last few decades, but no biomarker accurately differentiates between sepsis and sepsis-like syndrome. Published data support the use of biomarkers for pathogen identification, clinical diagnosis, and optimization of antibiotic treatment. In this narrative review, we highlight how clinicians could improve the use of pathogen-specific and of the most used host-response biomarkers, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, to improve the clinical care of patients with sepsis. Biomarker kinetics are more useful than single values in predicting sepsis, when making the diagnosis and assessing the response to antibiotic therapy. Finally, integrated biomarker-guided algorithms may hold promise to improve both the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. Herein, we provide current data on the clinical utility of pathogen-specific and host-response biomarkers, offer guidance on how to optimize their use, and propose the needs for future research.

Duration of antibiotic treatment for Gram-negative bacteremia - Systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.

Background: We aim to compare the effect of short versus long treatment duration in Gram-negative bacteremia on all-cause mortality in pre-specified sub-groups. Methods: Individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short (≤7) versus longer (>7 days) antibiotic treatment for Gram-negative bacteremia. Participants were adults (≥18 years), with Gram-negative bacteremia during hospital stay. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science to identify trials conducted up to May 2022. Primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, relapse of bacteremia, length of hospital stay, readmission, local or distant infection complications, adverse events, and resistance emergence.Outcomes were assessed in pre-specified subgroups: women vs men; non-urinary vs urinary source; presence vs absence of hypotension on initial presentation; immunocompromised patients versus non-immunocompromised patients, and age (above/below 65). Fixed-effect meta-analysis model was used to estimate pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). All three trials had low risk of bias for allocation generation and concealment. Findings: Three RCTs (1186 patients) were included; 1121 with enterobacterales bacteremia. No significant difference in mortality was demonstrated between 7- and 14-days treatment (90-day mortality: OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73-1.58; 30-day mortality: 1.08, 0.62-1.91). Relapse (1.00, 0.50-1.97); length of hospital stay (P = 0.78); readmission (0.96, 0.80-1.22); and infection complications (local: 1.62 0.76-3.47; distant: 2.00, 0.18-22.08), were without significant difference, and so were adverse events or resistance emergence.No significant difference in clinical outcomes between 7 and 14 days of antibiotics was demonstrated in the subgroups of gender, age, hemodynamic status, immune status, and source of infection. Interpretation: For patients hemodynamically stable and afebrile at 48 h prior to discontinuation, seven days of antibiotic therapy for enterobacterales bacteremia result in similar outcomes as 14 days, in terms of mortality, relapse, length of hospital stay, complications of infection, resistance emergence, and adverse events. These results apply for any adult age group, gender, source of infection, immune status, and hemodynamic status on presentation. Funding: There was no funding source for this study.

The urobiome in men and women: a clinical review.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic therapy alone is unable to control recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI); uropathogens have become multiresistant, and alternative strategies are needed. Far from sterile, the urinary tract contains various low-biomass microbiota, some of whose members appear to protect against clinical UTI. OBJECTIVES: This narrative review summarizes (a) the current knowledge of male and female urobiomes in healthy and diseased states, as well as their interplay among sexual partners and (b) clinical trials to date assessing probiotic and other nonantibiotic measures to reduce UTI. SOURCES: We used the PubMed interface to search Ovid Medline for articles describing urogenital flora, UTI, UTI dysbiosis, the effects of sexual intercourse on urogenital flora, and clinical trials of probiotics as UTI prophylaxis. CONTENT: The healthy urobiome of women contains several Lactobacillus species, some of which may impede Escherichia coli growth in the urinary tract. Although Lactobacilli have been found in male urethral microbiota, their presence in male bladder microbiota is less certain. Distal male urethral and vaginal microbiomes of male and sexual female partners influence one another, but more research is needed on the direct interplay of their full urobiomes. Clinical trials assessing the therapeutic potential of Lactobacilli have been largely underpowered and highly varied in tested formulations and routes and frequencies of administration; as such, they have failed to show a clear benefit. Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection was shown, in a retrospective study of seven patients, to reduce recurrent UTI as a side effect. IMPLICATIONS: The urobiome in men and women is complex, variable, and still understudied. Although there is hope that Lactobacilli and faecal microbial transplantation could be future nonantibiotic options for recurrent UTI, both require more pharmacologic and clinical research to identify optimal preparations and routes of administration.

Refined innate plasma signature after rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP immunization is shared among adult cohorts in Europe and North America.

Background: During the last decade Ebola virus has caused several outbreaks in Africa. The recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-vectored Zaire Ebola (rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP) vaccine has proved safe and immunogenic but is reactogenic. We previously identified the first innate plasma signature response after vaccination in Geneva as composed of five monocyte-related biomarkers peaking at day 1 post-immunization that correlates with adverse events, biological outcomes (haematological changes and viremia) and antibody titers. In this follow-up study, we sought to identify additional biomarkers in the same Geneva cohort and validate those identified markers in a US cohort. Methods: Additional biomarkers were identified using multiplexed protein biomarker platform O-link and confirmed by Luminex. Principal component analysis (PCA) evaluated if these markers could explain a higher variability of the vaccine response (and thereby refined the initial signature). Multivariable and linear regression models evaluated the correlations of the main components with adverse events, biological outcomes, and antibody titers. External validation of the refined signature was conducted in a second cohort of US vaccinees (n=142). Results: Eleven additional biomarkers peaked at day 1 post-immunization: MCP2, MCP3, MCP4, CXCL10, OSM, CX3CL1, MCSF, CXCL11, TRAIL, RANKL and IL15. PCA analysis retained three principal components (PC) that accounted for 79% of the vaccine response variability. PC1 and PC2 were very robust and had different biomarkers that contributed to their variability. PC1 better discriminated different doses, better defined the risk of fever and myalgia, while PC2 better defined the risk of headache. We also found new biomarkers that correlated with reactogenicity, including transient arthritis (MCP-2, CXCL10, CXCL11, CX3CL1, MCSF, IL-15, OSM). Several innate biomarkers are associated with antibody levels one and six months after vaccination. Refined PC1 correlated strongly in both data sets (Geneva: r = 0.97, P < 0.001; US: r = 0.99, P< 0.001). Conclusion: Eleven additional biomarkers refined the previously found 5-biomarker Geneva signature. The refined signature better discriminated between different doses, was strongly associated with the risk of adverse events and with antibody responses and was validated in a separate cohort.

Steering Away from Current Amoxicillin Dose Reductions in Hospitalized Patients with Impaired Kidney Function to Avoid Subtherapeutic Drug Exposure.

Current dose reductions recommended for amoxicillin in patients with impaired kidney function could lead to suboptimal treatments. In a prospective, observational study in hospitalized adults with varying kidney function treated with an IV or oral dose of amoxicillin, amoxicillin concentrations were measured in 1−2 samples on the second day of treatment. Pharmacometric modelling and simulations were performed to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) for 40% of the time above MIC following standard (1000 mg q6h), reduced or increased IV dosing strategies. A total of 210 amoxicillin samples was collected from 155 patients with kidney function based on a CKD-EPI of between 12 and 165 mL/min/1.73 m2. Amoxicillin clearance could be well predicted with body weight and CKD-EPI. Recommended dose adjustments resulted in a clinically relevant reduction in the PTA for the nonspecies-related PK/PD breakpoint MIC of 8 mg/L (92%, 62% and 38% with a CKD-EPI of 10, 20 and 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, versus 100% for the standard dose). For MICs ≤ 2 mg/L, PTA > 90% was reached in these patients following both reduced and standard dose regimens. Our study showed that for amoxicillin, recommended dose reductions with impaired kidney function could lead to subtherapeutic amoxicillin concentrations in hospitalized patients, especially when targeting less susceptible pathogens.

Association between women's authorship and women's editorship in infectious diseases journals: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Gender inequity is still pervasive in academic medicine, including journal publishing. We aimed to ascertain the proportion of women among first and last authors and editors in infectious diseases journals and assess the association between women's editorship and women's authorship while controlling for a journal's impact factor. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we randomly selected 40 infectious diseases journals (ten from each 2020 impact factor quartile), 20 obstetrics and gynaecology journals (five from each 2020 impact factor quartile), and 20 cardiology journals (five from each 2020 impact factor quartile) that were indexed in Journal Citation Reports, had an impact factor, had retrievable first and last author names, and had the name of more than one editor listed. We retrieved the names of the first and last authors of all citable articles published by the journals in 2018 and 2019 that counted towards their 2020 impact factor and collected the names of all the journals' editors-in-chief, deputy editors, section editors, and associate editors for the years 2018 and 2019. We used genderize.io to predict the gender of each first author, last author, and editor. The outcomes of interest were the proportions of women first authors and women last authors. We assessed the association between women's editorship and women's authorship by fitting quasi-Poisson regression models comprising the variables: the proportion of women last authors or women first authors; the proportion of women editors; the presence of a woman editor-in-chief; and journal 2020 impact factor. FINDINGS: We found 11 027 citable infectious diseases articles, of which 167 (1·5%) had an indeterminable first author gender, 155 (1·4%) had an indeterminable last author gender, and seven (0·1%) had no authors indexed. 5350 (49·3%) of 10 853 first authors whose gender could be determined were predicted to be women and 5503 (50·7%) were predicted to be men. Women accounted for 3788 (34·9%) of 10 865 last authors whose gender could be determined and men accounted for 7077 (65·1%). Of 577 infectious diseases journal editors, 190 (32·9%) were predicted to be women and 387 (67·1%) were predicted to be men. Of the 40 infectious diseases journals, 13 (32·5%) had a woman as editor-in-chief. For infectious diseases journals, the proportion of women editors had a significant effect on women's first authorship (incidence rate ratio 1·32, 95% CI 1·06-1·63; p=0·012) and women's last authorship (1·92, 1·45-2·55; p<0·0001). The presence of a woman editor-in-chief, the proportion of women last or first authors, and the journal's impact factor exerted no effect in these analyses. INTERPRETATION: The proportion of women editors appears to influence the proportion of women last and first authors in the analysed infectious diseases journals. These findings might help to explain gender disparities observed in publishing in academic medicine and suggest a need for revised policies towards increasing women's representation among editors. FUNDING: The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics.

Accumulating evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supports 7 days treatment for uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteraemia. However, some patient populations were not well represented in these RCTs, including critically ill patients, immunocompromised patients and those with MDR bacteria. In this debate document, we discuss the pros and cons for treating patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia with a 7 day antibiotic course. We surmise that the patients who were not well represented in the RCTs are probably those who have most to lose from the drawbacks of prolonged antibiotic courses, including adverse events, superinfections and resistance development. Treatment durations among these patients can be managed individually, with C-reactive protein or procalcitonin guidance or by clinical measures, and with care to discontinue antibiotics as soon as the patient recovers clinically from the infection.

Fitness of B-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 WT and Variants Up to One Year After Mild COVID-19 - A Comprehensive Analysis.

Objective: To comprehensively evaluate SARS-CoV-2 specific B-cell and antibody responses up to one year after mild COVID-19. Methods: In 31 mildly symptomatic COVID-19 participants SARS-CoV-2-specific plasmablasts and antigen-specific memory B cells were measured by ELISpot. Binding antibodies directed against the proteins spike (S), domain S1, and nucleocapsid (N) were estimated using rIFA, ELISA, and commercially available assays, and avidity measured using thiocyanate washout. Neutralizing antibodies against variants of concern were measured using a surrogate-neutralization test. Results: Plasmablast responses were assessed in all participants who gave sequential samples during the first two weeks after infection; they preceded the rise in antibodies and correlated with antibody titers measured at one month. S1 and N protein-specific IgG memory B-cell responses remained stable during the first year, whereas S1-specific IgA memory B-cell responses declined after 6 months. Antibody titers waned over time, whilst potent affinity maturation was observed for anti-RBD antibodies. Neutralizing antibodies against wild-type (WT) and variants decayed during the first 6 months but titers significantly increased for Alpha, Gamma and Delta between 6 months and one year. Therefore, near-similar titers were observed for WT and Alpha after one year, and only slightly lower antibody levels for the Delta variant compared to WT. Anti-RBD antibody responses correlated with the neutralizing antibody titers at all time points, however the predicted titers were 3-fold lower at one year compared to one month. Conclusion: In mild COVID-19, stable levels of SARS-CoV-2 specific memory B cells and antibodies neutralizing current variants of concern are observed up to one year post infection. Care should be taken when predicting neutralizing titers using commercial assays that measure binding antibodies.

Autoantibodies against apolipoprotein A-1 after COVID-19 predict symptoms persistence.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers different auto-antibodies, including anti-apolipoprotein A-1 IgGs (AAA1), which could be of concern as mediators of persistent symptoms. We determined the kinetics of AAA1 response over after COVID-19 and the impact of AAA1 on the inflammatory response and symptoms persistence. METHODS: All serologies were assessed at one, three, six and twelve months in 193 hospital employees with COVID-19. ROC curve analyses and logistic regression models (LRM) were used to determine the prognostic accuracy of AAA1 and their association with patient-reported COVID-19 symptoms persistence at 12 months. Interferon (IFN)-α and-γ production by AAA1-stimulated human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMDM) was assessed in vitro. RESULTS: AAA1 seropositivity was 93% at one month and declined to 15% at 12 months after COVID-19. Persistent symptoms at 12 months were observed in 45.1% of participants, with a predominance of neurological (28.5%), followed by general (15%) and respiratory symptoms (9.3%). Over time, strength of correlations between AAA1 and anti-SARS-COV2 serologies decreased, but remained significant. From the 3rd month on, AAA1 levels predicted persistent respiratory symptoms (area under the curves 0.72-0.74; p < 0.001), independently of disease severity, age and gender (adjusted odds ratios 4.81-4.94; p = 0.02), while anti-SARS-CoV-2 serologies did not. AAA1 increased IFN-α production by HMDMs (p = 0.03), without affecting the IFN-γ response. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 induces a marked though transient AAA1 response, independently predicting one-year persistence of respiratory symptoms. By increasing IFN-α response, AAA1 may contribute to persistent symptoms. If and how AAA1 levels assessment could be of use for COVID-19 risk stratification remains to be determined.

Therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical outcomes in severely ill patients receiving amoxicillin: a single-centre prospective cohort study.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ß-lactam antibiotics is increasingly used to overcome rising antimicrobial resistance and improve antibiotic exposure. However, there is little guidance on target amoxicillin plasma concentrations. We aimed to define these by evaluating associations between amoxicillin concentrations and clinical outcomes. This single-centre prospective cohort study enrolled severely ill and/or immunosuppressed adult patients receiving amoxicillin for suspected or confirmed bacterial infection. TDM with ≥1 intermediate and ≥1 trough level was performed 24 h after therapy initiation. Primary and secondary outcomes were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and clinical failure through Day 30, respectively. A total of 156 patients were included. Important variations were observed both for intermediate (mean 13 mg/L, S.D. 13) and trough (mean 7 mg/L, S.D. 9) amoxicillin levels. Of 111 patients, 33 (30%) had trough levels below the non-species-related breakpoint (2 mg/L). AEs occurred in 27/156 patients (17%); no intermediate- or trough-level threshold predicting toxicity could be established. Patients with the highest-quartile trough levels (9.07-51.5 mg/L) did not experience significantly increased AEs [6/28 (21%) vs. 13/83 (16%); P = 0.6]. Nearly one-third (48/156; 31%) experienced clinical failure; low trough levels did not correlate with failure. There were few amoxicillin AEs yet a relatively high incidence of clinical failure. While no toxicity threshold could be established, the absence of increased AEs among patients with the highest trough concentrations suggests that trough levels up to 40 mg/L may be safe, at least for limited durations. Larger trials must further define optimal amoxicillin concentrations. [ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03790631].