MORE EARLY BLEEDS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH BASELINE DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANT LEVELS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: THE MAS STUDY.

Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is effective and safe. However, bleeding complications still occur. Whether the measurement of DOAC levels may further improve treatment efficacy and safety is still an open issue. In the "Measure and See" (MAS) Study (#NCT03803579) venous blood was collected 15-30 days after DOAC initiation in AF patients who were then followed for one year to record the occurrence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. DOAC plasma levels were measured in one laboratory, and results were kept blind to patients and treating doctors. Trough DOAC levels were assessed in 1657 patients [957 (57.7%) and 700 treated with standard and low-dose, respectively]. Fifty bleeding events were recorded during 1606 years of follow-up (3.11% pt/yrs). Fifteen bleeding events (4.97% pt/yrs) occurred in patients with C-trough standardized values in the highest activity class (> 0.50); whereas 35 events (2.69% pt/yrs) occurred in those with values in the two lower classes ( 0.50, p= 0.0401). Increasing DOAC levels and low-dose DOAC use were associated with increased bleeding risk in the first three months of treatment. 19% of patients receiving low doses had standardized activity values in the highest class. More bleeding occurred in patients treated with low (4.3% pt/yrs) than standard (2.2% pt/yrs; p= 0.0160) dose DOAC. Early measurement of DOAC levels in AF patients identified many subjects with high activity levels despite the low doses use and had more bleeding risk during the first 3 months of treatment.

Thrombotic events associated with low baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study.

ABSTRACT: Although effective and safe, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is still associated with thrombotic complications. Whether the measurement of DOAC levels may improve treatment efficacy is an open issue. We carried out the observational, prospective, multicenter Measure and See (MAS) study. Blood was collected 15 to 30 days after starting DOAC treatment in patients with AF who were followed-up for 1 year. Plasma samples were centralized for DOAC level measurement. Patients' DOAC levels were converted into drug/dosage standardized values to allow a pooled analysis in a time-dependent, competitive-risk model. The measured values were transformed into standardized values (representing the distance of each value from the overall mean) by subtracting the DOAC-specific mean value from the original values and dividing by the standard deviation. Trough and peak DOAC levels were assessed in 1657 and 1303 patients, respectively. In total, 21 thrombotic complications were recorded during 1606 years of follow-up (incidence of 1.31% of patients per year). Of 21 thrombotic events, 17 occurred in patients whose standardized activity levels were below the mean of each DOAC (0); the incidence was the highest (4.82% of patients per year) in patients whose standardized values were in the lowest class (-1.00 or less). Early measurement of DOAC levels in patients with AF allowed us to identify most of the patients who, having low baseline DOAC levels, subsequently developed thrombotic complications. Further studies are warranted to assess whether thrombotic complications may be reduced by measuring baseline DOAC levels and modifying treatment when indicated. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03803579.

Clinical follow-up of atrial-fibrillation patients treated with novel oral anti-coagulants: A multi-disciplinary consensus from the Apulia section of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO).

The clinical use of novel oral anti-coagulant (NOAC) drugs is actually regulated in Italy by bureaucratic restrictions; clinical prescription of NOACs preliminarily requires an online prescription plan which should be compiled on the Italian Drug Agency website. The prescription plan has 1-year validity and clinical condition of the patient treated with NOACs should be reassessed at 1-year prescription renewal. Only few specialists are presently allowed to prescribe NOACs: cardiologists, geriatricians, neurologists, hematologists and internists; general practitioners (GPs) are not currently allowed to prescribe NOACs, although they are the most in proximity with the patient. An even more complex issue is the pertinence of clinical follow-up of patients prescribed with NOACs (control of possible interactions with any new drug, periodical assessment of renal function, management of dose assumption mistakes or drug suspension for occurring surgery before hospitalization for any planned intervention). International statements partially indicate when and how periodical laboratory and clinical follow-up should be performed, but such statements do not often comply with local regulations and do not always take in due consideration the local criticalities and prescription limitations. In May 2015, the regional section of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists of Apulia (ANMCO) therefore convened local representative champions of medical professionals potentially involved in prescription of NOACs, clinical management and follow-up of patients prescribed with NOACs. A final consensus conference formulated a possible shared diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for the clinical management and follow-up of patients assuming NOACs for atrial fibrillation.

Graft rejection after unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for thalassemia is associated with nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 disparity in host-versus-graft direction.

The success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from matched unrelated donors (UDs) for beta-thalassemia may be hampered by the occurrence of graft rejection. Here, we show that the rate of this complication can be reduced by selecting 5-loci HLA-matched donors without nonpermissive mismatches at HLA-DPB1, defined according to an algorithm previously described and based on principles of central T-cell tolerance. Seventy-two consecutive patients and their UDs, prospectively selected for matching at the allelic level for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB, and -DQB1 loci, were enrolled in the analysis. These pairs were either DPB1 matched/permissively mismatched (n = 45, control group) or had at least one nonpermissive DPB1 mismatch in the host-versus-graft (HvG; n = 17) or in the graft-versus-host (GvH; n = 10) direction. In multivariate analysis, the risk of rejection was significantly increased in the group with HvG disparity (RR = 7.42; 95% CI = 1.29-42.68; P = .02) as compared to the control group. A lower, statistically significant, probability of thalassemia-free survival was found in patients belonging to the HvG group as compared to controls (RR = 5.15; 95% CI = 1.58-16.82; P = .01). These data suggest that in patients with thalassemia, the incidence of graft failure after HSCT may be reduced by appropriate selection of UDs, with such selection taking into account the functional rules of immunogenetics.