Central Nervous System Adverse Reactions to Amantadine Intoxication: A Case Report and Analysis of JADER.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A few case reports of central nervous system (CNS) symptoms caused by amantadine intoxication have been published, detailing various types of symptoms and differing times to onset. We encountered a patient who developed CNS symptoms with amantadine. This prompted us to investigate the types, time to onset, and outcome of CNS adverse reactions to amantadine by analyzing data from a pharmacovigilance database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patient was evaluated at Chutoen General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan. Analysis was performed using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. RESULTS: In our case, the amantadine blood concentration was 4,042 ng/ml, i.e., in the toxic range. The time to onset was 26 days for dyskinesia and 90 days for depressed level of consciousness. Symptoms resolved when amantadine was discontinued. The JADER database contained 974 cases of adverse reactions to amantadine. The most frequently reported CNS adverse reaction was hallucination, with a reporting odds ratio of 64.28 (95% confidence interval=52.67-78.46). Positive signals were detected for all CNS adverse reactions. For all CNS reactions, clinical outcomes were poor in a comparatively low percentage of cases. Most CNS reactions occurred soon after administration of amantadine, usually within approximately one month. CONCLUSION: Because most CNS adverse reactions to amantadine usually occur within approximately one month of initiating treatment, healthcare providers should exercise heightened vigilance in monitoring patients for such reactions during this period.

Risk and Time-to-Onset of Acute Kidney Injury With Vancomycin Plus Piperacillin-tazobactam Combination: Analysis Using JADER.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pharmacovigilance data and clinical studies have indicated a risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with concomitant administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. However, no pharmacovigilance studies have evaluated time-to-onset and outcomes of AKI related to this combination. Therefore, this study used a pharmacovigilance database to investigate the incidence, time-to-onset, and outcomes of AKI in patients treated with intravenous vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam or other antipseudomonal antibiotics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From data in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database, we calculated the reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), time-to-onset, and outcomes of AKI following intravenous administration of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam or other antipseudomonal antibiotics and with other vancomycin regimens, including monotherapy. RESULTS: The JADER database contained 4,471 reports of intravenous vancomycin treatment, including 517 reports of AKI. The adjusted RORs (95%CIs) of AKI in cases with co-administration of intravenous vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam was 2.58 (2.06-3.24). The median time-to-onset for AKI in vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam was 6.0 (interquartile range=3.0-10.3). Weibull shape parameter analysis showed that the pattern of onset of AKI in vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam represented a wear out failure, predicting an increasing hazard with time. For the outcome of AKI, there was no significant difference between all vancomycin regimen and the piperacillin-tazobactam combination groups. CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of intravenous vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam may increase the incidence of AKI but may not affect the outcome. This combination does not necessarily have to be avoided, but long-term use is not advisable.

A case of complete atrioventricular block with extremely high blood concentration of azelnidipine.

BACKGROUND: Azelnidipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB), has less adverse effects (e.g. hot flushes and reflex tachycardia) compared to other dihydropyridine CCBs. Azelnidipine has been reported to reduce heart rate as opposed to inducing tachycardia. No evidence of bradycardia or complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) with azelnidipine treatment has been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: In the present study, a 92-year-old woman was diagnosed with CAVB while taking azelnidipine and simvastatin for an extended period of time, and referred to our medical center. It was thought that the CAVB may have been an adverse effect of azelnidipine treatment. Specifically, it was considered that in this patient, one of the causes might be the concomitant use of simvastatin inhibiting the metabolism of azelnidipine by cytochrome P450 enzyme 3A4. Consequently, it was suggested to the patient's physician that the patient's serum azelnidipine levels be measured and treatment with azelnidipine and simvastatin be discontinued. The patient's serum concentration of azelnidipine at the time of her visit to our center was 63.4 ng/mL, higher than the normal acceptable level. There was no occurrence of CAVB for 4 weeks, to present, following discontinuation of azelnidipine and simvastatin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Azelnidipine has a different mechanism of action that other CCBs. In very rare cases, it may cause CAVB when combined with CYP3A4 inhibitors. If a patient taking azelnidipine is diagnosed with CAVB, physicians should suspect that the condition may be an adverse effect of azelnidipine and should consider discontinuing azelnidipine. And, in the elderly, it is necessary to avoid concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors.

[Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Treated with Vancomycin and Piperacillin/Tazobactam Compared to Vancomycin and Meropenem or Doripenem: A Retrospective Cohort Study].

It has been reported that the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) is higher during treatment with vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam compared to use of vancomycin and cefepim or meropenem. We investigated the risk of AKI in patients receiving vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam versus those receiving vancomycin and meropenem or doripenem. The subjects were patients over 18 years old who received either vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam (V+P/T therapy) or vancomycin and carbapenems (meropenem or doripenem) (V+C therapy) for at least 48 h between 1 May 2013 and 28 February 2019. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI in patients receiving V+P/T or V+C therapy, while the secondary outcome was the timing of AKI in each group. The incidence of AKI was 33.3% (9/27) in patients receiving V+P/T therapy versus 9.1% (5/55) in those receiving V+C therapy, and its incidence was significantly higher with the former regimen (χ2=5.90, p=0.015). Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that V+P/T therapy was associated with an increased risk of AKI compared to V+C therapy (adjusted odds ratio: 5.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.46-17.5, p=0.01). The time to onset of AKI after initiation of treatment was not significantly different between patients receiving V+T/P or V+C therapy [median (interquartile range): 4 d (2-6 d) versus 7 d (3-10 d); p=0.282]. V+P/T therapy was associated with a significantly higher incidence of AKI than alternative regimens, suggesting that it should be avoided. When broad spectrum antibacterial therapy is required, V+C therapy should be considered instead.

[Risk of Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis Due to Low-carbohydrate Diet While Taking Empagliflozin: a Case Report].

Empagliflozin reduces blood glucose levels independently of insulin secretion by reducing glucose reabsorption in the proximal renal tubules through inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2). Because SGLT2 inhibitors have a different mechanism of action to conventional antidiabetic drugs, recommendations have been issued about the management of specific side effect such as ketoacidosis, urinary tract infection, and genital infection. There have been some reports of SGLT2 inhibitor-associated euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (euDKA), but there have been few reports about euDKA in patients with type 2 diabetes using SGLT2 inhibitors while on a low-carbohydrate diet. Here we report a patient who developed euDKA after starting a very low-carbohydrate diet while taking empagliflozin. A 51-year-old man was hospitalized with nausea and vomiting, and investigations revealed metabolic acidosis. euDKA was diagnosed from the information about medications in his drug notebook and a history of eating a low-carbohydrate diet (1900 kcal, consisting of 5.7% carbohydrate, 21.1% protein, 47.3% fat and 25.9% alcohol) for 4 d. The patient improved after infusion of acetated Ringer's solution with 5% glucose and administration of regular insulin. It is necessary for physicians and pharmacists to thoroughly inform patients about the side effects of SGLT2 inhibitors such as ketoacidosis, urinary tract infection, and genital infection. Patients should also be advised about the higher risk of euDKA associated with a low-carbohydrate diet while taking SGLT2 inhibitors.

Age-Dependent Onset of Insulin Resistance in Insulin-Resistant Mice.

We have previously isolated spontaneous insulin-resistant mice (ddY-H) and non-insulin-resistant mice (ddY-L) from ddY mice. In the present study, age-dependent onset of insulin resistance in obese ddY-H mice was investigated by comparing with lean ddY-L mice. In ddY-H mice fed a standard diet, an increase in elevation of glucose-stimulated plasma insulin level, glucose intolerance in an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test, and a reduction of hypoglycemic action of insulin were found at 9 weeks of age, but not at 6 weeks of age. When ddY-H mice were administered nateglinide, a greater elevation of plasma insulin level and a less decrease of serum glucose level were observed at 9 weeks of age. These changes developed progressively with age. These findings suggest that insulin resistance is induced at 9 weeks of age. The age-related change in insulin resistance was correlated with reductions in mRNA expression and protein content of the insulin receptor (InsR), and insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 in the epididymal adipose tissue. On the other hand, in the liver, mRNA expression of InsR and IRS-1 did not change at any age, although that of the IRS-2 was reduced. Thus, in ddY-H mice, insulin resistance and glucose-stimulated hyper-secretion of insulin are induced at 9 weeks of age and are reciprocally affected, resulting in progression to a more severe state at an older age. Insulin resistance may be attributed, at least in part, to the decreases in the mRNA expressions and proteins of InsR, IRS-1 and IRS-2 in adipose tissue.

Hepatic steatosis with relation to increased expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ in insulin resistant mice.

We have isolated insulin resistant mice (ddY-H mice) which are spontaneously induced even if fed with the standard chow pellets. Since marked accumulation of triglycerides (TG) in liver was observed, the present study investigated causes of hepatic TG accumulation in ddY-H mice fed with the standard chow pellets. In ddY-H mice, hepatic TG content increased from seven-weeks of age, and further marked accumulation of TG was observed at 20-weeks of age. Histologically, fat droplets appeared in pericentral parenchymal cells of the liver from nine-weeks of age, and the size and number of droplets were increased in hepatic lobules at 15-weeks of age, suggesting hepatic steatosis was spontaneously induced. Although secretion of TG from liver to blood in ddY-H mice was not increased, fat absorption from the digestive tract was significantly enhanced. The mRNA expressions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) involved in fat accumulation and fatty acid translocase (CD36) involved in the transportation of fatty acid into the liver were markedly increased. However, gene expressions of factors involved in lipogenesis, ß-oxidation of fatty acid and lipoprotein secretion were not changed. Pioglitazone (9 mg/kg), the PPARγ agonist, administered for six weeks deteriorated hepatic steatosis in ddY-H mice. Although pioglitazone did not affect gene expressions of PPARγ in the liver, CD36 and fat-specific protein 27 (fsp27), targets of PPARγ, were markedly elevated. These results suggest that, in the livers of ddY-H mice, hepatic steatosis is induced by increased incorporation of fatty acid into the liver via increased PPARγ expression.

[Case of colchicine intoxication caused by tubers of Gloriosa superba].

Gloriosa superba is one of the poisonous plants growing in Japan. It contains potent alkaloid such as colchicine which binds to tubulin and prevents it from forming microtubules that are part of the cytoskeleton in human cells. Ingestion of Gloriosa superba tubers causes severe and potentially fatal toxic effects. We report here a case of colchicine intoxication caused by tubers of Gloriosa superba. A 58-year-old male ingested about 25 g of Gloriosa superba tubers by mistake. He believed that it was wild yam. He developed abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhea 30 minutes after the ingestion of the plant. Forty five hours later he was taken to the emergency department. Unfortunately he died due to progressive multiple organ failure about one hour after the admission. It was two days after Gloriosa superba ingestion. The clinical features and the aspect of the poisonous plants should be acquainted with people.

[Hospital pharmacists prevented advance of lithium intoxication through pharmaceutical interventions].

Lithium carbonate is used to treat depressive episodes in patients with manic depressive disorder. Lithium toxicity is closely related to serum levels of lithium, and can occur with doses of lithium carbonate close to those used in therapy. Herein we report a case in which pharmaceutical intervention led to a patient's early recovery. The patient was hospitalized with a complaint of dyspnea, and clinical findings revealed signs of bradyarrhythmia. We investigated the medications the patient brought with him and the record of his prescribed medications in his drug notebook. From this we found that he had been taking imidapril (an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) in addition to lithium carbonate, and surmised that lithium toxicity may have occurred from the drug interactions between the lithium carbonate and imidapril in this patient. To prevent the level of toxicity from advancing, we proposed to the physician in charge that the patient's serum lithium levels be measured immediately and that all drugs be discontinued. By receiving care centered on detoxification, the patient avoided measures such as placement of a permanent pacemaker and thereby made a quick recovery from a dangerous state. This is a good example of a case in which pharmaceutical intervention improved the patient's quality of life (QOL) and contributed to conserving limited medical resources. As shown by this case, regular checks of patients' current medications and drug notebooks at the time of hospitalization are an effective means of implementing pharmaceutical interventions that can contribute to medical care.

[Proposal for a new tool to evaluate clinical pharmacy practice based on the percentage of pharmaceutical interventions that influence medical treatments].

Clinical pharmacy practice needs quality safeguards and proper evaluation to ensure good performance of hospital pharmacists. We propose a method for evaluating performance using the indicator of whether pharmaceutical interventions conducted in clinical practice affect the treatment carried out by the physician. To illustrate the usefulness of this method, we report one example of the response of a physician to our clinical practice. We first designed a worksheet on which information related to pharmaceutical interventions would be recorded. The worksheet included sections for the details of the pharmaceutical intervention, whether decisions about interventions were active (pharmacists' decisions) or passive (requests from the physician), the timing of the intervention (before or after prescription), the grounds for the intervention, and whether it had any influence on the treatment, as well as a detailed record of the course of the intervention. These worksheets were used to record pharmaceutical interventions from July to December 2005. During that period, a total of 347 pharmaceutical interventions for 164 patients were recorded. Each intervention was examined from the different perspectives of type of intervention, timing (before or after prescription was issued), and reason for the intervention. Overall, it was found that 91.6% of all interventions had some influence on treatment. Because numerical results can be obtained with this method, it has the benefit of being an objective means of evaluating the contribution of pharmaceutical services. Furthermore, the validity of even those interventions that had no influence on treatment can be examined using medical and pharmaceutical findings and may improve the quality of pharmacists.