Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 42(2): 254-259, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34989002

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: First-trimester ultrasound is an important component of prenatal care. We investigated the impact of introducing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) aneuploidy screening into routine care, on performance of first-trimester ultrasound. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients who had prenatal care at a tertiary referral center. We compared the performance of any first-trimester ultrasound between three different aneuploidy screening protocols, used consecutively during the study period: (1) combined first-trimester screening (FTS); (2) FTS and cfDNA offered together; (3) patients requested to choose between FTS and cfDNA. Secondary outcomes included performance of nuchal translucency (NT), aneuploidy screens and diagnostic genetic procedures. RESULTS: The number of patients undergoing first-trimester ultrasound remained similar with the second protocol but decreased in the third (68.7% vs. 40.9%, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.25-0.4, p < 0.001). Diagnostic procedures decreased between protocol 1 and 2 (7.6% vs. 4.4%, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93, p = 0.02) while NT scans decreased between protocol 2 and 3 (6.8% vs. 1.3%, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.4, p < 0.001). The rate of FTS decreased over the study period and less women had cfDNA when they had to choose one method (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Introducing cfDNA screening as an alternative to FTS, resulted in fewer patients receiving ultrasound in the first-trimester.


Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/tendencias , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 41(7): 888-895, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33470437

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Investigate factors that influence the decision to accept or decline diagnostic testing for pregnant women referred for genetic counseling. METHODS: Cross sectional anonymous survey of pregnant women undergoing genetic counseling at a tertiary care referral center. Subjects' perceived risk of procedure related loss and fetal chromosomal problem were obtained via survey where patients rated risk from 0 (no risk) to 10 (highest risk). RESULTS: There were no differences in sociodemographic factors between women undergoing a diagnostic procedure compared to those not undergoing a procedure. As the perceived risk for having a baby with genetic problem increased by one point, the estimated odds of having the diagnostic procedure increased by 43% controlling for the perceived risk of procedure related loss (p < .0001). Similarly, as the perceived risk of miscarriage increased by one point, the odds of having the diagnostic procedure decreased by 40%, controlling for the perceived risk of having a baby with a genetic problem (p < .0001). The main reason women cited for not undergoing a procedure was fear of procedure related loss. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women that decline diagnostic testing have a higher perceived risk of procedure related loss and lower perceived risk of fetal chromosomal abnormality than those who accept.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/normas , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/métodos , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Atención Prenatal/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 62(3): 518-527, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31145113

RESUMEN

Checklists, huddles, and debriefs are tools being more commonly adopted in health care with the goal to achieve a safer health system. Details regarding what, how and when to implement these tools in different circumstances related to women's health are described in this review.


Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación/normas , Obstetricia/métodos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Obstetricia/organización & administración , Obstetricia/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Embarazo , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , Administración de la Seguridad/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...