Use of antihyperglycaemic therapy with cardiovascular benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes who require hospitalisation: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of therapy with cardiovascular benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to internal medicine departments. METHODS: One day, cross-sectional study of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalised in internal medicine departments. We recorded demographic and anthropometric variables, laboratory data and use of antihyperglycaemic drugs. The endpoint was the proportion and determinants of the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA). RESULTS: We included 928 patients belonging to 74 hospitals, with a mean age of 78.9 years (SD, 10.86 years), 50% of whom were men. A total of 557 (60%) patients had ischaemic heart disease, 189 (20.4%) had cerebrovascular disease, 293 (31.6%) had heart failure, 274 (29.5%) had chronic kidney disease, and 129 (13.9%) had peripheral arterial disease. Prior to their hospital admission, the patients were taking sulfonylureas (5.7%), biguanides (49.1%), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (0.2%), pioglitazone (0%), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (39%), SGLT2i (5.8%), GLP1-RA (2.6%) and basal insulin analogues (24%). An age over 75 years was the main determinant for not taking SGLT2i (adjusted OR, 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.74; p = .039) or GLP1-RA (adjusted OR, 0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.46; p = .006). DISCUSSION: A large proportion of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at very high cardiovascular risk are not treated with antihyperglycemic drugs with proven cardiovascular benefit. The most commonly used drugs were metformin and DPP4i. There is room for improvement in the treatment of this very high-risk population.

Use of antihyperglycaemic therapy with cardiovascular benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes who require hospitalisation: A cross-sectional study. / Uso de terapia antihiperglucemiante con beneficio cardiovascular en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 que requieren hospitalización: un estudio transversal.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of therapy with cardiovascular benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to internal medicine departments. METHODS: One day, cross-sectional study of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalised in internal medicine departments. We recorded demographic and anthropometric variables, laboratory data and use of antihyperglycaemic drugs. The endpoint was the proportion and determinants of the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA). RESULTS: We included 928 patients belonging to 74 hospitals, with a mean age of 78.9 years (SD, 10.86 years), 50% of whom were men. A total of 557 (60%) patients had ischaemic heart disease, 189 (20.4%) had cerebrovascular disease, 293 (31.6%) had heart failure, 274 (29.5%) had chronic kidney disease, and 129 (13.9%) had peripheral arterial disease. Prior to their hospital admission, the patients were taking sulfonylureas (5.7%), biguanides (49.1%), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (0.2%), pioglitazone (0%), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (39%), SGLT2i (5.8%), GLP1-RA (2.6%) and basal insulin analogues (24%). An age over 75 years was the main determinant for not taking SGLT2i (adjusted OR, 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.74; P=.039) or GLP1-RA (adjusted OR, 0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.46; P=.006). DISCUSSION: A large proportion of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at very high cardiovascular risk are not treated with antihyperglycemic drugs with proven cardiovascular benefit. The most commonly used drugs were metformin and DPP4i. There is room for improvement in the treatment of this very high-risk population.

Effect of an intervention on quality indicators for improving the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients hospitalized in noncritical areas. / Efecto de una intervención sobre indicadores de calidad para mejorar el tratamiento de la hiperglucemia en pacientes hospitalizados en áreas no críticas.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of an intervention on certain quality indicators employed for improving the treatment of hospital hyperglycemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with hyperglycemia hospitalized in the internal medicine departments of 44 hospitals evaluated in 2 time periods: 2014 (baseline period) and 2015 (postintervention period). The intervention consisted of the dissemination of the indicators obtained in 2014 and the objectives for improvement. As indicators, we assessed the frequency of glucose monitoring adapted to the patient's dietary intake or medication, the use of basal-bolus or basal-bolus-correction insulin therapy as the preferred control method of hyperglycemia and the recent availability of HbA1c prior to hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 506 and 562 patients were assessed in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The results of the indicators in the baseline and postintervention periods were as follows: blood glucose monitoring adapted to the dietary intake or the medication (71.5 vs. 74.1%, P=.33), use of insulin in basal-correction regimen (32 vs. 32.6%, P=.61) or basal-bolo-correction (20.7 vs. 24, P=.20) and recent HbA1c value (54.1 vs. 66.3%, P<.001). The mean glucose values in the 24h prior to the study were similar in the 2 periods. The rate of hypoglycemia was also similar in both periods (3.3 vs. 2.3%, P=.31). CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to implement multimodal interventions to improve the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients hospitalized in noncritical areas.

[Nephritic colic management in an emergency room of a referral hospital]. / Manejo del cólico renal en urgencias de un hospital de tercer nivel.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with nephritic colic in a referral hospital, their monitoring and the incidence of alternative diagnoses. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 182 randomly selected patients who presented a clinical diagnosis compatible with nephritic colic in a referral hospital. In these cases initial treatment, monitoring and alternative diagnoses have been evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-five point four percent of the patients were male, the mean age was 47.7 years and 40% of the cases were in spring. Urinalysis was carried out in every patient (62.7% dipstick and 72% urinary sediment); they were pathological in over 70%. In 26.4% of cases renal function deteriorated, always transiently. Abdominal radiography (81.9%) was the most frequently diagnostic test performed, followed by ultrasound (25.8%). Treatment included a serum therapy in 31.3%; metamizol (61%) was the most commonly used analgesic followed by ketorolac (44.5%). More than one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory was used by 46.2%. Hospital admission was required by 24 patients, and 5 of them needed emergency surgery. Twenty-four point one percent of patients had relapses during the next six months. Forty-one point six percent were referred to urology discharge on from the emergency room. Eighteen point one percent of patients had alternative diagnoses; acute pyelonephritis was the most frequent of these (55%). CONCLUSIONS: In our work we found a significant variation in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of these patients. The use of clinical guidelines could help us to unify the management of patients with nephritic colic, both in the emergency room and on discharge. Due to the high prevalence of alternative diagnoses, we have to systematically exclude more serious diseases.