Evaluating the discrepancies between evidence-based and community standard practices in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a survey study.

BACKGROUND: The practice of endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) often diverges from evidence-based standards due to various factors, including inadequate dissemination of evidence or a mismatch between evidence and real-world contexts. This survey aimed to identify discrepancies between evidence-based standard practices and community standard practices for ESCC among endoscopists. METHODS: An online survey targeting endoscopists who perform upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at least weekly was conducted to collect data on clinical practices related to ESCC diagnosis. The survey, comprising 20 questions, was disseminated through multiple professional networks. Descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression were performed to analyze the data. RESULTS: Data from 819 endoscopists were included in the analyses. Notably, a significant proportion employed narrow-band imaging/blue-laser imaging over iodine staining, and preferences varied based on risk assessment for ESCC. In total, 64.0% of endoscopists primarily used iodine solution at a concentration of 1% or less, while 96.5% of endoscopists performed an observation of the oral cavity and the pharynx when conducting upper gastrointestinal endoscopies on individuals at high risk of ESCC. The surveillance interval for metachronous multiple ESCCs was most commonly every 6 months, followed by every 12 months. In addition, most physicians conducted surveillance of metastatic recurrence at 6-month intervals. CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights significant gaps between evidence-based and community standard practices in the endoscopic diagnosis of ESCC. These findings underscore the need for enhanced dissemination of evidence-based guidelines and consideration of real-world clinical contexts to bridge these gaps and optimize patient care.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer in the remnant esophagus after esophagectomy.

Treatment of esophageal cancer in the remnant esophagus after esophagectomy is highly invasive, therefore, early detection and minimally invasive treatment are considered necessary. Consequently, we aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual esophageal cancer compared to that for esophageal cancer in a normal cervical esophagus. This study involved 47 patients with 59 residual esophageal cancers and 92 patients with 107 cervical esophageal cancers in normal esophagus who underwent ESD between January 2008 and December 2023. Their clinicopathological findings and long-term outcomes were retrospectively collected and evaluated. The median tumor diameter was 13 mm, and the median procedure time was 31 minutes in remnant esophagus group, with no significant difference between the two groups. No serious complications such as perforation, massive intraoperative bleeding, and pneumonia were observed in the remnant group, except for one case of postoperative bleeding. The rates of complete resection and disease specific survival were not significantly different between two groups, with complete resection rate of 86.4% and 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 95.7% in the remnant esophagus group. No local recurrence was observed during the median observation period of 43 months in the remnant esophagus group. ESD for superficial cancer of the remnant esophagus showed a high complete resection rate without serious complications and good local-regional control with no evidence of local recurrence. This indicates that ESD is a safe and useful treatment for superficial cancer of the remnant esophagus.

Does Colorectal Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer Increase Perineural Invasion?

Objectives: To clarify whether self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) increases perineural invasion (PNI), thereby worsening the prognosis. Methods: In total, 1022 patients with pathological T3 or T4 colon or rectosigmoid cancer who underwent resection were retrospectively reviewed. The study patients were divided into a no obstruction group (n=693), obstruction without stent group (n=251), and obstruction with stent group (n=78), and factors demonstrating an independent association with PNI, the difference in PNI incidence and severity between groups, and the association between PNI and the duration from SEMS placement to surgery were investigated. Survival analysis was performed for each group. Results: On multivariate analysis, SEMS placement (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.08) was independently associated with PNI whereas SEMS placement was not. PNI occurred in 39%, 45%, and 68% of the no obstruction, obstruction without stent, and obstruction with stent group, respectively. In the obstruction with stent group, the proportion of PNI was not associated with the duration from SEMS placement to surgery. Extramural PNI, an advanced form of PNI, demonstrated no increase with increasing interval. The five-year OS was 86.3%, 76.7%, and 73.1% in no obstruction, obstruction without stent, and obstruction with stent group, respectively. On multivariate analysis, obstruction was an independent risk factor of decreased OS (HR: 1.57) whereas SEMS placement was not. Conclusions: The prognosis was comparable between patients with SEMS placement and those with an obstruction who did not undergo SEMS placement, thus demonstrating that SEMS is a viable, therapeutic option for BTS.

Curative criteria for endoscopic treatment of oesophageal squamous cell cancer.

Endoscopic treatment of early oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is widely accepted. ESD (Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection), which allows en bloc resection regardless of size, provides resected specimens that facilitate histological evaluation of curability. In the histological investigation, the determination of tumor depth, lymphovascular involvement, and lateral and vertical margins play a great role in the assessment of curability. The diagnosis of lymphovascular invasion, in particular, is enhanced by the addition of immunostaining. The long-term outcome of ESD is comparable to that of oesophagectomy, and ESD may be the first-line treatment for early-stage oesophageal cancer due to its fewer complications. Surveillance after curative resection is also imperative because oesophageal cancer is often characterized by the concept of field cancerization, which results in metachronous multiple primary lesions.

Diagnostic Performance of Endoscopic Ultrasonography with Water-Filled Balloon Method for Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a commonly used tool for preoperative depth diagnosis of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Probing EUS using the water-filled balloon method is a simple and safe examination. AIM: The aim of this study was to clarify the diagnostic performance of EUS with the water-filled balloon method for superficial ESCC compared to magnifying narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI). METHODS: We retrospectively examined 403 lesions in 393 consecutive patients diagnosed with ESCC and evaluated them with ME-NBI and EUS. Clinicopathological findings were collected, and the accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis was compared between ME-NBI and EUS-B. EUS examiners were not blinded to prior ME-NBI results, and EUS results may have been influenced by ME-NBI results. RESULTS: The pathological tumor depth of the EP/LPM in 152 lesions, MM/SM1 in 130 lesions, and deep submucosa (SM2/SM3) in 121 lesions was examined. The proportion of total lesions with an accurate diagnosis was significantly higher in EUS than in ME-NBI (67.7% versus 62.0%, P = 0.015). When analyzed by clinical depth diagnosis using ME-NBI, the proportion of lesions with an accurate diagnosis was significantly higher for EUS in MM/SM1 (55.7% versus 46.1%, P = 0.033). The sensitivity was significantly higher in EUS for SM2/SM3 lesions (76.0% versus 54.5%, P < 0.001). The accuracy and specificity of EUS, which differentiate MM/SM1 from EP/LPM or SM2/SM3, were significantly higher than those of ME-NBI. The median endoscopic ultrasonography procedure time was approximately 6.5 min. CONCLUSIONS: EUS with the water-filled balloon method is a safe and straightforward method that can be performed on lesions clinically diagnosed as MM/SM1 using ME-NBI. We retrospectively reviewed lesions in patients diagnosed with ESCC and evaluated them using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and endoscopic ultrasound using the water-filled balloon method (EUS-B). We conclude that EUS-B can increase the diagnostic accuracy.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for pharyngeal cancer: removal of supra-oropharyngeal cancer.

Video 1.

Rapidly growing oropharyngeal cancer with a 6-month course.

A male patient in his 70s who had undergone a regular upper gastrointestinal endoscopy noted a flat, erythematous area on the right soft palate of the oropharynx 9 months after his treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. Six months after noticing the lesion, endoscopy revealed that the lesion had rapidly developed into a thick, erythematous, bump. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed. Pathological analysis of the resected tissue found a squamous cell carcinoma with a thickness of 1400 µm invading the subepithelial layer. There are few reports on the growth speed of pharyngeal cancer and it remains unclear. In some cases, the growth of the pharyngeal cancer may be rapid, and it is important to follow up the patient in a short period of time.

Duodenal Diverticular Perforation Treated Conservatively: Reassessing Indications for Treatment.

A 59-year-old woman presented with a chief complaint of melena. She had no abdominal findings, such as tenderness or tapping pain. Laboratory tests revealed a white blood cell count of 5,300 cells/µL and C-reactive protein level of 0.07 mg/dL. Inflammation and anemia (hemoglobin 12.4 g/dL) were denied. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple duodenal diverticula and air surrounding a descending duodenal diverticulum. Based on these findings, duodenal diverticular perforation (DDP) was suspected. Oral food intake was stopped, and nasogastric tube feeding and conservative treatment with cefmetazole, lansoprazole, and ulinastatin were begun. On day 8 of hospitalization, follow-up CT revealed the disappearance of the air surrounding the duodenum, and the patient was discharged on day 19 after the resumption of oral feeding.

Multi-institutional questionnaire on treatment strategies for superficial entire circumferential esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Objectives: Recent innovations in prophylactic treatment with steroids have overcome the issue of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), except in entire circumferential esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EC-ESCC). Current Japanese guidelines weakly recommend performing ESD for clinical epithelial/lamina propria EC-ESCC with a longitudinal extension <50 mm upon implementing prophylactic treatment against stricture. However, the accurate indications for ESD in EC-ESCC remain unknown, and strategies differ among institutions. The aim of this study was to understand the initial treatment strategy for EC-ESCC and prophylactic treatment after ESD against esophageal stricture. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted across 16 Japanese high-volume centers on the initial treatment for EC-ESCC according to the invasion depth and longitudinal extension, and prophylactic treatment against stricture. Results: ESD was performed as the initial treatment not only in clinical epithelial/lamina propria lesions <50 mm (88-94% of institutions), but also in clinical epithelial/lamina propria ≥50 mm (44-50% of institutions) and clinical muscularis mucosae/SM1 (submucosal invasion depth invasion within 200 µm) lesions <50 mm (56-75% of institutions). Regarding prophylactic treatment against esophageal stricture, although there was a common point of local steroid injection, the details and administration of other treatments varied among institutions. Conclusions: As ESD was performed with expanded indications for EC-ESCC than those recommended by the guidelines in more than half of the institutions, the validity of ESD for expanded EC-ESCC needs to be clarified. For that, it is necessary to prospectively collect short- and long-term outcomes after ESD and other treatments, including esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy.

Curative Management After Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invading Muscularis Mucosa or Shallow Submucosal Layer-Multicenter Real-World Survey in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Curative management after endoscopic resection (ER) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), which invades the muscularis mucosa (pMM-ESCC) or shallow submucosal layer (pSM1-ESCC), has been controversial. METHODS: We identified patients with pMM-ESCC and pSM1-ESCC treated by ER. Outcomes were the predictive factors for regional lymph node and distant recurrence, and survival data were based on the depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and additional treatment immediately after ER. RESULTS: A total of 992 patients with pMM-ESCC (n = 749) and pSM1-ESCC (n = 243) were registered. According to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, pSM1-ESCC (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.07, P = 0.012) and LVI (hazard ratio = 6.92, 95% confidence interval 4.09-11.7, P < 0.0001) were associated with a risk of regional lymph node and distant recurrence. In the median follow-up period of 58.6 months (range 1-233), among patients with risk factors (pMM-ESCC with LVI or pSM1-ESCC), the 5-year overall survival rates, relapse-free survival rates, and cause-specific survival rates of patients with additional treatment were significantly better than those of patients without additional treatment; 85.4% vs 61.5% ( P < 0.0001), 80.5% vs 53.3% ( P < 0.0001), and 98.5% vs 93.1% ( P = 0.004), respectively. There was no difference in survival rate between the chemoradiotherapy and surgery groups. DISCUSSION: pSM1 and LVI were risk factors for metastasis after ER for ESCC. To improve the survival, additional treatment immediately after ER, such as chemoradiotherapy or surgery, is effective in patients with these risk factors.

Definition of Mucosal Breaks in the Era of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging.

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is diagnosed endoscopically based on the presence of mucosal breaks. However, mucosal breaks can be judged differently depending on the endoscopist, even in the same image. We investigated how narrow-band imaging (NBI) and magnified endoscopy affect the judgment of mucosal breaks. Methods: A total of 43 consecutive patients were enrolled who had suspected mucosal breaks on white-light images (WLI) and underwent nonmagnified NBI (N-NBI) and magnified NBI (M-NBI) by a single endoscopist. From WLI, N-NBI, and M-NBI, 129 image files were created. Eight endoscopists reviewed the image files and judged the presence of mucosal breaks. Results: The 8 endoscopists determined mucosal breaks were present in 79.4 ± 9.5% (67.4%-93.0%) on WLI, and 76.7 ± 12.7% (53.5%-90.7%) on N-NBI. However, the percentage of mucosal breaks on M-NBI was significantly lower at 48.8 ± 17.0% (18.6%-65.1%) (p < 0.05). Intraclass correlation between observers was 0.864 (95% CI 0.793-0.918) for WLI and 0.863 (95% CI 0.791-0.917) for N-NBI but was lower for M-NBI at 0.758 (95% CI 0.631-0.854). Conclusion: Rates of detection and agreement for mucosal breaks on WLI and N-NBI were high among endoscopists. However, these rates were lower on M-NBI.

Impact of frailty on the long-term outcomes of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clarify the association between frailty evaluated using the clinical frailty scale (CFS) and outcomes in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively included 67 patients (aged ≥ 75 years) diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (tumor depth ≥ m3) between 2011 and 2016. The patients were retrospectively evaluated and categorized according to their CFS scores (1-7) and divided into non-frailty (scores 1-2) and frailty groups (scores 3-7). Postoperative complications, 5 year survival rate, and prognostic risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Significant differences in performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status score, Charlson comorbidity index, and treatment type were observed between the two groups. Thirty-six patients underwent surgery, and morbidities with Clavien-Dindo grades ≥ II and ≥ IIIa were found in 72.2 and 47.2% of the patients, respectively. The remaining 31 patients underwent endoscopic resection and/or chemo (radio) therapy. The morbidity rate did not differ between the two groups. The 5 year survival rate was 75.3% overall and 92.7 and 60.8% in patients in the non-frailty and frailty groups, respectively (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed that frailty and cStage ≥ II were independent risk factors of overall survival (p = 0.005 and p = 0.013, respectively) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.048 and p = 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty greatly impacts the prognosis of elderly patients with esophageal cancer, regardless of surgical or nonsurgical treatment. The CFS score could be a useful prognostic predictor.

Efficacy of polyglycolic acid sheeting with fibrin glue for perforations related to gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Gastrointestinal (GI) perforations are one of the major adverse events of endoscopic procedures. Polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets with fibrin glue have been reported to close GI perforations. However, its clinical outcome has not yet been fully investigated; thus, we conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study to assess the efficacy of PGA sheeting for GI perforation. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent PGA sheeting for endoscopic GI perforations between April 2013 and March 2018 in 18 Japanese institutions were retrospectively analyzed. PGA sheeting was applied when the clip closure was challenging or failed to use. Perforations were filled with one or several pieces of PGA sheets followed by fibrin glue application through an endoscopic catheter. Nasal or percutaneous drainage and endoscopic clipping were applied as appropriate. Clinical outcomes after PGA sheeting for intraoperative or delayed perforations were separately evaluated. RESULTS: There were 66 intraoperative and 24 delayed perforation cases. In intraoperative cases, successful closure was attained in 60 cases (91%). The median period from the first sheeting to diet resumption was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4-8.8 days). Large perforation size (≥ 10 mm) and duodenal location showed marginal significant relationship to higher closure failure of intraoperative perforations. In delayed perforation cases, all cases had successful closure. The median period from the first sheeting to diet resumption was 10 days (IQR, 6-37.8 days). No adverse events related to PGA sheeting occurred. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic PGA sheeting could be a therapeutic option for GI perforations related to GI endoscopic procedures.

Effectiveness of lymphadenectomy along the thoracic duct for radical esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: There has been much debate on whether to perform TD resection in radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from the perspectives of metastatic rate, effect on postoperative hemodynamics, and other factors. The objective of this study was to determine whether TDLN dissection contributes to improved prognosis. METHODS: This study involved 1211 patients who underwent D2/D3 dissection with TD resection for thoracic esophageal cancer between 1984 and 2020. The lymph nodes along the TD were defined as TDLNs and the remaining No. 112 nodes as non-TDLNs. The metastatic rate in TDLNs and non-TDLNs and their outcomes were compared with those of other thoracic lymph nodes. Correlation with the invasion depth of the main lesion was also analyzed (T0-2 545 patients, T3-4 666 patients). RESULTS: The metastatic rates in TDLNs/non-TDLNs in all patients were 7.3%/7.5%, respectively, while those in T0-2 were 2.2%/3.9%, and those in T3-4 were 11.5%/10.6%, with both having higher rates in advanced cases. The efficacy index (EI) for lymphadenectomy in T3-4 was 2.94 for TDLNs and 3.44 for non-TDLNs, with no significant difference. The metastatic rate in TDLNs by tumor site was as follows: Ut/Mt/Lt = 1.1/2.4/2.4% (T0-2) and 7.7/14.5/8.4% (T3-4), being especially high (~ 15%) in patients with advanced cases in Mt region. The EI was comparable or higher for TDLNs compared with other group-2 (Mt/Lt) and group-3 (Ut) regional lymph nodes, regardless of site. CONCLUSIONS: The significance of TD resection was low in T0-2 due to the low metastatic rate but became evident in cases with invasion depth of T3-4. TDLN resection was at least as effective as dissection of other group-2 or -3 lymph nodes, including No. 112 nodes.

Clinicopathological Differences between Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Asymptomatic Esophageal Eosinophilia.

Objective According to consensus guidelines, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is defined as a clinicopathological entity whose symptoms and histology must always be considered together. However, endoscopic findings typical of EoE are often seen in asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE). We aimed to clarify the clinicopathological features of aEE. Methods We retrospectively compared cases of aEE and those of symptomatic EoE. Materials We reviewed 146 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and were confirmed histopathologically to have esophageal eosinophil infiltration of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field. They were divided into the aEE group (n=75) and the EoE group (n=71). Patients' clinicopathological findings were then collected and examined. Results The EoE group experienced dysphagia (47.9%), heartburn (40.8%), food impaction (40.8%), chest pain (16.9%), and other symptoms (8.5%). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, sex, current smoking status, or alcohol consumption. The aEE group had a significantly higher body mass index (p<0.01) and significantly lower frequency of concurrent allergic diseases (p<0.01) than the EoE group. No significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to the mean peripheral blood eosinophil count, non-specific immunoglobulin E concentration, peak eosinophil infiltration in the biopsy specimens, EoE histology scoring system, phenotype and location of typical endoscopic findings of EoE, or thickness of the esophagus wall or the mucosal and submucosal layer as measured by endoscopic ultrasonography. Two patients in the aEE group who were followed up without treatment subsequently developed esophageal symptoms. Conclusion aEE and EoE may have the same clinicopathological features.

Metachronous carcinogenesis of superficial esophagus squamous cell carcinoma after endoscopic submucosal dissection: incidence and risk stratification during long-term observation.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to reveal long-term outcomes, such as incidence of metachronous esophageal and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and overall survival rate, through long-term observation of patients with esophageal carcinoma post-endoscopic submucosal dissection. METHODS: Risk of metachronous carcinogenesis was evaluated in 88 patients with intramucosal esophageal carcinoma (without history of metachronous esophageal or head and neck squamous cell carcinomas) who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection from 2007 to 2008 and were endoscopically observed for > 3 years. Histologically, the papillary vessel is defined as the clock gear-like structure composed of capillaries directly penetrating the epithelium (starting from the lamina propria) and covering at least two-thirds of it, around which the tumor cells are arranged in a spiral pattern. RESULTS: Median endoscopic follow-up period was 11.0 years. Cumulative 2-, 5-, and 10-year metachronous esophageal carcinoma rates were 11.4%, 20.6%, and 39.3%, respectively. Stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified multiple Lugol-voiding lesions (LVLs) as the single significant independent predictor. Cumulative 2-, 5-, and 10-year metachronous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma rates were 6.9%, 10.4%, and 19.6%, respectively. Stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified multiple LVLs, Brinkman index, papillary vessel, and younger age as significant predictive factors. Overall post-endoscopic submucosal dissection survival rates were 98.8% and 87.5% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of esophageal carcinoma remain at risk for metachronous carcinogenesis even > 5 years after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Thus, long-term follow-up is important.

Transoral surgery for superficial head and neck cancer: National Multi-Center Survey in Japan.

Head and neck cancers, especially in hypopharynx and oropharynx, are often detected at advanced stage with poor prognosis. Narrow band imaging enables detection of superficial cancers and transoral surgery is performed with curative intent. However, pathological evaluation and real-world safety and clinical outcomes have not been clearly understood. The aim of this nationwide multicenter study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of transoral surgery for superficial head and neck cancer. We collected the patients with superficial head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who were treated by transoral surgery from 27 hospitals in Japan. Central pathology review was undertaken on all of the resected specimens. The primary objective was effectiveness of transoral surgery, and the secondary objective was safety including incidence and severity of adverse events. Among the 568 patients, a total of 662 lesions were primarily treated by 575 sessions of transoral surgery. The median tumor diameter was 12 mm (range 1-75) endoscopically. Among the lesions, 57.4% were diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma in situ. The median procedure time was 48 minutes (range 2-357). Adverse events occurred in 12.7%. Life-threatening complications occurred in 0.5%, but there were no treatment-related deaths. During a median follow-up period of 46.1 months (range 1-113), the 3-year overall survival rate, relapse-free survival rate, cause-specific survival rate, and larynx-preservation survival rate were 88.1%, 84.4%, 99.6%, and 87.5%, respectively. Transoral surgery for superficial head and neck cancer offers effective minimally invasive treatment. Clinical trials registry number: UMIN000008276.

Efficacy of Vonoprazan for Refractory Reflux Esophagitis after Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Refractory reflux esophagitis (RRE), unresponsive to conventional proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), is a complication in esophagectomy with gastric pull-up. Vonoprazan (VPZ), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has been available in Japan since 2015. Here, we investigated the efficacy of VPZ on PPI-resistant RRE after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study. We used the revised Los Angeles (r-LA) classification based on the Los Angeles classification and the modified Los Angeles classification to evaluate abnormal forms of mucosal breaks such as lateral spreading consistently. Patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric pull-up and had RRE grade B-D as per the r-LA classification, despite using standard-dose PPIs or double dose of rabeprazole, were included. Sixteen patients who switched to VPZ (20 mg/day) and 14 patients who continued PPIs were assigned to the VPZ and PPI groups, respectively. Endoscopic observations were reviewed by 3 endoscopists using the r-LA classification to ensure consistent diagnosis, while the treatment arm and patient information were blinded to evaluators. We defined mucosal breaks that improved by at least one grade after treatment as improved mucosa and recovery to grade M or N as mucosal healing. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with improved mucosa in the VPZ and PPI groups was 81.3 and 14.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The rate of mucosal healing was 68.8 and 7.1%, respectively (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: VPZ significantly improved PPI-resistant RRE after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up.

Diagnostic yield of conventional endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasonography for submucosal invasion of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a post hoc analysis of multicenter prospective confirmatory study (JCOG0508).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is reportedly the reliable modality to predict the depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), however, most previous studies are retrospective or single-centered. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of conventional endoscopy and EUS using the data from a multicenter prospective study of endoscopic resection (ER) followed by chemoradiotherapy for cSM1-2N0M0 ESCC (JCOG0508). METHODS: All lesions were evaluated as cSM cancer with both conventional endoscopy and EUS before enrollment and judged as cSM1 or cSM2 in real time. We compared the clinical and pathological diagnoses for tumor depth and assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) for pSM (pSM/cSM) as the primary endpoint. We also investigated the clinical factors affecting the pathological depth of SM. RESULTS: 175 lesions were examined, and clinical diagnosis was SM1 in 114 and SM2 in 61 lesions. The pathological diagnoses of the epithelium, lamina propria mucosa, muscularis mucosae, SM1, and SM2 were 3, 31, 55, 17, and 69. The PPV for pSM was 49.1% (86/175) in all lesions, 34.2% (39/114) in cSM1 lesions, and 77.0% (47/61) in cSM2 lesions. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that cSM2 (vs. cSM1, OR 6.79) was an independent clinical factor associated with pSM. CONCLUSIONS: While the accurate depth diagnosis in cSM ESCC was difficult to make, the clinical diagnosis of SM2 with both conventional endoscopy and EUS was significantly associated with pSM. Furthermore, diagnostic ER could be recommended to confirm the pathological diagnosis especially in cSM1 lesions with both conventional endoscopy and EUS.