Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Intern Med J ; 54(6): 1031-1034, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38651497

RESUMEN

The Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Mpox Vaccination Clinic opened in response to the 2022 multicountry mpox outbreak. A total of 9500 vaccinations were administered intradermally and subcutaneously during the first 16 weeks of clinic operation. The rate of adverse events was 0.1%. Compared to people who received the vaccine intradermally, those who received it subcutaneously were more likely to be aged 30-39 years (P = 0.047), sexual partners of gay and bisexual men (P < 0.001), eligible for Medicare (P < 0.001) and born in the Philippines (P = 0.01) or Malaysia (P = 0.04).


Asunto(s)
Vacunación Masiva , Mpox , Vacuna contra Viruela , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Australia/epidemiología , Inyecciones Intradérmicas , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Vacuna contra Viruela/administración & dosificación , Mpox/prevención & control
2.
Intern Med J ; 52(1): 121-124, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060290

RESUMEN

The Pfizer/BioNtech BNT162b2 is a major vaccine used in the Australian COVID-19 immunisation programme. We report on BNT162b2 safety in the observation period in a dedicated vaccination clinic linked to a quaternary teaching hospital. We performed a retrospective review of medical records for 57 842 vaccinations, and describe the model of care and adverse event rate at the clinic during its first 2 months of operation. A total of 243 adverse events following immunisation (0.42% of total vaccine doses) were recorded in the immediate observation period post-vaccination, which were predominantly immunisation stress-related responses. Of the 110 patients who experienced an adverse event with their first dose of the vaccine, 90% returned for their second dose of the vaccine, with 87% not reporting any further adverse reaction with the subsequent dose. Nineteen (0.03% of total doses) people were reviewed for an allergic reaction, of which 10 (53%) reported a history of prior allergies. A female predominance was present in both total adverse reactions (70%) and allergic vaccine reactions (79%). Only two patients experienced anaphylaxis (0.003% of total doses), in keeping with low rates of adverse reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine in the current literature. Overall, the present study reinforces the safety of BNT162b2 in the Australian population, describes vaccination completion rates after adverse events and identifies predisposing factors for rare allergic reactions to the vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , COVID-19 , Australia/epidemiología , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Vacunación Masiva , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...