RESUMEN
The primary objective of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase 3 biomarker Microarray Analysis in breast cancer to Taylor Adjuvant Drugs Or Regimens trial (MATADOR: ISRCTN61893718) is to generate a gene expression profile that can predict benefit from either docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) or dose-dense scheduled doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC). Patients with a pT1-3, pN0-3 tumor were randomized 1:1 between ddAC and TAC. The primary endpoint was a gene profile-treatment interaction for recurrence-free survival (RFS). We observed 117 RFS events in 664 patients with a median follow-up of 7 years. Hallmark gene set analyses showed significant association between enrichment in immune-related gene expression and favorable outcome after TAC in hormone receptor-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC) (triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]). We validated this association in TNBC patients treated with TAC on H&E slides; stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) ≥20% was associated with longer RFS (hazard ratio 0.18, p = 0.01), while in patients treated with ddAC no difference in RFS was seen (hazard ratio 0.92, p = 0.86, p interaction = 0.02).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) - performing dose adjustments based on measured drug levels and established pharmacokinetic (PK) targets - could optimise treatment with drugs that show large interpatient variability in exposure. We evaluated the feasibility of TDM for multiple oral targeted therapies. Here we report on drugs for which routine TDM is not feasible. METHODS: We evaluated drug cohorts from the Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group - TDM study. Based on PK levels taken at pre-specified time points, PK-guided interventions were performed. Feasibility of TDM was evaluated, and based on the success and practicability of TDM, cohorts could be closed. RESULTS: For 10 out of 24 cohorts TDM was not feasible and inclusion was closed. A high incidence of adverse events resulted in closing the cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib cohort. The enzalutamide and erlotinib cohorts were closed because almost all PK levels were above target. Other, non-pharmacological reasons led to closing the palbociclib, olaparib and tamoxifen cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Although TDM could help personalising treatment for many drugs, the above-mentioned reasons can influence its feasibility, usefulness and clinical applicability. Therefore, routine TDM is not advised for cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, enzalutamide, erlotinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib. Nonetheless, TDM remains valuable for individual clinical decisions.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas , Neoplasias , Piridinas , Humanos , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridinas/farmacocinética , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Administración Oral , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Imidazoles/farmacocinética , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Anilidas/farmacocinética , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Everolimus/farmacocinética , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Oximas/farmacocinética , Oximas/administración & dosificación , Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Feniltiohidantoína/farmacocinética , Feniltiohidantoína/administración & dosificación , Nitrilos/farmacocinética , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Piridonas , Pirimidinonas , Piperazinas , BenzamidasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Pazopanib is registered for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Its variable pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and narrow therapeutic range provide a strong rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Prior studies have defined target levels of drug exposure (≥ 20.5 mg/L) linked to prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but the added value of using TDM remains unclear. This study investigates the effect of TDM of pazopanib in patients with STS on survival outcomes and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and evaluates the feasibility of TDM-guided dosing. METHODS: A TDM-guided cohort was compared to a non-TDM-guided cohort for PFS, overall survival (OS) and DLTs. PK samples were available from all patients, though not acted upon in the non-TDM-guided cohort. We evaluated the feasibility of TDM by comparing the proportion of underdosed patients in our TDM cohort with data from previous publications. RESULTS: A total of 122 STS patients were included in the TDM-guided cohort (n = 95) and non-TDM-guided cohort (n = 27). The average exposure in the overall population was 30.5 mg/L and was similar in both groups. Median PFS and OS did not differ between the TDM-guided cohort and non-TDM-guided cohort (respectively 5.5 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.3, and 12.6 vs 10.1 months, p = 0.8). Slightly more patients in the non-TDM-guided cohort experienced DLTs (54%) compared to the TDM-guided cohort (44%). The proportion of underdosed patients (13.3%) was halved compared to historical data (26.7%). CONCLUSION: TDM reduced the proportion of patients with subtherapeutic exposure levels by ~ 50%. Nonetheless, the added value of TDM for achieving target trough levels of ≥ 20.5 mg/L for pazopanib on survival outcomes could not be confirmed in STS patients.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Indazoles , Pirimidinas , Sarcoma , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Sulfonamidas/farmacocinética , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Exploratory analyses of high-dose alkylating chemotherapy trials have suggested that BRCA1 or BRCA2-pathway altered (BRCA-altered) breast cancer might be particularly sensitive to this type of treatment. In this study, patients with BRCA-altered tumors who had received three initial courses of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC), were randomized between a fourth ddAC course followed by high-dose carboplatin-thiotepa-cyclophosphamide or conventional chemotherapy (initially ddAC only or ddAC-capecitabine/decetaxel [CD] depending on MRI response, after amendment ddAC-carboplatin/paclitaxel [CP] for everyone). The primary endpoint was the neoadjuvant response index (NRI). Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 122 patients were randomized. No difference in NRI-score distribution (p = 0.41) was found. A statistically non-significant RFS difference was found (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.23-1.25; p = 0.15). Exploratory RFS analyses showed benefit in stage III (n = 35; HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03-0.75), but not stage II (n = 86; HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.30-3.30) patients. For stage III, 4-year RFS was 46% (95% CI 24-87%), 71% (95% CI 48-100%) and 88% (95% CI 74-100%), for ddAC/ddAC-CD, ddAC-CP and high-dose chemotherapy, respectively. No significant differences were found between high-dose and conventional chemotherapy in stage II-III, triple-negative, BRCA-altered breast cancer patients. Further research is needed to establish if there are patients with stage III, triple negative BRCA-altered breast cancer for whom outcomes can be improved with high-dose alkylating chemotherapy or whether the current standard neoadjuvant therapy including carboplatin and an immune checkpoint inhibitor is sufficient. Trial Registration: NCT01057069.
RESUMEN
In clinical practice, 25-30% of the patients treated with fluoropyrimidines experience severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. Extensively clinically validated DPYD genotyping tests are available to identify patients at risk of severe toxicity due to decreased activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the rate limiting enzyme in fluoropyrimidine metabolism. In April 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended that, as an alternative for DPYD genotype-based testing for DPD deficiency, also phenotype testing based on pretreatment plasma uracil levels is a suitable method to identify patients with DPD deficiency. Although the evidence for genotype-directed dosing of fluoropyrimidines is substantial, the level of evidence supporting plasma uracil levels to predict DPD activity in clinical practice is limited. Notwithstanding this, uracil-based phenotyping is now used in clinical practice in various countries in Europe. We aimed to determine the value of pretreatment uracil levels in predicting DPD deficiency and severe treatment-related toxicity. To this end, we determined pretreatment uracil levels in 955 patients with cancer, and assessed the correlation with DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity. We identified substantial issues concerning the use of pretreatment uracil in clinical practice, including large between-center study differences in measured pretreatment uracil levels, most likely as a result of pre-analytical factors. Importantly, we were not able to correlate pretreatment uracil levels with DPD activity nor were uracil levels predictive of severe treatment-related toxicity. We urge that robust clinical validation should first be performed before pretreatment plasma uracil levels are used in clinical practice as part of a dosing strategy for fluoropyrimidines.
Asunto(s)
Deficiencia de Dihidropirimidina Deshidrogenasa , Dihidrouracilo Deshidrogenasa (NADP) , Uracilo , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos , Deficiencia de Dihidropirimidina Deshidrogenasa/tratamiento farmacológico , Deficiencia de Dihidropirimidina Deshidrogenasa/genética , Dihidrouracilo Deshidrogenasa (NADP)/genética , Dihidrouracilo Deshidrogenasa (NADP)/metabolismo , Humanos , Leucocitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Estudios Prospectivos , Uracilo/sangreRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Extensive work in preclinical models has shown that microenvironmental cells influence many aspects of cancer cell behavior, including metastatic potential and their sensitivity to therapeutics. In the human setting, this behavior is mainly correlated with the presence of immune cells. Here, in addition to T cells, B cells, macrophages, and mast cells, we identified the relevance of nonimmune cell types for breast cancer survival and therapy benefit, including fibroblasts, myoepithelial cells, muscle cells, endothelial cells, and seven distinct epithelial cell types. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using single-cell sequencing data, we generated reference profiles for all these cell types. We used these reference profiles in deconvolution algorithms to optimally detangle the cellular composition of more than 3,500 primary breast tumors of patients that were enrolled in the SCAN-B and MATADOR clinical trials, and for which bulk mRNA sequencing data were available. RESULTS: This large data set enables us to identify and subsequently validate the cellular composition of microenvironments that distinguish differential survival and treatment benefit for different treatment regimens in patients with primary breast cancer. In addition to immune cells, we have identified that survival and therapy benefit are characterized by various contributions of distinct epithelial cell types. CONCLUSIONS: From our study, we conclude that differential survival and therapy benefit of patients with breast cancer are characterized by distinct microenvironments that include specific populations of immune and epithelial cells.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Microambiente Celular , Células Endoteliales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Microambiente Tumoral/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIMs) and Potentially Omitted Medication (POMs) in older patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study (hospital) pharmacists conducted comprehensive medication reviews in older patients with cancer (aged ≥65 years) receiving parenteral chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy at the Deventer Hospital. PIMs and POMs were identified using the Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP), the Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment (START), and pharmacists' expert opinion. Recommendations regarding PIMs and POMs were communicated to the patient's oncologist/haematologist and follow-up was measured. Associations between covariates and the prevalence of PIMs and POMs were statistically analysed. RESULTS: For the 150 patients included, 180 PIMs and 86 POMs were identified with a prevalence of 78%. Using pharmacists' expert opinion in addition to only STOPP/START criteria contributed to 49% of the PIMs and 23% of the POMs. A follow-up action was required in 73% of the 266 PIMs and POMs. Number of medicines and Charlson Comorbidity Index score were both associated with having at least one PIM and/or POM (p = .031 and p = .016, respectively). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PIMs and POMs and subsequent follow-up in older patients with cancer is high. A pharmacist-led comprehensive medication review is a good instrument to identify these PIMs and POMs and to optimize patients' treatment. A complete approach, including pharmacists' expert opinion, is recommended to identify all PIMs and POMs in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In the phase II DIRECT study a fasting mimicking diet (FMD) improved the clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared to a regular diet. Quality of Life (QoL) and illness perceptions regarding the possible side effects of chemotherapy and the FMD were secondary outcomes of the trial. METHODS: 131 patients with HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer were recruited, of whom 129 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either a fasting mimicking diet (FMD) or their regular diet for 3 days prior to and the day of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-BR23; the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) and the Distress Thermometer were used to assess these outcomes at baseline, halfway chemotherapy, before the last cycle of chemotherapy and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Overall QoL and distress scores declined during treatment in both arms and returned to baseline values 6 months after surgery. However, patients' perceptions differed slightly over time. In particular, patients receiving the FMD were less concerned and had better understanding of the possible adverse effects of their treatment in comparison with patients on a regular diet. Per-protocol analyses yielded better emotional, physical, role, cognitive and social functioning scores as well as lower fatigue, nausea and insomnia symptom scores for patients adherent to the FMD in comparison with non-adherent patients and patients on their regular diet. CONCLUSIONS: FMD as an adjunct to neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to improve certain QoL and illness perception domains in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. Trialregister ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02126449.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Dieta , Ayuno , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Percepción , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Short-term fasting protects tumor-bearing mice against the toxic effects of chemotherapy while enhancing therapeutic efficacy. We randomized 131 patients with HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer, without diabetes and a BMI over 18 kg m-2, to receive either a fasting mimicking diet (FMD) or their regular diet for 3 days prior to and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here we show that there was no difference in toxicity between both groups, despite the fact that dexamethasone was omitted in the FMD group. A radiologically complete or partial response occurs more often in patients using the FMD (OR 3.168, P = 0.039). Moreover, per-protocol analysis reveals that the Miller&Payne 4/5 pathological response, indicating 90-100% tumor-cell loss, is more likely to occur in patients using the FMD (OR 4.109, P = 0.016). Also, the FMD significantly curtails chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in T-lymphocytes. These positive findings encourage further exploration of the benefits of fasting/FMD in cancer therapy. Trial number: NCT02126449.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/dietoterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Dieta , Ayuno , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Índice de Masa Corporal , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Daño del ADN , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Glucosa/química , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Menopausia , Ratones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Países Bajos , Calidad de Vida , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Linfocitos T/citología , Linfocitos T/inmunologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: To test the validity of diagnostics incorporating digital image analysis (DIA) for human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas, as an alternative to current standard diagnostics using manual scoring. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 319 consecutive gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas (232 biopsies and 87 surgical specimens). DIA was applied to determine HER2 IHC classification, using both standard breast cancer (BC) and modified gastro-oesophageal cancer (GEC) cut-offs. Consensus manual scores were established by four independent observers. Chromogenic in-situ hybridization (CISH) was performed on all 2+ cases by manual scoring, DIA or both. HER2 status was considered positive in 3+ and CISH-positive 2+ cases. Overall agreement between DIA and consensus manual scores was 76.5% (weighted κ = 0.66, BC cut-offs) and 85.6% (weighted κ = 0.80, GEC cut-offs). Agreement was similar for biopsies and surgical specimens. All disagreement occurred in the manual IHC equivocal cases. DIA resulted in a reduction of 2+ cases: 75.8% with BC cut-offs and 46.5% with GEC cut-offs. HER2 status was positive in 48 cases (15%) with standard diagnostics and DIA using GEC cut-offs, and 46 cases (14.4%) using BC cut-offs (all with CISH in 2+ cases). Considering standard diagnostics as a reference, DIA showed 93.8% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity (BC cut-offs) or 97.9% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity (GEC cut-offs). CONCLUSIONS: DIA is a reliable and feasible alternative to manual HER2 IHC scoring in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma, both in biopsies and surgical specimens, leading to a reduction of 2+ cases for which subsequent ISH testing is required.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/clasificación , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Receptor ErbB-2/análisis , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/clasificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Gástricas/clasificaciónRESUMEN
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have rapidly become an established factor in oncology, and have been shown to be effective in a wide variety of solid and hematologic malignancies. Use of the oral administration route of TKIs offers flexibility and is convenient for the patient; however, despite these advantages, the oral route of administration also causes a highly relevant new problem. Acid-inhibitory drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), increase the intragastric pH, which may subsequently decrease TKI solubility, bioavailability, and treatment efficacy. Clear and practical advice on how to manage PPI use during TKI therapy is currently not available in the literature. Since PPIs are extensively used during TKI therapy, prescribers are presented with a big dilemma as to whether or not to continue the combined treatment, resulting in patients possibly being deprived of optimal therapy. When all pharmacological characteristics and data of either TKIs and PPIs are considered, practical and safe advice on how to manage this drug combination can be given.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although pharmacogenomics has evolved substantially, a predictive test for chemotherapy toxicity is still lacking. We compared the toxicity of adjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (ddAC) and docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (TAC) in a randomized multicenter phase III trial and replicated previously reported associations between genotypes and toxicity. RESULTS: 646 patients (97%) were evaluable for toxicity (grade 2 and higher). Whereas AN was more frequent after ddAC (P < 0.001), TAC treated patients more often had PNP (P < 0.001). We could replicate 2 previously reported associations: TECTA (rs1829; OR 4.18, 95% CI 1.84-9.51, P = 0.001) with PNP, and GSTP1 (rs1138272; OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.13-3.68, P = 0.018) with PNP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with pT1-3, pN0-3 breast cancer were randomized between six cycles A60C600 every 2 weeks or T75A50C500 every 3 weeks. Associations of 13 previously reported single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with the most frequent toxicities: anemia (AN), febrile neutropenia (FN) and peripheral neuropathy (PNP) were analyzed using logistic regression models. CONCLUSIONS: In this independent replication, we could replicate an association between 2 out of 13 SNPs and chemotherapy toxicities. These results warrant further validation in order to enable tailored treatment for breast cancer patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To explore the role of bevacizumab and a chemotherapy-free approach, the authors evaluated the combination of bevacizumab, trastuzumab, and paclitaxel (HAT) and the regimen of trastuzumab and bevacizumab (HA) with the addition of paclitaxel after progression (HA-HAT) as first-line treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In a noncomparative phase 2 trial, patients were randomized between HAT and HA-HAT. The primary endpoint was the progression-free rate at 1 year (1-year PFR). In the HA-HAT group, progression-free survival (PFS) was separately established for HA (PFS1) and HAT (PFS2). RESULTS: Eighty-four patients received HAT (n = 39) or HA-HAT (n = 45). The 1-year PFR was 74.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.8%-89.4%) and 62.2% (95% CI, 49.6%-89.4%) in the HAT and HA-HAT arms, respectively. The median PFS was 19.8 months (95% CI, 14.9-25.6 months) in the HAT arm and 19.6 months (95% CI, 12.0-32.0 months) in the HA-HAT arm. In the HA-HAT arm, the median PFS1 was 10.4 months (95% CI, 6.2-15.0 months), and the median PFS2 was 8.2 months (95% CI, 7.0-12.6 months). The number and severity of adverse events were comparable between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: Both HAT and HA-HAT have promising activity in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In particular, starting with only targeted agents and delaying chemotherapy is worth further exploration. Cancer 2016;122:2961-2970. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Óseas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Metástasis Linfática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene shows overexpression in 15% to 30% of gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Targeted anti-HER2 therapy with trastuzumab has been recently validated in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer treatment. A standardized modified scoring system was recently introduced for gastroesophageal HER2 scoring. We aimed to validate this scoring system, including an analysis of interobserver variability of immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring. METHODS: In total, 323 patients with histologically confirmed invasive gastric or esophageal adenocarcinoma were examined for HER2 by IHC and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). IHC 3 + or IHC 2 +/CISH positive tumors were considered HER2 positive. Interobserver variability on IHC scoring using the currently standard modified HER2 scoring system was determined among three clinical pathologists. Clinicopathologic characteristics were retrospectively retrieved from the patient records. RESULTS: HER2 positivity was found in 50 (15.5%) of 323 patients. Interobserver agreement on IHC scoring was high (κ = 0.78). Most disagreement was found in diffuse or mixed tumor types and in weak to moderate stained samples (IHC 2 +). The HER2 IHC scoring system is sensitive in differentiating HER2 status before ISH. CONCLUSIONS: The currently used standardized HER2 scoring system is an excellent, clinically applicable method to establish HER2 status in appropriately educated and trained pathologists.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/biosíntesis , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Hibridación in Situ , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Receptor ErbB-2/análisis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oncology patients are more at risk for drug related problems because of treatment with (combinations of) anticancer drugs, as they have a higher risk for organ failure or altered metabolism with progression of their disease. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize and to evaluate the frequency of potential drug related problems (pDRPs) among oncology patients. SETTING: Outpatient- and day-care centres for Internal and Pulmonary Medicine at the Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands. METHOD: A prospective, descriptive, observational study was carried out from March 2010 to March 2011 at the Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands. All patients older than 18 years receiving anticancer drugs prescribed by an internal medicineoncologist or pulmonologist-oncologist were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the number and type of pDRPs according to Dutch guidelines. RESULTS: Among 546 patients with cancer, 952 pDRPs were identified, of which 474 were oncology-related. These were mainly drug interactions (IA) (246 IA in 157 patients) and potential contraindications (pCI) (201 pCI in 143 patients). CONCLUSION: Most identified pDRPs in cancer patients were IAs and pCIs and involved corticosteroids. The most frequently occurring oncology-related IAs were classified as minor or moderate levels of severity.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Países Bajos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Our group has previously employed array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) to assess the genomic patterns of BRCA1-mutated breast cancers. We have shown that the so-called BRCA1-like(aCGH) profile is also present in about half of all triple-negative sporadic breast cancers and is predictive for benefit from intensified alkylating chemotherapy. As aCGH is a rather complex method, we translated the BRCA1(aCGH) profile to a Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) assay, to identify both BRCA1-mutated breast cancers and sporadic cases with a BRCA1-like(aCGH) profile. METHODS: The most important genomic regions of the original aCGH based classifier (3q22-27, 5q12-14, 6p23-22, 12p13, 12q21-23, 13q31-34) were mapped to a set of 34 MLPA probes. The training set consisted of 39 BRCA1-like(aCGH) breast cancers and 45 non-BRCA1-like(aCGH) breast cancers, which had previously been analyzed by aCGH. The BRCA1-like(aCGH) group consisted of germline BRCA1-mutated cases and sporadic tumours with low BRCA1 gene expression and/or BRCA1 promoter methylation. We trained a shrunken centroids classifier on the training set and validation was performed on an independent test set of 40 BRCA1-like(aCGH) breast cancers and 32 non-BRCA1-like(aCGH) breast cancer tumours. In addition, we validated the set prospectively on 69 new triple-negative tumours. RESULTS: BRCAness in the training set of 84 tumours could accurately be predicted by prediction analysis of microarrays (PAM) (accuracy 94%). Application of this classifier on the independent validation set correctly predicted BRCA-like status of 62 out of 72 breast tumours (86%). Sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 87%, respectively. When the MLPA-test was subsequently applied to 46 breast tumour samples from a randomized clinical trial, the same survival benefit for BRCA1-like tumours associated with intensified alkylating chemotherapy was shown as was previously reported using the aCGH assay. CONCLUSIONS: Since the MLPA assay can identify BRCA1-deficient breast cancer patients, this method could be applied both for clinical genetic testing and as a predictor of treatment benefit. BRCA1-like tumours are highly sensitive to chemotherapy with DNA damaging agents, and most likely to poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors. The MLPA assay is rapid and robust, can easily be multiplexed, and works well with DNA derived from paraffin-embedded tissues.
Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Mutación , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Femenino , Dosificación de Gen , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Juego de Reactivos para DiagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Over a period of 1 year in our hospital, 3 patients were diagnosed with 'ileitis following capecitabine use'. The case of 1 of these patients is presented in this article. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 73-year-old man known to be suffering from liver metastases from rectal cancer was treated with oxaliplatin, bevacizumab and capecitabine. He was admitted to our hospital with abdominal pain, diarrhoea, nausea and a subfebrile temperature. A CT scan of the abdomen showed marked bowel wall thickening, particularly of the ileum, consistent with terminal ileitis. The diagnosis was 'ileitis following capecitabine use' since other disorders were excluded or seemed less likely, and the Naranjo score was compatible with 'possible adverse reaction'. Capecitabine treatment was discontinued. Following recovery, treatment was resumed without complications. CONCLUSION: Small intestine toxicity during capecitabine use has, to our knowledge, not been described previously. It is important to recognise this side-effect in order to avoid obstruction and perforation. Conservative treatment including an adapted diet and intravenous hydration is the therapy of choice. Surgery does not seem to be indicated.