Role of the gel spacer in safely delivering whole pelvic radiation therapy without central shielding in computed tomography-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To protect the rectum and bladder from high dose exposure, the Japanese guidelines for managing uterine cervical carcinoma recommend pelvic irradiation with central shielding (CS). Conversely, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines recommend delivering ≥85 Gy to high-risk clinical target volume D90 (CTVHR D90%). In this study, we investigated whether a gel spacer can enable the safe delivery of the ESTRO/ABS-recommended doses to the target while observing dose constraints for the OARs without using CS in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who received definitive radiation therapy without CS and were treated by brachytherapy with a gel spacer between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The cumulative doses of EBRT and brachytherapy treatment outcomes and incidence of adverse events were also examined. RESULTS: The median cumulative CTVHR D90%, rectum D2cm3, and bladder D2cm3 were 86.6 Gy, 62.9 Gy, and 72.0 Gy, respectively. The 2-year local control rate was 95%. There were no CTCAE ≥Grade 3 late gastrointestinal or genitourinary adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The use of gel spacer can enable ESTRO/ABS-recommended dose constraints even without using CS in EBRT, with favorable outcomes and low adverse event rates.

A Japanese multi-institutional phase II study of moderate hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with image-guided technique for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multi-institutional phase II study was to confirm the safety and the potential efficacy of moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with prostate-based image-guidance for Japanese patients. METHODS: Patients with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer were eligible. Patients with a part of high risk (having only one of the following factors, cT3a, 20 < PSA ≤ 30, or GS = 8 or 9) were also included. Hypofractionated IMRT using daily image-guided technique with prostate matching was performed with a total dose of 70 Gy in 28 fractions. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for 4-8 months was mandatory for patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. RESULTS: From 20 institutions, 134 patients enrolled. The median follow-up was 5.16 years (range, 1.43-6.47 years). The number of patients with low, intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer was 20, 80, and 34, respectively. The 5-year overall, biochemical failure-free, and clinical failure-free survival was 94.5%, 96.0%, and 99.2%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival for patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease was 94.1%, 97.4%, and 93.9%, respectively. The incidences of grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) late toxicities at 5 years were 5.3% and 5.3%, respectively. There are no acute or late toxicities ≥ grade 3. Of 124 patients who were followed for up to 5 years, the grade 2 late GU or GI toxicities were 10.5% (90% confidence intervals, 6.3-16.2%, p = 0.0958). CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of moderately hypofractionated IMRT with prostate-based image-guidance was confirmed among Japanese patients with prostate cancer.

Hydrogel spacer injection to the meso-sigmoid to protect the sigmoid colon in cervical cancer brachytherapy: A technical report.

Purpose: The use of a hydrogel spacer inserted into recto-vaginal fossa is a valuable strategy to mitigate radiation exposure to the rectum during radiation therapy for female pelvic malignancies. However, when the sigmoid colon is in proximity to the cervix, radiation exposure to the sigmoid colon cannot be adequately mitigated with a hydrogel spacer injected into the recto-vaginal fossa. Here, we presented a case, in which a hydrogel spacer was injected into the meso-sigmoid to protect the sigmoid colon. Material and methods: A 73-year-old female diagnosed with T3b stage IIIC2r uterine cervical cancer (FIGO 2018) underwent high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy consisting of 24 Gy in 4 fractions, following concurrent chemoradiotherapy with external beam radiation therapy of 50 Gy in 25 fractions of whole pelvic radiation therapy. In the initial brachytherapy, the sigmoid colon was in close contact with the uterine cervix. In the second brachytherapy, attempts to create a space between the sigmoid colon and uterine cervix using injected artificial ascites were unsuccessful due to rapid absorption of fluid. In the third and fourth brachytherapy fractions, 5 mL of hydrogel was injected into the meso-sigmoid through a pouch of Douglas under trans-rectal ultrasonography guidance. Dose ratio of sigmoid colon D2cc and high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 of each brachytherapy were evaluated. Results: Dose ratio of the sigmoid colon D2cc to HR-CTV D90 was 1.03, 0.43, 0.56, and 0.47 in each respective brachytherapy session, indicating dose escalation to HR-CTV whilst achieving acceptable sigmoid dose with hydrogel spacer injected into the meso-sigmoid. Conclusions: The dose ratio of the sigmoid colon to HR-CTV D90 was decreased by introducing a hydrogel spacer into the meso-sigmoid. In cases where the sigmoid colon is in proximity to the cervical tumor, this novel technique can be considered to achieve better clinical outcomes.