Impact of supplemental parenteral nutrition early during critical illness on invasive fungal infections: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: In the EPaNIC RCT (N=4640), postponing the administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) to beyond 1 week in the intensive care unit (ICU) (late-PN) reduced the number of ICU-acquired infections and the costs for antimicrobial drugs compared with initiation of PN within 24-48 hours of admission (early-PN). In a secondary analysis, we hypothesize that late-PN reduces the odds to acquire an invasive fungal infection (IFI) in the ICU. METHODS: The impact of late-PN (N=2328) versus early-PN (N=2312) on acquired IFI and on the likelihood to acquire an IFI over time was assessed in univariable and multivariable analyses. Subsequently, we performed multivariable analyses to assess the effect of the mean total daily administered calories from admission until day 3, day 5, and day 7 on the likelihood over time of acquiring an IFI. RESULTS: Fewer late-PN patients acquired an IFI compared with early-PN patients (77/2328 versus 112/2312) (p 0.008). After adjusting for risk factors, the odds to acquire an IFI and the likelihood of acquiring an IFI at any time were lower in late-PN (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.90, p 0.009; adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.93, p 0.02). Larger caloric amounts from admission until day 7 were associated with a higher likelihood to acquire an IFI over time (HRadj 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16, p 0.009). CONCLUSION: Postponing PN to beyond 1 week and smaller caloric amounts until day 7 in the ICU reduced ICU-acquired IFIs and the likelihood to develop an IFI over time.

Glucose homeostasis, nutrition and infections during critical illness.

Critical illness is a complex life-threatening disease characterized by profound endocrine and metabolic alterations and by a dysregulated immune response, together contributing to the susceptibility for nosocomial infections and sepsis. Hitherto, two metabolic strategies have been shown to reduce nosocomial infections in the critically ill, namely tight blood glucose control and early macronutrient restriction. Hyperglycaemia, as part of the endocrine-metabolic responses to stress, is present in virtually all critically ill patients and is associated with poor outcome. Maintaining normoglycaemia with intensive insulin therapy has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality, by prevention of vital organ dysfunction and prevention of new severe infections. The favourable effects of this intervention were attributed to the avoidance of glucose toxicity and mitochondrial damage in cells of vital organs and in immune cells. Hyperglycaemia was shown to impair macrophage phagocytosis and oxidative burst capacity, which could be restored by targeting normoglycaemia. An anti-inflammatory effect of insulin may have contributed to prevention of collateral damage to host tissues. Not using parenteral nutrition during the first week in intensive care units, and so accepting a large macronutrient deficit, also resulted in fewer secondary infections, less weakness and accelerated recovery. This was at least partially explained by a suppressive effect of early parenteral nutrition on autophagic processes, which may have jeopardized crucial antimicrobial defences and cell damage removal. The beneficial impact of these two metabolic strategies has opened a new field of research that will allow us to improve the understanding of the determinants of nosocomial infections, sepsis and organ failure in the critically ill.