Lessons learned: drive-through COVID-19 clinic testing during an adaptive epidemic response and a point-of-care test assessment of a computer-read rapid lateral flow immunoassay with fluorescence-based detection.

Background. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated a need for robust SARS-CoV-2 test evaluation infrastructure to underpin biosecurity and protect the population during a pandemic health emergency.Gap statement. The first generation of rapid antigen tests was less accurate than molecular methods due to their inherent sensitivity and specificity shortfalls, compounded by the consequences of self-testing. This created a need for more accurate point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 detection methods.Aim. Here we present the lessons-learned during the COVID-19 emergency response in Western Australia including the detailed set-up, evaluation and operation of rapid antigen test in a state-run drive-through sample collection service during the COVID-19 pandemic after the strict border shutdown ended.Methods. We report a conformity assessment of a novel, second-generation rapid antigen test (Virulizer) comprising a technician-operated rapid lateral flow immunoassay with fluorescence-based detection.Results. The Virulizer rapid antigen test demonstrated up to 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 61.0-100%), 91.94% specificity (95% CI: 82.5-96.5%) and 92.65% accuracy when compared to a commercial PCR assay method. Wide confidence intervals in our series reflect the limits of small sample size. Nevertheless, the Virulizer assay performance was well-suited to point-of-care screening for SARS-CoV-2 in a drive-through clinic setting.Conclusion. The adaptive evaluation process necessary under changing pandemic conditions enabled assessment of a simple sample collection and point-of-care testing process, and showed how this system could be rapidly deployed for SARS-CoV-2 testing, including to regional and remote settings.

Speaking of sepsis: semantics, syntax, and slang.

Medical language is in a constant state of evolution. Its grammar and vocabulary are not fixed by rigid rules. The interdisciplinary field of sepsis has become a meeting point for new insights arising from advances in systems biology, epidemiology, mechanistic understandings of disease process and antimicrobial interventions. This convergence has gained from our recent experience of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 and possibilities inferred from emerging information technology. Biomedical descriptors have diverged along disciplinary lines creating an unfortunate disconnect between clinical and laboratory-based terminology. The resulting confusion between clinically determined sepsis and laboratory verified bloodstream infection raises practical questions that affect daily operational processes in the ward, clinic and laboratory. There is an urgent need to understand how the clinical sepsis pathway and corresponding clinical laboratory workflow can be better aligned as a single coherent entity. There is also an implicit need to understand how this process should produce actionable information in a timely and orderly manner, and identify residual obselete terminology that has crept into common usage. A widely accepted sepsis epistemology, ontology and heuristic will help us improve our clinical management of sepsis.

Case Study: Applying Rapid Flow Cytometry Analysis to CAPD Effluent.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis cases require rapid clinical interventions to ensure the best possible patient outcomes. Culture-dependent microbiology tools are slow and cannot provide clinicians with evidence to guide antimicrobial prescription practices in an appropriate time frame. Genotypic methods have met with limited success for analyzing continuous ambulatory PD effluent, with most centers still relying on culture-dependent microbiology. We present a case study in which we apply flow cytometry techniques to antibiotic-compromised effluent. We demonstrate, with supporting evidence, direct enumeration of bacterial and human immune cells, with results reported within 2 hours of receiving the clinical specimen.

Comparison of methods for AmpC ß-lactamase detection in Enterobacteriaceae.

AmpC ß-lactamases (Bla(AmpC)) are an emerging group of antimicrobial resistance determinants. The lack of an agreed Bla(AmpC) detection method hinders investigation of their epidemiology and understanding of their clinical significance. This study compared the sensitivity and specificity of phenotypic methods of Bla(AmpC) detection in a collection of 246 Enterobacteriaceae with a diverse range of ß-lactam resistance profiles. The Bla(AmpC) screening methods evaluated were based on cephamycin, ceftazidime and cefepime susceptibility. These were compared with Bla(AmpC) screening using conventional ESBL detection methods. The confirmatory methods evaluated were biologically based assays, inhibitor-based assays, an AmpC Etest and a rapid chromogenic assay. A multiplex nucleic acid amplification test and the three-dimensional enzyme extraction assay were used as reference methods. Bla(AmpC) activity was present in 74 isolates. The majority of the enzymes were plasmid-encoded and belonged to the CMY, DHA and EBC families. The screening methods had sensitivities between 47 and 99 % and specificities of 45-95 %. The performance of confirmatory tests varied widely, ranging in sensitivity from 19 % to 97 % and in specificity from 88 % to 100 %. Only the Tris-EDTA and MAST ID D68C disc tests had a sensitivity and a specificity above 90 %. Further investigation is needed to establish the most suitable enzyme substrates, inhibitor types, inhibitor concentrations and interpretative cut-offs in order to refine the inhibitor-based methods. A simple disc-based protocol using cefoxitin non-susceptibility as a screening tool, followed by the Tris-EDTA method for confirmation, detects Bla(AmpC) activity with 95 % sensitivity and 98 % specificity.