Quality assurance in surgical trials of arteriovenous grafts for haemodialysis: A systematic review, a narrative exploration and expert recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Introducing new procedures and challenging established paradigms requires well-designed randomised controlled trials (RCT). However, RCT in surgery present unique challenges with much of treatment tailored to the individual patient circumstances, refined by experience and limited by organisational factors. There has been considerable debate over the outcomes of arteriovenous grafts (AVG) compared to AVF, but any differences may reflect differing practice and potential variability. It is essential, therefore, when considering an RCT of a novel surgical procedure or device that quality assurance (QA) is defined for both the new approach and the comparator. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the QA standards performed in RCT of AVG using a multi-national, multi-disciplinary approach and propose an approach for future RCT. METHOD: The methods of this have been previously registered (PROSPERO: CRD420234284280) and published. In summary, a four-stage review was performed: identification of RCT of AVG, initial review, multidisciplinary appraisal of QA methods and reconciliation. QA measures were sought in four areas - generic, credentialing, standardisation and monitoring, with data abstracted by a multi-national, multi-speciality review body. RESULTS: QA in RCT involving AVG in all four domains is highly variable, often sub-optimally described and has not improved over the past three decades. Few RCT established or defined a pre-RCT level of experience, none documented a pre-trial education programme, or had minimal standards of peri-operative management, no study had a defined pre-trial monitoring programme, and none assessed technical performance. CONCLUSION: QA in RCT is a relatively new area that is expanding to ensure evidence is reliable and reproducible. This review demonstrates that QA has not previously been detailed, but can be measured in surgical RCT of vascular access, and that a four-domain approach can easily be implemented into future RCT.

Quality assurance in surgical trials of arteriovenous grafts for haemodialysis: protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Decisions regarding the optimal vascular access for haemodialysis patients are becoming increasingly complex, and the provision of vascular access is open to variations in systems of care as well as surgical experience and practice. Two main surgical options are recognised: arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft (AVG). All recommendations regarding AVG are based on a limited number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). It is essential that when considering an RCT of a surgical procedure, an appropriate definition of quality assurance (QA) is made for both the new approach and the comparator, otherwise replication of results or implementation into clinical practice may differ from published results. The aim of this systematic review will be to assess the methodological quality of RCT involving AVG, and the QA measures implemented in delivering interventions in these trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be followed. A systematic search will be performed of the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify relevant literature. Studies will be selected by title and abstract review, followed by a full-text review using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data collected will pertain to generic measures of QA, credentialing of investigators, procedural standardisation and performance monitoring. Trial methodology will be compared against a standardised template developed by a multinational, multispecialty review body with experience in vascular access. A narrative approach will be taken to synthesise and report data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as it is a protocol for a systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, with the ultimate aim of providing recommendations for future RCT of AVG design.

Recruitment into randomised trials of arteriovenous grafts: A systematic review.

Although randomised controlled trials (RCT) are considered the optimal form of evidence, there are relatively few in surgery. Surgical RCT are particularly likely to be discontinued with poor recruitment cited as a leading reason. Surgical RCT present challenges over and above those seen in drug trials as the treatment under study may vary between procedures, between surgeons in one unit, and between units in multi-centred RCT. The most contentious and debated area of vascular access remains the role of arteriovenous grafts, and thus the quality of the data that is used to support opinions, guidelines and recommendations is critical. The aim of this review was to determine the extent of variation in the planning and recruitment in all RCT involving AVG. The findings of this are stark: there have been only 31 RCT performed in 31 years, the vast majority of which exhibited major limitations severe enough to undermine the results. This underlines the need for better quality RCT and data, and further inform the design of future studies. Perhaps most fundamental is the planning for a RCT that accounts for the intended population, the uptake of a RCT and the attrition for the significant co-morbidity in this population.

Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 6 Reveals a Potent Immunosuppressant Effect in Models of Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Current transplant immunosuppression regimens have numerous limitations. Recent evidence suggests histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) may represent a class of drug with immunosuppressive properties. This study compares cyclosporin A (CyA) with the pan-HDACi suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) and a novel HDAC6-specific inhibitor (KA1010) in models of alloreactivity. METHODS: Proliferation and mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR)-based assays were used to determine the immunosuppressive effect of compounds, and a murine model of allogeneic skin transplantation was adopted to assess the in vivo effects of HDAC6 inhibition. RESULTS: KA1010 displayed superior inhibitory effects on the activation of peripheral mononuclear cells using in vitro models of transplantation. In a 1-way MLR, KA1010 (5 µΜ) reduced parent cell proliferation from 92% to 64% (P = 0.001). A 2-way MLR, adopting IFN-γ production as a marker of alloresponse, resulting in up to 91% reduction. Dose-response curves revealed dose-dependent profiles with greater potency of HDACis over CyA (IC50 values of 82.0 nM and 13.4 nM for KA1010 and SAHA).Mice treated with KA1010 displayed no significant features of skin allograft rejection upon histological analysis at 70 days and graft survival of 80% in subjects treated with 160 mg/kg. Immunological assessment, revealed a significant increase in CD4CD25forkhead box P3 regulatory T cells (from 18% to 25%, P = 0.0002) and a corresponding reduction in CD4 T cells (from 58% to 42%, P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: HDAC6 may represent an optimal target for future immunosuppressant therapeutics with a particular role in transplantation. In this article, we have demonstrated a superior immunosuppressive effect of KA1010 over both CyA and SAHA, in the models of allotransplantation adopted.

The brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula: effect of patient variables.

PURPOSE: The hemodialysis population is constantly expanding as patients on dialysis have increased longevity and the number of kidneys available for transplantation remains static (1). After radiocephalic and brachiocephalic fistulas have been exhausted the use of the autologous brachiobasilic fistula (BBAVF) should be considered prior to use of a synthetic graft. We present our single center experience of 140 brachiobasilic fistulas in a five-year period and examine any factors that influence patency and long-term function. METHODS: Patients who had undergone formation of a BBAVF between January 2004 and January 2009 were identified; a review of all case notes and databases was undertaken. Details on demographics, cause of renal failure, co-morbidities (including diabetes, cardiac morbidity, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease), dialysis status at the time of fistula creation, hemoglobin, anti-coagulation regimens, and complications from surgery were recorded. RESULTS: Patency (defined as use of AVF for dialysis) was 83% at 3 months, 77% at 6 months, and 69% at 12 months. Length of patency ranged from 0 to 1918 days (at study cut-off) with a mean patency of 532 days. Factors found to significantly affect fistula patency included age over 60 (P=<0.001) and presence of peripheral vascular disease (P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Our brachiobasilic fistula patency rates are comparable with published literature and other fistulas. Within our population patient variables including age over 60 and the presence of peripheral vascular disease are associated with worse outcomes as would be expected. In spite of these factors we feel the brachiobasilic fistula is an excellent option for patients with more challenging access and should certainly be undertaken prior to the use of prosthetic grafts.