No effects of cerebellar transcranial random noise stimulation on cerebellar brain inhibition, visuomotor learning, and pupil diameter.

Cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) is an inhibitory output from the cerebellum to the primary motor cortex, which is decreased in early motor learning. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation to induce brain plastic changes; however, the effects of cerebellar tRNS on CBI and motor learning have not been investigated yet to our knowledge. In this study, whether cerebellar tRNS decreases CBI and improves motor learning was examined, and pupil diameter was measured to examine physiological changes due to the effect of tRNS on motor learning. Thirty-four healthy subjects were assigned to either the cerebellar tRNS group or the Sham group. The subjects performed visuomotor tracking task with ten trials each in the early and late learning stages while receiving the stimulus intervention. CBI and motor evoked potentials were measured before the learning task, after the early learning stage, and after the late learning stage, and pupil diameter was measured during the task. There was no change in CBI in both groups. No group differences in motor learning rates were observed at any learning stages. Pupil diameter was smaller in the late learning stage than in the early learning stage in both groups. The cerebellar tRNS was suggested not to induce changes in CBI and improvement in motor learning, and it did not affect pupil diameter.

Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation to the supplementary motor area on motor learning.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a noninvasive method for brain stimulation that artificially modulates oscillatory brain activity in the cortical region directly beneath the electrodes by applying a weak alternating current. Beta (ß) oscillatory activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) is involved in motor planning and maintenance, whereas gamma (γ) oscillatory activity is involved in the updating of motor plans. However, the effect of applying tACS to the SMA on motor learning has not yet been investigated. This study assessed the effects of applying tACS to the SMA on motor learning. Forty-two right-handed healthy adults (age 20.6 ± 0.5 years, 24 men and 18 women) were included. Motor learning was assessed using a visuomotor tracking task with pinch tension of the right thumb and right forefinger. Each trial lasted 60 s, and the error rates were measured. Conductive rubber electrodes were attached to the SMA and the left shoulder for tACS. Stimulation was applied at an intensity of 1.0 mA and frequencies of 70 and 20 Hz in the γ-tACS and ß-tACS treatment groups, respectively. The sham group was only administered a fade-in/out. The visuomotor tracking task was performed for 10 trials before tACS and 10 trials after tACS. Two trials were conducted on the following day to determine motor skill retention. The average deviation measured during 60 s was considered the error value. Pre-stimulation learning rate was calculated as the change in error rate. Post-stimulation learning rate and retention rate were calculated as the change in error rate after stimulation and on the day after stimulation, respectively. In both the stimulation groups, differences in pre-stimulation learning, post-stimulation learning, and retention rates were not significant. However, in the γ-tACS group, baseline performance and pre-stimulation learning rate were positively correlated with post-stimulation learning rate. Therefore, applying γ-tACS to the SMA can increase post-stimulation learning rate in participants exhibiting low baseline performance and high pre-stimulation learning rate. Our findings suggest that motor learning can be effectively enhanced by applying γ-tACS to the SMA based on an individual's motor and learning abilities.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation does not affect microscale learning.

A theory has been posited that microscale learning, which involves short intervals of a few seconds during explicit motor skill learning, considerably enhances performance. This phenomenon correlates with diminished beta-band activity in the frontal and parietal regions. However, there is a lack of neurophysiological studies regarding the relationship between microscale learning and implicit motor skill learning. In the present study, we aimed to determine the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) during short rest periods on microscale learning in an implicit motor task. We investigated the effects of 20-Hz ß-tACS delivered during short rest periods while participants performed an implicit motor task. In Experiments 1 and 2, ß-tACS targeted the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the right frontoparietal network, respectively. The participants performed a finger-tapping task using their nondominant left hand, and microscale learning was separately analyzed for micro-online gains (MOnGs) and micro-offline gains (MOffGs). Contrary to our expectations, ß-tACS exhibited no statistically significant effects on MOnGs or MOffGs in either Experiment 1 or Experiment 2. In addition, microscale learning during the performance of the implicit motor task was improved by MOffGs in the early learning phase and by MOnGs in the late learning phase. These results revealed that the stimulation protocol employed in this study did not affect microscale learning, indicating a novel aspect of microscale learning in implicit motor tasks. This is the first study to examine microscale learning in implicit motor tasks and may provide baseline information that will be useful in future studies.

Prism adaptation during balance standing enhances the transfer after-effect on standing postural displacement.

Prism adaptation (PA) is a sensorimotor adaptation paradigm that induces after-effects of adapted tasks and transfer after-effects of non-adapted tasks. Previous studies showed inconsistent results of transfer after-effects of adaptation to a leftward prismatic shift on the center-of-pressure (COP) displacement during eyes-closed standing. Challenging balance during PA increases the generalization of the internal model to untrained movements, resulting in increased transfer after-effects. The present study aimed to investigate the transfer after-effects of PA with challenging balance on standing postural displacement. Thirty healthy young adults were grouped into floor standing and balance-disc standing groups during leftward PA and pointed to targets while adapting to a leftward visual shift (30 diopters) for 20 min. After leftward PA, both groups had a significant rightward displacement of straight-ahead pointing with eyes closed. However, the COP position during eyes-closed standing with feet-closed was significantly displaced rightward only in the balance-disc standing group after leftward PA. These results show that challenging balance might increase the somatosensory and proprioceptive information for standing postural control, resulting in increased transfer after-effects of leftward PA on rightward standing postural displacement.

Effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on functional reach test.

Balance disorders are a risk factor for falls in older individuals, and an increased center of pressure (COP) sway path length during standing and decreased reach distance in the functional reach test (FRT) predispose them to falls. Reportedly, noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) reduces COP sway path length during standing in young and community-dwelling older individuals and suggested to be a promising approach to improve balance function. However, the effect of nGVS on FRT remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the effect of nGVS on the FRT reach distance. This study has a cross-over design and included 20 healthy young adults. Interventions under nGVS (stimulation intensity: 0.2 mA) and sham (stimulation intensity: 0 mA) conditions were randomly administered to each participant. The participants underwent COP sway during standing measurements and FRT pre-intervention and post-intervention under each condition, and COP sway path length and the FRT reach distance were calculated. Statistical analysis revealed a significant decrease in post-intervention COP sway path length compared with pre-intervention COP sway path length under the nGVS condition. Conversely, the FRT reach distance remained the same under both nGVS and sham conditions. Thus, nGVS may improve the standing balance function but cannot change the FRT reach distance in healthy young individuals.

Transcranial direct current stimulation over the right intraparietal sulcus improves response inhibition.

Various situations in our everyday life call for response inhibition, mechanisms deputed to outright stop an ongoing course of action. This function reportedly involves the activity of the right intraparietal sulcus (rIPS). This study aimed to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention to the rIPS alters response inhibition. We investigated 15 healthy adults performing a stop signal task before and after tDCS intervention. We applied tDCS with 1.5 mA to the rIPS directly above (P4) and the left supraorbital area for 20 min. The stimulation conditions involved Anodal, cathodal, and pseudo-stimulation. Each participant performed a stop signal task under all stimulation conditions. The changes in response inhibition function were evaluated by comparing the stop signal reaction times (SSRT) before and after the tDCS intervention. Under the Anodal condition, SSRT was significantly shorter after than before the intervention (p = 0.014). Under the Anodal and Cathodal conditions, we could observe a significantly positive correlation between the SSRT before the tDCS intervention and the difference in SSRT before and after tDCS intervention (Anodal condition: r = 0.823, p < 0.001; Cathodal condition: r = 0.831, p < 0.001). No such correlation could be found under the Sham condition. In summary, this study demonstrated that Anodal-tDCS intervention for rIPS improves response-inhibitory function and the stimulus effect depends on the response-inhibitory function of the participant prior to stimulation.

Changes in excitability and GABAergic neuronal activity of the primary somatosensory cortex after motor learning.

Introduction: It is widely known that motor learning changes the excitability of the primary motor cortex. More recently, it has been shown that the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) also plays an important role in motor learning, but the details have not been fully examined. Therefore, we investigated how motor skill training affects somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in 30 neurologically healthy subjects. Methods: SEP N20/P25_component and N20/P25 SEP paired-pulse depression (SEP-PPD) were assessed before and immediately after complex or simple visuomotor tasks. Results: Motor learning was induced more efficiently by the complex visuomotor task than by the simple visuomotor task. Both the N20/P25 SEP amplitude and N20/P25 SEP-PPD increased significantly immediately after the complex visuomotor task, but not after the simple visuomotor task. Furthermore, the altered N20/P25 SEP amplitude was associated with an increase in motor learning efficiency. Conclusion: These results suggest that motor learning modulated primary somatosensory cortex excitability.

Effect of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex on Tactile Spatial Discrimination Performance.

The intraparietal sulcus region, which is part of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), has been shown to play an important role in discriminating object shapes using the fingers. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) are noninvasive strategies widely used to modulate neural activity in cortical regions. Therefore, we investigated the effects of tRNS and anodal tPCS applied to left or right PPC on the tactile discrimination performance of the right index finger in 20 neurologically healthy subjects. A grating orientation task (GOT) was performed before and immediately after delivering tRNS (stimulus frequency 0.1-640 Hz) in Experiment 1 or anodal tPCS (pulse width 50 ms and inter-pulse interval 5 ms) in Experiment 2. Performing tRNS over the right PPC significantly improved discrimination performance on the GOT. Subjects were classified into low and high baseline performance groups. Conducting tRNS over the left PPC significantly reduced the GOT discrimination performance in the high-performance group. By contrast, anodal tPCS delivered to the PPC of the left and right hemispheres had no significant effect on the tactile GOT discrimination performance of the right hand. We show that transcranial electric stimulation over the PPC may improve tactile perception but the effect depends on stimulus modality, parameters, and on the stimulated hemisphere.

Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over the cerebellum differentially affect the cerebellum and primary motor cortex pathway.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) are two methods of noninvasively modulating cortical excitability below the placed electrode. Anodal tDCS over the cerebellum has been shown to modulate cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI), which is an indication of cerebellar excitability, but does not alter contralateral M1 excitability. However, the effect of tRNS over the cerebellum has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was thus to compare the effects of tDCS and tRNS over the cerebellum on CBI and the contralateral motor evoked potentials (MEPs), as well as on the relationship between CBI and contralateral MEPs. A total of 15 healthy subjects completed four-condition transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) interventions (anodal tDCS_1 mA, anodal tDCS_2 mA, tRNS, and Sham) on separate days. CBI and MEPs were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) before and after the 20 min tES intervention. For all conditions, there were no significant differences before and after tES in CBI or contralateral MEPs. In contrast, following tRNS, changes in CBI and MEPs were significantly correlated. No significant correlations were found in the other three conditions, indicating that cerebellar tDCS and tRNS have distinct effects on the relationship between CBI and contralateral MEPs. Taken together, these findings suggest that cerebellar tRNS may modulate the cerebellar to contralateral M1 pathway.

Gamma-transcranial alternating current stimulation on the cerebellum and supplementary motor area improves bimanual motor skill.

BACKGROUND: Bimanual movements require sophisticated coordination of both hands. For improving bimanual motor skills, previous studies employed non-invasive brain stimulation methods to evaluate their effects on symmetrical and/or gross bimanual motor skills. However, asymmetrical and elaborate movements were not sufficiently improved. Studies using non-invasive brain stimulation have examined the effects of stimulation on the primary and supplementary motor areas (SMA), but not on the cerebellar regions. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether the transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), which modulates oscillations in the cerebral cortex, of the cerebellum and SMA improves bimanual movements. METHODS: Bimanual movements were assessed in 22 healthy young adults (mean age: 21.3 ± 1.5 years) via 13 trials of the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT). A DC stimulator delivered 70 Hz tACS (γ-tACS) at 1 mA intensity via electrodes placed over the SMA, cerebellum and left shoulder in 5 s fade in/out cycles of 5 s for a total stimulus duration of 60 s for in each trial. Four stimulation conditions were applied and compared for statistical differences. RESULTS: The γ-tACS of the cerebellum, γ-tACS of the SMA and simultaneous stimulation of both regions caused significant improvement in PPT performance scores. The γ-tACS of the cerebellum improved PPT performance in all subjects and was more effective than the γ-tACS of the SMA. CONCLUSION: The γ-tACS of the cerebellum effectively and reliably improves complex bimanual motor skills. Although the neural mechanisms of the stimulation effect remain unclear, these results can guide the future development of new stimulation methods for improving bimanual motor skills.

Sleep affects the motor memory of basketball shooting skills in young amateurs.

Sleep has long been shown as important for memory processing and retention, and has recently been implicated in motor memory consolidation. However, it is not known whether sports skills, including basketball shooting skills, are also affected by sleep in young, healthy individuals. Therefore, we investigated whether sleep before and after basketball shooting skill training affected the acquisition and retention of shooting skills. This study included 19 healthy male subjects who participated in a basketball shooting skill training session (100 shots) and a retention test performed 2 days later (30 shots). The learning and retention indices were calculated using performance scores that evaluated each subject's shooting skills. A wearable activity tracker was used to measure sleep parameters for 4 consecutive days, 2 days before and 2 days after training. We discovered the relationship between sleep duration before and after training and retention of shooting skills (sleep duration before training; p = 0.044, r = 0.467, sleep duration after training; p = 0.006, r = 0.606). The retention index for the subgroup with long sleep duration before and after training was significantly higher than that for the subgroup with short sleep duration before and after training, respectively (p = 0.021 for both). There was no significant relationship between learning index and each sleep parameter. Our results demonstrated that sleep duration before and after training was related to retention of shooting skills following basketball shooting skills training.

Auditory change-related cortical response is associated with hypervigilance to pain in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic pain exhibit hypervigilance (heightened responsiveness to stimuli) to innocuous auditory stimuli as well as noxious stimuli. "Generalized hypervigilance" suggests that individuals who show heightened responsiveness to one sensory system also show hypervigilance to other modalities. However, research exploring the existence of generalized hypervigilance in healthy subjects is limited. METHODS: We investigated whether hypervigilance to pain is associated with auditory stimuli in healthy subjects using the pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ) and auditory change-related cortical responses (ACRs). ACRs are thought to reflect a change detection system, based on preceding sensory memory. We recorded ACRs under conditions that varied in terms of the accumulation of sensory memory as follows: short-ACR, with short preceding continuous stimuli and long-ACR, with long preceding continuous stimuli. In addition, the attention to pain (PVAQ-AP) and attention to changes in pain (PVAQ-ACP) subscales were evaluated. RESULTS: Amplitudes of long-ACR showed significant positive correlations with PVAQ-ACP, whereas those of short-ACR did not show any significant correlations. CONCLUSIONS: Generalized hypervigilance may be observed even in healthy subjects. ACR may be a useful index to evaluate the hypervigilance state in the human brain.

The Number or Type of Stimuli Used for Somatosensory Stimulation Affected the Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability.

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) a few milliseconds after this cortical activity following electrical stimulation (ES) result in an inhibition comparable to that by TMS alone; this is called short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI). Cortical activity is observed after mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) and is affected by the number of stimuli by ES. We determined the effects of somatosensory stimulus methods and multiple conditioning stimuli on SAI in 19 participants. In experiment 1, the interstimulus intervals between the conditioning stimulation and TMS were 25, 27 and 29 ms for ES and 28, 30 and 32 ms for MS. In experiment 2, we used 1, 2, 3 and 4 conditioning stimulations of ES and MS. The interstimulus interval between the ES or MS and TMS was 27 or 30 ms, respectively. In experiment 1, MEPs were significantly decreased in both the ES and MS conditions. In experiment 2, MEPs after ES were significantly decreased in all conditions. Conversely, MEPs after MS were significantly decreased after one stimulus and increased after four stimulations, indicating the SAI according to the number of stimuli. Therefore, the somatosensory stimulus methods and multiple conditioning stimuli affected the SAI.

The intervention of mechanical tactile stimulation modulates somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and cortical oscillations.

The different cortical activity evoked by a mechanical tactile stimulus depends on tactile stimulus patterns, which demonstrates that simple stimuli (i.e., global synchronous stimulation the stimulus area) activate the primary somatosensory cortex alone, whereas complex stimuli (i.e., stimulation while moving in the stimulus area) activate not only the primary somatosensory cortex but also the primary motor area. Here, we investigated whether the effects of a repetitive mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) and cortical oscillations depend on MS patterns. This single-blinded study included 15 healthy participants. Two types interventions of MS lasting 20 min were used: a repetitive global tactile stimulation (RGS) was used to stimulate the finger by using 24 pins installed on a finger pad, whereas a sequential stepwise displacement tactile stimulation (SSDS) was used to stimulate the finger by moving a row of six pins between the left and right sides on the finger pad. Each parameter was measured pre- and post-intervention. The P50m amplitude of the SEF was increased by RGS and decreased by SSDS. The modulation of P50m was correlated with its amplitude before RGS and with the modulation of beta band oscillation at the resting state after SSDS. This study showed that the effects of a 20-min MS on SEFs and cortical oscillations depend on mechanical tactile stimulus patterns. Moreover, our results offer potential for the modulation of tactile functions and selection of stimulation patterns according to cortical states.

Region-Specific Effects of 10-Hz Transcranial Alternate Current Stimulation Over the Left Posterior Parietal Cortex and Primary Somatosensory Area on Tactile Two-Point Discrimination Threshold.

Changes in α-band cortical oscillatory activity (8-13 Hz) affect perception; however, how these changes in the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and primary somatosensory cortex (S1), which play different roles in determining the two-point discrimination (TPD) threshold, affect TPD threshold remains unelucidated. Therefore, to determine TPD threshold, we aimed to investigate the function of the left PPC and S1 by applying α-band transcranial alternating current stimulation (α-tACS; 10 Hz). TPD threshold was examined at the pad of the right index finger, contralateral to the stimulation site, in 17 healthy adults using a custom-made, computer-controlled, two-point tactile stimulation device, with random application of either active or sham α-tACS over the left PPC (Experiment 1) and left S1 (Experiment 2). Then, 50% TPD threshold was obtained in the active and sham conditions via logistic regression analysis. Afterward, we compared the difference between the active and sham conditions at 50% TPD threshold in each region and found that α-tACS reduced TPD threshold when applied over the left PPC (P = 0.010); however, its effect was insignificant when applied over the left S1 (P = 0.74). Moreover, a comparison of the change in 50% TPD threshold among the regions revealed that α-tACS applied over the left PPC significantly reduced TPD threshold compared with that applied over the left S1 (P = 0.003). Although we did not reveal the actual changes in cortical activity induced by α-tACS, this is the first empirical evidence that α-tACS applied over the left PPC and left S1 exerts region-specific effects on determining TPD threshold assessed in the contralateral index finger pad by stimulation.

α-tACS over the somatosensory cortex enhances tactile spatial discrimination in healthy subjects with low alpha activity.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous oscillations in the somatosensory cortex, especially of the alpha (8 - 14 Hz) and gamma (60 - 80 Hz) frequencies, affect tactile perception; moreover, these oscillations can be selectively modulated by frequency-matched transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the basis of ongoing oscillatory brain activity. To examine whether tACS can actually improve tactile perception via alpha and gamma modulation, we measured the effects of 10-Hz and 70-Hz tACS (α- and γ-tACS) on the left somatosensory cortex on right-finger tactile spatial orientation discrimination, and the associations between performance changes and individual alpha and gamma activities. METHODS: Fifteen neurologically healthy subjects were recruited into this study. Electroencephalography (EEG) was performed before the first day, to assess the normal alpha- and gamma-activity levels. A grating orientation discrimination task was performed before and during 10-Hz and 70-Hz tACS. RESULTS: The 10-Hz tACS protocol decreased the grating orientation discrimination threshold, primarily in subjects with low alpha event-related synchronization (ERS). In contrast, the 70-Hz tACS had no effect on the grating orientation discrimination threshold. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that 10-Hz tACS can improve tactile orientation discrimination in subjects with low alpha activity. Alpha-frequency tACS may help identify the contributions of these oscillations to other neurophysiological and pathological processes.

Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation effect on center of pressure sway during one-legged standing.

Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) involves the application of a weak, noisy, electrical current to the vestibular end organs and their afferent nerves, through electrodes placed bilaterally over the mastoid process. Center of pressure (COP) sway was shown to decrease during nGVS under conditions of static standing posture. However, whether nGVS can improve balance functions other than the static standing posture remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of nGVS on COP sway during one-legged standing. We randomly assigned 36 participants to either a control group (sham stimulation), a 0.2 mA group (nGVS at 0.2 mA), or a 0.4 mA group (nGVS at 0.4 mA). All participants were measured for COP sway standing on one leg, with open eyes, both before and during stimulation. In the 0.2 mA group, the sway path length, mediolateral mean velocity, and anteroposterior mean velocity decreased during stimulation compared with before stimulation. Conversely, no significant differences in COP sway were detected for either the control group or the 0.4 mA group. The stimulation effects for all COP sway parameters were significantly higher in the 0.2 mA group than in either the control group or the 0.4 mA group. The results of this study suggested that nGVS not only decreases COP sway during static standing postures but can also reduce COP sway during one-legged standing.

Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation.

Balance disorders are a risk factor for falls in the elderly population. Balance control involving the complex interaction among nervous, muscular, and sensory systems should be maintained to keep an upright posture and prevent falls. Vestibular sensation is one of the main senses essential for postural control. Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) is a noninvasive stimulation method for vestibular organs. Recently, it has received increasing attention for the treatment of balance disorders. However, the effect of balance disorders on stimulus effect during the implementation of nGVS remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects of different floor surface and visual conditions on the stimulus effects of the nGVS intervention. In this study, two experiments were conducted with 24 participants (12 each for Experiments 1 and 2). In Experiment 1, nGVS (0.4 mA; 0.1-640 Hz) was performed in the open-eyes standing position on a solid surface (nGVS condition) and in the closed-eye standing position on a foam rubber (nGVS + foam rubber condition). In Experiment 2, sham stimulation was performed under the same conditions as in Experiment 1, except for nGVS. Center of pressure (COP) sway was measured in all participants with them standing with open eyes at Pre and Post-1 (immediately after the intervention) and Post-2 (10 min after the measurement of post-1). In Experiment 1, under the nGVS condition, COP sway was significantly reduced in Post-1 and Post-2 compared with Pre. However, no significant difference was observed among Pre, Post-1, and Post-2 under the nGVS + foam rubber condition. Furthermore, the intervention effect was significantly greater in the nGVS condition than in the nGVS + foam rubber condition. In contrast, in Experiment 2, the COP sway did not significantly differ among Pre, Post-1, and Post-2 under either condition. Based on the results of this study, nGVS was found to be effective with open-eyes standing on a solid surface.

Effects of stimulating the supplementary motor area with a transcranial alternating current for bimanual movement performance.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can regulate the frequency of neuronal activity in the cerebral cortex. Beta (ß) activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) is involved in motor planning and maintenance while gamma (γ) activity is involved in updating motor plans. We investigated the effect of tACS in the ß- and γ-bands (ß-tACS and γ- tACS) applied to the SMA on bimanual movement performance. This study included 32 right-handed healthy participants performing a Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) during the administration of either ß-tACS (20 Hz), γ-tACS (80 Hz), or sham stimulation over the SMA. Each participant performed nine PPT trials during each stimulation condition. The linear approximation of the number of parts and their differences for the 9 trials performed by each participant was calculated. A significant positive correlation was found between the difference from linear approximation for the ß-tACS condition and the intercept of the linear approximation (p = 0.007, Pearson's r = 0.464), and significant negative correlation was found for the γ-tACS condition (p = 0.012, Pearson's r = -0.438). In the low-performance subgroup, the mean values of the difference from linear approximation under the γ-tACS condition was significantly larger than that under the ß-tACS condition (p = 0.048). These results were opposite for the high-performance subgroup (p = 0.002) and sham group (p = 0.014). We demonstrated that the effect of tACS over the SMA depended on the stimulus frequency and the participant's motor performance and may modulate the maintenance and updating of motor plans.

Effects on motor learning of transcranial alternating current stimulation applied over the primary motor cortex and cerebellar hemisphere.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive method of brain stimulation that modulates oscillatory neural activity in the cortical area under the electrodes. Gamma (γ)-tACS applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellar hemisphere is known to improve motor performance; however, it is not yet known whether it affects motor learning. Thus, here we investigated whether γ-tACS applied over the M1 and cerebellar hemisphere affects motor learning. This study involved 30 healthy subjects (14 females, 16 males) performing a visuomotor control task (eight trials) during an administration of either γ-tACS or a sham stimulation (15 subjects per condition) over their right M1 and left cerebellar hemisphere. Each subject performed five trials after 24 h. The motor learning efficiency, motor learning retention and re-motor learning efficiency in each condition were compared. The motor learning retention in the γ-tACS condition was significantly higher than that in the sham condition (p = 0.031). Thus, subjects who were administered γ-tACS maintained their motor performance the next day better than sham-stimulated subjects. There was no significant difference between the conditions in the motor learning efficiency and those in the re-motor learning efficiency. Our results demonstrate that γ-tACS administered over the M1 and cerebellar hemisphere during a motor learning task can enhance motor learning retention.