Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
1.
Psychiatr Serv ; 74(4): 349-357, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36695012

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite robust evidence for efficacy of measurement-based care (MBC) in behavioral health care, studies suggest that adoption of MBC is limited in practice. A survey from Blue Cross-Blue Shield of North Carolina was sent to behavioral health care providers (BHCPs) about their use of MBC, beliefs about MBC, and perceived barriers to its adoption. METHODS: The authors distributed the survey by using professional networks and snowball sampling. Provider and clinical practice characteristics were collected. Numerical indices of barriers to MBC use were created. Ordered logistic regression models were used to identify associations among practice and provider characteristics, barriers to MBC use, and level of MBC use. RESULTS: Of the 922 eligible BHCPs who completed the survey, 426 (46%) reported using MBC with at least half of their patients. Providers were more likely to report MBC use if they were part of a large group practice, had MBC training, had more weekly care hours, or practiced in nonmetropolitan settings. Physicians, self-reported generalists, more experienced providers, and those who did not accept insurance were less likely to report MBC use. Low perceived clinical utility was the barrier most strongly associated with less frequent use of MBC. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence exists for efficacy of MBC in behavioral health care, less than half of BHCPs reported using MBC with at least half of their patients, and low perceived clinical utility of MBC was strongly associated with lower MBC use. Implementation strategies that attempt to change negative attitudes toward MBC may effectively target this barrier to use.


Asunto(s)
Médicos , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , North Carolina , Autoinforme , Modelos Logísticos
2.
QJM ; 116(2): 143, 2023 Feb 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35169845
3.
QJM ; 116(1): 85, 2023 02 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092296
5.
QJM ; 116(1): 7-25, 2023 Feb 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35238384

RESUMEN

Variable clinical criteria taken by medical professionals across the world for myocarditis following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination along with wide variation in treatment necessitates understanding and reviewing the same. A systematic review was conducted to elucidate the clinical findings, laboratory parameters, treatment and outcomes of individuals with myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination after registering with PROSPERO. Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, LitCovid, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Web of Science were searched. A total of 85 articles encompassing 2184 patients were analysed. It was a predominantly male (73.4%) and young population (mean age: 25.5 ± 14.2 years) with most having taken an mRNA-based vaccine (99.4%). The mean duration from vaccination to symptom onset was 4.01 ± 6.99 days. Chest pain (90.1%), dyspnoea (25.7%) and fever (11.9%) were the most common symptoms. Only 2.3% had comorbidities. CRP was elevated in 83.3% and cardiac troponin in 97.6% patients. An abnormal ECG was reported in 979/1313 (74.6%) patients with ST-segment elevation being most common (34.9%). Echocardiographic data were available for 1243 patients (56.9%), of whom 288 (23.2%) had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (76.5%), steroids (14.1%) followed by colchicine (7.3%) were used for treatment. Only 6 patients died among 1317 of whom data were available. Myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination is often mild, seen more commonly in young healthy males and is followed by rapid recovery with conservative treatment. The emergence of this adverse event calls for harmonizing case definitions and definite treatment guidelines, which require wider research.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Miocarditis , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Femenino , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Miocarditis/etiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda
11.
Psychiatr Q ; 93(1): 297-310, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34536188

RESUMEN

Emergency department (ED) psychiatrists face the consequential decision to pursue involuntary inpatient psychiatric admission. Research on the relationship between patient characteristics and the decision to pursue involuntary psychiatric admission is limited. Using data from 2017 to 2018 at an urban Los Angeles hospital, we used generalized linear mixed effects models to compare patients who were involuntarily admitted to inpatient psychiatry to patients who were discharged from the ED. Of 2,448 patients included in the study, 1,217 (49.7%) were involuntarily admitted to inpatient psychiatry and 1,231 (50.3%) were discharged. After controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, admitted patients were more likely to have been brought in by police, have had an organized suicide plan or recent attempt, physical signs of harm, psychosis, depression or hopelessness, lack social support, have diagnoses of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, and be administered injectable psychotropic medications. Stimulant use, a diagnosis of anxiety or developmental disorders, and recent medical ED utilization were associated with discharge. Psychiatrists pursued involuntarily psychiatric hospitalization based on factors potentially indicative of dangerousness, leaving patients, particularly those with recent substance use, without immediate access to treatment. Policies should focus on increasing follow up to high quality, voluntary outpatient mental health care.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Trastornos Mentales , Psiquiatría , Trastornos Psicóticos , Internamiento Obligatorio del Enfermo Mental , Hospitalización , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia
14.
Psychiatr Q ; 92(2): 489-499, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32812141

RESUMEN

It has been suggested that psychiatric multimorbidity may better characterize severely impaired psychiatric patients than individual severe mental illness (SMI) diagnoses, and that these patients may be better served by centers offering integrated co-located, psychiatric and social services than in conventional clinics providing one-to-one care. We tested the hypothesis that multimorbidity is a critical characteristic of Veterans treated at a co-located multi-service Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) program originally established to treat Veterans living with SMI. Administrative data from the VA Connecticut Health Care System from fiscal year 2012 were used to compare veterans using diverse mental health and social services at the Errera Community Care Center (ECCC), an integrated "one-stop shop" for SMI veterans, and those seen exclusively at standard outpatient mental health clinics. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to compare groups on demographic characteristics, psychiatric and medical diagnoses, service utilization, and psychotropic medication fills. Results: Of the 11,092 veterans included in the study, 2281 (20.6%) had been treated at the ECCC and 8811 (79.4%) had not. Multivariable analysis highlighted the association of treatment in the ECCC and younger age, lower income, homelessness, and especially multimorbidity including both multiple substance use and multiple psychiatric diagnoses. Programs originally designed to address the diverse needs of patients living with SMI and homelessness may be usefully characterized as treating patients with psychiatric multimorbidity, a term of greater clinical relevance. Effectiveness research is needed to evaluate the one-stop shop approach to their treatment.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Enfermos Mentales/psicología , Multimorbilidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Veteranos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
15.
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci ; 476(2239): 20190790, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32831602

RESUMEN

Co-morbidity between medical and psychiatric conditions is commonly considered between individual pairs of conditions. However, an important alternative is to consider all conditions as part of a co-morbidity network, which encompasses all interactions between patients and a healthcare system. Analysis of co-morbidity networks could detect and quantify general tendencies not observed by smaller-scale studies. Here, we investigate the co-morbidity network derived from longitudinal healthcare records from approximately 1 million United States military veterans, a population disproportionately impacted by psychiatric morbidity and psychological trauma. Network analyses revealed marked and heterogenous patterns of co-morbidity, including a multi-scale community structure composed of groups of commonly co-morbid conditions. Psychiatric conditions including posttraumatic stress disorder were strong predictors of future medical morbidity. Neurological conditions and conditions associated with chronic pain were particularly highly co-morbid with psychiatric conditions. Across conditions, the degree of co-morbidity was positively associated with mortality. Co-morbidity was modified by biological sex and could be used to predict future diagnostic status, with out-of-sample prediction accuracy of 90-92%. Understanding complex patterns of disease co-morbidity has the potential to lead to improved designs of systems of care and the development of targeted interventions that consider the broader context of mental and physical health.

16.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1311, 2020 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32859202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since deinstitutionalization in the 1950s-1970s, public mental health care has changed its focus from asylums to general hospitals, outpatient clinics and specialized community-based programs addressing both clinical and social determinants of mental health. Analysis of the place of community-based programs within a comprehensive health system such as the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) may illuminate the role of social forces in shaping contemporary public mental health systems. METHODS: National VHA administrative data were used to compare veterans who exclusively received outpatient clinic care to those receiving four types of specialized community-based services, addressing: 1) functional disabilities from severe mental illness (SMI), 2) justice system involvement, 3) homelessness, and 4) vocational rehabilitation. Bivariate comparisons and multinomial logistic regression analyses compared groups on demographics, diagnoses, service use, and psychiatric prescription fills. RESULTS: An hierarchical classification of 1,386,487 Veterans who received specialty mental health services from VHA in Fiscal Year 2012, showed 1,134,977 (81.8%) were seen exclusively in outpatient clinics; 27,931 (2.0%) received intensive SMI-related services; 42,985 (3.1%) criminal justice services; 160,273 (11.6%) specialized homelessness services; and 20,921 (1.5%) vocational services. Compared to those seen only in clinics, veterans in the four community treatment groups were more likely to be black, diagnosed with HIV and hepatitis, had more numerous substance use diagnoses and made far more extensive use of mental health outpatient and inpatient care. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-fifth of VHA mental health patients receive community-based services prominently addressing major social determinants of health and multimorbid substance use disorders.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 46(3): 380-390, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30706163

RESUMEN

Patients with psychiatric disorders are treated by both mental health specialists and non-specialists. We use national data from the Veterans Health Administration to evaluate changing proportions of patients seen exclusively by non-specialists during the study year (FY 2012) limit as well as differences in socio-demographic, clinical and service use characteristics. There has been a five-fold increase in veterans with mental disorders seen by non-specialists over 20 years from 7 to 38%, findings similar to those in non-VA settings. Veterans treated by mental health specialists were younger, more likely to have been homeless and disabled, and had more severe and more numerous psychiatric diagnoses. There is a need to maintain specialty services and to strengthen non-specialty care through education and research.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Salud Mental , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Características de la Residencia , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Salud de los Veteranos
18.
J Dual Diagn ; 15(1): 36-45, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30444189

RESUMEN

Objective: A distinct group of patients has recently been described who experience polysubstance use disorder characterized by use of multiple addictive substances. This study examines baseline characteristics and longitudinal outcomes of a group of such patients in specialized intensive Veterans Health Administration posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) programs and followed 4 months after discharge. Methods: Patients with diagnosed PTSD or subsyndromal PTSD and who used a single substance at baseline were compared to those who used two or three and more than three different addictive substances on measures of PTSD symptom severity and functioning. Comparisons were also adjusted for differences in total days of any substance use and other potentially confounding factors. Patients were reclassified according to the number of substances used at follow-up and again compared on symptoms and functioning. Results: Bivariate analysis of baseline data (N = 8,240) showed frequent polysubstance use (n = 3,695, 44.8% of the sample) and that use of greater numbers of substances was associated with more severe PTSD symptoms as well as more total days of substance use. At follow-up after treatment, 58.2% of the original sample (n = 4,797) was assessed. Polysubstance use was less frequent (n = 756, 15.8% of the follow-up sample), but showed a similar association with more severe symptoms, although differences were attenuated after adjusting for total days of substance use. Conclusions: Polysubstance use, conceptualized within the multimorbidity perspective, is associated with increased severity of PTSD symptoms among veterans with dual diagnoses requiring complex interventions, the evaluation of which will require innovative trial designs.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Veteranos , Humanos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
J Law Med Ethics ; 46(2): 343-350, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30146976

RESUMEN

This article seeks to shed light on civil commitment in the context of the opioid crisis, to sketch the existing legal landscape surrounding civil commitment, and to illustrate the relevant medical, ethical, and legal concerns that policymakers must take into account as they struggle to find appropriate responses to the crisis.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Tratamiento Involuntario/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Tratamiento Domiciliario , Derechos Civiles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Tratamiento Involuntario/ética , Estados Unidos
20.
Schizophr Res ; 201: 39-45, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29709490

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: While "dual diagnosis" involving both psychiatric and substance use disorders has long been a focus of schizophrenia research, recent studies have advocated for a shift of focus to multimorbidity, addressing comorbidity from both additional psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders. We hypothesized that more extensive mental health multimorbity would be associated with poorer quality of life (QOL) and functioning, and that additional psychiatric comorbidity in schizophrenia would have similar adverse effects on QOL as substance use comorbidity. METHODS: Participants with schizophrenia in the NIMH-funded Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) were classified using baseline diagnostic data into four groups: 1) monomorbid schizophrenia: 2) additional psychiatric comorbidity, 3) additional substance use comorbidity, and 4) both additional psychiatric and substance use comorbidity. Mixed models compared groups on self-reported QOL (SF-12 and Lehman QOLI) and rater-evaluated QOL (the Quality of Life Scale) using baseline, 6, 12 and 18-month follow-up data. RESULTS: As hypothesized, patients with schizophrenia alone had a better QOL than those with any multimorbidity; patients with both psychiatric and substance use comorbidities had a worse QOL than those with fewer comorbidities; and patients with comorbid substance use alone were not significantly worse off than those with comorbid psychiatric disorder. CONCLUSION: The multimorbidity framework more richly differentiates complex clinical presentations of schizophrenia than the current dual diagnosis concept and deserves further study as to its etiology, consequences, and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Salud Mental , Calidad de Vida , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Multimorbilidad , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...