Risk factors of bleeding during rectal cancer surgery in obese patients in Japan.

BACKGROUND: According to several clinical trials for patients with rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces intraoperative complications and bleeding compared with laparotomy and demonstrated comparable long-term results. However, obesity is considered one of the risk factors for increased surgical difficulty, including complication rate, prolonged operation time, and bleeding. METHODS: Patients with clinical pathological stage II/III rectal cancer and a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 who underwent laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery between January 2009 and December 2013 at 51 institutions participating in the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery were included. These patients were divided into major bleeding (>500 mL) group and minor bleeding (≤500 mL) group. The risk factors of major bleeding were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: This study included 517 patients, of which 74 (19.9%) experienced major bleeding. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The major bleeding group had a longer operative time (p < 0.001) and a larger tumor size than the minor bleeding group (p = 0.011). In the univariate analysis, age >65 years, laparotomy, operative time >300 min, and multivisceral resection were significantly associated with intraoperative massive bleeding. In the multivariate analysis, age >65 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-4.82), laparotomy (OR, 20.82; 95% CI, 11.56-39.75), operative time >300 min (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.67-132), and multivisceral resection (OR, 10.72; 95% CI, 2.47-64.0) showed to be risk factors for massive bleeding. CONCLUSION: Age >65 years, laparotomy, operative time >300 min, and multivisceral resection were risk factors for massive bleeding during rectal cancer surgery in patients with obesity.

Does Pathological T-Factor Affect Long-term Prognosis of Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACC) has poor long-term outcomes. Our hypothesis was that the pathological tumor depth would affect postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent multivisceral resection with clear margins (R0). The aim of this study was to analyze short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent multivisceral resection for LACC, comparing between T3 and T4 stages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a propensity score-matched, retrospective study. All 8,764 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between April 2007 and January 2021 at the Saitama Medical University International Medical Center were screened; 572 underwent multivisceral resection for LACC. We compared the T3 and T4 groups to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (hazard ratio=1.344, 95% confidence interval=0.638-2.907, p=0.33). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly worse for the T4 group than for the T3 group (hazard ratio=3.162, 95% confidence interval=1.077-11.44), p=0.037). To determine the association between American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, transfusion, pathological T and OS, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses. ASA, transfusion, and pathological T-stage were associated with worse OS in univariate analysis (T4 vs. T3, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that postoperative complications and DFS of the T4 group were similar to those of the T3 group of locally advanced colorectal cancer treated with laparoscopic multivisceral resection. However, OS was worse in the T4 group compared with the T3 group. Multivariate risk factors for poor OS were ASA>2, transfusion, and T4 stage.

Ventral hernia repair with enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal technique after a massive weight loss by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) for obese patients is often associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications and hernia recurrences. Achieving preoperative weight loss is ideal before VHR; however, it is difficult to attain with medical treatment. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) offers the most effective and durable treatment for obesity. Therefore, massive weight loss occurring after MBS will improve the outcome of VHR. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old man (122.9 kg, BMI 39.1 kg/m2) presented to our hospital wishing to undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and VHR. Physical examination revealed a tennis ball-sized lower midline defect. Computed tomography (CT) scans revealed a hernia orifice 5 cm in width and 10 cm in height. As the hernia orifice was large, mesh reinforcement was essential. We planned for him to undergo VHR after massive weight loss was achieved by MBS. VHR was performed using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique after weight loss of 38 kg was achieved 9 months following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. His postoperative course was uneventful, and neither recurrence nor seroma was observed at 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: eTEP repair of a ventral hernia after massive weight loss following MBS would appear to be the best combination treatment for obese patients with ventral hernias. However, long-term follow-up is necessary to establish its safety and efficacy.

D3 lymph node dissection with versus without left colic artery preservation in single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectosigmoid cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: In surgery for colorectal cancer, dissection of the lymph nodes and fatty tissue around the root of the inferior mesenteric artery is important from an oncologic point of view. However, it is debatable whether it is better to preserve or remove the left colic artery (LCA). This study aimed to compare D3 lymphadenectomy with versus without LCA preservation in single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectosigmoid cancer. METHODS: A total of 1138 patients underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between April 2011 and December 2018 at Fukui Prefectural Hospital. This propensity score-matched retrospective study analyzed the data of 163 patients: 42 patients with LCA preservation (group A) and 129 without LCA preservation (group B). Clinical and oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups A and B in patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, including the 5-year overall survival rate (75% vs. 64.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-4.30), 5-year disease-free survival rate (85.7% vs. 85.7%, HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.24-4.22), and 5-year cancer-specific survival rate (92.8% vs. 89.3%, HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.25-11.4). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic surgery with D3 lymphadenectomy with versus without LCA preservation. This suggests that LCA preservation is safe and feasible in single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer.

Oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open multivisceral resection for local advanced colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Laparoscopic (lap) colectomies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) often require resection of other organs. We systematically reviewed currently available literature on lap multi-visceral resection for CRC, with regard to short- and long-term oncological outcomes, and compared them with open procedures. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and PubMed from inception to November 30, 2020. The aim of this study was to synthesize short-term and oncological outcomes associated with laparoscopic versus open surgery. Pooled proportions and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using an inverse variance method. We included six observational cohort studies published between 2012 and 2020 (lap procedures: n = 262; open procedures: n = 273). Collectively, they indicated that postoperative complications were significantly more common after open surgeries than lap surgeries (RR: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.72; P < 0.00001), but the two approaches did not significantly differ in positive resection margins (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.38-1.50; P = 0.42), local recurrence (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.28-1.62; P = 0.37), or (based on two evaluable studies) 5-year OS (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.46-1.04; P = 0.08) or 5-year DFS (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.67-1.11) for T4b disease. In conclusion, laparoscopic and open multi-visceral resections for advanced CRC have comparable oncologic outcomes. Although a randomized study would be ideal for further research, no such studies are currently available.

Small bowel fistula with colorectal cancer and mesenteric lymph node metastasis: a report of two cases.

A 65-year-old man presented to our hospital with complaints of diarrhea. Computed tomography showed a fistula with the small intestine, and a single incision laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectum with D3 dissection and partial resection of the small intestine were performed. Lymph node dissection, including a part of the inflow vessel area, was also performed because lymph node swelling was observed in the mesentery of the small intestine around the fistula. Histopathological analysis revealed that the lymph nodes in the small intestine were positive for metastasis. The patient was a 61-year-old woman who presented to our hospital with a chief complaint of diarrhea. A partial resection of the small intestine, including resection of the left hemicolectomy and lymph node dissection around the fistula, was performed at laparotomy. Histopathological examination revealed numerous lymph node metastases in the small intestinal mesentery.

Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence in T1 Colorectal Cancer: Analysis of 801 Patients in a Single Institute.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for lymph node metastasis and postoperative recurrence of pT1 colorectal cancer by clinicopathological study of surgically resected cases. METHODS: In 801 patients with pT1 colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection with lymph node dissection between April 2007 and January 2021, we evaluated clinicopathological factors (age, gender, BMI, serum CEA level, tumor localization, additional resection after endoscopic treatment, operation time, blood loss, histological type, tumor size, vascular invasion, and central lymph node dissection). We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to examine risk factors for lymph node metastasis. We also examined risk factors for recurrence in 583 patients up to December 2017. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis was observed in 100/801 patients (12.5%). Multivariate analysis of lymph node metastasis showed that patients with positive lymphatic invasion (odds ratio 2.57, 95% CI 1.62-4.04, P < .0001), positive venous invasion (odds ratio 2.31, 95% CI 1.48-3.61, P = .0002), and histologically poorly differentiated type (odds ratio 4.54, 95% CI 1.35-15.2, P = .014) were identified as risk factors. Postoperative recurrence was observed in 18/580 patients (3.1%). Risk factors for postoperative recurrence were also examined, including preoperative endoscopic treatment (odds ratio 3.59, 95% CI 1.18-10.9, P = .024), positive venous invasion (odds ratio 3.63, 95% CI 1.22-10.8, P = .021), positive lymph node metastasis (odds ratio 4.91, 95% CI 1.10-21.8, P = .037) were extracted as risk factors. DISCUSSION: In this study, venous invasion, lymphatic invasion, and histologically poorly differentiated type were identified as risk factors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer, and positive venous invasion, positive lymph node metastasis, and preoperative endoscopic treatment were identified as risk factors for recurrence. We hope that large prospective study will lead to the development of a more specific treatment strategy, including endoscopic treatment and additional surgical resection.

A case of sigmoid colon volvulus with transanal ileus tube placement and Sharon's operation performed safely.

Although endoscopic repair is often performed for sigmoid colon volvulus without intestinal necrosis, surgery is the common choice of treatment due to recurrence. With no established treatment, Hartmann's operation or sigmoid colon resection is often performed. We report a case of a 65-year-old man with transanal ileus tube placement before surgery for sigmoid colon volvulus to prevent recurrence and achieve intestinal decompression followed by Sharon's operation to achieve one-stage anastomosis. The patient showed good postoperative course, with no recurrence 3 months after surgery. This report discusses the usefulness of the transanal ileus tube and Sharon's operation for sigmoid colon volvulus without intestinal necrosis along with a review of the literature.

Initial entry via the left upper quadrant with an optical trocar in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (BS) is not readily performed in Japan. To facilitate safe initial access to the abdominal cavity, we insert an optical viewing trocar at a unique site in the left upper quadrant (LUQ). Herein, we describe the technique, its advantages, and outcomes. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Briefly, the optical trocar is inserted just below the left subcostal margin, 8 cm from the midline. On insertion, layers of the abdominal wall are visualized on the monitor. Depending on the angle of insertion, five, seven, or eight layers are seen. DISCUSSION: In assessing our initial entry technique, used in 21 obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, we found median insertion time to be 25 seconds. There were no related complications. In nearly all (20/21) patients, the abdominal wall was visualized as seven layers: subcutaneous fat, anterior rectus sheath, rectus abdominis muscle, posterior rectus sheath, transverse abdominis muscle, transversalis fascia, and peritoneum. Understanding the layers of the abdominal wall visualized during optical trocar insertion in the LUQ will provide for safe and rapid initial entry in patients undergoing laparoscopic BS and can further the widespread acceptance of laparoscopic BS.

Successful one-stage laparoscopic procedure for de Garengeot hernia: a totally extraperitoneal repair-first approach.

The de Garengeot hernia is a femoral hernia in which the appendix migrates into the hernia sac. It is usually diagnosed intraoperatively due to its rarity and lack of clinical presentation typical to acute appendicitis. Although most cases need emergency operation due to incarceration, no standard procedure exists. We report the case of a 49-year-old woman who was diagnosed with a de Garangeot hernia preoperatively by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. She underwent one-stage laparoscopic surgery via a totally extraperitoneal approach followed by laparoscopic appendectomy. She recovered uneventfully and was discharged on postoperative Day 3. Generally, hernioplasty and appendectomy are required for the de Garengeot hernia treatment. Avoiding a peritoneal incision around the herniation and performing a mesh repair prior to appendectomy is expected to carry a lower infectious risk than other laparoscopic procedures. With accurate diagnosis, this procedure could be a useful modality for de Garengeot hernia.

Propensity-score-matched analysis of short- and long-term outcomes in patients with an ileocolic artery crossing anterior vs posterior to the superior mesenteric vein during curative resection for right-sided colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases worldwide. However, laparoscopic lymph node dissection is technically demanding and time-consuming in right-sided colon cancer surgery because of variable vessel anatomy. We evaluated whether the ileocolic artery (ICA) crossing anterior to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) was associated with better intraoperative parameters and survival compared with the ICA crossing posterior to the SMV, following laparoscopic curative resection for right-sided colon cancer. METHODS: This was a propensity-score-matched retrospective study including data for 540 patients with right-sided colon cancer undergoing laparoscopic curative resection (299 with the ICA crossing anterior to the SMV (group A) and 241 with the ICA crossing posterior to the SMV (group B). We compared propensity-matched scores between the two groups to evaluate surgical and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in 5-year overall survival rates between groups for any disease stage (0-III). However, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates did differ significantly between groups (p = 0.011), especially in patients with stage III disease (p = 0.013). We then performed univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the associations between DFS and ICA location and tumor-node-metastasis (UICC) stage. ICA location and UICC stage had a poor association with DFS on univariate analysis: ICA hazard ratio (HR) 2.52, CI 1.19-5.78, p = 0.014 vs HR 3.18, CI 1.08-9.46, p = 0.03, and on multivariate analysis: HR 2.48, CI 1.17-5.69, p = 0.016 vs HR 3.86, CI 1.90-7.96, p = 0.0002. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that an ICA crossing posterior to the SMV was associated with worse DFS compared with an ICA crossing anterior to the SMV. We recommend careful laparoscopic technique in patients with an ICA crossing posterior to the SMV, during lymph node resection in right-sided colon cancer surgery.