RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock is a morbid complication of heart disease that claims the lives of more than 1 in 3 patients presenting with this syndrome. Supporting a unique collaboration across clinical specialties, federal regulators, payors, and industry, the American Heart Association volunteers and staff have launched a quality improvement registry to better understand the clinical manifestations of shock phenotypes, and to benchmark the management patterns, and outcomes of patients presenting with cardiogenic shock to hospitals across the United States. METHODS: Participating hospitals will enroll consecutive hospitalized patients with cardiogenic shock, regardless of etiology or severity. Data are collected through individual reviews of medical records of sequential adult patients with cardiogenic shock. The electronic case record form was collaboratively designed with a core minimum data structure and aligned with Shock Academic Research Consortium definitions. This registry will allow participating health systems to evaluate patient-level data including diagnostic approaches, therapeutics, use of advanced monitoring and circulatory support, processes of care, complications, and in-hospital survival. Participating sites can leverage these data for onsite monitoring of outcomes and benchmarking versus other institutions. The registry was concomitantly designed to provide a high-quality longitudinal research infrastructure for pragmatic randomized trials as well as translational, clinical, and implementation research. An aggregate deidentified data set will be made available to the research community on the American Heart Association's Precision Medicine Platform. On March 31, 2022, the American Heart Association Cardiogenic Shock Registry received its first clinical records. At the time of this submission, 100 centers are participating. CONCLUSIONS: The American Heart Association Cardiogenic Shock Registry will serve as a resource using consistent data structure and definitions for the medical and research community to accelerate scientific advancement through shared learning and research resulting in improved quality of care and outcomes of shock patients.
Asunto(s)
American Heart Association , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Choque Cardiogénico , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Choque Cardiogénico/fisiopatología , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Estados Unidos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Benchmarking , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Tiempo , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Desarrollo de Programa , Mortalidad HospitalariaAsunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , American Heart Association , Cardiología/normas , Bases de Datos Factuales/normas , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Informe de Investigación/normas , Cardiología/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Datos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Cardiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Revascularización Miocárdica , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , American Heart Association , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Cardiología/métodos , Cardiología/normas , Reglas de Decisión Clínica , Exactitud de los Datos , Humanos , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Revascularización Miocárdica/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Reportes Públicos de Datos en Atención de Salud , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/normas , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Exactitud de los Datos , Minería de Datos/normas , Bases de Datos Factuales/normas , Revascularización Miocárdica/normas , Consenso , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Humanos , Revascularización Miocárdica/efectos adversos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Terminología como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vocabulario ControladoRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to present normative values for thumb abduction and adduction and also to present measures of reliability of the measuring system arising from the use of the Ab-Adductometer. With the Ab-Adductometer, we obtained abductor and adductor measurements of intrinsic muscle strength of the healthy hand thumb in 600 volunteers. Handgrip strength values were obtained with the Jamar dynamometer. Age and male-female specific reference ranges for the Ab-Adductometer and the Jamar dynamometer are presented. This study, with a very large number of volunteer subjects, 600, presents reference ranges for pure palmar adduction and abduction of the thumb. The results indicate that the Ab-Adductometer is a clinically useful device for the purpose of quantitatively measuring thumb adduction and abduction strength at various starting angles of thumb abduction relative to the plane of the palm. The device may be especially helpful in the evaluation of compressive neuropathies of the median or ulnar nerves such as carpal tunnel syndrome or cubital tunnel syndrome as well as for primary disease of the peripheral nerves that affect intrinsic muscles and for thumb function in proximal conditions such as tetraplegia and brachial plexopathy.