Jaw claudication and branch perfusion reduction as rare complications of fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

We report a rare case of jaw claudication following fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair for a saccular aortic arch aneurysm. The brachiocephalic artery (BCA) was preserved with fenestration and intentionally half covered. Although discharged without any complications 2 weeks after the procedure, the patient subsequently experienced right mandibular fatigue at mealtime and hypotension in the right upper extremity. Angiography revealed a flap-like structure in the BCA orifice, with a 100-mm Hg pressure gradient between the aorta and BCA. Intravascular ultrasound revealed a stenosed BCA with a cord-like structure, which was considered a graft protrusion. Bare metal stenting was performed, which promptly resolved the symptoms.

Preemptive Embolization of the Lumbar Arteries and Inferior Mesenteric Artery to Prevent Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Enlargement Associated with Type 2 Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive embolization (PE) of the lumbar arteries (LAs) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (PELI) for preventing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) enlargement associated with type 2 endoleak (T2EL). Material and Methods: Patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between January 2015 and December 2020 were classified into the control (without PE), IMA (PE of a patent IMA with a diameter ≥2.5 mm), and PELI (PE of patent LAs with a diameter ≥2 mm and IMA) groups. The rate of freedom from AAA enlargement following EVAR (enlargement ≥5 mm from pre-EVAR) was compared using the log-rank test. The prevalence of T2EL at 6 months and 1 year after EVAR was compared using Fisher's exact test. Results: The cumulative rates of freedom from AAA enlargement at 54 months after EVAR (maximum observational period in the PELI group) were as follows: control group, 77.5%; IMA group, 62.5%; and PELI group, 100%. The mean CT follow-up periods of the control, IMA, and PELI groups were 46.4 ± 22.3, 31.1 ± 20.6, and 22.9 ± 15.5 months, respectively. None of the 31 patients in the PELI group experienced AAA enlargement after EVAR, whereas 2 out of the 16 patients in the IMA group and 20 out of the 98 patients in the control group had AAA enlargement. No significant differences were observed in the rate of freedom from AAA enlargement (PELI group vs. IMA group, P = 0.11; PELI group vs. control group, P = 0.11). The prevalence of T2EL was significantly lower in the PELI group than in the control group at 6 months (13.6% in PELI group vs. 42.1% in control group, P = 0.02) and 1 year (14.3% in PELI group vs. 40.0% in control group, P = 0.04). Conclusions: PELI was significantly associated with a low prevalence of T2EL and may prevent T2EL-associated AAA enlargement.

Zone 0 TEVAR with femoral artery inflow for an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm.

We describe the case of an 89-year-old female with a distal anastomotic pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta after an ascending aorta replacement for an acute type A aortic dissection. Initially, we attempted endovascular repair using a semi-custom-made thoracic fenestrated stent graft. However, this treatment failed due to an endoleak. Two weeks later, we performed a total arch vessel debranching using femoral artery inflow and thoracic endovascular repair. Postoperative computed tomography revealed no signs of the endoleak. This hybrid approach could be an effective treatment option for anastomotic pseudoaneurysms of the ascending aorta.

Role of Percutaneous Deep Venous Arterialization for Patients with Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia.

Efficacy of percutaneous deep venous arterialization (pDVA) has been reported for patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In the countries where a manufactured device dedicated for pDVA has not been reimbursed, pDVA using the off-the-shelf technique has alternatively spread. The off-the-shelf techniques for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation reported are as follows: AV spear technique, venous arterialization simplified technique (VAST), and a use of penetration guidewire or a reentry device. Technical success rates of the procedures are similar to those using the dedicated device. pDVA could be a last resort for the patients with no-option CLTI, including those suffering from stump ulcer after major limb amputation or those with occluded surgical bypass.

Real-world impact of antifibrotics on prognosis in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVE: No studies have demonstrated the real-world efficacy of antifibrotics for progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD). Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of antifibrotics in patients with PF-ILD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with ILD from January 2012 to July 2021. Patients were diagnosed with PF-ILD if they had ≥10% fibrosis on high-resolution CT (HRCT) and a relative forced vital capacity (FVC) decline of either ≥10% or >5% to <10% with clinical deterioration or progression of fibrosis on HRCT during overlapping windows of 2 years and with a %FVC of ≥45%. We compared FVC changes and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without antifibrotics. FVC changes were analysed using generalised estimating equations. We used inverse probability weighting (IPW) and statistical matching to adjust for covariates. RESULTS: Of the 574 patients, 167 were diagnosed with PF-ILD (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), n=64; non-IPF, n=103). Antifibrotics improved the FVC decline in both IPF (p=0.002) and non-IPF (p=0.05) (IPW: IPF, p=0.015; non-IPF, p=0.031). Among patients with IPF, OS was longer in the antifibrotic group (log-rank p=0.001). However, among patients with non-IPF, OS was not longer in the antifibrotic group (p=0.3263) (IPW and statistical matching: IPF, p=0.0534 and p=0.0018; non-IPF, p=0.5663 and p=0.5618). CONCLUSION: This is the first real-world study to show that antifibrotics improve the FVC decline in PF-ILD. However, among patients with non-IPF, we found no significant difference in mortality between those with and without antifibrotics. Future studies must clarify whether antifibrotics improve the prognosis of non-IPF.

Outcomes of embolization procedures for type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the mid-term outcomes of embolization procedures for type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic repair, and clarify the risk factors for aneurysm enlargement after embolization procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter registry study enrolling patients who underwent embolization procedures for type II endoleaks after EVAR from January 2012 to December 2018 at 19 Japanese centers. The primary end point was the rate of freedom from aneurysm enlargement, more than 5 mm in the aortic maximum diameter, after an embolization procedure. Demographic, procedural, follow-up, and laboratory data were collected. Continuous variables were summarized descriptively, and Kaplan-Meier analyses and a Cox regression model were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 315 patients (248 men and 67 women) were enrolled. The average duration from the initial embolization procedure to the last follow-up was 31.6 ± 24.6 months. The rates of freedom from aneurysm enlargement at 3 and 5 years were 55.4 ± 3.8% and 37.0 ± 5.2%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that a larger aortic diameter at the initial embolization procedure and the presence of a Moyamoya endoleak, defined as heterogeneous contrast opacity with an indistinct faint border, were associated with aneurysm enlargement after embolization management. CONCLUSIONS: The embolization procedures were generally ineffective in preventing further expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with type II endoleaks after EVAR, especially in patients with a large abdominal aortic aneurysm and/or a presence of a Moyamoya endoleak.

Hemodynamic evaluation of lower limbs in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Revascularization plays an important role in the treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Evaluation of hemodynamic compromise in the lower extremity is required to optimize the treatment strategy for each patient. A variety of methods have been reported to detect arterial obstruction or impaired foot perfusion. This article reviews each method, clarifying features and limitations.

Drug Eluting Versus Covered Stent for Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions: Results of the ULTIMATE Study.

OBJECTIVE: Stent grafts (SG) and drug eluting stents (DES) have emerged to combat intimal hyperplasia. It remains unclear which type of stent yields superior outcomes in femoropopliteal (FP) arterial lesions. This study compared the clinical data between the VIABAHN SG and the Eluvia DES two years after endovascular treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre study, 504 cases with a lesion length > 10 cm treated either with SG or DES were analysed. Ankle brachial index (ABI) measurements were conducted before and after the endovascular procedure, and every three months thereafter. When the ABI dropped ≥ 0.15 compared with the baseline value, a duplex ultrasound was conducted to check stent patency. The outcome measures were stent patency rates, freedom from target lesion revascularisation (TLR), stent thrombosis, and acute limb ischaemia (ALI) accompanying loss of patency rates. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for confounding baseline characteristics. RESULTS: PSM extracted 219 limbs in the SG group and 109 limbs in the DES group. Compared with the SG group, the DES group had statistically significantly higher rates of freedom from TLR (86.0 ± 4.2% vs. 73.1 ± 4.8%, p = .040), and ALI accompanying loss of patency (98.9 ± 1.1% vs. 93.5 ± 1.8%, p = .029) at two years. Primary patency (75.9 ± 5.9% vs. 69.5 ± 5.9%, p = .087) and freedom from stent thrombosis (90.4 ± 3.3% vs. 81.2% ± 3.0%, p = .11) were not statistically significantly different. For lesions ≤ 15 cm, primary patency in the DES group was statistically significantly better than the SG group. CONCLUSION: FP lesions treated with Eluvia DES had a higher primary patency rate in lesions ≤ 15 cm, freedom from clinically driven TLR and ALI accompanying loss of patency than the VIABAHN SG.

Branched versus fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the aortic arch: A multicenter comparison.

OBJECTIVE: For thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the arch, branched and fenestrated endografts are available with different limitations regarding anatomy and extent of the pathology. Comparisons are lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 2 currently commercially available devices for branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair and fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair. METHODS: In a retrospective, multicenter cohort study, a consecutive patient series treated with branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair or fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch pathologies was assessed. Baseline characteristics, procedural fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and outcome were analyzed. Furthermore, the potential anatomic feasibility of the respective alternate device was assessed on the preoperative computed tomography scans. RESULTS: The branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair and fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair cohorts consisted of 20 and 34 patients, respectively, with similar comorbidities; indication was aneurysm in 65% and 79%, penetrating aortic ulcer in 20% and 9%, and dissection in the remaining procedures, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all but 1 patient. Perioperative mortality and major stroke rate were both 10% in branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair and 0% and 3% in fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively. During follow-up of 31 and 40 months, 1 branch occlusion occurred in the branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair cohort, and 2 late endoleaks occurred in the fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair group. One aortic death occurred. Although 35% of patients undergoing branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair were anatomically suitable for fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 91% of those undergoing fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair were suitable for branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair. CONCLUSIONS: Both branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair and fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair show excellent technical success and acceptable complication rates, whereas branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair tends toward higher morbidity, especially stroke rates. By offering fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair along with branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair, aortic centers could potentially lower complication rates and simultaneously still treat a wide range of anatomies.

Total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique for a right-sided aortic arch with a Kommerell diverticulum and aberrant right vertebral artery.

The best treatment for a right-sided aortic arch (RAA) and Kommerell diverticulum (KD) has not been determined due to the rarity of these conditions. The current trend in the treatment of this disease is to increase the endovascular approach without a sternotomy. We describe a rare condition with an association of an RAA with a KD of an aberrant left subclavian artery and an anomalous right vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch (AVA). The left vertebral artery was missing. Also, there was an incomplete circle of Willis due to the absence of the left and right posterior communication arteries. Therefore, the AVA was the only artery to supply the vertebral-basilar system. In our case, a simple thoracic endovascular aortic repair was not suitable because of the sharply curved arch and short landing zone. Also, a debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair was not appropriate because that approach would not permit reconstruction of the AVA. The patient successfully underwent a total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique. This procedure could be an effective option for patients with RAAs with KDs associated with another arch vessel anomaly.

Aortic Agatston score correlates with the progression of acute type A aortic dissection.

Aortic calcification in the tunica media is correlated with aortic stiffness, elastin degradation, and wall shear stress. The study aim was to determine if aortic calcifications influence disease progression in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We retrospectively reviewed a total of 103 consecutive patients who had undergone surgery for ATAAD at our institution between January 2009 and December 2019. Of these, 85 patients who had preoperatively undergone plain computed tomography angiography (CTA) for evaluation of their aortic calcification were included. Moreover, we assessed the progression of aortic dissection after surgery via postoperative CTA. Using a classification and regression tree to identify aortic Agatston score thresholds predictive of disease progression, the patients were classified into high-score (Agatston score ≥ 3344; n  =   36) and low-score (<3344; n  =   49) groups. Correlations between aortic Agatston scores and CTA variables were assessed. Higher aortic Agatston scores were significantly correlated with the smaller distal extent of aortic dissection (p < 0.001), larger true lumen areas of the ascending (p  =  0.009) and descending aorta (p =   0.002), and smaller false lumen areas of the descending aorta (p =  0.028). Patients in the high-score group were more likely to have DeBakey type II dissection (p =  0.001) and false lumen thrombosis (p  =  0.027) than those in the low-score group, thereby confirming the correlations. Aortic dissection in the high-score group was significantly less distally extended (p < 0.001). A higher aortic Agatston score correlates with the larger true lumen area of the ascending and descending aorta and the less distal progression of aortic dissection in patients with ATAAD. Interestingly, the findings before and after surgery were consistent. Hence, aortic Agatston scores are associated with aortic dissection progression and may help predict postoperative residual dissected aorta remodeling.

Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Among Patients with Different Indications of Acute/Subacute Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by TEVAR: Data from the JaPanese REtrospective multicenter stuDy of ThoracIc Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (J-Predictive Study).

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationships between indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection and clinical outcomes, and complications specific to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The J-predictive study retrospectively collected data of patients treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection at 20 institutions from January 2012 to March 2017. From the database, those treated for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection were extracted (n = 118; 96 men; average age, 66.1 years; standard deviation, ± 13) and classified into groups 1, 2, and 3 according to thoracic endovascular aortic repair indications (rupture, superior mesenteric artery malperfusion, and renal or lower extremity malperfusion, respectively). Primary and secondary measures were mortality (overall and aortic-related) and complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively. For each outcome, the risks of being in groups 1 and 2 were statistically compared with that of being in group 3 as a control using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Mortality rate (odds ratio, 5.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-20.53) and prevalence of paraparesis/paraplegia (odds ratio, 30.46; confidence interval, 1.71-541.77) were higher in group 1 than in group 3. Compared to group 3, group 2 showed no statistically significant differences in mortality or complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. CONCLUSIONS: Rupture as an indication for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection was more likely to result in worse mortality and high prevalence of spinal cord ischemia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Case series.

Penetration of Dissected Membrane for False Lumen Embolization in a Case of Chronic Aortic Dissection.

Background: Patent false lumens carry a high risk of aortic events including rupture. False lumen embolization is a useful method to promote thrombosis of false lumen. In the case presented here, direct penetration of the dissected membrane was employed to obtain access to the false lumen, enabling embolization. Case report: The case was a 64-year-old female who developed a Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. Replacement of ascending aorta and aortic arch with frozen elephant trunk technique was performed. After the operation, there was a residual flow through the false lumen in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. Twenty months later, the patient complained of sudden back pain, and a CT scan demonstrated another new dissection at the distal edge of the open stent. Additionally, the false lumen that had remained since the onset of the type A aortic dissection enlarged during the observation period. An endovascular procedure was planned to exclude the false lumen. Despite closing all communicating channels between true and false lumen using a vascular plug, coils, and stent grafts, the false lumen continued to expand due to the residual flow at the visceral segment. The origin responsible for the flow was not identified. To perform an embolization of the false lumen, access into the false lumen was obtained by penetration of the dissected flap using a trans-septal needle. Following the successful penetration of the flap, embolization of the false lumen was performed using coils and glue. After the embolization, an angiogram of the false lumen confirmed the significant reduction of leakage into the true lumen. The size of the aorta and false lumen decreased after the embolization. Conclusion: Direct penetration of the dissected membrane of the aorta was a safe and useful measure for regaining access to the false lumen and for the following endovascular intervention.

Prediction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth After Endovascular Aortic Repair by Measuring Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity.

BACKGROUND: Although endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the dominant therapeutic approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), continued sac growth after EVAR remains a major concern and is still unpredictable. Since AAA formation is thought to arise from atherosclerotic vascular damage of the aortic wall, we hypothesize that the severity of atherosclerosis in the AAA wall may influence sac growth. Therefore, we investigated whether brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), a marker of atherosclerosis severity obtained by noninvasive automatic devices, can predict sac growth after EVAR. METHODS: The data from all patients who underwent elective EVAR for AAA at a single institution from January 2012 to March 2019 were reviewed. We extracted the baPWV before EVAR and divided patients into 2 groups according to the baPWV cut-off value identified by a classification and regression tree (CART). The primary outcome was significant sac growth, defined as an increment of 5 mm or more in aneurysm size after EVAR relative to the aneurysm size before EVAR. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the potential predictors of sac growth. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 222 consecutive patients underwent elective EVAR for AAA. Of these, 175 patients with a median follow-up period of 36 months were included. The baPWV values were classified as <1854 cm/s (Group 0) in 100 patients and ≥1854 cm/s (Group 1) in 75 patients according to the cut-off value identified by CART. During the follow-up period, 10 (10.0%) patients in Group 0 and 18 (24.0%) patients in Group 1 demonstrated significant sac growth (P = 0.021). Risk factors for significant sac growth included baPWV (hazard ratio [HR], 3.059; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-6.64; P = 0.005), age (HR, 1.078; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16; P = 0.036), and persistent type II endoleak (HR, 3.552; 95% CI, 1.69-7.48; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that baPWV remained a significant risk factor for sac growth after adjustment for age (HR, 2.602; 95% CI, 1.15-5.82; P = 0.02) and persistent type II endoleak (HR, 2.957; 95% CI, 1.36-6.43; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The baPWV before EVAR was associated with significant sac growth after EVAR; thus, measuring the baPWV may be useful for assessing the risk of future sac growth in patients after EVAR.

Clinical Impact of Stent Graft Thrombosis in Femoropopliteal Arterial Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to elucidate the clinical impact and prognosis of stent graft (SG) thrombosis. BACKGROUND: The VIABAHN SG offers a favorable outcome in long peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) lesions in the femoropopliteal artery. One concern after SG deployment is the incidence of stent thrombosis and consequent acute limb ischemia (ALI). METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, we collected the clinical data of PAOD patients treated with VIABAHN SG who subsequently experienced SG thrombosis. The clinical symptoms of SG thrombosis, patency after reintervention, and predictors of loss of patency after reintervention were examined. RESULTS: VIABAHN SGs were used for 1,215 patients; SG thrombosis occurred in 159 (13%) patients at a median of 6.4 months (interquartile range: 2.8 to 13.5 months) after SG implantation; 21 (13%) patients presented with ALI. A total of 131 (82%) patients underwent reintervention for SG thrombosis, whereas 2 (1%) underwent primary major amputation and the remaining 26 (16%) were treated conservatively. The patency rate 1 year after reintervention, freedom from major adverse limb events, and limb salvage after reintervention were 54.9%, 73.6%, and 92.5%, respectively. Critical limb-threatening ischemia at SG implantation and ALI presentation at SG thrombosis were positively associated with an increased risk of rethrombosis, whereas distal stent diameter was negatively associated with the risk of rethrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: SG thrombosis is associated with a considerable risk of ALI, but the risk of primary major amputation was not high. Clinical outcomes after reinterventions for thrombosed SGs were suboptimal.

Seven arterial aneurysms with an acute type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Multiple arterial aneurysms are often seen in the elderly and are caused mainly by atherosclerosis.

Improved midterm outcomes after endovascular repair of nontraumatic descending thoracic aortic rupture compared with open surgery.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become first-line treatment for descending thoracic aortic rupture (DTAR), but its midterm and long-term outcomes remain undescribed. This study evaluated whether TEVAR would improve midterm outcomes of nontraumatic DTAR relative to open surgical repair (OSR). METHODS: Between December 1999 and October 2018, 118 patients with DTAR were treated with either OSR (n = 39) or TEVAR (n = 79) at a single center. Primary end points were 30-day and long-term all-cause mortalities. Secondary end points included stroke, permanent spinal cord ischemia (SCI), prolonged ventilation support or tracheostomy, permanent hemodialysis, and aortic reintervention. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower with TEVAR (OSR, 38.5%; TEVAR, 16.5%; P = .01). Stroke (15.6% vs 3.8%; P = .03), permanent SCI (15.6% vs 2.5%; P = .02), prolonged ventilation (30.8% vs 8.9%; P = .002), and tracheostomy (12.8% vs 2.5%; P = .04) were significantly lower after TEVAR than OSR. Need for hemodialysis trended higher after OSR (12.8% vs 5.1%; P = .2). Mean follow ups were 1048 ± 1591 days for OSR group and 828 ± 1258 days for TEVAR. All-cause mortality at last follow-up was significantly lower after TEVAR than OSR (35.4% vs 66.7%; P = .001). Aortic reintervention was required more frequently within 30 days after TEVAR (15.2% vs 2.6%; P = .06). By multivariate analysis, TAAA was an independent predictor for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR improves both early and midterm outcomes of DTAR relative to OSR. TAAA was a predictor of mortality. Endovascular approach to DTAR may provide the greatest chance at survival.

Efficacy of Multichannel Balloon Angioplasty in Calcified Common Femoral Artery Lesions.

This report describes 7 cases in which multichannel balloon angioplasty was performed for severely calcified common femoral artery stenosis. After the successful passage of a guidewire through the stenosis, another guidewire with a tip load of 12g or 14 g was passed through a different channel inside the calcified plaques, followed by balloon angioplasty via each route. After the procedure, ankle brachial index improved from 0.49 ± 0.23 to 0.89 ± 0.05 on an average, and 6 of the 7 patients had patent arteries at a median follow-up period of 13 months. Multichannel balloon angioplasty offers the promise of being an effective endovascular intervention to expand calcified lesions.

Changes in Skin Perfusion Pressure After Endovascular Treatment for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

PURPOSE: To assess skin perfusion pressure (SPP) changes after endovascular treatment (EVT) of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and to explore preoperative factors that affect SPP changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study recruited 147 patients (mean age 74 years; 99 men) with ischemic wounds at 6 vascular centers in Japan between July 2017 and December 2018. Over half of the patients (92, 63%) were diabetic, and 76 (52%) required dialysis. Sixty-four patients (43%) had WIfI (wound, ischemia, foot infection) wound grades of 2 or 3; 59 (40%) had foot infections. SPP was measured before and 1, 2, 7, and 30 days after EVT to establish inline flow to the ischemic foot based on the angiosome concept when feasible. The anterior and posterior tibial arteries and the peroneal artery were revascularized in 66 (45%), 50 (34%), and 30 (21%) patients, respectively. RESULTS: Both the dorsal and plantar SPPs at 1 or 2 days post-EVT were significantly higher than those at baseline (p<0.001), and both SPPs increased further at 1 month compared with those at 1 (p=0.001) or 2 days (p=0.006) post-EVT. SPP increases occurred on the dorsal and plantar surfaces of the foot regardless of the vessel revascularized. The SPP increase at 1 month after EVT was significantly lower in patients with foot infections than that in those without foot infections (p=0.003). Age, sex, diabetes, dialysis, wound severity, and direct revascularization did not affect the pattern of SPP change. CONCLUSION: The SPP increased continuously up to 1 month after EVT, though the increase was smaller in patients with wound infections. The SPP on the dorsal and plantar surfaces increased, regardless of the vessel revascularized, which could justify indirect revascularization when direct revascularization is technically challenging.

Modifying the "Eye of the Tiger" Technique: Preserving Gluteal Artery Perfusion in the Treatment of an Aneurysm of the Hypogastric Artery.

PURPOSE: In endovascular aneurysm repair, parallel stent graft deployment is sometimes utilized to preserve the distal branch perfusion. However, there will be some gutter space around 2 stent grafts, which may cause endoleak. The "eye of the tiger" technique was invented to minimize this leak when deploying a small side-branch stent graft in conjunction with a large aortic endograft. The purpose of this case report is to describe our modified technique for 2 small endografts deployed in double D-shape in order to prevent gutter leak, which we applied in endovascular treatment for a hypogastric artery aneurysm. CASE REPORT: A 79-year-old male patient presented with a right hypogastric artery aneurysm measuring 44 mm. The patient refused the open surgical repair option and hoped for an endovascular treatment. Therefore, endovascular treatment to exclude the hypogastric artery aneurysm as well as preserve the gluteal arteries was planned. An Internal Iliac Component (IIC)(W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) was utilized for the proximal sealing and 2 Viabahn stent grafts (W. L. Gore & Associates) were deployed in the superior and inferior gluteal arteries for distal sealing. Then, 2 VBX stent grafts (W. L. Gore & Associates) were added in the IIC as bridging stents to connect the IIC and both Viabahn stent grafts. Next, over-dilatation of VBX stent grafts was performed alternately with an 8 mm balloon catheter and subsequent kissing balloon dilation with 5 mm balloon catheters, which allowed the VBX stents to be set in double D-shape. A follow-up CT scan performed 1 week after the procedure revealed no endoleak and a favorable shape to the VBX stent grafts. CONCLUSION: The modified method of dilating the VBX stent grafts allowed the double D-shape deployment, minimizing the risk of gutter leak and preserving distal branch perfusion.