RESUMEN
Introduction: In pulmonary embolism (PE), when used for catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), low-dose alteplase is associated with good outcomes. Tenecteplase has been only used as intravenous for this indication. In the context of our national economic crisis where alteplase was unavailable, we describe our experience with tenecteplase CDT. Case: A 73-year-old male, hypertensive and smoker with COPD, presented to the ED with intermediate high-risk PE.(ED) with intermediate high-risk PE. Heparin infusion was initiated. A few hours later, the patient developed atrial fibrillation (AF) for which amiodarone infusion was started. Also, a left femoral and popliteal vein thrombosis was also confirmed by the lower extremity duplex. As the patient remained dyspneic with unstable vital signs, the decision was to perform a CDT. In the absence of alteplase, tenecteplase was used at 0.5 mg/h over 30 h, for a total of 15 mg. Result: Twenty-four hours after tenecteplase initiation, dyspnea and vital signs had significantly improved. Oxygen support was gradually dropping to finally stop. Being on concomitant heparin infusion, the patient had a mild blood oozing at the femoral vein site of entry; however, this did not require any transfusion or discontinuation of heparin. The patient regained his baseline physical and mental functions and was discharged on enoxaparin and amiodarone tablet. Discussion: This is the first experience describing the use of tenecteplase as part of CDT in a patient with acute intermediate high-risk PE. The combination to therapeutic heparin infusion, already described in different clinical scenarios with intravenous tenecteplase, was safe and well tolerated Conclusion: CDT with tenecteplase was, for the first time, safely and effectively used in an intermediate high-risk PE patient. However, more studies are needed to confirm and establish these findings.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe a methodological approach to explore the concordance of recommendations across guidelines and its application to the case of the WHO recommendations on chest imaging for the diagnosis and management of COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We followed a methodological approach applied to a case study that included: defining the 'reference guideline' (i.e., the WHO guidance) and the 'reference recommendations'; searching for 'related guidelines' and identifying 'related recommendations'; constructing the PICO for the recommendations; assessing the matching of the PICO of each related recommendation to the PICO corresponding reference recommendation; and assessing the concordance between the PICO-matching recommendations. RESULTS: We identified a total of 89 related recommendations from 22 related guidelines. Out of the 89 related recommendations, 43 partly matched and 1 entirely matched one of the reference recommendations, and out of these, 8 were concordant with one of the reference recommendations. When considering the seven reference recommendations, they had a median of 12 related recommendations (range 3-17), a median of 7 PICO-matching recommendations (range 0-13), and a median of 1 concordant recommendation (range 0-4). CONCLUSION: Following a detailed methodological approach, we were able to explore the concordance between our reference recommendations and related recommendations from other guidelines. A relatively low percentage of recommendations was concordant.
