Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Chem Res Toxicol ; 20(12): 1927-41, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18052113

RESUMEN

Modeling the potential of chemicals to induce chromosomal damage has been hampered by the diversity of mechanisms which condition this biological effect. The direct binding of a chemical to DNA is one of the underlying mechanisms that is also responsible for bacterial mutagenicity. Disturbance of DNA synthesis due to inhibition of topoisomerases and interaction of chemicals with nuclear proteins associated with DNA (e.g., histone proteins) were identified as additional mechanisms leading to chromosomal aberrations (CA). A comparative analysis of in vitro genotoxic data for a large number of chemicals revealed that more than 80% of chemicals that elicit bacterial mutagenicity (as indicated by the Ames test) also induce CA; alternatively, only 60% of chemicals that induce CA have been found to be active in the Ames test. In agreement with this relationship, a battery of models is developed for modeling CA. It combines the Ames model for bacterial mutagenicity, which has already been derived and integrated into the Optimized Approach Based on Structural Indices Set (OASIS) tissue metabolic simulator (TIMES) platform, and a newly derived model accounting for additional mechanisms leading to CA. Both models are based on the classical concept of reactive alerts. Some of the specified alerts interact directly with DNA or nuclear proteins, whereas others are applied in a combination of two- or three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship models assessing the degree of activation of the alerts from the rest of the molecules. The use of each of the alerts has been justified by a mechanistic interpretation of the interaction. In combination with a rat liver S9 metabolism simulator, the model explained the CA induced by metabolically activated chemicals that do not elicit activity in the parent form. The model can be applied in two ways: with and without metabolic activation of chemicals.


Asunto(s)
Aberraciones Cromosómicas/inducido químicamente , Bases de Datos Factuales , Modelos Biológicos , Mutágenos , Relación Estructura-Actividad Cuantitativa , Animales , Línea Celular , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Fibroblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Pruebas de Mutagenicidad/métodos , Pruebas de Mutagenicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Mutágenos/química , Mutágenos/metabolismo , Mutágenos/toxicidad
2.
Environ Health Perspect ; 115(5): 671-8, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17520051

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has completed phase 2 of an international program to validate the rodent Hershberger bioassay. DESIGN: The Hershberger bioassay is designed to identify suspected androgens and antiandrogens based on changes in the weights of five androgen-responsive tissues (ventral prostate, paired seminal vesicles and coagulating glands, the levator ani and bulbocavernosus muscles, the glans penis, and paired Cowper's or bulbourethral glands). Protocol sensitivity and reproducibility were tested using two androgen agonists (17alpha-methyl testosterone and 17beta-trenbolone), four antagonists [procymi-done, vinclozolin, linuron, and 1,1-dichoro-2,2-bis-(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (p,p'-DDE)], and a 5alpha-reductase inhibitor (finasteride). Sixteen laboratories from seven countries participated in phase 2. RESULTS: In 40 of 41 studies, the laboratories successfully detected substance-related weight changes in one or more tissues. The one exception was with the weakest antiandrogen, linuron, in a laboratory with reduced sensitivity because of high coefficients of variation in all tissue weights. The protocols performed well under different experimental conditions (e.g., strain, diet, housing protocol, bedding, vehicle). There was good agreement and reproducibility among laboratories with regard to the lowest dose inducing significant effects on tissue weights. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the OECD Hershberger bioassay protocol is reproducible and transferable across laboratories with androgen agonists, weak androgen antagonists, and a 5alpha-reductase inhibitor. The next validation phase will employ coded test substances, including positive substances and negative substances having no androgenic or antiandrogenic activity.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/toxicidad , Andrógenos/toxicidad , Bioensayo/normas , Disruptores Endocrinos/toxicidad , Tamaño de los Órganos/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Europa (Continente) , Genitales/efectos de los fármacos , Genitales/crecimiento & desarrollo , Ratas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios de Validación como Asunto
3.
Environ Health Perspect ; 111(12): 1530-49, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12948896

RESUMEN

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has completed phase 2 of an international validation program for the rodent uterotrophic bioassay. The purpose of the validation program was to demonstrate the performance of two versions of the uterotrophic bioassay, the immature female rat and the adult ovariectomized rat, in four standardized protocols. This article reports the dose-response studies of the validation program; the coded single-dose studies are reported in an accompanying paper. The dose-response study design used five selected weak estrogen agonists, bisphenol A, genistein, methoxychlor, nonylphenol, and o,p -DDT. These weak agonists were administered in a prescribed series of doses to measure the performance and reproducibility of the protocols among the participating laboratories. All protocols successfully detected increases in uterine weights when the weak agonists were administered. Within each protocol, there was good agreement and reproducibility of the dose response among laboratories with each substance. Substance-specific variations were observed in the influence of the route of administration on the uterine response, the potency as related to the dose producing the first statistically significant increase in uterine weights, and the maximum increase in uterine weight. Substantive performance differences were not observed between the uterotrophic bioassay versions or among the standardized protocols, and these were judged to be qualitatively equivalent. It is noteworthy that these results were reproducible under a variety of different experimental conditions (e.g., animal strain, diet, housing, bedding, vehicle, animal age), indicating that the bioassay's performance as a screen is robust. In conclusion, both the intact, immature, and adult OVX versions, and all protocols appear to be reproducible and transferable across laboratories and are able to detect weak estrogen agonists.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ambientales/toxicidad , Útero/crecimiento & desarrollo , Útero/patología , Factores de Edad , Alimentación Animal , Animales , Bioensayo/normas , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Sistema Endocrino/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Vivienda para Animales , Humanos , Laboratorios/normas , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Ovariectomía/veterinaria , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de Investigación
4.
Environ Health Perspect ; 111(12): 1550-8, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12948897

RESUMEN

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has completed phase 2 of an international validation program for the rodent uterotrophic bioassay. This portion of phase 2 assessed the reproducibility of the assay with a battery of positive and negative test substances. Positive agonists of the estrogen receptor included the potent reference estrogen 17-ethinyl estradiol (EE), and the weak estrogen agonists bisphenol A, genistein, methoxychlor, nonylphenol, and o,p -DDT. The negative test substance or nonagonist was n-dibutylphthalate. The test substances were coded, and prescribed doses of each test substance were administered in 16 laboratories. Two versions of the uterotrophic assay, the intact immature and the adult ovariectomized female rat, were tested and compared using four standardized protocols covering both sc and po administration. Assay reproducibility was compared using a) EE doses identical to those used in phase 1 and in parallel dose-response studies, b) single doses of the weak agonists identical to one of five doses from the dose-response studies, and c) a single dose of the negative test substance. The results were reproducible and in agreement both within individual laboratories and across the participating laboratories for the same test substance and protocol. The few exceptions are examined in detail. The reproducibility was achieved despite a variety of different experimental conditions (e.g., variations in animal strain, diet, housing protocol, bedding, vehicle, animal age). In conclusion, both versions of the uterotrophic bioassay and all protocols appear robust, reproducible, and transferable across laboratories and able to detect weak estrogen agonists. These results will be submitted along with other data for independent peer review to provide support for the validation of the uterotrophic bioassay.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ambientales/toxicidad , Estrógenos/toxicidad , Útero/crecimiento & desarrollo , Útero/patología , Alimentación Animal , Animales , Bioensayo/normas , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Sistema Endocrino/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Vivienda para Animales , Laboratorios/normas , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Ratas , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de Investigación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...