RESUMEN
Objective: The purpose of this project was to determine the positive predictive value of existing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) screening tools in clinical use, in a real-world clinical population of gravidae, and to explore the development of a new questionnaire for screening for OSA during pregnancy. Methods: Pregnant people were administered sleep screening questionnaires as part of routine clinical care. These included Facco's four variable OSA screening tool, the STOP-BANG, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Those who screened positive were referred for diagnostic sleep testing, typically with a type III home monitoring device. Here we analyzed the screening responses used by those who completed diagnostic testing to determine the positive predictive value of the existing tools. Results: 159 pregnant people completed diagnostic OSA testing and were included in this analysis. The positive predictive value of Facco's four variable sleep screening tool was 74.3%, STOP-BANG was 75.3%, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was 69.8%. Our sample size was insufficient to create a new screening tool. Conclusions: Here we calculated the positive predictive value of Facco's 4 variable screening tool for screening for OSA in pregnancy in a real-world pregnant population. While we were not able to generate a new screening tool for screening for OSA during pregnancy, both STOP-BANG and Facco's four variable tool had positive predictive values over 70% in our population which was characterized by high BMI and advanced maternal age. Increased clinical use of the pregnancy-specific tool may be warranted.
RESUMEN
PROBLEM CONSIDERED: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is underdiagnosed during pregnancy, but there is strong theoretical and some empiric evidence that treatment may improve obstetric outcomes. Barriers to screening, testing, and treatment are common during pregnancy. The goal of this described intervention was to reduce these barriers and improve detection of OSA in pregnancy. METHODS: Representatives from sleep medicine and perinatology established a cross-disciplinary, collaborative Sleep Pregnancy Clinic offering a streamlined referral process for multimodal screening, testing, and treatment of OSA during pregnancy. This is a retrospective analysis of data from the clinic's first 19 months. RESULTS: Between June 2017 and December 2018, 134 pregnant women were referred for OSA testing. Sixty-three (47.0%) completed objective sleep testing, and 38 (60.3%) of the women who completed testing met diagnostic criteria for OSA. This intervention resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of diagnostic sleep apnea tests performed (average 22.4 tests per year pre-intervention, 77 per year post-intervention [P = 0.0012]). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Despite a streamlined referral pipeline, completion rates of OSA testing in pregnant women remained below 50%. However, the overall number of women referred and who completed testing increased significantly during this time period. Of those who completed testing, the majority were diagnosed with OSA. Since starting this clinic, we have created resources to familiarize patients with the equipment and worked to reduce other barriers. Assessment of these interventions and the impact of treatment on obstetric outcomes is ongoing, as is assessment of reasons women do not complete diagnostic testing.
