Large multiplanar changes to native alignment have no apparent impact on clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: This study sought to examine if achieved postoperative alignment when compared to the native anatomy would lead to a difference in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), and whether the achieved alignment could be broadly categorised by an accepted alignment strategy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data on patients undergoing single primary or bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was carried out. CT scans were used to determine the mean change ("delta values") between the pre and postoperative; hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle and femoral implant rotation. Femoral implant flexion and tibial implant slope were measured postoperatively. The primary outcome was the relationship of the variables to the change in KOOS pain subscale after one year. The secondary outcome was the number of knees which could be categorised postoperatively to an alignment strategy, and the mean PROMs in each cohort. RESULTS: A total of 296 knees in 261 patients were available for analysis. With regards to the primary outcome, the delta values for each variable did not demonstrate any association with the change in knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) pain score. Approximately 46% of knees could not be categorised to an alignment strategy based on postoperatively measured alignment, with no significant difference between each cohort with regards to the change in KOOS Pain score. CONCLUSION: Achieved alignment does not consistently match accepted alignment strategies, and appears to confer no benefit to clinical outcomes when the native anatomy is most closely approximated, nor results in poorer outcomes in outliers. This study highlights the importance of routine three dimensional pre and postoperative imaging in clinical practice and for the valid analysis of outcomes in studies on alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Preoperative Joint Distraction Imaging and Planning Protocol for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Current preoperative total knee arthroplasty (TKA) planning strategies are bone-referencing and do not consider the ligamentous profile of the knee. This study assessed the mean Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle of the planned Distracted Alignment (DA), an alignment output using a joint distraction radiology and planning protocol, which incorporates preoperative evaluation of ligament laxity. METHODS: A retrospective study of 144 knees undergoing TKA was performed. Each patient received a preoperative computer tomograph scan, a weight-bearing antero-posterior knee radiograph, and distracted knee radiographs in extension and flexion. The imaging was used to develop a preoperative DA plan aiming for medio-lateral and extension-flexion space balance. The mean DA, weight-bearing, and arithmetic HKA angles were compared to each other, and to the HKA of a healthy nonarthritic population. RESULTS: The mean weight-bearing, arithmetic, and planned DA HKA angles were 4.8° (interquartile range [IQR] 6.5°) varus, 0.4° (IQR 4.5°) varus, and 2.2° (IQR 4.0°) varus, respectively. This compares to a healthy adult HKA angle of 1.3° varus. The difference between the planned DA and arithmetic HKA angles was greater than 3° for 36% of the patients in the study population. CONCLUSIONS: The planned DA HKA angle was fundamentally different from the arithmetic HKA angle, but comparable to a healthy population. Considering both hard and soft tissue information of the knee, we believe the planned DA resulting from the joint distraction radiology protocol allows for optimized preoperative surgical planning in TKA. This protocol has been shown to be clinically viable.