Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase I trial of co-administered pyronaridine and piperaquine in healthy adults of sub-Saharan origin.

Drug resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine threatens the efficacy of malaria chemoprevention interventions in children and pregnant women. Combining pyronaridine (PYR) and piperaquine (PQP), both components of approved antimalarial therapies, has the potential to protect vulnerable populations from severe malaria. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (double-dummy), parallel-group, single site phase I study in healthy adult males or females of Black sub-Saharan African ancestry investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PYR + PQP (n = 15), PYR + placebo (n = 8), PQP + placebo (n = 8), and double placebo (n = 6) administered orally once daily for 3 days at the registered dose for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. All participants completed the study. Forty-five adverse events were reported in 26 participants, most (41/45) were mild/moderate in severity, with no serious adverse events, deaths, or study withdrawals. Adverse events were reported in 66.7% (10/15) of participants administered PYR + PQP, 87.5% (7/8) with PYR + placebo, 50.0% (4/8) with PQP + placebo, and 83.3% (5/6) with placebo. For PYR containing regimens, five of 23 participants had asymptomatic transient increases in alanine and/or aspartate aminotransferase. With PQP containing regimens, four of 23 participants had mild Fridericia-corrected QT interval prolongation. Liver enzyme elevations and prolonged QTc interval were consistent with observations for PYR-artesunate and dihydroartemisinin-PQP, respectively, administered to healthy adults and malaria patients. Increases in PYR and PQP exposures were observed following co-administration versus placebo, with substantial interparticipant variability. The findings suggest that PYR + PQP may have potential in chemoprevention strategies. Further studies are needed in the target populations to assess chemoprotective efficacy and define the benefit-risk profile, with special considerations regarding hepatic and cardiac safety.

Bone and Joint Tissue Penetration of the Staphylococcus-Selective Antibiotic Afabicin in Patients Undergoing Elective Hip Replacement Surgery.

Afabicin (formerly Debio 1450, AFN-1720) is a prodrug of afabicin desphosphono (Debio 1452, AFN-1252), a novel antibiotic in development which targets the staphylococcal enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI) and exhibits selective potent antibacterial activity against staphylococcal species, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus As part of clinical development in bone and joint infections, a distribution study in bone was performed in 17 patients who underwent elective hip replacement surgery. Patients received 3 doses of 240 mg afabicin orally (every 12 h) at various time points before surgery. Afabicin desphosphono concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in plasma, cortical bone, cancellous bone, bone marrow, soft tissue, and synovial fluid collected during surgery at 2, 4, 6, or 12 h after the third afabicin dose. The study showed good penetration of afabicin desphosphono into bone tissues, with mean area under the curve ratios for cortical bone-, cancellous bone-, bone marrow-, soft tissue-, and synovial fluid-to-total plasma concentrations of 0.21, 0.40, 0.32, 0.35, and 0.61, respectively. When accounting for the free fraction in plasma (2%) and synovial fluid (9.4%), the mean ratio was 2.88, which is indicative of excellent penetration and which showed that the afabicin desphosphono concentration was beyond the MIC90 of S. aureus over the complete dosing interval. These findings, along with preclinical efficacy data, clinical efficacy data for skin and soft tissue staphylococcal infection, the availability of both intravenous and oral formulations, and potential advantages over broad-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of staphylococcal bone or joint infections, support the clinical development of afabicin for bone and joint infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02726438.).

Bioavailability of paracetamol, phenylephrine hydrochloride and guaifenesin in a fixed-combination syrup versus an oral reference product.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability of paracetamol, phenylephrine hydrochloride and guaifenesin in a new oral syrup with an established oral reference product. The secondary objective was to compare the safety of the new syrup and the reference product. METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, randomized, reference-replicated, crossover study. Healthy adult volunteers received one dose of syrup and two separate doses of a reference oral liquid formulation in a randomized sequence over three study periods, with a washout interval of ≥ 7 days between study periods. Blood samples were taken regularly postdose and analysed for paracetamol, phenylephrine hydrochloride and guaifenesin concentrations; adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: This study enrolled 45 subjects. For paracetamol and guaifenesin, the syrup and reference product were considered to be bioequivalent. Bioequivalence was not shown for phenylephrine hydrochloride. All adverse events were mild or moderate, most of which were considered formulation related. CONCLUSIONS: The syrup did not reach bioequivalence with the reference product, as bioequivalence could not be shown for phenylephrine hydrochloride. This may be due to differences in the excipients between the two products. Both the syrup and the reference product had a good safety profile and were well tolerated.