Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pain Physician ; 27(5): 317-320, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39087969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The gender bias in academic anesthesiology is well known. Women are not only a minority in the field but also underrepresented in leadership positions. Reported reasons for this underrepresentation include barriers to career advancement, lack of mentorship, and differences in compensation, among others. Interventional pain, a competitive procedural subspecialty of anesthesiology, sees the trickle-down effects of this disparity. According to a report from the ACGME that sorted medical subspecialties by number of female trainees, pain medicine ranked in the bottom quartile across all disciplines from 2008-2016. OBJECTIVES: To better understand the landscape for women physicians in the field of pain medicine, we undertook this investigation to review the knowledge about the topic and what questions remain unanswered. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a review of the current literature and aims to summarize and describe the landscape of pain medicine for women physicians. SETTING: All literature review and manuscript preparation took place at the Yale University School of Medicine. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for the combined terms "gender disparity," "pain medicine," and "anesthesiology," limiting our search to the year 2000 onward for the most recent literature on the topic. Our initial search retrieved 38 articles. All relevant articles pertaining to this perspective piece were collated. The available literature is discussed below. RESULTS: Women are underrepresented in interventional pain. The grim scarcity of female pain physicians is unlikely to improve soon, since while the number of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education pain fellowship programs continues to grow, women trainees comprise only between 22-25% of all pain medicine fellows. Additionally, although studies have compared the numbers of male interventional pain faculty to their female counterparts in academic hospitals and shown the ratio to range from 71.84-82% to 18-28.52%, respectively, no studies have truly explored the landscape for women physicians in private practice. Patients prefer and have better experiences with physicians who are racially and ethnically like themselves. In fact, the preference for and the lack of female clinicians have been associated with delayed pursuit of care and adverse health outcomes. The consequences of the burnout and attrition caused by the gender disparity, especially in a field like pain medicine, cannot be understate. LIMITATIONS: The review might not have been comprehensive, and relevant studies might not have been included. CONCLUSION: While the gender disparity in academia is well documented for both anesthesiology and pain medicine, the reasons for this disparity have not been fully explored. Moreover, it is also unknown whether the minority of female physicians who select pain medicine as a subspecialty gravitate toward an academic or a private-practice path. To address the existing gender disparity, it is necessary to explore the landscape of interventional pain medicine in both academic and private practices and understand pain physicians' beliefs and sentiments regarding their subspecialty.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Mujeres , Sexismo , Humanos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Anestesiología/educación
2.
J Pain ; 25(1): 132-141, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549775

RESUMEN

Guidelines recommend consideration of modification, tapering, or discontinuation of long-term, full-agonist opioid therapy when harms outweigh benefits; one alternative to tapering or discontinuing full-agonist opioids for the management of chronic pain is switching to the partial agonist buprenorphine. As the use of buprenorphine for pain expands, understanding the patient experience during and after the transition to buprenorphine is critical. We conducted 45- to 60-minute semistructured qualitative interviews with 19 patients to understand the experiences of patients with chronic pain actively maintained on buprenorphine after previously receiving full-agonist, long-term opioid therapy. Patients were recruited from 2 medical centers via provider referral. Through thematic analysis, 5 overall themes were identified, including satisfaction with buprenorphine, the importance of preconceptions about buprenorphine, experiences with transitions, patient-provider communication, and potential contributions to racial disparities in pain care. While we heard a range of experiences, most patients were satisfied with buprenorphine, reporting either equivalent pain control to their previous regimens or reporting less analgesia but improved functioning due to a reduction in side effects (eg, mental clarity). Patients also emphasized the importance of a nonjudgmental, patient-centered approach, including education about the risks and benefits of buprenorphine. The few Black patients interviewed all reported limited access to pain care, which is consistent with the well-documented existence of racial disparities in access to pain treatment. As buprenorphine is used more frequently for pain management, provider education focused on pain treatment disparities, patient-centered approaches informed by motivational interviewing, and increasing acceptance of buprenorphine as an option for pain are needed. PERSPECTIVE: Qualitative analyses of patient experiences transitioning from full-agonist opioids to buprenorphine for chronic pain revealed general satisfaction. Patients reflected on functioning, tradeoffs between analgesia and side effects, patient-centered care, and access to treatment, highlighting how future research should focus on outcomes valued by patients.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Dolor Crónico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Veteranos , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/inducido químicamente , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Bone ; 136: 115351, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32276154

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Standard of care metabolic bone disease assessment relies on changes to bone quantity, which can only be detected after structural changes occur. PURPOSE: To investigate the usefulness of Bone Metabolism Score (BMS), derived from fluorine 18 labeled sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET/CT imaging as a biomarker of localized metabolic changes at the femoral neck. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 139 participants (68 females and 71 males, ages 21-75 years) that had undergone 18F-NaF PET/CT were included. BMS was calculated as the ratio of standard uptake value (SUV) in the bone region to that of the total region. Correlations and linear regressions of BMS with age, CT-derived bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), height, and weight were conducted. Differences in BMS between women younger and older than the age of 50 years were assessed. Inter- and intra-operator reproducibility was evaluated by coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Among females, age was negatively correlated with left and right whole BMS (5.61% and 4.90% drop in BMS per decade of life) and left and right cortical BMS (10.50% and 10.09% drop in BMS per decade of life). BMS of women older than 50 years was lower than BMS of women younger than 50 years (P < .0001). Among males, age was negatively correlated with left and right whole BMS (4.29% and 4.25% drop in BMS per decade of life) and left and right cortical BMS (9.13% and 10.30% drop in BMS per decade of life). BMD was positively correlated with whole (r = 0.80, P < .0001) and cortical (r = 0.92, P < .0001) BMS. CONCLUSIONS: BMS could provide functional insight regarding bone metabolism in the femoral neck to complement bone health status assessed through conventional structural imaging. The methodology described herein could be potentially useful for assessing hip fracture risk in individuals when BMD tests provide borderline determination of bone disease.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Fluoruro de Sodio , Adulto , Anciano , Densidad Ósea , Femenino , Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
4.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 47(7): 1678-1687, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31734781

RESUMEN

AIMS: To investigate the benefit of utilizing 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT over calcium and Framingham scoring for potential preventative coronary artery disease (CAD) intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study included 136 participants (ages 21-75, BMI 18-43 kg/m2): 86 healthy controls and 50 patients. CT heart segmentations were superimposed onto PET images and standard uptake values (SUV) were calculated by a semi-auto segmentation method of drawing volumes of interest around the heart. Intergroup comparisons were made matching 37 patient/control pairs based on age, gender, and BMI. ROC curves were generated to determine how well SUV and Framingham methods predicted patient status. Regressions including all 136 participants were performed between SUV, age, and BMI. Patients exhibited higher average SUV (SUVmean; P = 0.006) and Framingham scores (P = 0.02) than controls. However, ROC curves indicated that SUVmean could discriminate patients from controls (AUC = 0.63, P = 0.049), but Framingham scores could not (AUC = 0.44, P = 0.38). Calcium scores and maximum SUV (SUVmax) did not differ between patients and controls. SUVmean correlated with age and BMI among females (age, partial R2 = 0.16, P = 0.001; BMI, partial R2 = 0.12, P = 0.004) and males (age, partial R2 = 0.28, P < 0.0001; BMI, partial R2 = 0.22, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Unlike calcium scores, NaF PET/CT-derived values differed between patients and controls. Framingham risk score patterns echoed those of SUVmean, but were not sensitive enough to predict patient status. SUVmean values increased with age and BMI. Therefore, incorporation of NaF PET/CT into routine prognostic CAD assessment might prove beneficial for assessing early stage plaque calcification in coronary arteries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01724749).


Asunto(s)
Vasos Coronarios , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Calcificación Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Calcio , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fluoruro de Sodio , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...