Evolution of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease over 5 years under routine medical care--the ProGERD study.

BACKGROUND: The evolution of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) under current management options remains uncertain. AIM: To examine whether, depending on the initial presentation, non-erosive (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD) without Barrett's oesophagus will progress to more severe disease under current routine care following the resolution of the initial condition. METHODS: Patients with the primary symptom of heartburn were included at baseline, and stratified into non-erosive (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD), LA grades A-D (Los Angeles classification). After a 2- to 8-week course with esomeprazole therapy to achieve endoscopic healing in ERD and symptom relief in NERD, patients were treated routinely at the discretion of their physician. We report oesophagitis status and the presence of endoscopic and confirmed Barrett's oesophagus after 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 6215 patients were enrolled in the study of whom 2721 patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Progression, regression and stability of GERD severity were followed from baseline to 5 years. Only a few patients with NERD and mild/moderate ERD progressed to severe forms of ERD and even Barrett's oesophagus. Most patients remained stable or showed improvement in their oesophagitis; 5.9% of the NERD patients, 12.1% of LA grade A/B patients and 19.7% of LA grade C/D patients in whom no Barrett's oesophagus was recorded at baseline progressed to endoscopic or confirmed Barrett's oesophagus at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Most GERD patients remain stable or improve over a 5-year observation period under current routine clinical care.

[Spleen ruptures after screening colonoscopy]. / Milzruptur nach Vorsorgekoloskopie.

Splenic injury during colonoscopy is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. The case of an 82-year-old male patient with a ruptured spleen after screening colonoscopy is reported. The predisposing risk factors for a laceration of the spleen during colonoscopy are discussed as well as the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Health-related quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease under routine care: 5-year follow-up results of the ProGERD study.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder associated with substantial reductions in health-related quality of life (HRQL). AIM: To describe patterns of change in HRQL during 5 years of follow-up in a large population of GERD patients. METHODS: In 2000, a total of 6215 GERD patients were enrolled in the Progression of GERD (ProGERD) study. During follow-up, patients received any medication considered necessary. HRQL was assessed yearly with the Short-Form 36 and the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaires. Associations between patient characteristics and changes in HRQL were analysed using multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: After 5 years, data on HRQL were available for 4597 (74%) patients. Both generic and disease-specific HRQL improved after baseline and remained well above baseline levels in the following years. A clinically relevant decrease in QOLRAD scores was reported by 3-5% of patients. According to our multivariate analysis, a decrease in HRQL was associated with a higher reflux symptom load and the presence of night-time heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small minority of the ProGERD population reported a clinically relevant decrease in HRQL, which was associated most strongly with nocturnal heartburn.

Clinical course of laryngo-respiratory symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease during routine care--a 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be associated with laryngo-respiratory symptoms (LRS) such as chronic cough, asthma or laryngeal symptoms. AIM: To analyse the long-term clinical course of LRS in a large population with GERD and LRS. METHODS: ProGERD is a prospective multicentre cohort study of 6215 adult out-patients with GERD. At baseline, the prevalence of LRS was assessed. Initial standardized treatment was esomeprazole for up to 8 weeks. After 5 years of follow-up, patients were interviewed for LRS and a multivariate analysis was performed with resolved vs. persistent symptoms for chronic cough, asthma and laryngeal symptoms. RESULTS: In all, 2886 patients (46.4%) were available for analysis at baseline and at 5 years. The prevalence of chronic cough and laryngeal disorders had decreased while the prevalence of asthma had increased. Resolution of LRS was independent of clinical reflux characteristics or PPI medication. CONCLUSIONS: In a large population with GERD, only few patients reported persistent LRS over 5 years. Resolution of LRS was independent of the stage of GERD and PPI treatment. Accordingly, data on the direction of causality between GERD and LRS are lacking and the strength of the association between the two must remain controversial.

Serum gastrin and pepsinogens do not correlate with the different grades of severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Gastrin and pepsinogens reflect the functional state of the gastric mucosa. AIM: To evaluate whether serum gastrin and pepsinogens correlate with the different grades of severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: In all, 388 patients with heartburn not taking any form of acid suppressive therapy were matched-controlled for age and gender and sub-classified into four groups: group 1 non-erosive reflux disease (NERD); group 2, erosive reflux disease (ERD) Los Angeles (LA) A and B, group 3, ERD LA C and D; group 4 Barrett's oesophagus (BO). Fasting serum was analysed for gastrin 17, pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II und Helicobacter pylori using specific EIA tests (GastroPanel; Biohit, Plc). STATISTICS: Kruskal-Wallis test and analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was a significant difference among the four groups with respect for pepsinogen I, but not for pepsinogen II, the pepsinogen I pepsinogen II ratio, H. pylori serology and gastrin levels. Pepsinogen I was the lowest in NERD and the highest in BO (median 91.6, mean +/- standard deviation 106.2 +/- 51.6 vs. median 114.7, mean +/- standard deviation 130.4 +/- 70.6; P = 0.046). Pepsinogen I levels were higher in H. pylori positive subjects. After adjusting for H. pylori status, the differences in pepsinogen I across patient groups were no longer statistically significant (P = 0.298). CONCLUSIONS: Serum gastrin and pepsinogen I and II do not correlate with the different grades of severity of GERD. The non-invasive GastroPanel is not useful for the differentiation of the various forms of GERD.

Long-term treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in routine care - results from the ProGERD study.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition frequently requiring long-term pharmacological treatment. AIM: To describe the long-term pattern of GERD medication use in GERD patients receiving routine care. METHODS: Patients were recruited as part of the ongoing ProGERD study, a 10-year-cohort study including 6215 patients at baseline. GERD medication and symptoms were assessed with patient questionnaires. During follow-up, medical treatment was prescribed by participating primary care physicians. Associations between patient characteristics and medication were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who reported using any GERD medication remained constant from year 1 to year 4 (74%, 74%, 73% and 71%). Of patients who reported using GERD medication, the majority were taking proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (79%, 84%, 85%, and 87%). Continuous PPI intake was the predominant prescription pattern (53%, 49%, 56% and 56%), followed by on-demand treatment (26%, 35%, 29% and 29%). Continuous PPI intake was strongly associated with the presence of erosive GERD. CONCLUSION: Three-quarters of the GERD population in our study reported long-term treatment with a PPI. Continuous PPI intake was the predominant treatment pattern, and the proportion of patients taking a PPI on a continuous basis remained constant over time.

Extraesophageal manifestations in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition that affects about 20-30% of the adult population, presenting with a broad spectrum of symptoms and varying degrees of severity and frequency. Other manifestations are being increasingly recognized: the so-called ''extraesophageal'' manifestations, such as laryngitis, hoarseness, chronic cough, asthma, or non-cardiac chest pain. Epidemiological studies consistently demonstrate significant associations between pulmonary manifestations and GERD. Up to 50% of patients with an endoscopically proven esophagitis suffer from symptoms other than heartburn or acid regurgitation. However, the published estimates of extraesophageal disorders in patients with GERD vary widely, which may be a result of referral bias. The most effective initial approach in suspected reflux-related extraesophageal symptoms is empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. However, studies demonstrated that the advantage of long-term PPI treatment over placebo could have been overestimated.

Histological effects of esomeprazole therapy on the squamous epithelium of the distal oesophagus.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor therapy has been reported to reduce proliferative changes of the oesophagus significantly in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM: To assess the histological effects of esomeprazole treatment on the oesophagus. METHODS: Data were derived from a subgroup of patients participating in the proGERD study, who had either erosive reflux disease (n = 720) or non-erosive reflux disease (n = 35) and who had biopsy data from two sites [(i) 2 cm above the z-line and (ii) at the z-line], obtained at baseline and following treatment with esomeprazole. Proliferative changes of the squamous epithelium were assessed histologically by measuring thickness of the basal cell layer and elongation of the papillae as a percentage of the whole epithelial thickness. RESULTS: In erosive reflux disease patients, the thickness of the basal cell layer and length of the papillae pretreatment were associated with the severity of oesophagitis (P < 0.05), at both biopsy sites. After esomeprazole treatment, baseline thickness and length of papillae were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) at both biopsy sites in non-erosive reflux disease and erosive reflux disease patients (particularly those with Los Angeles grades C and D). CONCLUSION: This demonstrates a strong correlation between severity of GERD and histological parameters. Esomeprazole therapy resulted in clear reversal of proliferative changes observed prior to treatment in the squamous epithelium at both biopsy locations.

Cost-of-disease analysis in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's mucosa.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and frequently chronic condition that causes considerable costs. AIM: To estimate the economic burden caused by patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease, and Barrett's oesophagus. METHODS: The Progression of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease study includes a total of 6,215 patients. At baseline, patients were categorized as non-erosive reflux disease, erosive reflux disease, or Barrett's oesophagus according to endoscopic findings alone or as confirmed by histology. Direct and indirect disease-related costs were calculated based on 5,273 patients with complete information in the second year of the study. RESULTS: A total of 73% of the Progression of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease patients had taken GERD medication, 61% had visited a doctor, and 2% had been hospitalized because of GERD during the previous 12 months. Of all employed persons, 6% reported days off work because of GERD. This health resource utilization caused direct costs of 342+/-864 (mean+/-s.d.) and indirect costs of 40+/-473 per patient and year. Total costs for patients with Barrett's oesophagus or erosive reflux disease were higher than those for patients with non-erosive reflux disease. CONCLUSION: Patients with GERD frequently need long-term medication and doctor care. The disorder is associated with a considerable health economic burden to society.

Long-term clinical course of extra-oesophageal manifestations in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A prospective follow-up analysis based on the ProGERD study.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can be associated with extra-oesophageal reflux disease such as chronic cough or laryngeal symptoms. The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical course of extra-oesophageal reflux disease in a large population with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and extra-oesophageal reflux disease under routine clinical care. METHODS: ProGERD is a prospective multicentre cohort study of 6215 outpatients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. At baseline all patients underwent endoscopies and were interviewed for extra-oesophageal reflux disease. Initial standardised treatment was esomeprazole for up to 8 weeks. After 2 years of follow-up, reflux symptoms and the prevalence of extra-oesophageal reflux disease were assessed. A multivariate analysis was performed with resolved versus persistent symptoms for chronic cough and laryngeal symptoms as dependent predictors. Independent variables were gender, age, body mass index (BMI), alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease classification, history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in the family, duration of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and proton pump inhibitors medication. RESULTS: Four thousand four hundred and four patients (71%) were available for analysis at 2 years, including 570 and 454 patients who had chronic cough and laryngeal disorders at baseline, respectively. In 63% and 74% of the patients, chronic cough and laryngeal disorders had resolved. Patients with persistent respiratory symptoms in year 2 had significantly more reflux symptoms. Further clinically relevant associations were smoking and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use. According to the multivariate analysis, classification of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, proton pump inhibitors medication or duration of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were not associated with the resolution of cough or laryngeal symptoms. CONCLUSION: In most patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and extra-oesophageal reflux disease, respiratory symptoms resolve during long-term routine care. A high reflux symptom load was associated with the persistence of respiratory disorders.

[Reflux-associated sleep disorders]. / Refluxassoziierte Schlafstörungen.

Difficulties of initiating or maintaining sleep are very common in the general population. Individuals with clinical sleep disorders have a greatly impaired quality of life. The causes for sleeping disorders are complex, but evidence has recently come from different trials supporting a causal relationship between gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and sleep disorders in some patients. The majority of patients with GERD report reflux symptoms during the night. It is well known that especially at night reflux is characterized by prolonged esophageal acid exposure. Recent data have indicated that sleep disorders significantly improve while on efficacious antisecretory treatment. In particular in patients with sleep disorders but no previously known GERD, the search for it is recommended and should be followed by adequate antisecretory treatment. In other severe diseases associated with sleep, like the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), an association with esophageal acid exposure has been proven. The sleep apnea-associated reflux has probably a multifactorial etiology: in cases with other predisposing conditions for gastro-esophageal reflux, OSAS promotes the development of reflux. Antisecretory treatment has been able to improve the severity of OSAS. The purpose of this review has been to survey of recent publications in GERD-associated sleep disorders, as well as the possible pathophysiological basis of the observed phenomena.

[Capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers: current situation in Germany]. / Kapselendoskopie bei Herzschrittmacher-Patienten: Aktueller Stand in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The study evaluated the actually experience of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with electrical implants (cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator) in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was sent to all centers in Germany doing capsule endoscopy. The questionnaire covers the number of examined patients, monitoring during CE, check of the electric implants before and after CE, occurrence of arrhythmia, quality of CE-video, complications, location and indication of CE. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 154 hospitals and 51 surgeries. 43% of the questionnaires were sent back to our hospital. In 28 centers 45 Patients with a cardiac pacemaker (CP) and 8 patients with a defibrillator (ICD) were examined with CE. There were no relevant complications. In only two cases supraventricular extrasystoles were seen. 93% of patients with a cardiac pacemaker and 67% of the patients with a defibrillator were examined in a hospital. The predominant indication (patients with CP 86%, patients with ICD 67%) was a gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSION: There are limited experiences of CE in patients with electric implants in Germany. Domain of CE is the diagnostic of gastrointestinal bleeding. Through the results of the inquiry you can conclude that CE in patients with cardiac pacemakers seems to be acceptable in the clinics.

Prognostic influence of Barrett's oesophagus and Helicobacter pylori infection on healing of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and symptom resolution in non-erosive GORD: report from the ProGORD study.

BACKGROUND: Adequacy of acid suppression is a critical factor influencing healing in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). The European prospective study ProGORD was set up to determine the endoscopic and symptomatic progression of GORD over five years under routine care, after initial acid suppression with esomeprazole. We report on factors influencing endoscopic healing and symptom resolution during the acute treatment phase. METHODS: Patients with symptoms suggestive of GORD underwent endoscopy and biopsies were obtained from the oesophagus for diagnosis of abnormalities, including Barrett's oesophagus (BO). Data from 6215 patients were included in the "intention to treat" analysis, 3245 diagnosed as having erosive reflux disease (ERD) and 2970 non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). ERD patients were treated with esomeprazole 40 mg for 4-8 weeks for endoscopic healing while NERD patients received 20 mg for 2-4 weeks for resolution of heartburn symptoms. RESULTS: Endoscopic healing occurred overall in 87.7% of ERD patients although healing was significantly lower in those with more severe oesophagitis (76.9%) and in those with BO (72.4%), particularly in Helicobacter pylori negative BO patients (70.1%). Age, sex, and body mass index appeared to have no significant impact on healing. Complete heartburn resolution was reported by 70.4% of ERD patients and by 64.8% of NERD patients at the last visit. Only H pylori infection had a significant influence on complete heartburn resolution in the NERD group (68.1% and 63.7% for H pylori positive and H pylori negative, respectively; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The presence of Barrett's mucosa, as well as severe mucosal damage, exerts a negative impact on healing. H pylori infection had a positive influence on healing in ERD patients with coexistent BO but no influence on those without BO.

What parameters are relevant for the histological diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease without Barrett's mucosa?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are still ongoing controversies as to which histological parameters allow the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of the present analysis was to relate histological changes of the esophageal squamous epithelium to different severities of GERD. METHODS: Data were obtained from patients participating in the ProGERD study, who had either erosive reflux disease (ERD, n = 3,245) or non-erosive reflux disease (NERD, n = 2,970). 1,475 patients fulfilled our requirement of having complete biopsy data from two sites (2 cm above the z-line and at the z-line). Changes in the squamous epithelium were assessed by measuring the thickness of the basal cell layer and elongation of the papillae as a percentage of the whole epithelial thickness and counting interepithelial inflammatory cells. RESULTS: The most useful parameters for histological assessment of GERD (given as means, 2 cm above the z-line and at the z-line, respectively) were elongation of the papillae: NERD 40.7 and 48.9%; ERD 46.1 and 54.9% and basal cell hyperplasia: NERD 12.7 and 17.9%; ERD 15.7 and 23.0%. The occurrence of intraepithelial lymphocytic infiltrates, however, is dependent on the severity of GERD, and they are more common than neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocytes. CONCLUSION: This study shows that both NERD and ERD can be diagnosed histologically if biopsies are obtained from the distal esophagus or from the z-line. Intraepithelial inflammatory cells are rare and show a high specificity, but very low sensitivity.

Risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease: methodology and first epidemiological results of the ProGERD study.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the design and report the first results of the Progression of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (ProGERD) study, to our knowledge the largest prospective study of GERD patients. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Patients were recruited at 1,253 centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Following an assessment of medical history, all patients were endoscoped and received esomeprazole for 2 to 8 weeks before entering the 5-year observational phase. RESULTS: A total of 6,215 patients (53% male, age 54+/-14) were included. Of these patients, 46% reported at least daily symptoms, 15% were unable to work at least once during the prior year, and 71% had visited a physician due to reflux symptoms. Barrett's esophagus (BE) was found in 11% of our GERD patients. In polychotomous regression analysis, the main factors related to the occurrence of the three GERD subgroups (nonerosive, erosive disease, and BE) were age, gender, duration of GERD, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and previous PPI use. Factors associated with longer disease duration were increasing age, male gender, BMI, increasing symptom severity, presence of erosive GERD or BE, positive family history, and smoking. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that GERD is a great burden for patients, and has significant socioeconomic implications. The long-term follow-up period with further endoscopic and histologic evaluations, will help further our understanding of the natural course of the disease.

[Gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic sinusitis]. / Gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit und chronische Sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: It is increasingly suggested that there may be a connection between gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and chronic sinusitis. We therefore wished to establish whether the literature contains sufficient evidence to support this assumption. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a search in Medline (PubMed) and EMBASE with the key words "GERD, GER, reflux, sinusitis, chronic sinusitis". The literature obtained was assessed with regard to the reported results and their evidence levels. The level of evidence was classified according to the usual levels I - IV, only levels Ia or Ib being considered sufficient evidence for a knowledge gain confirmed by therapeutic trials. RESULTS: A total of 77 references were found in Medline and 142 in EMBASE. A large number of these were narrative review articles addressing the connection between GERD or sinusitis and asthma or GERD or sinusitis and chronic cough. Only 12 papers and one case report dealt more or less directly with the question of a connection between chronic sinusitis and reflux. None of the studies could be classed as evidence level I (randomised controlled trials), ten were classed as level III studies, one as level IIb and one as level IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The existing studies do not allow us to pinpoint LPR (and even less so GERD) as a clear-cut factor in the aetiopathogenesis of chronic sinusitis. However, despite all their deficiencies and limitations the studies nevertheless do show that reflux into the pharynx and nasopharynx is possible. This reflux (= LPR) can lead to chronic inflammation which can be successfully treated with antireflux therapy with proton pump inhibitors. Quantification of the association is not currently possible. An above-average proportion of the patients with chronic rhinosinusitis appear to have GERD/LPR. However the prevalence of GERD in the population is generally high. It has not yet been established with sufficient certainty whether the LPR must be regarded as a causative factor, whether it exacerbates or chronifies the disease or whether it is merely an epi-phenomenon which does not require specific treatment. To answer this important question we need prospective randomised controlled studies which will provide evidence of sufficient quality. These should be conducted with the help of standardised documentation.

Quality of life in relation to symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-- an analysis based on the ProGERD initiative.

AIMS: To determine the impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on the quality of life, to assess changes in the quality of life during treatment with esomeprazole and to define factors that can predict these changes. METHODS: Patients with GERD (n=6215) were included in a prospective cohort study (ProGERD). All patients underwent endoscopy and received esomeprazole. At baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment, symptoms and quality of life were assessed. Factors that influenced changes in the quality of life were determined by multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: At baseline, the quality of life in GERD patients was lower than that in the general population, and was similar to that in patients after acute coronary events. No differences in symptoms or quality of life were observed between the subgroups of patients with non-erosive GERD, erosive GERD and Barrett's oesophagus. After treatment with esomeprazole, the symptoms and quality of life were improved in all subscales within 2 weeks (P<0.001). The mean score of the disease-specific quality of life instrument (Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Patients) increased from 4.6 to 6.2 points, representing a highly relevant clinical improvement. The generic quality of life (SF-36) reached levels similar to those in the general population, but, again, no difference was found between the three different subgroups of GERD patients. The main factors associated with an improvement in the quality of life after treatment were symptom relief, severe erosive reflux disease, absence of extra-oesophageal disorders, avoidance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake and positive Helicobacter pylori status. CONCLUSIONS: GERD causes a significant impairment in the quality of life that can be attenuated or normalized within a time period as short as 2 weeks by treatment with esomeprazole. These findings were similar across the whole GERD patient spectrum.

Prevalence of extra-oesophageal manifestations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an analysis based on the ProGERD Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be associated with a variety of extra-oesophageal disorders (EED) such as chronic cough, asthma, laryngeal disorder or chest pain. The aim of the study was to estimate and compare the prevalence of EED in a population with symptomatic GERD presenting as either erosive reflux disease (ERD) or non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). METHODS: Baseline data were collected from a prospective, multicentre, open cohort study (ProGERD) in which patients will be followed for 5 years after initial treatment with esomeprazole. Within the framework of this trial, all patients underwent gastroscopy and filled out a questionnaire designed to assess EED. The influence of potential prognostic factors on the prevalence of EED was analysed by multivariate (stepwise logistic regression) analysis. RESULTS: 6215 patients (3303 male, 2912 female; mean age 54 years) presenting with heartburn were included. EED was detected in 32.8% of all patients. The proportion was significantly higher (P = 0.0002) in ERD patients (34.9%) than in NERD patients (30.5%). As judged from the multivariate analysis, female gender, age, oesophagitis of LA grade C/D, duration of GERD disease greater than 1 years and smoking were significantly associated with EED. ERD patients with oesophagitis of LA grade A or B did not have a significantly higher risk of EED than patients with NERD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GERD have a high probability of experiencing EED, which may be associated with a number of prognostic factors such as duration and severity of GERD. Extra-oesophageal disorders are slightly, but statistically, more prevalent in ERD than in NERD patients.