Competency-Based Assessment Tool for Pediatric Esophagoscopy: International Modified Delphi Consensus.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric esophagoscopy with foreign body removal. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded modified Delphi consensus process. SETTING: Tertiary care center. METHODS: A list of 25 potential items was sent via the Research Electronic Data Capture database to 66 expert surgeons who perform pediatric esophagoscopy. In the first round, items were rated as "keep" or "remove" and comments were incorporated. In the second round, experts rated the importance of each item on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was determined with a goal of 7 to 25 final items. RESULTS: The response rate was 38/64 (59.4%) in the first round and returned questionnaires were 100% complete. Experts wanted to "keep" all items and 172 comments were incorporated. Twenty-four task-specific and 7 previously-validated global rating items were distributed in the second round, and the response rate was 53/64 (82.8%) with questionnaires returned 97.5% complete. Of the task-specific items, 9 reached consensus, 7 were near consensus, and 8 did not achieve consensus. For global rating items that were previously validated, 6 reached consensus and 1 was near consensus. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to reach consensus about the important steps involved in rigid esophagoscopy with foreign body removal using a modified Delphi consensus technique. These items can now be considered when evaluating trainees during this procedure. This tool may allow trainees to focus on important steps of the procedure and help training programs standardize how trainees are evaluated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5. Laryngoscope, 131:1168-1174, 2021.

Competency-Based Assessment Tool for Pediatric Tracheotomy: International Modified Delphi Consensus.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded, modified, Delphi consensus process. METHODS: Using the REDCap database, a list of 31 potential items was circulated to 65 expert surgeons who perform pediatric tracheotomy. In the first round, items were rated as "keep" or "remove," and comments were incorporated. In the second round, experts were asked to rate the importance of each item on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus criteria were determined a priori with a goal of 7 to 25 final items. RESULTS: The first round achieved a response rate of 39/65 (60.0%), and returned questionnaires were 99.5% complete. All items were rated as "keep," and 137 comments were incorporated. In the second round, 30 task-specific and seven previously validated global rating items were distributed, and the response rate was 44/65 (67.7%), with returned questionnaires being 99.3% complete. Of the Task-Specific Items, 13 reached consensus, 10 were near consensus, and 7 did not achieve consensus. For the 7 previously validated global rating items, 5 reached consensus and two were near consensus. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to reach consensus on the important steps involved in pediatric tracheotomy using a modified Delphi consensus process. These items can now be considered to create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. Such a tool will hopefully allow trainees to focus on the important aspects of this procedure and help teaching programs standardize how they evaluate trainees during this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 130:2700-2707, 2020.

Ossiculoplasty.

Contemporary surgical techniques for treating various pathologies affecting the middle ear address not only eradication of the underlying disease process but also restoration of normal auditory function. Trauma, neoplasms, inflammatory processes, and cholesteatomas can erode and alter normal middle ear components and relationships vital for the transmission of auditory energy to the inner ear. Over the last five decades, various ossiculoplasty techniques and prostheses have been studied and reported in the literature. Unfortunately, the multitude of reconstructive techniques attests to the fact that none of the currently available methods are ideal.

CD4+CD25+ suppressor lymphocytes in the circulation of patients immunized against melanoma antigens.

Murine studies have suggested that a population of CD4+ T cells expressing the alpha chain of the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (CD25+) are phenotypically anergic in response to T cell receptor stimulation and can suppress the function of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Recent studies of peripheral lymphocytes from healthy human volunteers have identified a similar population, although little is known about the presence and activity of these cells in patients with cancer and their possible impact on anticancer immunization strategies. Thus, the authors have undertaken these studies in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing immunizations with known melanoma antigens. CD4+ CD25+, CD4+ CD25-, and a 1:1 ratio of these isolated T cells were stimulated with soluble anti-CD3 antibody in the presence of irradiated T cell-depleted PBMCs, and proliferation was assessed by measuring [3H]thymidine incorporation. In 13 patients, isolated CD4+CD25+ T cells proliferated 68% (+/- 5.8%) less than separately cultured CD4+ CD25- T cells. Moreover, CD4+ CD25+ T cells suppressed the proliferation of an equal number of cocultured CD4+ CD25+ T cells in 11 of 13 patients by an average of 60% (+/- 4.9%). Suppression was not seen at day three of culture and became apparent at days five through nine. The degree of suppression was proportional to the numbers of CD4+ CD25+ T cells. Addition of high-dose IL-2 reversed the hypoproliferative phenotype of the CD4+ CD25+ T cells and abrogated their suppressive function. These studies demonstrate that anergic and functionally suppressive CD4+ CD25+ T cells exist in patients with melanoma undergoing tumor antigen immunization and thus may play a role in modifying the magnitude of the T cell response to immunization.