RESUMEN
AIMS: To assess features associated with glucagon prescribing and hospital admissions with hypoglycaemia in type one diabetes. METHODS: Observational study of 4462 adults. Outcome measures were features associated with glucagon prescriptions and predictors of hospital admissions with hypoglycaemia and high levels of glucagon prescribing. RESULTS: 74 % did not collect any glucagon prescriptions and 2.7 % collected >6 over 3.5 years. Hospital admission with hypoglycaemia (P = 0.032), impaired awareness (P = 0.049) and female sex (P < 0.001) were associated with glucagon collection. More frequent prescribing of glucagon was associated with diabetes duration (P < 0.001) and socioeconomic deprivation (P < 0.001). Higher average glucose (P = 0.047), higher time above 13.9 mM (P = 0.008) and higher SD (P = 0.002) were associated with glucagon prescribing. Diabetes duration (P < 0.001) and HbA1c (P < 0.001) were higher in people with hospitalised hypoglycaemia. Higher time above 13.9 mM (P = 0.004) and SD glucose (P < 0.001) were most clearly associated with hospitalised hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of people with type 1 diabetes have access to glucagon suggesting more could be done to better target this treatment. Individuals with risk factors and those with frequent glucagon prescriptions should be identified for interventions known to reduce hypoglycaemia.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Hipoglucemia , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Glucagón , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Glucemia , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/efectos adversos , Benchmarking , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Glucosa , Hospitales , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Background: Cortisol response to stressors (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, autonomic nervous system, and immune system) plays a vital role in maintaining stable metabolic homeostasis. This study was done to assess the prevalence of hypocortisolemia in patients presenting to ED with sepsis and/or septic shock. Methods: This prospective observational study was done from July 2020 to April 2021. Serum cortisol levels were measured in patients with sepsis and septic shock, and their clinical and laboratory profile was categorized, coded, and analyzed. Results: Ninety-eight patients were included, of which serum Cortisol <10 µg/dl was noted in 7 (7.2%) patients. The cohort's mean age was 52.9 (SD: 15.3) years with a male predominance (n-61; 62.2%). Most common presenting complaint was fever (n-52; 53.1%), followed by abdominal pain (n-24; 24.5%), and breathing difficulty (n-14; 14.3%). Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg and tachycardia were seen in 63 patients (64.3%). Assessment of diet and native medication use did not demonstrate a predisposition to hypocortisolemia. The median (IQR) arterial lactate values were lower in the hypocortisolemic group: 2.2 (1.2-2.5) as compared to the non-hypocortisolemic group: 3.7 (2.2-8.0). Patients with septic shock without hypocortisolemia were noted to have a higher mean lactate level (2.6 ± 1.3 Vs 5.4 ± 3.9) and lower platelet counts compared to those with low cortisol levels. Patients with normal cortisol levels (n-38; 38.8%) still had low ACTH values. Conclusion: The prevalence of hypocortisolemia was lower when compared to other Indian studies. Diet and native medication use do not predispose Indians to hypocortisolemia.
RESUMEN
The efficacy of statins in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease has been proven beyond doubt. The number needed to treat to prevent one cardiovascular event is 1 in 30 over 10 years, and the number needed to treat for secondary prevention is much lower. However, a recent study demonstrated that only 68% of eligible patients are on statin therapy. Moreover, there seems to be a reluctance to escalate statin doses due to the fear of adverse effects. The adverse effects that worries patients and their physicians most frequently are those related to muscular symptoms. N-of-1 trial evidence suggests that muscular symptoms attributed to statins are often caused by the nocebo effect. This article aims to provide a structured, evidence-based approach to suspected statin-related muscle toxicity.