Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 22(2D)2024 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866043

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parallel panel germline and somatic genetic testing of all patients with ovarian cancer (OC) can identify more pathogenic variants (PVs) that would benefit from PARP inhibitor (PARPi) therapy, and allow for precision prevention in unaffected relatives with PVs. In this study, we estimate the cost-effectiveness and population impact of parallel panel germline and somatic BRCA testing of all patients with OC incorporating PARPi therapy in the United Kingdom and the United States compared with clinical criteria/family history (FH)-based germline BRCA testing. We also evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multigene panel germline testing alone. METHODS: Microsimulation cost-effectiveness modeling using data from 2,391 (UK: n=1,483; US: n=908) unselected, population-based patients with OC was used to compare lifetime costs and effects of panel germline and somatic BRCA testing of all OC cases (with PARPi therapy) (strategy A) versus clinical criteria/FH-based germline BRCA testing (strategy B). Unaffected relatives with germline BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 PVs identified through cascade testing underwent appropriate OC and breast cancer (BC) risk-reduction interventions. We also compared the cost-effectiveness of multigene panel germline testing alone (without PARPi therapy) versus strategy B. Unaffected relatives with PVs could undergo risk-reducing interventions. Lifetime horizon with payer/societal perspectives, along with probabilistic/one-way sensitivity analyses, are presented. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained were compared with £30,000/QALY (UK) and $100,000/QALY (US) thresholds. OC incidence, BC incidence, and prevented deaths were estimated. RESULTS: Compared with clinical criteria/FH-based BRCA testing, BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 germline testing and BRCA1/BRCA2 somatic testing of all patients with OC incorporating PARPi therapy had a UK ICER of £51,175/QALY (payer perspective) and £50,202/QALY (societal perspective) and a US ICER of $175,232/QALY (payer perspective) and $174,667/QALY (societal perspective), above UK/NICE and US cost-effectiveness thresholds in the base case. However, strategy A becomes cost-effective if PARPi costs decrease by 45% to 46% or if overall survival with PARPi reaches a hazard ratio of 0.28. Unselected panel germline testing alone (without PARPi therapy) is cost-effective, with payer-perspective ICERs of £11,291/QALY or $68,808/QALY and societal-perspective ICERs of £6,923/QALY or $65,786/QALY. One year's testing could prevent 209 UK BC/OC cases and 192 deaths, and 560 US BC/OC cases and 460 deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Unselected panel germline and somatic BRCA testing can become cost-effective, with a 45% to 46% reduction in PARPi costs. Regarding germline testing, unselected panel germline testing is highly cost-effective and should replace BRCA testing alone.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Pruebas Genéticas , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/economía , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/genética , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/economía , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/economía , ARN Helicasas/genética , Adulto , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Proteínas del Grupo de Complementación de la Anemia de Fanconi/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN
2.
BJOG ; 131(6): 848-857, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37752678

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient preference for short (gist) or detailed/extensive decision aids (DA) for genetic testing at ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis. DESIGN: Cohort study set within recruitment to the Systematic Genetic Testing for Personalised Ovarian Cancer Therapy (SIGNPOST) study (ISRCTN: 16988857). SETTING: North-East London Cancer Network (NELCN) population. POPULATION/SAMPLE: Women with high-grade non-mucinous epithelial OC. METHODS: A more detailed DA was developed using patient and stakeholder input following the principles/methodology of IPDAS (International Patients Decision Aids Standards). Unselected patients attending oncology clinics evaluated both a pre-existing short and a new long DA version and then underwent mainstreaming genetic testing by a cancer clinician. Appropriate inferential descriptive and regression analyses were undertaken. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction, readability, understanding, emotional well-being and preference for long/short DA. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 66 years (interquartile range 11), and 85% were White British ethnicity. Of the participants, 74% found DAs helpful/useful in decision-making. Women reported higher levels of satisfaction (86% versus 58%, p < 0.001), right amount of information provided (76.79% versus49.12%, p < 0.001) and improved understanding (p < 0.001) with the long DA compared with the short DA. There was no statistically significant difference in emotional outcomes (feeling worried/concerned/reassured/upset) between 'short' and 'long' DA; 74% of patients preferred the long DA and 24% the short DA. Patients undergoing treatment (correlation coefficient (coef) = 0.603; 95% CI 0.165-1.041, p = 0.007), those with recurrence (coef = 0.493; 95% CI 0.065-0.92, p = 0.024) and older women (coef = 0.042; 95% CI 0.017-0.066, p = 0.001) preferred the short DA. Ethnicity did not affect outcomes or overall preference for long/short DA. CONCLUSIONS: A longer DA in OC patients has higher satisfaction without increasing emotional distress. Older women and those undergoing treatment/recurrence prefer less extensive information, whereas those in remission preferred a longer DA.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Pruebas Genéticas
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(17)2021 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34503154

RESUMEN

We present findings of a cancer multidisciplinary-team (MDT) coordinated mainstreaming pathway of unselected 5-panel germline BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 and parallel somatic BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in all women with epithelial-OC and highlight the discordance between germline and somatic testing strategies across two cancer centres. Patients were counselled and consented by a cancer MDT member. The uptake of parallel multi-gene germline and somatic testing was 97.7%. Counselling by clinical-nurse-specialist more frequently needed >1 consultation (53.6% (30/56)) compared to a medical (15.0% (21/137)) or surgical oncologist (15.3% (17/110)) (p < 0.001). The median age was 54 (IQR = 51-62) years in germline pathogenic-variant (PV) versus 61 (IQR = 51-71) in BRCA wild-type (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in distribution of PVs by ethnicity, stage, surgery timing or resection status. A total of 15.5% germline and 7.8% somatic BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs were identified. A total of 2.3% patients had RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 PVs. A total of 11% germline PVs were large-genomic-rearrangements and missed by somatic testing. A total of 20% germline PVs are missed by somatic first BRCA-testing approach and 55.6% germline PVs missed by family history ascertainment. The somatic testing failure rate is higher (23%) for patients undergoing diagnostic biopsies. Our findings favour a prospective parallel somatic and germline panel testing approach as a clinically efficient strategy to maximise variant identification. UK Genomics test-directory criteria should be expanded to include a panel of OC genes.

4.
Kidney Int ; 93(4): 961-967, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29398133

RESUMEN

The clinical diagnosis of inherited renal tubulopathies can be challenging as they are rare and characterized by significant phenotypic variability. Advances in sequencing technologies facilitate the establishment of a molecular diagnosis. Therefore, we determined the diagnostic yield of a next generation sequencing panel assessing relevant disease genes in children followed through three national networks with a clinical diagnosis of a renal tubulopathy. DNA was amplified with a kit provided by the European Consortium for High-Throughput Research in Rare Kidney Diseases with nine multiplex PCR reactions. This kit produced 571 amplicons covering 37 genes associated with tubulopathies followed by massive parallel sequencing and bioinformatic interpretation. Identified mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Overall, 384 index patients and 16 siblings were assessed. Most common clinical diagnoses were 174 patients with Bartter/Gitelman syndrome and 76 with distal renal tubular acidosis. A total of 269 different variants were identified in 27 genes, of which 95 variants were considered likely, 136 definitely pathogenic and 100 had not been described at annotation. These mutations established a genetic diagnosis in 245 of the index patients. Genetic testing changed the clinical diagnosis in 16 cases and provided insights into the phenotypic spectrum of the respective disorders. Our results demonstrate a high diagnostic yield of genetic testing in children with a clinical diagnosis of a renal tubulopathy, consistent with a predominantly genetic etiology in known disease genes. Thus, genetic testing helped establish a definitive diagnosis in almost two-thirds of patients thereby informing prognosis, management and genetic counseling.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Mutacional de ADN/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Mutación , Defectos Congénitos del Transporte Tubular Renal/genética , Acidosis Tubular Renal/diagnóstico , Acidosis Tubular Renal/genética , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Síndrome de Bartter/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Bartter/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Marcadores Genéticos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Síndrome de Gitelman/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Gitelman/genética , Herencia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Linaje , Fenotipo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Defectos Congénitos del Transporte Tubular Renal/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Prenat Diagn ; 38(1): 44-51, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29266293

RESUMEN

The identification of cell-free fetal DNA circulating in maternal blood combined with technological developments, in particular next-generation sequencing, is enabling the development of safer prenatal diagnosis. While this technology has been widely applied as a highly sensitive screening test for aneuploidy, there has been relatively little clinical application for the diagnosis of monogenic disorders. In the UK, we have established non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) as a clinical service for a range of inherited disorders. The results from NIPD do not require confirmation by invasive testing and are welcomed by patients and health professionals alike. Here, we describe the technical approaches used, current practice and outline recommendations for best practice when delivering an NIPD service from an accredited laboratory. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Detección del Suero Materno/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
6.
Prenat Diagn ; 35(7): 656-62, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25728633

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Accurate prenatal diagnosis of genetic conditions can be challenging and usually requires invasive testing. Here, we demonstrate the potential of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood to transform prenatal diagnosis of monogenic disorders. METHODS: Analysis of cell-free DNA using a PCR and restriction enzyme digest (PCR-RED) was compared with a novel NGS assay in pregnancies at risk of achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia. RESULTS: PCR-RED was performed in 72 cases and was correct in 88.6%, inconclusive in 7% with one false negative. NGS was performed in 47 cases and was accurate in 96.2% with no inconclusives. Both approaches were used in 27 cases, with NGS giving the correct result in the two cases inconclusive with PCR-RED. CONCLUSION: NGS provides an accurate, flexible approach to non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of de novo and paternally inherited mutations. It is more sensitive than PCR-RED and is ideal when screening a gene with multiple potential pathogenic mutations. These findings highlight the value of NGS in the development of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for other monogenic disorders.


Asunto(s)
Acondroplasia/diagnóstico , ADN/sangre , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Pruebas de Detección del Suero Materno , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodos , Displasia Tanatofórica/diagnóstico , Acondroplasia/genética , Biomarcadores/sangre , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Masculino , Mutación , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Embarazo , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Displasia Tanatofórica/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...