RESUMEN
Objectives: Pap smear screenings are associated with a 60% reduction in cervical cancer rates for women over the age of 40 years. West Texas presents a challenge for cervical cancer screening as demonstrated by some of the highest incidence and mortality rates of any region in Texas. This study examined the role of socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors in the nonadherence of underserved/uninsured women treated by Access to Breast and Cervical Cancer Care for West Texas (ABC24WT) in three regions with the goal of identifying barriers to screening and higher risk groups. Methods: ABC24WT Program database was queried from November 1, 2018, to June 1, 2021, for sociodemographic variables, screening history, and screening results to identify high-risk groups for outreach. Independent samples t-test, Pearson's chi square test, and logistic regression were used to detect significant relationships between variables. Results: There were 1,998 women from the ABC24WT Program included in the study. The program's rates of abnormal pap tests were 21.5% (Council of Government 1 [COG-1]), 8.1% (Council of Government 2 [COG-2]), and 9.6% (Council of Government 7 [COG-7]), all much higher than the nation's average of 5%. Women without recent cervical screening (5 or more years) represented 31.8% (n = 183) of COG-1, 40.3% (n = 132) of COG-2, and 49.5% (n = 61) of COG-7. In addition, a lower baseline adherence rate was noted in women with reduced incomes (<$600 per month per person) than those with higher incomes (p = 0.008). Non-Hispanic women were two times more likely to "no-show" screening appointments than Hispanic women (odds ratio [OR] = 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.08). However, Hispanic women required two times more colposcopies and biopsies (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.05-4.13). Conclusions: Hispanic race and poverty represent a high-risk category for cervical cancer and form an important target for community outreach in West Texas.
RESUMEN
The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes that tuberculosis (TB) in children and adolescents is often overlooked by healthcare providers and difficult to diagnose. As childhood TB cases rise, finding a diagnostic high in sensitivity and specificity is critical. In this study 91 urine samples from children aged 1-10 years were analyzed for tuberculostearic acid (TBSA) by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and capture ELISA (C-ELISA). In C-ELISA the CS35/A194-01 antibody performed very poorly with both curve-based and model-based cutoffs. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the CS35 OD450 values was only 0.60. Replacing the capture antibody with BJ76 gave a better performance in both sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.95). When these samples were analyzed by GC/MS, 41 classified as 'probable/possible' for TB were distinctly TBSA positive with ten samples having <3 ng/mL LAM. However, from the 50 samples with 'unlikely' TB classification, 36 were negative but 7 had >3 ng/mL and were designated as LAM positive. This experimental assay assessment study signifies that i) the antibody pair CS35/A194-01 that has been successful for adult active TB diagnosis is not adequate when LAM level is low as in pediatric TB; ii) no one mAb appears to recognize all TB-specific LAM epitopes.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos , Niño , Epítopos , Humanos , Límite de Detección , Lipopolisacáridos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tuberculosis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Importance: A thickened placenta is easily identified on ultrasound and provides insight into maternal and fetal wellbeing as well as underlying structural and physiologic anomalies. Objectives: The aim of this study was to review the literature to clarify what classifies a placenta as "thickened" and to review the associated incidence, maternal and fetal comorbidities, and management during pregnancy. Evidence Acquisition: Electronic databases (PubMed and Web of Science) were searched from 2000 to 2020 in the English language. Studies were selected that examined associations between placental thickness, potential etiologies, and obstetric outcomes. Results: There were 140 abstracts identified. After reviewing the articles, 60 were used in this review. Routine assessment of the placenta in the prenatal period is an easy and inexpensive way to assess the maternal and fetal patients. The criteria for a "thickened placenta" vary between studies based on gestational age, placental location, measurement technique, and maternal or fetal factors. Whereas most suggest thickness exceeding 4 cm is pathologic, a review had a threshold of 6 cm in the third trimester to classify placentomegaly. Several maternal and fetal conditions have been associated with a thickened placenta, such as obesity, parity, anemia, diabetes, preeclampsia, cardiac dysfunction, infection, assisted reproductive technology, multiple pregnancy, sacrococcygeal teratomas, and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. A thickened placenta in pregnancy is associated with a higher incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Conclusions: The literature is clear that early evaluation of the placenta using ultrasound should be a standard practice. A thickened placenta found on routine imaging should prompt a more thorough investigation to determine the etiology of the placentomegaly. At the time of this literature review, there are no recommendations regarding modality or frequency of antenatal surveillance in pregnancies complicated by a thickened placenta. However, serial ultrasounds and weekly antenatal testing in the third trimester should be considered. Relevance: A thickened placenta has been associated with a variety of maternal and fetal conditions and increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Fetales , Placenta , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Placenta/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Diagnóstico PrenatalRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Early detection through appropriate screening is key to curing breast cancer. The Access to Breast Care for West Texas (ABC4WT) program offers no-cost mammography to underserved women in West Texas. The U.S. Preventative Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are breast cancer screening guidelines which suggest screening for all women at the age of 50 years. The focus of this study was to identify sociodemographic barriers and determinants for breast cancer screenings, as well as screening outcomes, in low income, uninsured, or under-insured communities in West Texas. Materials and Methods: The ABC4WT program's patient database was queried from 1 November, 2018, to 1 June, 2021, for sociodemographic variables, screening history, and results to identify high-risk groups for outreach. The American College of Radiology's risk assessment and quality assurance tool, BI-RADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System), a widely accepted lexicon and reporting schema for breast imaging, was used for risk differentiation. Results: The cancer rate for ABC4WT's program was significantly higher than the national mean (5.1), at 23.04 per 1000 mammograms. Of the 1519 mammograms performed, women between 40 and 49 years old represented the highest percentages of BI-RADS 4 and 5 (42.0% and 28.0%, respectively; p = 0.049). This age group also received 43.7% of biopsies performed and comprised 28.6% (n = 10) of cancers diagnosed (n = 35) (p = 0.031). Additionally, participants with a monthly household income of less than USD 800/month/person were more likely to result in a cancer diagnosis (70.6%) than higher incomes (29.4%) (p = 0.021). Conclusions: These determinants most starkly impacted women 40-49 years old who would not have been screened by U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. This population with increased cancer risk should be encouraged to undergo screening for breast cancer via mammography.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Pacientes no Asegurados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Texas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Laryngeal cysts are rare lesions of the larynx that are often described on incidental discovery. We report an unusual presentation of a large ductal cyst located on the laryngeal surface of the epiglottis. The patient presented with a low tone voice while displaying bilateral normal appearing vocal cords with normal mobility. Computed tomography scans and flexible laryngoscopy showed a round supraglottic mass approximately 2 cm in diameter on the right lateral laryngeal surface of the epiglottis. The mass was removed surgically during microsuspension laryngoscopy with excision of the mucocele utilizing a gold laser. Postoperatively, the patient's voice returned to baseline with no complications.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that spine surgery patients with a history of bariatric surgery do not differ in expectations of surgery, perceived benefit of surgical intervention, or physician determined outcome of surgery from patients with no history of bariatric surgery. METHODS: Patients seen in our spine clinic between January 1, 2 009 and December 30, 2 010 were reviewed. Included patients had a history of bariatric surgery and were 18 to 89 years old. We compared their expectations for recovery, self-perceived clinical outcome (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] or Neck Disability Index [NDI] and visual analog scale [VAS]), satisfaction with surgery, and physician-perceived clinical outcome (Odom's criteria) to a matched cohort with no such history. Patients were matched by type of surgery (approach, levels, and procedure), diagnosis, sex, body mass index (BMI), weight category, age, and smoking status. RESULTS: Of 210 included patients, 89 underwent spine surgery. One bariatric patient could not be matched. Seventeen received cervical spine surgery; 71 received lumbar spine surgery. The 2 cohorts had similar expectations and satisfaction. Patients with no history of bariatric surgery tended to be more satisfied than the bariatric surgery patients, but not significantly so. ODI/NDI and VAS scores were statistically worse for the bariatric cohort. Differences were attributed to differences among lumbar spine surgery patients; neck surgery patients were not different. Odom's scores were not different between the two. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative expectations and satisfaction of bariatric patients are similar to those of nonbariatric patients. Bariatric patients receiving lumbar spine surgery experienced inferior clinical outcomes compared with nonbariatric patients. Cervical spine surgery bariatric patients have similar clinical outcomes as nonbariatric patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Compare the expectations and outcomes of students involved in rural medical training versus those of urban trainees. METHODS: Survey items relating to primary care interest were added to program evaluation surveys already being sent at the beginning and end of the primary clinical year. Students from the graduating class of 2016 and the class of 2017 responded to the surveys (N=115). Responses from students trained in rural sites were compared with students trained in medium or large communities. For the purposes of the survey, primary care was not specifically defined and was open to participants' interpretation. Primary care is commonly thought of as the medical care from the doctor who sees a patient first and provides treatment or decides the other specialist care that the patient may need. Primary care specialties can include family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology. RESULTS: Most students enter their primary clinical year undecided about specialty choice and preferred practice location. At the end of the primary clinical year, most students have decided on a specialty and most report wanting to practice in communities similar to where they trained during that year. Before the primary clinical year student attitudes toward primary care are not significantly different based on selected training site. However at the end of the primary clinical year, students who had been trained in small communities were significantly more likely to choose primary care compared with students trained in medium to large communities. CONCLUSIONS: For students who begin the primary clinical year undecided regarding specialty choice, and practice location, the community size of the training site plays a large role in the decisions they will make. A majority of students trained in small communities chose to go into primary care and practice in small communities.