Electrocardiographic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and the role of diabetes duration.

BACKGROUND: The association between type 2 diabetes and electrocardiographic (ECG) markers are incompletely explored and the dependence on diabetes duration is largely unknown. We aimed to investigate the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes associated with type 2 diabetes over time. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we matched people with type 2 diabetes 1:1 on sex, age, and body mass index with people without diabetes from the general population. We regressed ECG markers with the presence of diabetes and the duration of clinical diabetes, respectively, adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, smoking, heart rate, diabetes medication, renal function, hypertension, and myocardial infarction. RESULTS: We matched 988 people with type 2 diabetes (332, 34% females) with as many controls. Heart rate was 8 bpm higher (p < 0.001) in people with vs. without type 2 diabetes, but the difference declined with increasing diabetes duration. For most depolarization markers, the difference between people with and without type 2 diabetes increased progressively with diabetes duration. On average, R-wave amplitude was 6 mm lower in lead V5 (p < 0.001), P-wave duration was 5 ms shorter (p < 0.001) and QRS duration was 3 ms (p = 0.03). Among repolarization markers, T-wave amplitude (measured in V5) was lower in patients with type 2 diabetes (1 mm lower, p < 0.001) and the QRS-T angle was 10 degrees wider (p = 0.002). We observed no association between diabetes duration and repolarization markers. CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 diabetes was independently associated with electrocardiographic depolarization and repolarization changes. Differences in depolarization markers, but not repolarization markers, increased with increasing diabetes duration.

Association of DIO2 and MCT10 Polymorphisms With Persistent Symptoms in LT4-Treated Patients in the UK Biobank.

CONTEXT: Some evidence suggests gene-treatment interactions might cause persistent symptoms in individuals receiving levothyroxine (LT4) treatment. OBJECTIVE: We investigated, as previously hypothesized, if single-nucleotide variations (SNVs; formerly single-nucleotide polymorphisms) in rs225014 (Thr92Ala), rs225015, or rs12885300 (ORFa-Gly3Asp) in the deiodinase 2 gene (DIO2), or rs17606253 in the monocarboxylate transporter 10 gene (MCT10) were associated with outcomes indicative of local tissue hypothyroidism in LT4-treated patients and controls. METHODS: We included 18 761 LT4-treated patients and 360 534 controls in a population-based cross-sectional study in the UK Biobank. LT4 treatment was defined as a diagnosis of hypothyroidism and self-reported use of LT4 without use of 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine. Outcomes were psychological well-being, cognitive function, and cardiovascular risk factors. Associations were evaluated by linear, logistic, or ordinal logistic multiple regression. Adjustments included sex, age, sex-age interaction, and genetic principal components 1 to 10. RESULTS: Compared to controls, LT4 treatment was adversely associated with almost all outcomes, most noteworthy: Increased frequency of tiredness (P < .001), decreased well-being factor score (P < .001), increased reaction-time (P < .001), and increased body mass index (P < .001). Except for a significant association between the minor rs225015 A allele and financial dissatisfaction, there was no association of rs225014, rs225015, rs12885300, or rs17606253 with any outcomes in LT4-treated patients. For all outcomes, carrying the risk allele at these 4 SNVs did not amplify symptoms associated with LT4 treatment compared to controls. CONCLUSION: rs225014, rs225015, rs12885300, and rs17606253 could not explain changed psychological well-being, cognitive function, or cardiovascular risk factors in LT4-treated patients. Our findings do not support a gene-treatment interaction between these SNVs and LT4 treatment.

Primary weight loss failure after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is characterized by impaired gut-hormone mediated regulation of food intake.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: After Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) a subset of patients never obtain excess BMI loss (EBMIL) > 50% and are categorized as having primary weight loss (WL) failure. We hypothesized that postprandial concentrations of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) would be lower in patients with primary WL failure compared with patients with successfully maintained WL. Furthermore, that inhibition of gut hormone secretions would increase ad libitum food intake less in patients with primary WL failure. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Twenty women with primary WL failure (LowEBMIL < 50%) were individually matched to twenty women with successful WL (HighEBMIL > 60%) on age, preoperative BMI and time from RYGB. On separate days performed in a random order, patient-blinded subcutaneous injections of octreotide or saline (placebo) were followed by a fixed breakfast and an ad libitum lunch with blood sampling for appetite regulating hormones and Visual-Analogue-Scale (VAS)-scoring of hunger/satiety. Furthermore, participants underwent gene variant analysis for GLP-1, PYY and their receptors, indirect calorimetry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scans, 4-days at-home food registration and 14-days step counting. RESULTS: On placebo days, postprandial GLP-1, PYY and cholecystokinin (CCK) concentrations were similar between groups after breakfast. Fasting ghrelin was lower in LowEBMIL, but the postprandial suppression was similar. LowEBMIL had lower satiety VAS-scores and less suppression of hunger VAS-scores. Gene variants did not differ between groups. Octreotide diminished GLP-1, PYY, CCK and ghrelin concentrations in both groups. Octreotide did not affect ad libitum food intake in LowEBMIL (-1% [-13, 12], mean [95%CI]), while food intake increased in HighEBMIL (+23% [2,44]). CONCLUSIONS: Primary WL failure after RYGB was not characterized by impaired secretions of appetite regulating gut hormones. Interestingly, inhibition of gut hormone secretions with octreotide only increased food intake in patients with successful WL post-RYGB. Thus, an impaired central anorectic response to gut hormones may contribute to primary WL failure after RYGB.

Association of Levothyroxine Treatment and Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies with Antidepressant Use: A Danish Population-Based Longitudinal Study.

Background: Subjects receiving levothyroxine (LT4) treatment have increased prevalence of depression, anxiety, and antidepressant use, but whether the underlying mechanism relates to thyroid autoimmunity is still unclarified. Methods: This is a population-based longitudinal study. Baseline biochemical and questionnaire data from the Danish General Suburban Population Study (GESUS) in 2010-2013 were linked with individual-level longitudinal data in national health registries. The aim was to investigate the associations between thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAbs) and LT4 treatment, separately and through interaction, and at least one redeemed prescription for antidepressants. Logistic and Cox regression were used to evaluate initiation of antidepressant use before and after the baseline examination in GESUS, respectively. All exposures and covariates were fixed at the date of baseline examination. Thyroid autoimmunity was defined as serum TPOAbs >60 U/mL. Adjustments included sex, age, education, income, Charlson comorbidity index, smoking, and alcohol. Sensitivity analyses were performed for missing variables, exclusion of lithium use, exclusion of thyroid surgery, and conservative definitions for LT4 treatment and antidepressant use requiring at least two prescriptions. Results: We included 12,894 individuals, of whom 2353 (18%) had "past or current" antidepressant use at baseline, leaving 10,541 individuals at risk for incident antidepressant use after baseline. The median follow-up was 7.8 years during which 783 individuals (7.4% of 10,541 individuals) had incident antidepressant use. TPOAb positivity was not associated with "past or current" (odds ratio [OR] 0.90 [confidence interval, CI 0.78-1.03], p = 0.13) nor incident antidepressant use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02 [CI 0.83-1.25], p = 0.88). LT4 treatment was associated with increased "past or current" antidepressant use (OR 1.33 [CI 1.10-1.62], p = 0.004) and increased incident antidepressant use (HR 1.38 [CI 1.03-1.85], p = 0.03). There were no interactions between the effects of TPOAb positivity and LT4 treatment on the use of antidepressants in logistic (p = 0.87) or Cox regression models (p = 0.82). Sensitivity analyses were robust, except that incident use of at least two redeemed antidepressant prescriptions was not statistically significant. Conclusions: LT4 treatment, but not TPOAb positivity, was associated with increased prevalent or incident antidepressant use with at least one prescription. Our findings do not support that thyroid autoimmunity is an important factor for antidepressant use in patients receiving LT4 treatment.

Socioeconomic influence on treatment with liothyronine and desiccated thyroid extract in Denmark.

Introduction: High compared with low educational level increases the odds of starting levothyroxine (L-T4) with a normal thyroid-stimulating hormone - the mechanism is most likely patient request. The use of liothyronine (L-T3) and desiccated thyroid extract (DTE) is also speculated to be initiated at patients' request. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate if educational level influences treatment with L-T3 and DTE. Material and methods: In this register-based cross-sectional study, we included all Danish citizens ≥30 years with redeemed prescription of L-T4, L-T3, or DTE during 2017-2020. We defined educational levels as short, medium, and long (<10 years, 10-12 years, and above 12 years, respectively). The association between educational level and treatment with LT3 or DTE vs only LT4 was analyzed in logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex. Results: We included 154,360 individuals using thyroid medication of whom 3829 were treated with L-T3 (2.48%) and 430 with DTE (0.28%). The usage was highest among women (3.15%) and the age group 40-49 (5.6%). Longer education compared with short increased the odds of being treated with DTE or L-T3 (medium education odds ratio (OR) 1.61 (95% CI 1.50-1.8) and long education OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.79-2.13)). Test for trend: OR: 1.37 (95% CI 1.31-1.42). Adjustment for other covariates did not affect the results substantially. Conclusion: Persons with a longer compared to a shorter education are more often treated with either DTE or L-T3, and the usage of these drugs is limited to less than 3% of thyroid hormone users.

Plasma GDF15 levels are similar between subjects after bariatric surgery and matched controls and are unaffected by meals.

Growth differentiating factor 15 (GDF15) is expressed in the intestine and is one of the most recently identified satiety peptides. The mechanisms controlling its secretion are unclear. The present study investigated whether plasma GDF15 concentrations are meal-related and if potential responses depend on macronutrient type or are affected by previous bariatric surgery. The study included 1) volunteers ingesting rapidly vs. slowly digested carbohydrates (sucrose vs. isomaltose; n = 10), 2) volunteers who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery and unoperated matched controls ingesting a liquid mixed meal (n = 9-10 in each group), and 3) individuals with previous RYGB compared with unoperated controls ingesting isocaloric glucose, fat, or protein (n = 6 in each group). Plasma was collected after an overnight fast and up to 6 h after ingestion (≥12 time points). In cohort 1, fasting GDF15 concentrations were ∼480 pg/mL. Concentrations after sucrose or isomaltose intake did not differ from baseline (P = 0.26 to P > 0.99) and total area under the curves (tAUCs were similar between groups (P = 0.77). In cohort 2, fasting GDF15 concentrations were as follows (pg/mL): RYGB = 540 ± 41.4, SG = 477 ± 36.4, and controls = 590 ± 41.8, with no between-group differences (P = 0.73). Concentrations did not increase at any postprandial time point (over all time factor: P = 0.10) and tAUCs were similar between groups (P = 0.73). In cohort 3, fasting plasma GDF15 was similar among the groups (P > 0.99) and neither glucose, fat, nor protein intake consistently increased the concentrations. In conclusion, we find that plasma GDF15 was not stimulated by meal intake and that fasting concentrations did not differ between RYGB-, SG-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls when investigated during the weight stable phase after RYGB and SG.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our combined data show that GDF15 does not increase in response to a liquid meal. Moreover, we show for the first time that ingestion of sucrose, isomaltose, glucose, fat, or protein also does not increase plasma GDF15 concentrations, questioning the role of GDF15 in regulation of food source preference. Finally, we find that neither fasting nor postprandial plasma GDF15 concentrations are increased in individuals with previous bariatric surgery compared with unoperated body mass index (BMI)-matched controls.

Responses of gut and pancreatic hormones, bile acids, and fibroblast growth factor-21 differ to glucose, protein, and fat ingestion after gastric bypass surgery.

Postprandial gut hormone responses change after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and we investigated the impact of glucose, protein, and fat (with and without pancreas lipase inhibition) on plasma responses of gut and pancreas hormones, bile acids, and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) after RYGB and in nonoperated control subjects. In a randomized, crossover study 10 RYGB operated and 8 healthy weight-matched control subjects were administered 4 different 4-h isocaloric (200 kcal) liquid meal tests containing >90 energy (E)% of either glucose, protein (whey protein), or fat (butter with and without orlistat). The primary outcome was glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion (area under the curve above baseline). Secondary outcomes included responses of peptide YY (PYY), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), cholecystokinin (CCK), glicentin, neurotensin, ghrelin, insulin, glucagon, bile acids, and FGF-21. In the RYGB group the responses of GLP-1, GIP, glicentin, FGF-21, and C-peptide were increased after glucose compared with the other meals. The neurotensin and bile acids responses were greater after fat, while the glucagon and CCK responses were greater after protein ingestion. Furthermore, compared with control subjects, RYGB subjects had greater responses of total PYY after glucose, glucagon after glucose and fat, glicentin after glucose and protein, and GLP-1 and neurotensin after all meals, while GIP and CCK responses were lower after fat. Ghrelin responses did not differ between meals or between groups. Orlistat reduced all hormone responses to fat ingestion, except for ghrelin in the RYGB group. In conclusion, after RYGB glucose is a more potent stimulator of most gut hormones, especially for the marked increased secretion of GLP-1 compared with fat and protein.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We investigated the impact of glucose, protein, and fat meals on intestinal and pancreatic hormones, bile acid, and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) secretion in gastric bypass-operated patients compared with matched nonoperated individuals. The fat meal was administered with and without a pancreas lipase inhibitor. We found that the impact of the different meals on gut hormones, bile, and FGF 21 secretion differ and was different from the responses observed in nonoperated control subjects.