Pemetrexed plus cisplatin in patients with previously treated advanced sarcoma: a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced sarcomas have a poor prognosis and few treatment options that improve overall survival. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of pemetrexed and cisplatin combination therapy in patients with refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma (STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were included in this multicenter, phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03809637) if they progressed after receiving one or more chemotherapy regimens containing an anthracycline and/or ifosfamide. Pemetrexed was first administered intravenously, followed by cisplatin, over a cycle of 21 days, for a maximum of six cycles. The primary endpoint was a progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 months (3-month PFR). RESULTS: From January 2017 to September 2019, we enrolled 37 patients; of these, 73% had previously undergone three or more rounds of chemotherapy. Five patients (13.5%) exhibited objective responses, including two patients (2/6, 33.3%) with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, one patient (1/4, 25%) with synovial sarcoma, one patient (1/4, 25%) with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and one patient (1/4, 25%) with angiosarcoma. The median progression-free survival was 2.6 months, and the 3-month PFR was 45.9% (n = 17). None of the four patients with osteosarcoma exhibited objective responses or were progression free at 3 months. The most frequent treatment-related grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (16.2%), anemia (13.5%), thrombocytopenia (13.5%), and fatigue (8.1%). Among 26 patients (70.3%) available for immunohistochemical assessments, patients in the low-excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) and low-thymidylate synthase expression groups showed a tendency for longer overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin was associated with clinically meaningful and sustained responses among patients with advanced and refractory STS. The combination therapy met its predefined primary study endpoint.

Notch inhibition counteracts Paneth cell death in absence of caspase-8.

Opposing activities of Notch and Wnt signaling regulate mucosal barrier homeostasis and differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells. Specifically, Wnt activity is essential for differentiation of secretory cells including Wnt3-producing Paneth cells, whereas Notch signaling strongly promotes generation of absorptive cells. Loss of caspase-8 in intestinal epithelium (casp8∆int) is associated with fulminant epithelial necroptosis, severe Paneth cell death, secondary intestinal inflammation, and an increase in Notch activity. Here, we found that pharmacological Notch inhibition with dibenzazepine (DBZ) is able to essentially rescue the loss of Paneth cells, deescalate the inflammatory phenotype, and reduce intestinal permeability in casp8∆int mice. The secretory cell metaplasia in DBZ-treated casp8∆int animals is proliferative, indicating for Notch activities partially insensitive to gamma-secretase inhibition in a casp8∆int background. Our data suggest that casp8 acts in the intestinal Notch network.

Postoperative pain and influencing factors among living liver donors.

PURPOSE: In Korea, living donor transplantation is increasing steadily as a life-saving alternative. It is essential to provide living donors the mental and physical care they need throughout their lives including postoperative period. Therefore, this study explored postoperative pain among living liver donors. METHODS: We used a convenience sampling at a university-affiliated hospital from March 1 to August 30, 2009 including 102 subjects. Face-to-face interviews with questionnaires and medical records were used to assess postoperative pain levels, state and trait anxiety as well as satisfaction. Data were analyzed using SPSS 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA). RESULTS: Average age of donors was 28.9±7.7 years (ranged 16 to 53) with 70.6% male. Most donors (80.4%, n=82) were immediate family members. Ninety-one (89.2%) participants made the decision by themselves. To control postoperative pain, all participants had patient-controlled anesthesia with several types of analgesics as prescribed by physician's preference. The mean values of state anxiety, trait anxiety, and satisfaction in this study were 2.1±1.89, 36.7±7.25 and, 8.9±1.79, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that trait anxiety and number of analgesics use were significantly associated with postoperative pain. Overall, approximately 29.7% of total variability in postoperative pain could be explained by the nine variables in this model (R2=0.297, F9,102=4.28, (P<.001). There was no multicollinearity checked by tolerance, variation inflation factor, or condition index. CONCLUSION: This study of postoperative pain among living liver donors may contribute to developing the safest, most effective strategy to relieve postoperative pain after living liver donation.

Safety of ultra-rapid intravenous infusion of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in liver transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of institutional protocol for ultra-rapid hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) infusion (10,000 IU in 30 minutes) for hepatitis B virus prophylaxis in adult liver transplant recipients. METHODS: In this case-controlled study, prospectively recruited liver transplant recipients received ultra-rapid infusions of HBIG (10,000 units in 30 minutes) for 6 months. The historical control group consisted of patients who had received 1-hour HBIG infusions (conventional rapid infusion) for the precedent 6 months. RESULTS: We found that 1472 patients had received 5744 ultra-rapid HBIG infusions, whereas 1343 patients had received 5200 conventional rapid HBIG infusions. Adverse side-effects were observed after 7 (0.13%) and 9 (0.16%) infusions, respectively (P = .763). The number of infusions per month increased significantly, from 878 ± 34 before the introduction of ultra-rapid infusion to 957 ± 29 afterwards (P < .001), an increase of 10.5%. The maximal capacity of HBIG infusions per day in the outpatient clinic increased from 53 for conventional rapid infusion to 65 for ultra-rapid infusion, without expansion of the outpatient facility or equipment. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all adult liver recipients able to tolerate 1-hour infusions of HBIG can also tolerate ultra-rapid infusions well. Thus, it seems to be reasonable to perform ultra-rapid infusion protocol widely for patient convenience.