RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: This research investigated the biophysical properties, safety, and efficacy of polydioxanone (PDO) filler compared to poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. In both mouse and human skin models, a novel collagen stimulation was compared with hyaluronic acid filler. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electron microscope was used to capture images of the solid particle microsphere shape. Moreover, animal models named SKH1-Hrhr were used to assess the 12-week persistence of PDO, PLLA, or PCL filler. H&E and Sirus Red staining were used to compare collagen density. Five participants in the clinical trial received three injections in the dermis over an eight-month period. Skin density, wrinkles, and gloss were evaluated using DUB® skin scanner, Antera 3D CS, Mark-Vu, and Skin gloss meter after injection to assess the efficacy of fillers. RESULTS: PDO microspheres had uneven surfaces and were spherical and consistent in size. In comparison to other fillers, the PDO filler demonstrated complete biodegradability in just 12 weeks and better neocollagenesis, and a lower inflammatory response than the HA filler. After three injections, the human body assay showed a significant improvement in skin gloss, wrinkles, and density. CONCLUSION: In comparison to PCL and PLLA, PDO filler demonstrated a comparable volume increase rate and better biodegradability. Furthermore, although its physical characteristics are similar to those of a solid, PDO has the advantage of being more organically spread. In photoaging mice, PDO fillers are thought to offer equivalent or superior anti-wrinkle and anti-aging effects to PBS, PCL, and PLLA.