Medic and Portable Pulse Oximeter Respiratory Rate Measurement Comparison to Waveform Capnography: A Prospective, Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The second leading cause of preventable battlefield death involves airway management. Tactical combat casualty care (TCCC) guidelines emphasize combat casualty airway, breathing and respiratory evaluation, including respiratory rate (RR) measurement. The current standard of practice for the US Army medics is to measure the RR by manual counting. Manual counting methods are operator-dependent, and medics face situational stressors limiting accurate measurement of RR in combat settings. To date, no published studies evaluate alternate methods of RR measurement by medics. The purpose of this study is to compare RR assessment by medics against waveform capnography and commercial finger pulse oximeters with continuous plethysmography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study to compare Army medic RR assessments against plethysmography and waveform capnography RR. Assessments were performed prior to and following exertion at 30 and 60 seconds with both the pulse oximeter (NSN 6515-01-655-9412) and defibrillator monitor (NSN 6515-01-607-8629), followed by end-user surveys. RESULTS: Of the 40 medics enrolled over a 4-month period, most were male (85%), and reported between less than 5 years of military and medical experience. The mean manual RR reported by medics at rest did not significantly differ from waveform capnography (14.05 versus 13.98, p is equal to 0.523); however, mean manual RR reported by medics on post-exertional subjects was significantly lower than waveform capnography (25.62 versus 29.77, p is less than 0.001). Time to medic-obtained RR was slower than the pulse oximeter (NSN 6515-01-655-9412) both at rest (-7.37 seconds, p is less than 0.001) and at exertion (-6.50 seconds, p is less than 0.001). While the mean difference in RR between the pulse oximeter (NSN 6515-01-655-9412) and waveform capnography in models at rest at 30 seconds was statistically significant (-1.38, p is less than 0.001). There was no overall statistically significant differences in RR between the pulse oximeter (NSN 6515-01-655-9412) and waveform capnography in models at exertion at 30 seconds and at rest and exertion at 60 seconds. CONCLUSION: Resting RR measurement did not differ significantly; however, medic-obtained RR considerably deviated from both pulse oximeters and waveform capnography at elevated rates. Existing commercial pulse oximeters with RR plethysmography do not differ significantly from waveform capnography and should be investigated further for consideration in fielding across the force for RR assessment.

Comparing two doses of intramuscular ketorolac for treatment of acute musculoskeletal pain in a military emergency department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to assess a low-dose versus a high-dose of intramuscular (IM) ketorolac for non-inferiority in adults with acute MSK pain in an emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a single-blinded, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of adults presenting to an ED with a chief complaint of acute MSK pain. Patients were randomized to either a 15 mg or a 60 mg IM ketorolac dose. The primary outcome was the mean difference of change in pain from baseline to 60-min between the two groups as reported on a 100-mm (mm) visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included the mean difference of change in VAS scores at 30-min and the incidence of reported adverse effects associated with the administration of ketorolac. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were randomized with 55 in each group. The mean difference in pain between groups at 60-min (0.2 mm [95% CI -8.5-8.7]; p = .98) and 30 min (-1.7 mm [95% CI -8.5-5.1; p = .63) was less than the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 13 mm. There were no major adverse effects reported. Minor adverse effects were more frequent in the 60 mg group (n = 9; 16.4% vs. n = 1; 1.8%; p = .016) with burning at the injection site being the most commonly reported. CONCLUSIONS: A 15 mg dose of IM ketorolac was found to be non-inferior to a 60 mg dose for acute MSK pain in adults presenting to the ED. Discontinuing the practice of ordering 60 mg doses of IM ketorolac in place of a lower dose for acute MSK pain should be considered.

"Guidewire Intravenous Catheter Systems Do Not Improve First-Pass Success Rates for Peripheral Access When Placed By Army Combat Medics (68W) in a Pre-hospital Setting." A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial with Crossover Study Design.

Introduction: This study was completed to determine if guidewire catheters improve first-pass success and time of placement for peripheral intravenous access. In the military, 21% of casualties from the battlefield arrive to a medical facility in hemorrhagic shock. The importance of successful and timely intravenous placement is crucial in the initial steps of preventing this condition. Multiple studies and reviews have shown that initial first-pass success rates for pre-hospital intravenous placement have been as low as 40%, and an average success rate of 81% when completed by paramedics or similarly skilled personnel. In an attempt to replicate or improve these rates, we proposed to study placement success rates by active duty military combat medics. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in first-pass success rates when using either a standard or guidewire catheter. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial with a crossover study design comparing the Accucath 18-gauge guidewire catheter to the standard 18-gauge peripheral intravenous catheter. The study included 93 1st Cavalry Division Army Combat Medics. Participants were voluntarily enrolled and consented on an individual basis. Each participant paired with a partner of their choice and acted as their own control. All supplies were laid out for the participants with the catheters randomly selected for either arm of the patient. The subjects were allowed to choose which catheter they would be tested on first. Times were recorded for only successful attempts. Results: The guidewire catheter was not proven to have a higher cannulation rate, achieving only a 44% success rate versus 66% in the standard catheter group, as well as averaging 42 seconds longer to obtain successful cannulation versus the standard catheter. Interestingly, it was observed that the greater the time in service, there was an increased success rate with the guidewire catheter that was not noted with the standard catheter. Conclusions: There was not a statistically significant improvement in the first-pass success rate of intravenous placement with the use of the guidewire catheter when compared with the standard-issue catheter. With these results, we cannot recommend the guidewire catheter to be used in leu of the standard catheter. Further studies might show improvement if subjects are allotted increased practice and familiarity with the new guidewire device.

Fracture of the inferior pole of the patella.

The patient was a 19-year-old woman serving in the military at a remote location. She presented to a medical aid station with a chief complaint of right anterior knee pain after falling 3 hours prior from a height of 3 m and landing directly on the anterior aspect of her right knee.