RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reported that pravastatin can mitigate the progression of kidney disease, but limited evidence exists regarding its effects on kidney function in Asian patients. This multicenter prospective observational study aimed to assess the effect of pravastatin on kidney function in Korean patients with dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in clinical practice. METHODS: This 48-week prospective multicenter study included 2604 of 2997 eligible patients with dyslipidemia and T2DM who had available estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements. The primary endpoint was eGFR percent change at week 24 from baseline. We also assessed secondary endpoints, which included percent changes in eGFR at weeks 12 and 48 from baseline, as well as changes in eGFR, metabolic profiles (lipid and glycemic levels) at 12, 24, and 48 weeks from baseline, and safety. RESULTS: We noted a significant improvement in eGFR, with mean percent changes of 2.5%, 2.5%, and 3.0% at 12, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively (all adjusted p < 0.05). The eGFR percent changes significantly increased in subgroups with baseline eGFR 30-90 mL/min/1.73 m2, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7 at baseline, no hypertension history, T2DM duration > 5 years, or previous statin therapy. Lipid profiles were improved and remained stable throughout the study, and interestingly, fasting glucose and HbA1c were improved at 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that pravastatin may have potential benefits for improving eGFR in Korean patients with dyslipidemia and T2DM. This could make it a preferable treatment option for patients with reduced kidney function. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05107063 submitted October 27, 2021.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacies of vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily) relative to pioglitazone (15 mg once daily) as an add-on treatment to metformin for reducing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The present study was a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled investigation comparing the effects of vildagliptin and pioglitazone in Korean patients receiving a stable dose of metformin but exhibiting inadequate glycemic control. Each patient underwent a 16-week treatment period with either vildagliptin or pioglitazone as an add-on treatment to metformin. RESULTS: The mean changes in HbA1c levels from baseline were -0.94% in the vildagliptin group and -0.6% in the pioglitazone group and the difference between the treatments was below the non-inferiority margin of 0.3%. The mean changes in postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) levels were -60.2 mg/dL in the vildagliptin group and -38.2 mg/dL in the pioglitazone group and these values significantly differed (P=0.040). There were significant decreases in the levels of total, low density lipoprotein, high density lipoprotein (HDL), and non-HDL cholesterol in the vildagliptin group but increases in the pioglitazone group. The mean change in body weight was -0.07 kg in the vildagliptin group and 0.69 kg in the pioglitazone group, which were also significantly different (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: As an add-on to metformin, the efficacy of vildagliptin for the improvement of glycemic control is not inferior to that of pioglitazone in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, add-on treatment with vildagliptin had beneficial effects on PPG levels, lipid profiles, and body weight compared to pioglitazone.
