Office-Based Minor Surgery: An Ever-Increasing Challenge Not Only for the Dutch General Practitioner.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Office-based minor surgery (OBMS) refers to all surgical procedures performed under local anesthetic in the office setting. It is cost effective for the health economy, safe, and appreciated by patients. It is not yet fully understood why some general practitioners (GPs) perform OBMS and others do not, while there is a growing demand for OBMS. Therefore, we explored factors that influence the performance of OBMS by GPs. The aim of this study is to explore the facilitators and barriers that influence GPs in deciding whether to perform OBMS. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study using focus groups consisting of GPs and GP trainers. Two researchers analyzed the data independently. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in a comprehensive list of facilitators and barriers. Besides already known factors such as financial consequences and geographic location, the most important factors influencing the decision to perform OBMS were training and the role of the GP trainer; fear of having to work alone and having to solve unexpected complications; and the influence of collaboration, organization, and facilities in the GP's own practice. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing demand for OBMS in primary care centers requires more attention to training aspects, the existing fear, adequate reimbursement for special accreditation, and collaboration and organization. We expect that addressing these factors will result in the strengthening of primary care, improving patient safety, lower referral rates, and a reduction in health care costs.

Role modelling in the training of hospital-based medical specialists: a validation study of the Role Model Apperception Tool (RoMAT).

INTRODUCTION: Role modelling is a key component in the training of doctors that influences professional behaviour, identity and career choices. Clinical teachers and residents are often unaware of this, thereby risking transmission of negative behaviour. On the other hand, awareness positively affects role model behaviour. To assess role model behaviour, the Role Model Apperception Tool (RoMAT) was developed and validated in general practice training. The aim of the current study was to validate the RoMAT in the hospital-based training setting. METHODS: The authors asked first to last year residents, regardless of their specialty, to participate after written approval from their clinical teachers. The tool was completed online in 2017. The authors performed a principal component analysis and investigated internal consistency, construct validity, inter-rater reliability, known-groups comparisons and floor and ceiling effects. RESULTS: Of the 473 residents contacted, 187 (40%) completed the questionnaire. As in the primary validation study, the authors extracted two components: 'Caring Attitude' and 'Effectiveness', explaining 67% of the variation with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94 and 0.93 respectively. Evidence for construct validity was found and there were no floor or ceiling effects, but inter-rater reliability was low. DISCUSSION: The RoMAT was internally consistent and valid to assess role model behaviour of the clinical teacher towards the resident in the hospital-based training of medical specialists. The poor inter-rater reliability, most likely due to homogeneous RoMAT responses, should be borne in mind when evaluating RoMAT scores on individual clinical teachers.