[The cancer registry notification seen from the perspective of the German Society of Uro-Oncologists (d-uo)]. / Die Krebsregistermeldung aus der Sicht der Deutschen Uro-Onkologen (d-uo).

The current cancer registry notification, which was introduced in Germany as a mandatory institution in 2015, has its starting point in the National Cancer Plan of 2008. Other milestones include the Federal Cancer Registry Data Act (2009), the Cancer Early Detection and Registry Act (2013), the Uniform Oncological Basic Data Set (2014/2021) with its modules (e.g. the module prostate carcinoma 2017) as well as the Cancer Registry Data Merger Act (2021). At the beginning of 2017, the German Society of Uro-Oncologists (d-uo) had the idea of designing a documentation platform that would enable d-uo members to report to the cancer registry and transfer data to d-uo's own database - without a double effort. The cancer registry reimburses the first notification of a tumour with € 18. As the only provider, d-uo reimburses its members for the documentation effort associated with the additional notification to d-uo with a further € 18. In addition to the basic oncological data set, further parameters were defined by d-uo. This data is collected, evaluated and interpreted as part of the VERSUS study. The realisation that the parameters of the basic data set are limited in their informative value led d-uo to establish the two national registries for urothelial carcinoma (UroNAT) and prostate carcinoma (ProNAT). This underscores d-uo's leading position in uro-oncological healthcare research in Germany.

[Real-world data on prostate cancer: the VERSUS trial by d-uo]. / Ergebnisse aus der VERSUS-Studie von d-uo am Beispiel des Prostatakarzinoms.

At the beginning of 2017, the German Society of Uro-Oncologists (d-uo) had the idea of designing a documentation platform that would enable d-uo members to report cancer cases to the cancer registry and transfer data to d-uo's own database - without a double effort. The cancer registry reimburses the first notification of a tumour with €18. As the only provider, d-uo reimburses its members for the documentation effort associated with the additional notification to d-uo with a further €18. In addition to the basic oncological data set, further parameters were defined by d-uo. This data is collected, evaluated and interpreted as part of the VERSUS study. At the end of 2022, 14,834 patients with a newly diagnosed urological tumour were included in the VERSUS study. Almost two thirds of all patients had prostate cancer. About half of all patients with prostate cancer were diagnosed as part of an early detection measure. These patients then also had more favourable tumour stages. Overall, almost every eighth patient already had metastases at the time of initial diagnosis. Data from the VERSUS study are available for 2,167 operations on prostate cancer with tumour category T2 or T3. There were 1,360 operations in patients with a T2 tumour (62.8%) and 807 operations in patients with T3 tumours (37.2%). A positive margin was present in 25.5% of all operated-on patients. In relation to tumour categories T2 and T3, the proportion of a positive resection margin was 14.3% and 44.2%, respectively. The VERSUS study will continue to provide answers to many questions from the uro-oncological field with reference to the "real world" situation in Germany.

[National Registries for Urothelial Cancer (UroNAT) and Prostate Cancer (ProNAT) by d-uo]. / Nationale Register Urothelkarzinom (UroNAT) und Prostatakarzinom (ProNAT) von d-uo.

The German Society of Uro-Oncologists ("Deutsche Uro-Onkologen e.V.", d-uo) provides a national registry for urothelial cancer (UroNat) and a national registry for prostate cancer (ProNAT). These registries aim to evaluate the standard of care for urothelial cancer of the bladder and the upper urinary tract as well as prostate cancer by office-based urologists, oncologists and outpatient hospital departments in Germany. This includes, but is not limited to, adherence to guidelines during the treatment of patients with urothelial cancer and prostate cancer. The registries aim to capture and analyse scientifically how patients with these two most frequent urological tumours are treated and how quality assurance is implemented to improve the quality of their outpatient treatment in Germany. Both registries may share basic patient data supplied by the non-interventional, prospective, multicentre VERSUS registry by d-uo, which has been ongoing since 2018 and today includes more than 15,000 patients with different urological malignancies. In the UroNAT and ProNAT registries, additional items and parameters are included to allow for more detailed analyses of outcomes of outpatient treatments in Germany, which have so far been unavailable from the German Cancer Registry. By documenting the current treatment landscape of urothelial and prostate cancer in the outpatient setting, the registries intend to identify potential improvements of patient care and to initiate their implementation into clinical practice. These non-interventional prospective registries only document daily routine diagnostics, clinical courses and procedures.

[Osteoprotection in patients with non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) receiving androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT): Real-world data from Germany, presented by d-uo]. / Osteoprotektion beim nichtmetastasierten hormonsensitiven Prostatakarzinom (nmHSPC) unter androgendeprivativer Therapie (ADT): Aktuelle Daten aus Deutschland, vorgelegt von d-uo.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with prostate cancer often present with reduced bone mineral density. We herein present real-world data (RWD) regarding osteoprotection in patients with non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (nmHSPC) receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) treated by German urologists in private practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a questionnaire-based study including members of d-uo ("Deutsche Uro-Onkologen", German uro-oncologists). Patients with nmHSPC between July 2019 and June 2020 were included. They were asked about start, type and duration of osteoprotection as well as supplementation with calcium and vitamin D. RESULTS: Between July 2019 and June 2020, a total of 3,692 patients with prostate cancer were seen at least once in one of the private practices of 15 urologists (all d-uo members). There were 844 patients (22.9%) with nmHSPC treated with ADT. Osteoprotection using denosumab or a bisphosphonate to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) was applied in 183/844 patients (21.7%) with nmHSPC. In patients receiving osteoprotection, denosumab was chosen in 73.2% of patients and a bisphosphonate was chosen in 26.8% of patients. Supplementation with calcium and vitamin D was given in 84.7% of patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with nmHSPC received osteoprotection in 1/5 of patients. Of these, 3/4 received denosumab and 1/4 received a bisphosphonate. The majority of patients were additionally treated with calcium and vitamin D. In our study, osteoprotection in patients with nmHSPC was rather an exception.

[Osteoprotection in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): real-world data from Germany, presented by d-uo]. / Osteoprotektion beim ossär metastasierten kastrationsresistenten Prostatakarzinom (mCRPC): Aktuelle Daten aus Deutschland, vorgelegt von d-uo.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with bone metastasis due to prostate cancer often present allover reduced bone mineral density. Additionally, patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have a relevant risk for skeletal-related events (SRE). We herein present real-world data (RWD) regarding osteoprotection in mCRPC patients with bone metastasis treated by German urologists in private practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a questionnaire-based study including members of d-uo ("Deutsche Uro-Onkologen", German uro-oncologists). All patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer seen at least once in the surveyed urology practice between July 2019 and June 2020 were included. Questions included start, type and duration of osteoprotection as well as supplementation with calcium and vitamin D. RESULTS: Between July 2019 and June 2020, a total of 3,692 patients with prostate cancer were seen at least once in 15 urology practices. There were 410 mCRPC patients (11.1%) with bone metastasis. Osteoprotection with denosumab or a bisphosphonate to prevent SRE was applied in 274/410 mCRPC patients (66.4%) with bone metastasis. In patients receiving osteoprotection, denosumab was chosen for 67.9% of patients and a bisphosphonate was chosen for 32.1%. Supplementation with calcium and vitamin D was performed in 93.4% of the patients. The median duration of treatment was 25.3 months for denosumab compared with 39.6 months for bisphosphonates. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mCRPC with bone metastasis received osteoprotection in 2/3 of cases. Of these, 2/3 received denosumab and 1/3 received a bisphosphonate. The majority of patients were also treated with calcium and vitamin D. According to guideline recommendations regarding osteoprotection in mCRPC patients with bone metastasis, our RWD data showed some lack of guideline adherence.

[Retrospective practice-related care research study on therapy of mCPRC with radium-223 dichloride]. / Retrospektive Versorgungsstudie von d-uo zur Therapie des mCRPC mit Radium-223-dichlorid.

During phase III study ERA-223, patients under combination therapy with radium-223 and abiraterone showed an increased risk of bone fractures and a possible higher risk of death. This observation led to a change in the German therapeutic guidelines in 2018. Radium-223 is now only allowed as a third-line monotherapy (besides ADT) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with symptomatic bone lesions without known visceral metastases or for patients with mCRPC, for whom no other available systematic therapy is suitable. Since almost no data on practice-related care research on the use of radium-223 exist, we consulted members of d-uo (German Uro-Oncologists) over their therapy algorithms. This study analysed data of patients treated with radium-223 between 2014 and 2019. It could be shown that 50% of mCRPC-patients had received radium-223 in the past as third-line therapy. Half of these were treated in combination with new androgen receptor targeted therapies (ARTA) and no increase in bone fractures was observed. This was most likely due to the additional use of bone protecting agents. Despite the late cancer stage, treatment response was seen in almost half of the patients.

Systemic treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the context of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: recommendations from the interdisciplinary working group for renal tumors (IAG-N).

This letter summarizes recommendations from the interdisciplinary working group of renal tumors (IAGN) of the German Cancer Society for the systemic treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the context of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

A prospective study investigating the impact of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naïve patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: The PROKOMB study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) according to current guidelines systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostate is performed to verify or rule out PCa. However, TRUS-guided biopsy can result in underdetection of clinically significant cancers as well as diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancers. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) might improve the diagnostic pathway and help to avoid unnecessary biopsies. DESIGN AND METHODS: The PROKOMB (Prostata - Kooperatives MRT-Projekt Berlin) study is a prospective two-arm multicentre study designed to evaluate the potential role of mpMRI as a triage test before biopsy. Up to 600 biopsy-naïve men with suspicion for PCa undergo mpMRI at two dedicated imaging centers. Only patients with equivocal or suspicious lesions on mpMRI undergo prostate biopsy including systematic as well as MRI-guided targeted biopsies at several different community-based urologists or hospitals. The PROKOMB study is designed to evaluate how many biopsies can be avoided, how many clinically insignificant cancers are diagnosed on prostate biopsy in patients with positive findings on mpMRI, and how many clinically significant cancers are missed using this alternative diagnostic pathway. For the purpose of this study clinically significant PCa is defined as Gleason ≥3+4 cancer. In addition, the detection rates of different techniques for MRI-guided biopsy are evaluated as well as psychological distress before mpMRI and after the diagnosis of PCa. CONCLUSION: The PROKOMB study might help in defining the role of mpMRI in biopsy-naïve patients with suspected PCa in an ambulatory care setting.

Sequential mTOR inhibitor treatment with temsirolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma following failure of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Agents targeting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, e. g. everolimus, can provide clinical benefit in pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but data from randomized trials on the sequential use of temsirolimus are lacking. We retrospectively studied the efficacy and safety of temsirolimus therapy following failure of rTKI therapy. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients treated with temsirolimus (25 mg/week) following progression on rTKI therapy were studied at four institutions. All patients had failed at least one prior rTKI therapy (sunitinib, n = 6; sorafenib, n = 1; both, n = 22). Over 80% had two or more prior therapies. Data on efficacy (response assessment, progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS]) and safety (NCI-CTC) were analyzed. RESULTS: Adverse events occurred in 90% of patients with the majority being grade 1 (n = 4, 14%) or grade 2 (n = 12, 41%). Most grade 3/4 toxicities (n = 10, 34%) were manageable and included anemia (n = 4, 14%), leukopenia/neutropenia (n = 2, 7%), hyperglycemia (n = 1, 3%), acidosis/alkalosis (n = 2, 7%), and infection (n = 1, 3%). One patient discontinued temsirolimus for grade 3 pneumonitis. Median (range) PFS and OS were 5.1 months (1-10.4) and 18.0 months (12.6-23.3), respectively. Best response included partial response (n = 1) and stable disease (n = 15) for a disease control rate of 55%, and disease progression of 45% (n = 13). CONCLUSIONS: Temsirolimus after rTKI failure appears to provide promising safety and efficacy comparable to other treatment options in pretreated patients with mRCC.

Difference between clinical and pathologic renal tumor size, correlation with survival, and implications for patient counseling regarding nephron-sparing surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the difference between clinical tumor size and pathologic tumor size and the influence of both parameters on cancer-specific survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical tumor size was measured by CT in 834 patients undergoing nephrectomy and was compared with pathologic tumor size. Clinical tumor size and clinical tumor stages were assessed in a central radiologic review. Several variables were analyzed regarding their impact on cancer-specific survival by use of the Kaplan-Meier method, multivariable Cox regression, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up for patients who were alive at the end of the study (n = 564) was 85 months. The mean clinical and pathologic tumor size was 5.93 and 5.53 cm, respectively (p = 0.005). Of 265 patients with cT1a tumors, only 3.0% (n = 8) had pathologic tumor stage pT3a or higher. In contrast, 15.2% of 317 patients with cT1b tumors had pathologic tumor stage pT2 or higher. Five-year cancer-specific survival according to clinical tumor size was 94% (≤ 4 cm), 83% (4.01-7 cm), and 68% (> 7 cm), respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that metastasis, sex, age, and clinical tumor size significantly influenced cancer-specific survival. Integration of pathologic tumor size instead of clinical tumor size into multivariable analysis resulted in a reduction of predictive accuracy of 2.3%. CONCLUSION: CT significantly overestimated tumor size in the overall study group, but this overestimation is unlikely to be of clinical importance regarding the decision about radical versus nephron-sparing surgery. However, clinical understaging in 15% of cT1b tumors should be considered in treatment decision making. Clinical tumor size had an independent impact on cancer-specific survival and revealed a higher prognostic value compared with pathologic tumor size.

Sequence therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: comparison of common targeted treatment options following failure of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The best sequence of targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has not been sufficiently defined. OBJECTIVE: To describe the efficacy and toxicity of sequential everolimus (EV) versus receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (rTKI) following failure of first rTKI treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study of 108 patients receiving rTKI or EV after progression on rTKI therapy at two German academic centres. INTERVENTION: Sequence of systemic targeted treatment with sunitinib (n=85) or sorafenib (n=23) followed by EV (n=62) or another rTKI (n=46; sorafenib, n=35; sunitinib, n=11). MEASUREMENTS: We measured response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.0) and toxicity. Survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression) was conducted for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Main patient characteristics did not significantly differ by sequence of treatment groups (rTKI-rTKI vs rTKI-EV). Response rate following first rTKI failure was not significantly different between sequential therapies with a disease control rate of 51.6% (EV) and 43.5% (rTKI). The corresponding median PFS was 3.6 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-5.4) for EV and 4.0 mo (3.2-4.9) for rTKI treatment. The estimated OS was longer for the rTKI-EV group (43 mo; 95% CI, 33.9-52.1) than for the rTKI-rTKI group (29 mo; 95% CI, 18.6-39.5; p=0.03), but this difference lost statistical significance in multivariable-adjusted analyses. Intrinsic rTKI resistance was independently associated with inferior subsequent PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.79; 95% CI, 1.15-3.62; p=0.015) and OS (HR: 6.54; 95% CI, 3.01-14.20; p<0.001). Limitations are the retrospective design, limited numbers of cases, and residual confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: The sequence therapies rTKI-EV and rTKI-rTKI may be equally efficacious in terms of PFS and response rate, whereas a tendency towards superior survival was observed for the rTKI-EV sequence. These data, particularly the potential benefit of an early change of mode of action, need confirmation in randomised comparative trials.

Efficacy of sunitinib re-exposure after failure of an mTOR inhibitor in patients with metastatic RCC.

BACKGROUND: The sequential use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) followed by mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) has been recently established for the systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, subsequent treatment in mTORi-refractory disease remains undetermined. We analyzed the efficacy of sunitinib re-challenge after failure of an mTORi at 2 German centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients who failed both sunitinib and an mTORi were analyzed, and all patients were re-exposed to sunitinib. Tumor assessment was performed every 2nd cycle of sunitinib or every 3 months. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST criteria. RESULTS: Initial treatment with sunitinib was associated with a median progression free survival (PFS) of 21 months. Objective response consisted of 2 (15%) complete remissions and 7 (54%) partial remissions (PR) as best response. At the time of re-exposure, 12 of 13 (92%) patients again showed clinical benefit which was associated with a median PFS of 6.9 months and consisted of 2 (15%) PR and 10 (77%) disease stabilizations. CONCLUSIONS: In sunitinib-responsive patients, re-challenge with sunitinib has been successfully introduced after mTORi-refractory disease, underscoring the at least partially transient nature of TKI resistance in mRCC.

Metabolic profiling reveals key metabolic features of renal cell carcinoma.

Recent evidence suggests that metabolic changes play a pivotal role in the biology of cancer and in particular renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Here, a global metabolite profiling approach was applied to characterize the metabolite pool of RCC and normal renal tissue. Advanced decision tree models were applied to characterize the metabolic signature of RCC and to explore features of metastasized tumours. The findings were validated in a second independent dataset. Vitamin E derivates and metabolites of glucose, fatty acid, and inositol phosphate metabolism determined the metabolic profile of RCC. α-tocopherol, hippuric acid, myoinositol, fructose-1-phosphate and glucose-1-phosphate contributed most to the tumour/normal discrimination and all showed pronounced concentration changes in RCC. The identified metabolic profile was characterized by a low recognition error of only 5% for tumour versus normal samples. Data on metastasized tumours suggested a key role for metabolic pathways involving arachidonic acid, free fatty acids, proline, uracil and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. These results illustrate the potential of mass spectroscopy based metabolomics in conjunction with sophisticated data analysis methods to uncover the metabolic phenotype of cancer. Differentially regulated metabolites, such as vitamin E compounds, hippuric acid and myoinositol, provide leads for the characterization of novel pathways in RCC.

The immunocytokine F8-IL2 improves the therapeutic performance of sunitinib in a mouse model of renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We investigated the therapeutic action of F8-IL2, a fusion protein consisting of the F8 antibody specific to the alternatively spliced extradomain-A of fibronectin, in diabody format and of human interleukin-2 in the Caki-1 (ATCC®) model of human renal cell carcinoma grafted subcutaneously in nude mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: F8-IL2 was cloned, expressed in CHO cells and purified to homogeneity. This immunocytokine was administered alone or combined with 3 standard drugs commonly used as therapy for kidney cancer, including sunitinib, sorafenib and interferon-α, in 2 sets of doses and treatment schedules. RESULTS: Neither F8-IL2 nor any other therapeutic agent cured tumor bearing mice when used as a single agent. The best therapeutic results were observed for the combination of sunitinib with F8-IL2 in a continuous administration schedule, which yielded a 28% cure rate and substantial tumor growth retardation. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that recombinant interleukin-2 based immunocytokines are now being investigated in several clinical trials in patients with cancer alone or combined with chemotherapy our preclinical results provide a motivation to study F8-IL2 combined with sunitinib in clinical trials in patients with kidney cancer.

The tumour-targeting human L19-IL2 immunocytokine: preclinical safety studies, phase I clinical trial in patients with solid tumours and expansion into patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: L19-IL2, a tumour-targeting immunocytokine composed of the recombinant human antibody fragment L19 (specific to the alternatively-spliced EDB domain of fibronectin, a well characterised marker of tumour neo-vasculature) and of human IL2, has demonstrated strong therapeutic activity in animal cancer models. This phase I/II trial was performed to evaluate safety, tolerability, recommended phase II dose (RD) and early signs of activity of L19-IL2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five cohorts of patients with progressive solid tumours (n=21) received an intravenous infusion of L19-IL2 (from 5 to 30 Mio IU IL2 equivalent dose) on days 1, 3 and 5 every 3 weeks. This treatment cycle was repeated up to six times. In the following expansion phase, patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (n=12) were treated at the RD of L19-IL2. Clinical data and laboratory findings were analysed for safety, tolerability and activity. RESULTS: Preclinical studies in rats and monkeys did not raise any safety concerns. The RD was defined to be 22.5 Mio IU IL2 equivalent. Pharmacokinetics of L19-IL2 was dose proportional over the tested range, with a terminal half-life of 2-3h. Toxicities were manageable and reversible with no treatment-related deaths. We observed stable disease in 17/33 patients (51%) and 15/18 with mRCC (83%) after two cycles. Median progression-free survival of RCC patients in the expansion phase of the study was 8 months (1.5-30.5). CONCLUSIONS: L19-IL2 can be safely and repeatedly administered at the RD of 22.5 Mio IU IL2 equivalent in advanced solid tumours. Preliminary evaluation suggests clinical activity of L19-IL2 in patients with mRCC.

Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia for prostate cancer.

Magnetic nanoparticles are increasingly used for clinical applications such as drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic fluid hyperthermia. A novel method of interstitial heating of tumours following direct injection of magnetic nanoparticles has been evaluated in humans in recent clinical trials. In prostate cancer this approach has been investigated in two separate phase I studies, employing magnetic nanoparticle thermotherapy alone and in combination with permanent seed brachytherapy. The feasibility and good tolerability was shown in both trials, using the first prototype of an alternating magnetic field applicator. As with any other heating technique, this novel approach requires specific tools for planning, quality control and thermal monitoring, based on appropriate imaging and modelling techniques. In these first clinical trials a newly developed method for planning and non-invasive calculations of the 3-dimensional temperature distribution based on computed tomography was validated. Limiting factors of the new approach at present are patient discomfort at high magnetic field strengths and irregular intratumoural heat distribution. Until these limitations are overcome and thermoablation can safely be applied as a monotherapy, this treatment modality is being evaluated in combination with irradiation in patients with localised prostate cancer.

Ten-year survival analysis for renal carcinoma patients treated with an autologous tumour lysate vaccine in an adjuvant setting.

About 30% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) will develop recurrence after surgery. Despite evidence for a significantly improved survival by autologous tumour cell vaccination therapy, the procedure has not become standard. Between August 1993 and December 1996, 1,267 RCC patients undergoing radical nephrectomy in 84 German hospitals were subsequently treated by autologous tumour cell vaccination therapy. The study group comprised 692 patients with complete follow-up (stages pT2-3, pNx-2, M0 based on the TNM classification, 4th edition). Subsequent propensity-score matching according to 7 defined criteria with 861 control patients undergoing nephrectomy alone without adjuvant treatment at the Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, resulted in 495 matched pairs. Overall and stage-specific survival rates were analysed after a median follow-up of 131 months. The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 80.6 and 68.9% in the vaccine group and 79.2 and 62.1% in the control group (p = 0.066). Patients with pT3 stage RCC revealed 5- and 10-year OS rates of 71.3 and 53.6% in the study group and 65.4 and 36.2% in the control group (p = 0.022). In multivariable analysis, patients in the vaccine group showed a significantly improved survival both in the whole study group (HR = 1.28, p = 0.030) and in the subgroup presenting with pT3 stage tumours (HR = 1.67, p = 0.011). Adjuvant treatment with autologous vaccination therapy resulted in a significantly improved overall survival in pT3 stage RCC patients, suggesting benefit especially in this subgroup. However, controlled clinical trials integrating the recent TNM classification and further risk constellations are required to define additional patient groups that may derive benefit from this treatment.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using FloSeal for hemostasis: technique and experiences in 102 patients.

OBJECTIVES: The authors report their techniques, perioperative data, and oncological outcome for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a single-center experience with 3 different surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 102 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal partial nephrectomy for exophytic tumors using FloSeal for hemostasis. Mean age was 58 years (range = 26-79 years), and median tumor size was 2.6 cm (range = 0.5-8.5 cm). In 84 cases, the renal artery was clamped using endoscopic bulldog clamps, and tumor resection was performed using scissors or the harmonic scalpel. Hemostasis was achieved by application of FloSeal; lesions of the collecting system were closed with Lahodny sutures in 33 cases (31%). Frozen sections were obtained for margin status. RESULTS: All 102 procedures were successful with no intraoperative complications. Mean surgical time was 201 minutes (range = 60-355 minutes); clamping time was 25.8 minutes (range = 6-75 minutes) in 64 cases. Margins were negative in 92 cases; in 8 cases secondary resection was necessary to achieve negative margin status, and in 2 cases radical nephrectomy was performed. Histological findings were clear-cell carcinoma in 51 (50.0%), papillary carcinoma in 26 (25.5%), and others in 25 (24.5%) cases. At a mean follow-up of 32 months (12-62 months), no recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with the use of FloSeal is a feasible and safe method for treatment of small renal masses. The technique is reproducible by surgeons who are used to complex laparoscopic procedures. Patient outcome during follow-up was comparable with data published for open standard procedures.

Down-regulation of the pro-apoptotic XIAP associated factor-1 (XAF1) during progression of clear-cell renal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Decreased expression of the interferon-stimulated, putative tumour suppressor gene XAF1 has been shown to play a role during the onset, progression and treatment failure in various malignancies. However, little is yet known about its potential implication in the tumour biology of clear-cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC). METHODS: This study assessed the expression of XAF1 protein in tumour tissue obtained from 291 ccRCC patients and 68 normal renal tissue samples, utilizing immunohistochemistry on a tissue-micro-array. XAF1 expression was correlated to clinico-pathological tumour features and prognosis. RESULTS: Nuclear XAF1 expression was commonly detected in normal renal- (94.1%) and ccRCC (91.8%) samples, without significant differences of expression levels. Low XAF1 expression in ccRCC tissue, however, was associated with progression of tumour stage (p = 0.040) and grade (p < 0.001). Low XAF1 tumour levels were also prognostic of significantly shortened overall survival times in univariate analysis (p = 0.018), but did not provide independent prognostic information. CONCLUSION: These data suggest down-regulation of XAF1 expression to be implicated in ccRCC progression and implies that its re-induction may provide a therapeutic approach. Although the prognostic value of XAF1 in ccRCC appears to be limited, its predictive value remains to be determined, especially in patients with metastatic disease undergoing novel combination therapies of targeted agents with Interferon-alpha.