Acute Chemical Eye Injury and Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency-A Prospective Study in the United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: To analyze the incidence, nature, outcomes, and complications of acute chemical eye injuries, including the incidence of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) and to compare the 2 main classifications for ocular chemical injuries: Roper-Hall (RH) and Dua. METHODS: This is a prospective, consecutive, interventional single-center study between April and October 2009 of all new patients with acute chemical eye injury presenting to the Royal Victoria Infirmary eye emergency department (EED). RESULTS: Of 11,683 patients who attended the EED, 98 patients (110 eyes) presented with acute chemical eye injury (60% male). This represents an estimated annual incidence of 5.6 new cases per 100,000 population. Mean age was 36.5 years (1-78; SD 17.1 years), including 7 children (age <10 years). Fifty-one patients (52%) had work-related injuries. The most common chemical agent was alkali (78%). All 4 RH grade IV cases were unilateral, assault with ammonia, and required early amniotic membrane transplantation as per the protocol, but despite full treatment, they developed total LSCD in the affected eye. CONCLUSIONS: Acute chemical eye injuries are rare. Male patients in the working age group are more prone to work-related chemical injuries, whereas young children tend to have domestic injuries. Grade I, II, and III RH and Dua chemical injuries had a very good prognosis with topical treatment only, whereas RH grade IV (Dua grade IV-VI), mainly assaults with ammonia, progressed to total/severe LSCD despite appropriate management including early amniotic membrane transplantation. The Dua classification includes conjunctival involvement, having a greater value in predicting the final clinical outcome when grading chemical eye injuries.

Evaluation of quality of life and priorities of patients with glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the quality of life and priorities of patients with glaucoma. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with glaucoma and no other ocular comorbidity were consecutively recruited. Clinical information was collected. Participants were asked to complete three questionnaires: EuroQuol (EQ-5D), time tradeoff (TTO), and choice-based conjoint analysis. The latter used five-attribute outcomes: (1) reading and seeing detail, (2) peripheral vision, (3) darkness and glare, (4) household chores, and (5) outdoor mobility. Visual field loss was estimated by using binocular integrated visual fields (IVFs). RESULTS: Of 84 patients invited to participate, 72 were enrolled in the study. The conjoint utilities showed that the two main priorities were "reading and seeing detail" and "outdoor mobility." This rank order was stable across all segmentations of the data by demographic or visual state. However, the relative emphasis of these priorities changed with increasing visual field loss, with concerns for central vision increasing, whereas those for outdoor mobility decreased. Two subgroups of patients with differing priorities on the two main attributes were identified. Only 17% of patients (those with poorer visual acuity) were prepared to consider TTO. A principal component analysis revealed relatively independent components (i.e., low correlations) between the three different methodologies for assessing quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments of quality of life using different methodologies have been shown to produce different outcomes with low intercorrelations between them. Only a minority of patients were prepared to trade time for a return to normal vision. Conjoint analysis showed two subgroups with different priorities. Severity of glaucoma influenced the relative importance of priorities.

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in glaucoma. DESIGN: Descriptive series of published studies. PARTICIPANTS: Published studies reporting a measure of the diagnostic accuracy of OCT for glaucoma. METHODS: Review of English language papers reporting measures of diagnostic accuracy of OCT for glaucoma. Papers were identified from a Medline literature search performed in June 2006. Articles were appraised using the 25 items provided by the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative. Each item was recorded as full, partially, or not reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Degree of compliance with the STARD guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty papers were appraised. Eight papers (26.7%) fully reported more than half of the STARD items. The lowest number of fully reported items in a study was 5 and the highest was 17. Descriptions of key aspects of methodology frequently were missing. For example, details of participant sampling (e.g., consecutive or random selection) were described in only 8 (26.7%) of 30 publications. Measures of statistical uncertainty were reported in 18 (60%) of 30 publications. No single STARD item was fully reported by all the papers. CONCLUSIONS: The standard of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using OCT was suboptimal. It is hoped that adoption of the STARD guidelines will lead to an improvement in reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies, enabling clearer evidence to be produced for the usefulness of OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma.