Effect of prolonged pressure equalization on final drifting during pressure wire studies.

Pressure drifting is a troublesome error in invasive coronary function tests. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between prolonged and short-time pressure equalizations in pressure drifting. Pressure drifting was defined as the pressure gradient between the mean pressure of the distal wire sensor (Pd) and aortic pressure (Pa) when the wire was withdrawn to the tip of the guiding catheter. Significant drifts 1 and 2 were defined as the absolute values of pressure gradients > 2 and > 3 mmHg, respectively. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations between prolonged pressure equalization and each pressure drifting. The prolonged pressure equalization strategy was associated with a lower incidence of drift 1 than the short-time pressure equalization strategy (6.84% vs. 16.92%, p < 0.05). However, no statistical differences were found in the incidence of drift 2 between the prolonged and short-time pressure equalization strategies (4.27% vs. 7.69%, p = 0.34). In the multivariable regression model, only the prolonged pressure equalization strategy predicted a lower incidence of pressure drift 1. In conclusion, the prolonged pressure equalization strategy was associated with a lower incidence of significant pressure drifting with more stringent thresholds than the short-time pressure equalization strategy.

Subclinical myocardial injury increases the risk of heart failure in patients with and without type 2 diabetes post-acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effect of subclinical myocardial injury (sMi) on heart failure (HF) risk after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We examined the frequency patterns of sMi after ACS among patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM), and the influence of sMis on HF risk at 1 year. METHODS: Fifty patients with ACS who underwent revascularization were prospectively enrolled. After discharge, serial study visits were conducted and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-TnT) levels were checked at 3-month intervals for 1 year. sMi was defined as hs-TnT ≥14 ng/L without clinical symptoms. The primary endpoint was a composite of post-ACS chronic HF or significant left ventricular (LV) dysfunction without HF symptoms. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for risk evaluation. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 58 years, and 90% were men. Overall, 44% of patients had DM, and the median LV ejection fraction at discharge was 56%. Patients with DM had a higher incidence of sMi than those without DM (63.6% vs. 32.1%, P < 0.05). sMi occurred at least twice in most patients, and the prevalence declined over time in DM, but not in non-DM. Fourteen patients (28%) met the primary endpoint at 1 year, and the risk was higher in patients with DM (odds ratio: 4.99) and patients with sMi (odds ratio: 6.26). However, sMi was not a mediator of the association between DM and HF risk. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DM had a higher incidence of sMi. Nonetheless, sMi increased the risk of HF after ACS, irrespective of diabetes status.

Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Intracoronary Adenosine Injection in Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment.

Background: The recommended dosage of intracoronary adenosine in fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment is controversial. High-dose adenosine may overcome the biological variability of adenosine response in hyperemia. Objectives: We aimed to test the efficacy and safety of a high-dose escalation protocol at our institute. Methods: Using the adenosine dose escalation protocol, the percentages of FFR ≤ 0.75 and 0.80 after high-dose escalation were compared with those at conventional doses. The chi-squared test was used to evaluate the accuracy of FFR values with the tested doses by comparing them with the results of a non-invasive pretest. Results: A total of 87 patients (130 vessels) were included, and protocol adherence was 93.1%. High-dose intracoronary adenosine was injected in 78.5% of the vessels. The dose escalation strategy was well-tolerated without serious complications. The positive rate increased significantly after conducting the protocol compared to that with a conventional dose (28.2% vs. 23.6% with an FFR threshold of 0.75, and 48.7% vs. 42.5% with a threshold of 0.80, both p < 0.05). In the validation cohort, only FFR ≤ 0.75 was associated with the binary result of the non-invasive pretest (p < 0.01 vs. p = 0.37). The high-dose adenosine escalation strategy did not increase the accuracy of FFR (77.8% vs. 75.6% in conventional dose and high-dose adenosine, respectively). Conclusions: The use of a high-dose escalation strategy increased the positive rate in FFR assessments.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Coronary Artery Revascularization in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention has shown favorable long-term clinical outcomes. However, limited data exist evaluating the FFR assessment among the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of FFR-guided coronary revascularization in patients with CKD. A total of 242 CKD patients who underwent FFR assessment were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: revascularization (FFR ≤ 0.80) and non-revascularization (FFR > 0.80). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel failure (TVF). The key secondary endpoint was TVF. The Cox regression model was used for risk evaluation. With 91% of the ischemic vessels revascularized, the revascularization group had higher risks for both the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.97; p = 0.030) and key secondary endpoint (aHR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.10-4.37; p = 0.026), during a median follow-up of 2.9 years. This result was consistent among different CKD severities. In patients with CKD, functional ischemia in coronary artery stenosis was associated with poor clinical outcomes despite coronary revascularization.

High dose escalation of intracoronary adenosine in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: A retrospective cohort study.

Maximal hyperaemia for fractional flow reserve (FFR) may not be achieved with the current recommended doses of intracoronary adenosine. Higher doses (up to 720 µg) have been reported to optimize hyperaemic stimuli in small dose-response studies. Real-world data from a large cohort of patients is needed to evaluate FFR results and the safety of high-dose escalation. This is a retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and frequency of FFR ≤0.8 after high-dose escalation of intracoronary adenosine. Data were extracted from the medical databases of two university hospitals. Increasing doses (100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 µg) of adenosine were administered as intracoronary boluses until FFR ≤0.8 was achieved or heart block developed. The percentage of FFR ≤0.8 after higher-dose escalation was compared with those at conventional doses, and the predictors for FFR ≤0.8 after higher doses were analysed. In the 1163 vessels of 878 patients, 402 vessels (34.6%) achieved FFR ≤0.8 at conventional doses and 623 vessels (53.6%) received high-dose escalation. An additional 84 vessels (13.5%) achieved FFR ≤0.8 after high-dose escalation. No major complications developed during high-dose escalation. Borderline FFR (0.81-0.85) at the conventional dose, stenosis >60%, and triple-vessel disease increased the likelihood of FFR ≤0.8 after high-dose escalation, but chronic kidney disease decreased it. For vessels of borderline FFR at conventional doses, 46% achieved FFR ≤0.8 after high-dose escalation. In conclusion, High-dose escalation of intracoronary adenosine increases the frequency of FFR ≤0.8 without major complications. It could be especially feasible for borderline FFR values near the 0.8 diagnostic threshold.

A randomized controlled trial of drug-coated balloon angioplasty in venous anastomotic stenosis of dialysis arteriovenous grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel-coated balloons are used to reduce neointimal hyperplasia in native arteriovenous (AV) fistulas. However, no study specifically evaluated their effect on venous anastomotic stenosis of dialysis grafts. We aimed to compare the efficacy of angioplasty with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and angioplasty with conventional balloons (CBs) for venous anastomotic stenosis in dysfunctional AV grafts. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, single-center, single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial, we randomly assigned 44 patients who had venous anastomotic stenosis to undergo angioplasty with DCBs (n = 22) or CBs (n = 22) from July 2015 to August 2018. Access function was observed per the hemodialysis center's protocols; ancillary angiographic follow-up was performed every 2 months for 1 year after the interventions. The primary end point was target lesion primary patency at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included anatomic and clinical success after angioplasty, circuit primary patency at 6 months and 1 year, and target lesion primary patency at 1 year. RESULTS: At 6 months, target lesion primary patency in the DCB group was significantly greater than that in the CB group (41% vs 9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.393; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.194-0.795; P = .006), as was the primary patency of the entire access circuit (36% vs 9%; HR, 0.436; 95% CI, 0.218-0.870; P = .013). At 1 year, the target lesion primary patency in the DCB group remained greater than that in the CB group (23% vs 9%; HR, 0.477; 95% CI, 0.243-0.933; P = .019) but not the primary patency of the access circuit (14% vs 9%; HR, 0.552; 95% CI, 0.288-1.059; P = .056). No difference in anatomic or clinical success was observed; no major complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Angioplasty with DCBs showed a modest improvement in primary patency of venous anastomotic stenosis and all dialysis AV grafts at 6 months. The short-term benefit was not durable to 1 year, and reinterventions were eventually needed.

Relationship Between Body Mass Index, Antidiabetic Agents, and Midterm Mortality in Patients With Both Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background The aim of this study was to determine the influence of various antidiabetic therapies on the relationship between body mass index and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome. Methods and Results This was a prospective, observational study comprising 1193 patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome. The patients were stratified into 4 body mass index categories, and their mortality rates were compared using time-dependent Cox regression analysis using normal weight (body mass index, 18.5-23.9) as the reference. Subsequently, the influence of antidiabetic therapies on the association between BMI and mortality were analyzed. Seventy-four patients (6.2%) died over 2 years of follow-up. The mortality rate was lowest in the class I obese group (3.35%) and highest in the normal-weight group (9.67%). After adjusting for covariates, class I obesity paradoxically remained significantly protective against mortality compared with normal weight (hazard ratio, 0.141; P=0.049); interaction term analysis showed that insulin therapy influenced this "obesity paradox" ( P=0.045). When the patients were stratified by insulin use, the protective effect of obesity disappeared in the insulin-treated patients but persisted in the non-insulin-treated patients. Conclusions In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome, the relationship between body mass index and mortality rate is U-shaped, with class I obesity representing the nadir and normal weight the peak. The protective effect of obesity disappeared in patients treated with insulin.

Metformin was associated with lower all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes with acute coronary syndrome: A Nationwide registry with propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: No randomized controlled trials evaluating metformin therapy efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been reported. We aimed to examine the mortality benefit of metformin therapy in patients with type 2 DM and ACS, compared with non-metformin anti-diabetes agents users. METHODS: Data were extracted from the prospective nationwide ACS-DM Taiwan Society of Cardiology registry. Propensity score (PS) matching on baseline characteristics and treatment measures was performed for metformin versus non-metformin users. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare mortality outcomes among the PS-matched cohort as the primary analysis. The Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for all pre-determined covariates and quintiles of the PS among the overall population were performed as the secondary analyses. RESULTS: Of 1157 patients with type 2 DM and ACS receiving anti-diabetes agents, 78 patients (6.7%) died over the 2-year follow-up period. After PS matching, 318 metformin users were matched with 318 non-metformin users. Metformin users had a lower all-cause mortality rate (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.95) in the primary analysis. The survival benefit of metformin therapy was consistent in the secondary analyses (aHR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.54 while adjusting for all pre-determined covariates, and aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.59 while adjusting for quintiles of the PS). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 DM and ACS, metformin was associated with lower all-cause mortality. However, a detrimental effect of any of the comparators could not be excluded.