Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 6(7): 1663-7, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21685023

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Octogenarians frequently require maintenance hemodialysis (HD) for treatment of stage renal disease ESRD. Although the Fistula First Initiative recommends creating an arteriovenous fistula as the preferred dialysis access method, vascular access selection should be based on life expectancy and functional status at treatment initiation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This is a retrospective analysis of 4-year outpatient data (January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2007) of incident octogenarian dialysis population in an academic institution. Thirty-nine of 268 patients were octogenarians with a mean (± SD) age of 83.4 ± 3.4 years, and 25 were men. Kaplan-Meier survival and Fisher's post hoc statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven octogenarian patients selected HD and two selected peritoneal dialysis. Among the 37 HD patients, 29 initiated dialysis with a tunneled cuffed catheter, 6 with an arteriovenous fistula, and 2 with an arteriovenous graft. Three patients regained renal function after an average 112 days and one was lost to follow-up. Of the 33 remaining on HD, 8 required nursing home admission and 25 were discharged home after initiating HD. Among these 33, 19 died and 14 remained on HD at the end of study period. Days on dialysis (mean ± SEM) before death in those discharged to a nursing facility versus home were 52.6 ± 14.7 versus 386.1 ± 90.7 (P < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular access planning should include assessment of functional status and life expectancy in octogenarian HD patients.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Factores de Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , North Carolina , Selección de Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 6(7): 1635-43, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21597024

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Relative to hemoglobin (Hb) A(1c), glycated albumin (GA) more accurately reflects glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus and ESRD. We determined the association between GA, HbA(1c), and glucose levels with survival and hospitalizations in diabetic dialysis patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Quarterly GA levels were measured for up to 2.33 years in 444 prevalent patients with diabetes and ESRD. Proportional hazard time-dependent covariate models were computed with adjustment for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory variables. Similar analyses were performed for available HbA(1c) and monthly random serum glucose determinations. RESULTS: The participants were 53% male, 54% African American, 43% Caucasian, 90% on hemodialysis, with a mean (SD) age of 62 (12) years and median follow-up duration of 2.25 years. GA and HbA(1c) mean ± SD 21.5% ± 6.0%, median 20.4% and mean ± SD 6.9% ± 6.6%, median 1.6%, respectively. There were 156 deaths during the observation period. In best-fit models, predictors of death included increasing GA, increasing age, presence of peripheral vascular disease, decreasing serum albumin, and decreasing hemoglobin concentrations. HbA(1c) and random serum glucose concentrations were not predictive of survival. Increasing GA levels were associated with hospitalization in the 17 days after measurement, whereas HbA(1c) was not. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the HbA(1c) and random serum glucose values, GA accurately predicts the risk of death and hospitalizations in patients with diabetes mellitus and ESRD. The GA assay should be considered by clinicians who care for patients with diabetes on dialysis.


Asunto(s)
Nefropatías Diabéticas/sangre , Nefropatías Diabéticas/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Albúmina Sérica/metabolismo , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/metabolismo , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Nefropatías Diabéticas/etnología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/mortalidad , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Productos Finales de Glicación Avanzada , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/etnología , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Albúmina Sérica Glicada
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA