Guidelines for proton pump inhibitor prescriptions in paediatric intensive care unit.

Background Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is recommended in some situations to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding and is a component of standard care for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), already among the most widely prescribed drug classes, are being increasingly used. Objective To describe PPI prescribing patterns and their changes after the dissemination of guidelines. Setting Paediatric ICU (PICU), Robert-Debré Teaching Hospital, Paris, France, which admits about 800 patients annually, from full-term neonates to 18-year-olds. Method Prospective observational study with two 6-week observation periods (July-August and September-October, 2013), before and after dissemination in the PICU of PPI prescribing guidelines. Main outcome measure Changes in PPI prescribing patterns (prevalence, dosage, and indication) after the guidelines. Results The number of patients admitted to the PICU was 77 (mean age 4.6 years [range 1 day-18 years]) before and 70 (mean age 3.8 years [range 1 day-17 years]) after the guidelines. During both periods, SUP was the most common reason for PPI prescribing. The proportion of patients prescribed PPIs dropped significantly, from 51% before the guidelines to 30% after the guidelines (p < 0.001). Mean daily dosage also decreased significantly, from 1.5 mg/kg/(range 0.5-4.4) to 1.1 mg/kg (range 0.7-1.8) (p < 0.002). None of the patients experienced upper gastrointestinal bleeding during either period. Conclusion Off-label PPI prescribing for SUP was common in our PICU. The introduction of guidelines was associated with a significant decrease in PPI use and dosage. This study confirms that guidelines can change PPI prescribings patterns in paediatric practice.

[Attitudes and experiences of off-label prescribing among paediatricians in a French university teaching hospital]. / Attitudes et expériences des médecins face à la prescription hors autorisation de mise sur le marché dans un hôpital pédiatrique français.

PURPOSE: The lack of drugs specifically assessed for paediatric use results in a widespread off-label drug use. The aim of this work is to identify experiences and attitudes towards paediatrics off-label prescribing in a university teaching paediatric hospital. METHODS: A questionnaire of 24 items was sent by email to 409 paediatricians in February 2013. DATA COLLECTED: frequency of off-label prescribing, sources of information, concern about safety and adverse events with off-label drug use, proportion of parents informed and order with "off-label" mention. RESULTS: Eighty questionnaires were returned. Over 81% of responders were familiar with the concept of off-label drugs prescribing. The most common reason given for off-label prescribing was for a younger age (74%) and for another indication (28%). They (79%) used a colleague's opinion and the most important sources of information used were the literature (72%), international guidelines (62%), the French National Formulary Vidal (56%) and national guidelines (46%). Although 54% of responders expressed concerns about safety about off-label prescription, only 29% had observed adverse event with off-label drug use. Two third of respondents informed the parents but off-label prescribing cannot be always explained to family. Many respondents (81%) did not write "off-label" mention on prescription. However, 52% stated that they would be willing to undertake off-label prescription monitoring with a local observatory. CONCLUSION: Our study describes the perceptions and attitudes of paediatrician's regarding off-label prescribing for children. Patient information and documentation in the patient file remain incomplete. The prospective collection of off-label prescription will locally be performed.

[A training medication errors room: simulate to better train health professionals]. / La chambre des erreurs médicamenteuses: simuler pour mieux former.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors (ME) could lead to severe adverse events. Hospital staff have to gain practical knowledge and ME preventing methods. Simulation is a teaching method more and more used in health system. The aim of this study was to create an error patient room which represents a factitious patient room with ME for health professionals of the hospital. METHOD: Chosen according 3 criteria (errors already observed, "never events" related errors, errors associated with frequent issues), 21 ME were designed concerning the different steps of the medication process (prescribing, dispensing and administration) and took place in a patient room reserved for training. Seven sessions were proposed from april to june 2014. All health professionals were invited to participate on a voluntary basis. Training session was not time limit. An individual debriefing was done after each session. RESULTS: Forty-six health professional participated of 13 different hospitals' departments: 7 medicine residents, 26 nurses and 13 persons of the pharmacy staff (8 pharmacy technicians, 3 pharmacy students and 2 pharmacists). EM rate ranged of 33% (medicine residents), 50% (nurses) to 47% (pharmacy staff). DISCUSSION - CONCLUSION: The training ME room represents an easy, useful and reusable simulating tool, to train health professional and to improve their knowledge's and practical methods. This learning tool is developed in order to provide patient safety. This successful study will be evaluated by satisfaction questionnaire. Future sessions will be programmed.