Epidural catheter migration in non-obstetric adult surgical patients: A prospective, observational, cohort study.

Background and Aims: Epidural catheter migration is a well-described complication in the obstetric population, though its significance in the non-obstetric surgical population is not known. The purpose of this study was to explore the incidence of epidural catheter migration in a non-obstetric adult surgical cohort, assess the factors associated with migration and analyse complications among patients with and without catheter migration. Methods: In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, the acute pain services team collected data over 12 months on consecutive, adult non-obstetric surgical patients who received an epidural catheter for postoperative pain management. Details of epidural catheter insertion, fixation, migration and complications were collected from the first to the fourth postoperative day. Results: Of the 510 patients recruited, epidural catheter migration was noted in 233 patients (45.7%), of which 152 (65.2%) migrated outwards and the rest migrated inwards. Also, 72 (30.9%) and 86 (31.05%) complications were noted in the groups with and without catheter migration, respectively. The most frequent complications noted were inadequate analgesia, unilateral sensory block, motor block and hypotension in both groups. We did not find any correlation between the frequency of epidural catheter migration and demographic factors. Conclusions: Epidural catheter migration is a sizeable postoperative occurrence in non-obstetric surgical patients. Factors that might play a role in catheter migration could not be established in this study. There is an almost similar frequency of complications noted among patients with and without catheter migration, with the most common being inadequate analgesia in both groups.

Improving safety in anesthetized patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging-Concept of time-out in the MRI suite and measures to improve adherence to time-out protocol.

BACKGROUND: The time-out protocol introduced by the Joint Commission is an important tool to prevent adverse events and improve safety in various health-care environments. However, its implementation and utilization involve human, social, behavioral as well as system issues. AIMS: The SMART aim of the current project was to increase the utilization of the time-out protocol to more than 80% from baseline of 13%, over 6-month period in all the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures performed at a tertiary care, teaching institute in South India. METHODS: The Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle and root cause analysis strategies were utilized in this quality improvement initiative. The time-out protocol was modified for MRI environment and put into practice to improve safety. Six months after the initiation of this safety protocol, our audit showed only a 13% compliance to the time-out protocol. A multimodal strategy was utilized by involving all the stakeholders, educational interventions, and placing reminders for following the time-out protocol, to affect change and achieve improvement in safety. RESULTS: The compliance to time-out protocol increased from 13% to 86% and the run chart showed that a special cause variation indicated by six points above the centerline at 86%. When analyzing individual components of the time-out, the greatest improvement was noted in the ferromagnetic check of the personnel involved, namely, the Anesthesiologist, radiographer, and anesthesia technician. There were no delays in the list because of adherence to the time-out protocol. CONCLUSION: Time-out protocol in an MRI suite provides a final check to the anesthesia team before the anesthetized patient is wheeled into MR gantry. Using quality improvement methodology, we increased the compliance of time-out protocol in the magnetic resonance imaging environment. Our study is an example how other institutions in India and elsewhere can adapt similar improvement strategies to enhance patient safety.

Development and validation of Daycare Anesthesia Satisfaction (DAS) questionnaire to assess patient's satisfaction with daycare anesthesia.

Background and Aims: The patient's satisfaction can be considered as a unique indicator of the quality of healthcare provided. The advantages of patient satisfaction surveys rely heavily on using standardized, psychometrically tested data collection approaches. There is a lack of a proper, psychometrically robust instrument to evaluate the patient's perioperative satisfaction following all types of anesthesia in daycare facility. Hence, this study aimed to develop a Daycare Anesthesia Satisfaction (DAS) questionnaire to measure the patient's satisfaction with the experience of daycare anesthesia services. Material and Methods: A preliminary pool of questions was generated from research literature, expert consultations, and pilot tested on patients. The internal consistency and reliability of the preliminary questionnaire was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and feasibility with the formation of a final 27-item questionnaire. In the next step, the questionnaire was distributed to a larger group of patients in the phase 2 of postanesthesia care unit (PACU). The results were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis to determine the goodness of fit of the questions under each domain. Results: The internal consistency of the preliminary questionnaire as measured by Cronbach's alpha was 0.929. Intraclass correlation coefficient measured for test-retest reliability was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]). Feasibility was confirmed, as 75% of the patients could fill the questionnaire within 15 min. In the second step of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), questionnaire has been shown to have goodness of fit with Bentler's comparative fit index (CFI) of 0.99 that is greater than the suggested cutoff of 0.90. The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of 0.09 is also close to the suggested cutoff of 0.06. Conclusion: This systematically developed and validated, 27-item DAS questionnaire can be tentatively recommended to be used to measure patient's satisfaction with day care anesthesia services following all types of surgical procedures, under various types of anesthesia.

A cross sectional, observational study to evaluate the surgeons' knowledge and perspective on preoperative fasting guidelines in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Southern India.

Background and Aims: The preoperative fasting orders given by the Anesthesiologists as per ASA and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol, are often modified by the surgeons, for practical convenience, which can end up with patients being starved for prolonged periods of time. Hence, this study was conducted among various specialty surgical colleagues, to evaluate the knowledge and their perspective regarding patients' preoperative fasting guidelines. Material and Methods: A validated questionnaire was distributed to 68 surgeons belonging to various surgical specialties, which included consultants and postgraduate residents. The surgeons were grouped as surgeons operating only on children, only on adults, and on adults and children (mixed). Data were summarized using the mean (SD)/median for continuous variables and categorical data were expressed as frequency and percentage. The difference in knowledge score, among the surgeons of three groups, was analyzed using ANOVA, with Bonferroni as post hoc. Results: This study shows an overall decrease in knowledge (score of 6.13 ± 1.74) about preoperative fasting guidelines among surgeons. We found that the level of knowledge about preoperative fasting guidelines and complications was higher among surgeons who operate only on children (score of 7.05) as compared to surgeons operating only on adults (score 5.5) and adults and children (mixed) (score 6.1), which was statistically significant (P = 0.013). We found no difference in knowledge level based on designation and gender. All the surgeons uniformly had the perspective that patients have to be kept fasting preoperatively. Conclusion: Preoperative fasting orders for all surgical patients, especially for vulnerable patients such as children and geriatrics, should be administered by the anesthesiologist or surgeon who is familiar with fasting guidelines. We intend to raise the awareness of fasting guidelines of surgical colleagues by putting up placards and posters in the wards.

Implementation and outcomes of enhanced recovery protocols in pediatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review examines the feasibility and safety of implementing Enhanced recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols in children. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane library for papers describing ERAS implementation in children between January 2000 and January 2021. The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The meta-analysis was done using R Software (Ver 4.0.2). p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, describing a total of 1723 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. An average of 15 (range 11-16) relevant components were implemented with an overall compliance close to 84%. The time to initiate feeds and reach full enteral nutrition was reduced in ERAS group with mean difference (MD) of - 21.20 h (95% CI - 22.80, - 19.59, p < 0.01), and - 2.20 days (95% CI - 2.72, - 1.71, p < 0.01), respectively. The use of opioids for postoperative analgesia was reduced with MD of -0.86 morphine equivalents mg/kg (95% CI - 1.40, - 0.32, p < 0.01). The length of hospital stay showed a significant reduction with MD of -2.54 days (95% CI - 2.94, - 2.13, p < 0.01). There was no difference in the complication and readmission rates between the groups. CONCLUSION: ERP implementation in pediatric perioperative care is a viable option in a variety of surgical settings. There is clear evidence of a decrease in hospital stay duration with no increase in complication or readmission rates. The length of hospital stay reduced in inverse proportion to the number of ERAS elements implemented. Parental satisfaction is increased by initiating enteral feeding early, minimizing catheter and drain use, and reducing opioid use.

Intravenous clonidine as a part of balanced anaesthesia for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomised controled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Controlled hypotension with balanced anaesthesia minimises blood loss. This study was done to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous clonidine as a single bolus dose to establish controlled hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was done in a tertiary hospital in India. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients (18-65 years) undergoing FESS were randomly allocated to one of the two groups. Placebo group (group A, n = 30) received sterile water whereas the clonidine group (group B, n = 30) received 3µg/kg of clonidine intravenously, 30 min prior to induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was to achieve a target mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of 55-65 mmHg intraoperatively. The secondary outcomes measured were requirement of additional fentanyl and metoprolol, intra-operative blood loss, surgeon's opinion on the surgical field, pain, sedation score and complications requiring treatment. RESULTS: Target MAP was easily achieved in clonidine group as against the placebo group (P < 0.001). Significant reduction in intra-operative blood loss (P = 0.0449), a better surgical site scoring (P = 0.02), less requirement of additional hypotensive drugs and good analgesia (P = 0.01) were seen in clonidine group. The complication rates were similar in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Clonidine is effective in achieving controlled hypotension in patients undergoing FESS. It reduces intra-operative blood loss, requirement of additional hypotensive drugs, improves the surgical field and offers good analgesia without significant side effects.

Anesthetic considerations of parturients with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by upper airway collapse and obstruction during sleep. It is estimated to affect nearly 5% of the general female population. Obesity is often associated with OSA. The physiological changes associated with pregnancy may increase the severity of OSA with a higher risk of maternal and fetal morbidity. However, very few parturients are diagnosed during pregnancy. These undiagnosed parturients pose great challenge to the attending anaesthesiologist during the perioperative period. Parturients at risk should be screened for OSA, and if diagnosed, treated. This review describes the anaesthetic concerns in obese parturients at risk for OSA presenting to the labor and delivery unit.

Paediatric Auto Renal transplantation-Anaesthetic Challenge.

SUMMARY: Takayasu's arteritis is described to be the single most important cause of renovascular hypertension. Anaesthetising a child with Takayasu's arteritis for auto renal transplantation is a challenge as it is complicated by severe uncontrolled hypertension, end-organ dysfunction resulting from hypertension, stenosis of major blood vessels affecting regional circulation, and difficulties encountered in monitoring arterial blood pressure. A balanced anaesthetic technique, maintenance of stable haemodynamics with monitoring is required for a successful outcome. We describe the anaesthetic management of a child with Takayasu's arteritis and severe hypertension refractory to medical treatment requiring auto renal transplantation.