Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury Among Colombian Women.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of brain injury (BI) and its relationship to cognitive and psychological outcomes in women survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) in Colombia, South America. SETTING: Women's shelters and organizations in Barranquilla, Colombia. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy women from the city of Barranquilla, Colombia, who experienced any form of IPV. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective. MAIN MEASURES: Participants were administered the computerized EMBRACED neuropsychological battery to assess learning, working and long-term memory, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed. Participants also completed measures of psychological symptoms. Partner violence severity was assessed with a semistructured interview for survivors of domestic violence. Presence and severity of IPV-related BI were assessed using the Brain Injury Severity Assessment (BISA). RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of women sustained at least one BI during an abusive relationship, and 10% sustained repetitive BIs. Furthermore, BI was negatively associated with measures of long-term and working memory, cognitive flexibility, as well as a trending ( P = .05) positive association with depression. With the exception of the relationship between BI and cognitive flexibility, which was substantially reduced and no longer significant, all of these relationships were nearly identical in strength when controlling for abuse severity, socioeconomic status, and educational level. CONCLUSION: These data are the first to specifically examine IPV-related BI in relation to cognitive and psychological functioning in a sample of Colombian women. These data add cross-cultural knowledge to the limited work in this area that has largely focused on women in North America.

Understanding Traumatic Brain Injury in Females: A State-of-the-Art Summary and Future Directions.

In this report, we identify existing issues and challenges related to research on traumatic brain injury (TBI) in females and provide future directions for research. In 2017, the National Institutes of Health, in partnership with the Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine and the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, hosted a workshop that focused on the unique challenges facing researchers, clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders regarding TBI in women. The goal of this "Understanding TBI in Women" workshop was to bring together researchers and clinicians to identify knowledge gaps, best practices, and target populations in research on females and/or sex differences within the field of TBI. The workshop, and the current literature, clearly highlighted that females have been underrepresented in TBI studies and clinical trials and have often been excluded (or ovariectomized) in preclinical studies. Such an absence in research on females has led to an incomplete, and perhaps inaccurate, understanding of TBI in females. The presentations and discussions centered on the existing knowledge regarding sex differences in TBI research and how these differences could be incorporated in preclinical and clinical efforts going forward. Now, a little over 2 years later, we summarize the issues and state of the science that emerged from the "Understanding TBI in Women" workshop while incorporating updates where they exist. Overall, despite some progress, there remains an abundance of research focused on males and relatively little explicitly on females.

Estimating premorbid intelligence in persons with traumatic brain injury: an examination of the Test of Premorbid Functioning.

Knowledge of intelligence is essential for interpreting cognitive performance following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Test of Premorbid Functioning (ToPF), a word reading test co-normed with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS-IV), was examined as a tool for estimating premorbid intelligence in persons with a history of TBI. Fifty-two participants with mild, moderate, or severe TBI were administered the ToPF and WAIS-IV between two weeks and 19 months post-injury. The independent ability of the ToPF/demographic score and the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) to predict WAIS-IV Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) was examined, as were discrepancies between ToPF and WAIS-IV scores within and between participants. The ToPF/demographic predicted FSIQ accounted for a significant proportion of variability in actual FSIQ, above and beyond that accounted for by education or time since injury. ToPF and WAIS-IV scores did not differ by injury severity. In our sample, the ToPF/demographic predicted FSIQ underestimated intelligence in a substantial portion of our participants (31%), particularly in those with high average to superior intelligence. Finally, VCI scores were more predictive of actual FSIQ than the ToPF/demographic predicted FSIQ. The ToPF frequently underestimated post-injury intelligence and is therefore not accurately measuring premorbid intelligence in our sample, particularly in those with above average to superior intelligence. Clinicians are encouraged to administer the entire WAIS-IV, or at minimum the VCI subtests, for a more accurate measure of intelligence in those with above average intelligence and history of TBI.

Relating Self-Reported Balance Problems to Sensory Organization and Dual-Tasking in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Individuals who have experienced a traumatic brain injury (TBI) often have residual balance problems. It remains unclear whether these balance problems are driven by vestibular dysfunction or gait automaticity deficits, particularly in the chronic stages of TBI recovery, because most studies include only acute/subacute cases. OBJECTIVES: Compare performance on the Sensory Organization Test vestibular score and Dual-Task test in individuals with and without subjective balance problems at least 1 year after a TBI. Investigate the ability of each test to predict perceived balance problems. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Rehabilitation department within a single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty adults (21-71 years) with a history of mild, moderate, or severe TBI 1 to 5 years following nonpenetrating TBI. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. METHODS: Measures included the Dual-Task test, Sensory Organization Test, Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, Dizziness Handicap Inventory, and assessments of four cognitive domains and depression. Participants who endorsed "feeling dizzy" and "loss of balance" on the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory were classified as symptomatic (n = 26) and others as asymptomatic (n = 24). T-tests, chi-square, and regression analyses predicting the Dizziness Handicap Inventory total score were performed. RESULTS: Dual-task gait cost was negatively associated with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (P = .044), controlling for depression and gender, whereas vestibular scores failed to predict balance-related disability. Symptomatic individuals endorsed more balance problems (P < .001) and depression symptoms (P = .007), had poorer dual-task cognitive output (P = .036), and slower dual-task gait velocity (P = .036) than asymptomatic participants. Groups did not differ on Sensory Organization Test scores. CONCLUSIONS: The nature of balance problems in chronic TBI may be related to automaticity of gait. These findings suggest that patients in the chronic stages of TBI may benefit from dual-task assessments and interventions. Balance rehabilitation should be tailored to patient needs and assess cognition and affect.

Rey Tangled Line Test: A measure of processing speed in TBI.

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychological assessment plays a key role in characterizing and detecting cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Rey Tangled Line Test (RTLT), an understudied neuropsychological assessment thought to be capable of detecting visual processing deficits, was examined to determine which cognitive abilities may contribute to performance on the test in participants with a history of TBI. METHOD: One-hundred participants with a history of mild to severe TBI were administered a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing attention, executive functioning, memory, visual construction, motor functioning, and processing speed between 30 days and 5 years postinjury. An exploratory principal components analysis (PCA) was performed to determine which cognitive tests the RTLT was most highly associated with. RESULTS: No difference in RTLT latency was present between mild and moderate/severe TBI. The PCA resulted in 5 factors. RTLT latency had a significant primary factor loading on the "processing speed" factor, and a secondary loading on the "motor" factor. Forty-two percent of participants had an impaired latency score. CONCLUSIONS: RTLT latency appears to measure processing speed, and likely aspects of motor functioning, in our sample. The RTLT may be useful as a rapid assessment in individuals with a history of TBI to detect cognitive deficit before initiating further cognitive testing or rehabilitation efforts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).