Impact of upadacitinib induction and maintenance therapy on health-related quality of life, fatigue, and work productivity in patients with moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quality of life in patients with active Crohn's disease may be significantly reduced. We evaluated the effects of upadacitinib induction and maintenance therapy on fatigue, quality of life, and work productivity in the phase 3 trials U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED, and U-ENDURE. METHODS: Clinical responders to upadacitinib 45 mg in U-EXCEL and U-EXCEED induction trials were re-randomized 1:1:1 to upadacitinib 30 mg, 15 mg, or placebo for 52 weeks of maintenance in U-ENDURE. Clinically meaningful improvements in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) response, IBDQ remission, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment were evaluated. Percentages of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements were assessed at induction Weeks 4 and 12 and maintenance Week 52. RESULTS: Analysis included 1021 and 502 patients assessed at induction and maintenance, respectively. In U-EXCEL, greater improvements (all p≤0.001) in IBDQ response (71.0% vs 50.2%), IBDQ remission (44.2% vs 23.7%), and FACIT-Fatigue (42.0% vs 27.0%) were observed in upadacitinib-treated patients versus placebo at Week 4. Improvements in IBDQ response, IBDQ remission, and FACIT-Fatigue were similar or greater at Week 12. Clinically meaningful improvement in overall work impairment (52.1% vs 38.1%, p≤0.05) was demonstrated at Week 12. Similar results were observed in U-EXCEED. Improvements were sustained through 52 weeks of upadacitinib maintenance treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active Crohn's disease, upadacitinib treatment relative to placebo significantly improved fatigue, quality of life, and work productivity as early as Week 4. These effects were sustained through 52 weeks of maintenance.

Evaluating Treatment Choice in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in the United States: Results from a US Patient Survey.

INTRODUCTION: While multiple treatments are available for moderate to severe psoriasis, patient preferences are rarely systematically studied. This study aims to identify factors associated with choice of a new once-daily oral psoriasis treatment, elicit patient views on treatment characteristics, and rank treatment characteristics by importance. METHODS: This noninterventional, cross-sectional survey study, conducted from December 2021 to June 2022, recruited US adults with moderate to severe psoriasis. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and perspectives on psoriasis treatment were collected. Factors associated with the choice of a new oral treatment were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Treatment characteristics and reasons for treatment choice were ranked using bivariate comparisons. RESULTS: The study included 882 participants [mean (standard deviation; SD) age, 45.7 (12.8) years; female, 67.7%; White, 74.9%]; 92.7% were currently receiving treatment [mean (SD) duration, 2.9 (4.8) years]. Half of participants rated their psoriasis symptoms over the past week as mild, very mild, or nonexistent; 36.5% as moderate; and 12.7% as severe or very severe. Most (66.5%) indicated willingness to start a new oral treatment; 65.0% indicated that the new oral treatment would cause less anxiety than injections/infusions. Participants were significantly more likely to start the new oral treatment if they were currently receiving a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor [odds ratio (OR): 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-3.1] or ustekinumab (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.6-5.0) versus apremilast (P < 0.001) or if they reported mild (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 2.0-4.9), moderate (OR: 5.0, 95% CI: 3.1-8.2), or severe (OR: 7.6, 95% CI: 3.9-15.0) psoriasis symptoms compared with those who reported no symptoms in the past week (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most participants indicated willingness to start a new once-daily oral treatment, viewing it as less anxiety provoking than injections/infusions. Current treatment and psoriasis severity affected participants' willingness to start a new oral treatment.

Patients with psoriasis have multiple treatment options available to them. We surveyed 882 adults with moderate to severe psoriasis in the US to assess their perspectives and the values placed on treatment characteristics that are most important to them when making treatment-related decisions. Participants were assigned to one of five groups based on their psoriasis treatment at the time of the survey: (1) apremilast (oral), (2) a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment (injectable), (3) ustekinumab (injectable), (4) a topical therapy or phototherapy, or (5) over-the-counter medications or participants who were untreated (this group included those who were not currently using a psoriasis treatment). The extent of skin clearance associated with a drug, how a drug is taken, and a drug's safety profile were among the top-ranked treatment characteristics that are important to survey participants when they choose a psoriasis treatment. Most participants (66.5%) were willing to start a new oral treatment, with 65.0% indicating that the new oral treatment would cause less anxiety than injections or infusions. Participants were more willing to switch to a new oral psoriasis treatment if they were currently receiving an injectable treatment, such as ustekinumab or a TNFi, compared with those who were already taking an oral treatment. These findings suggest that, when prescribing treatments for psoriasis, health care providers should consider the treatment characteristics that are important to their patients and consider that patients generally prefer an oral versus injectable drug.

A Preliminary Investigation of the Reliability of Acoustic Parameters of Voice through Smartphone Recordings in Individuals with Dysphonia.

Telepractice offers the opportunity to receive care at home without risk of exposure to healthcare acquired infections, especially during a pandemic. Hence, establishing the reliability of the diagnosis of dysphonia via a smartphone is fundamental to providing an alternative service delivery model. A total of 20 participants participated in the study. Recordings of sentence-based voice samples were done using a standardized microphone and the software used in labs and on smartphones. Comparisons were made of acoustic and perceptual voice in real-time and recorded samples speech in persons with typical vs pathological voice. Results revealed no significant differences perceptually between real-time voice and recorded voice in individuals with typical and pathological voices. In acoustic analysis, there was no significant difference in Fundamental frequency (F0) and Auditory Voice Quality Index (AVQI) between real-time voice and recorded voice in individuals with typical and pathological voice.

Patient-reported outcomes in ZUMA-7, a phase 3 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma.

Here, we report the first comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy vs standard-of-care (SOC) therapy in second-line relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) from the pivotal randomized phase 3 ZUMA-7 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) vs SOC. PRO instruments were administered at baseline, day 50, day 100, day 150, month 9, and every 3 months from randomization until 24 months or an event-free survival event. The quality of life (QoL) analysis set comprised patients with a baseline and ≥1 follow-up PRO completion. Prespecified hypotheses for Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) physical functioning, global health status/QoL, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) were tested using mixed-effects models with repeated measures. Clinically meaningful changes were defined as 10 points for QLQ-C30 and 7 for EQ-5D-5L VAS. Among 359 patients, 296 (165 axi-cel, 131 SOC) met inclusion criteria for QoL analysis. At day 100, statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in mean change of scores from baseline were observed favoring axi-cel over SOC for QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL (estimated difference 18.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 12.3-23.9]), physical functioning (13.1 [95% CI, 8.0-18.2]), and EQ-5D-5L VAS (13.7 [95% CI, 8.5-18.8]; P < .0001 for all). At day 150, scores significantly favored axi-cel vs SOC for global health status/QoL (9.8 [95% CI, 2.6-17.0]; P = .0124) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (11.3 [95% CI, 5.4-17.1]; P = .0004). Axi-cel showed clinically meaningful improvements in QoL over SOC. Superior clinical outcomes and favorable patient experience with axi-cel should help inform treatment choices in second-line R/R LBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03391466.

Impact of Hypomethylating Agent Use on Hospital and Emergency Room Visits, and Predictors of Early Discontinuation in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Previous analyses using the SEER-Medicare database have reported substantial underutilization of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) among patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and an association between poor HMA persistence and high economic burden. We aimed to compare rates of hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits among patients with higher-risk MDS according to use or non-use of HMA therapy, and to explore factors associated with early discontinuation of HMA therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the 2010-2016 SEER-Medicare database to identify patients aged ≥66 years with a new diagnosis of refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB; a surrogate for higher-risk MDS) between 2011 and 2015. New hospitalizations and ER visits during the 12 months following MDS diagnosis were determined. Treatment discontinuation was defined as stopping HMA therapy before 4 cycles. RESULTS: Overall, 664 (55.8%) patients were HMA users and 526 (44.2%) non-users. Non-users had more hospitalizations (mean 0.47 vs. 0.30, P < .001) and ER visits (mean 0.69 vs. 0.41, P = .005) per month than HMA users. Among HMA users, 193 (29.1%) discontinued HMA therapy before 4 cycles, and 91 (47.2%) of these after 1 cycle. Older age and poor performance status were associated with higher risk of HMA discontinuation. CONCLUSION: An increased rate of hospitalizations and ER visits occurred in HMA non-users vs. HMA users. Approximately one-third of patients discontinued HMA therapy early. Predictors of discontinuation included older age and poor performance status. Novel approaches are needed to improve utilization and persistence with HMA therapy and associated outcomes, particularly among these higher-risk groups.

Injectable Hypomethylating Agents for Management of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Patients' Perspectives on Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, patients with MDSs could receive HMAs via intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) administration. An oral HMA was recently approved as an alternative to IV/SC administration. This study assessed the impact of IV/SC HMA on MDS patients, and their experience of, challenges with, and views about oral MDS treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey among adult MDS patients (or caregivers as proxies) invited by 2 U.S. MDS patient advocacy groups. Patients were required to have received IV/SC HMA (ie, azacitidine or decitabine) within 6 months of the survey. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 141 participants (120 patients, 21 caregiver proxies). Median patient age was 63.0 years, 53.9% were women, and 19.8%, 62.4%, and 17.7% had lower-, higher-, or unknown risk scores, respectively. HMA treatments received included SC azacitidine (37%), IV azacitidine (36%), and IV decitabine (27%). Among 89 IV HMA recipients, 74.2% and 69.7% reported treatment-related interference with their social and daily activities, respectively, and 66.3% reported pain related to treatment administration. Following an injection, SC HMA recipients reported pain (94.2%) and interference with daily (86.5%) and social (80.8%) activities. Among the 49.6% of patients who were working, 61.4% felt less productive due to treatment. Most (69.5%) MDS patients indicated they would prefer oral MDS treatment to IV/SC therapies. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving IV/SC HMAs experienced pain/discomfort and interference with social and daily activities. The introduction of an oral HMA may alleviate some treatment challenges for MDS patients.

Evaluation of Minimal Important Difference and Responder Definition in the EORTC QLQ-PAN26 Module for Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Surgically Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-PAN26 is widely used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), its group-level minimal important difference (MID) and individual-level responder definition (RD) are not established; we calculated MID and RD using HRQoL data from the APACT trial in patients with surgically resected pancreatic cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: HRQoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 at baseline, during treatment, at end of treatment, and during follow-up. Distribution-based MIDs were estimated using 0.5 × baseline standard deviation (SD) and reliability-based (intraclass correlation) standard error of measurement (SEM). Anchor-based MIDs and RDs (anchor, QLQ-C30 overall health) were estimated using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Overall, 772 patients completed the baseline assessment. Distribution-based MIDs (0.5 × SD) for QLQ-PAN26 scales ranged from 12 to 13, except hepatic symptoms (≈8), pancreatic pain (≈10), and sexual dysfunction (≈17); those for stand-alone items ranged from 12 to 16. The SEM values were similar. Among scales/items sufficiently correlated (r > 0.30) with the anchor, MIDs ranged from 5 to 9. Within-patient QLQ-PAN26 RD estimates varied by direction (deterioration vs. improvement) and scale/item, but all values were lower than the true possible within-patient change (e.g. 16.7 points for a two-item scale) given a one-category change on the raw scale. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with distribution-based MIDs, anchor-based MIDs were twice as sensitive in detecting group-level changes in QLQ-PAN26 scales/items. For interpreting clinically meaningful change, RDs cannot be less than the true minimum of the scale. The group-level MID may help clinicians/researchers interpret HRQoL changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01964430; Eudra CT 2013-003398-91.

Direct Medical Costs Associated With Treatment Nonpersistence in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Receiving Hypomethylating Agents: A Large Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) among higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) patients can translate into worse health outcomes and economic burden. We estimated the direct medical costs associated with HMA treatment nonpersistence among HR-MDS patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database, a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB), a diagnosis that substantially overlaps with HR-MDS, between January 2011 and December 2015 was analyzed. Patients who had ≥ 1 year of continuous Medicare enrollment before diagnosis and who did not receive stem cell transplant or lenalidomide in the follow-up period were included. Patients receiving HMAs were stratified into HMA persistent (≥4 HMA cycles) and HMA nonpersistent (<4 cycles or a gap of ≥ 90 days between cycles) groups. Healthcare resource use and costs during the follow-up period were reported descriptively as total and per patient per month (PPPM). Weighted generalized linear models (GLM) were used to compare estimated healthcare resource use and costs between HMA groups. RESULTS: Among the 664 patients with RAEB, 295 (44.4%) were HMA nonpersistent and 369 (55.6%) HMA persistent. On the basis of weighted GLM analysis, the HMA nonpersistent group incurred significantly (P < .05) higher total PPPM costs compared to the HMA persistent group ($18,039 vs. $13,893), particularly for hospitalization ($3,375 vs. $2,131), and emergency room ($5,517 vs. $2,867) costs. CONCLUSION: There is a substantial economic burden associated with early discontinuation of guideline-recommended HMA therapy in RAEB patients. The study findings necessitate closer care management in this population in order to improve outcomes and reduce healthcare spending.

Continuation of systemic treatments and outcomes for patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease in the USA.

Aim: To compare secondary systemic treatment (SST) continuation and associated resource use and costs in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) patients in the USA. Materials & methods: This was a retrospective study using Truven Health MarketScan database (2009-2016). cGvHD patients were classified as continuers or discontinuers if treated with SST for ≥180 days without or with a treatment gap (≥45 days), respectively. Results: Among 464 cGvHD patients with SST, mTOR inhibitors, extracorporeal photopheresis and imatinib were most frequently used. A total of 172 patients were SST continuers and 292 were discontinuers. Extracorporeal photopheresis treated patients were the highest continuers, followed by imatinib and mTOR inhibitors. SST continuers had lower monthly hospitalization costs versus discontinuers. Conclusion: This real-world analysis demonstrates high SST continuation rates in cGvHD patients are associated with lower resource utilization and cost.

Under-use of Hypomethylating Agents in Patients With Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome in the United States: A Large Population-based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest significant underutilization of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) that are recommended treatments for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB). The study objective was to assess the degree of HMA use and predictors of HMA underuse in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study including patients diagnosed with the RAEB form of MDS between January 2011 and December 2015 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. Patients were excluded if they had < 1 year of continuous enrollment before diagnosis or received stem cell transplant or lenalidomide during the follow-up period. HMA non-peristence was defined as use of < 4 cycles (3-10 HMA days/28 days) of HMAs or a gap of ≥ 90 days between consecutive cycles. Patients were characterized as HMA never-users, HMA-persistent users, and HMA-non-persistent users. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess predictors of HMA underuse and persistence. RESULTS: Of the 1190 patients, 526 (44%) were never-users, 295 (25%) were non-persistent users, and 369 (31%) were persistent users. Age at diagnosis (eg, 66-70 years vs. ≥ 80 years; odds ratio [OR], 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-3.56), marital status (single vs. married; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.89), National Cancer Institute comorbidity index (≥ 3 vs. 0-1; OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.83), and performance status (poor vs. good; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87) were significantly associated with HMA underuse. CONCLUSION: Several demographic and clinical factors were associated with underuse of HMAs. There is need for a better understanding of suboptimal HMA use and its relationship with clinical response.

Patient and caregiver preferences for haemophilia A treatments: A discrete choice experiment.

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting products are changing the haemophilia A treatment landscape by giving patients and caregivers treatment options with varying product attributes. AIM: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to elicit treatment attribute preferences among patients with haemophilia A and caregivers of children with haemophilia A. MATERIALS & METHODS: A survey of sociodemographics and preferences was completed by an online panel of adult patients with haemophilia A and caregivers of children (<18 years) with haemophilia A. The DCE included a series of questions in which respondents chose their preferred option from pairs of hypothetical treatment profiles with systematic variation in the levels of six attributes (safety concerns with too much clotting, bleed protection, dosing frequency, length of time the product has been approved for use, product type and joint health studies). Preference weights and relative attribute importance scores were estimated using random parameters logit models. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients (mean age: 35.5 years) and 96 caregivers (mean age of child: 10.3 years) were included. For patients with haemophilia A, the top three attributes ranked from the most to least important were: (a) dosing frequency; (b) bleed protection; and (c) safety concerns with too much clotting. For caregivers of children with haemophilia A, the ranking was as follows: (a) safety concerns; (b) bleed protection; and (c) dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with haemophilia A viewed dosing as the most important driver of treatment decision-making whereas caregivers of children with haemophilia A valued safety the most.

Patient and caregiver benefit-risk preferences for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Recently approved second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (SGARIs) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) have similar efficacy but differ in safety profiles. We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to examine how nmCRPC patients and caregivers perceive the benefits versus risks of these new treatments. METHODS: An online DCE survey with 14 treatment choice questions was administered to nmCRPC patients and caregivers. Each choice question compared two hypothetical medication profiles varying in terms of 5 safety attributes (risk or severity of adverse events [AEs]: fatigue, skin rash, cognitive problems, serious fall, and serious fracture) and two efficacy attributes (duration of overall survival [OS] and time to pain progression). Random parameters logit models were used to estimate each attribute's relative importance. We also estimated the amounts of OS that respondents were willing to forego for a reduction in AEs. RESULTS: In total, 143 nmCRPC patients and 149 caregivers viewed the AEs in following order of importance (most to least): serious fracture, serious fall, cognitive problems, fatigue, and skin rash. On average, patients were willing to trade 5.8 and 4.0 months of OS to reduce the risk of serious fracture and fall, respectively, from 3% to 0%; caregivers were willing to trade 6.6 and 5.4 months of OS. CONCLUSIONS: nmCRPC patients and caregivers preferred treatments with lower AE burdens and were willing to forego OS to reduce the risk and severity of AEs. Our results highlight the importance of carefully balancing risks and benefits when selecting treatments in this relatively asymptomatic population.

Physician preferences for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Recent approvals of second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (SGARIs) have changed the treatment landscape for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). These SGARIs have similar efficacy but differ in safety profiles. We used a discrete choice experiment to explore how United States physicians make treatment decisions between adverse events (AEs) and survival gains in nmCRPC, a largely asymptomatic disease. METHODS: Treating physicians (n = 149) participated in an online survey that included 14 treatment choice questions, each comparing 2 hypothetical treatment profiles, which varied in terms of 5 safety and 2 efficacy attributes. We described safety attributes (fatigue, skin rash, cognitive problems, falls, and fractures) in terms of severity and frequency, and efficacy attributes (overall survival [OS] and time to pain progression) in terms of duration of effect. We used a random parameters logit model to estimate preference weights and importance scores for each attribute. We also estimated the amount of survival gain physicians were willing to trade for a reduction in specific AEs between treatment options. RESULTS: Physicians placed more importance on survival than on time to pain progression, and viewed a reduction in cognitive problems from severe to none, a reduction in risk of a serious fracture from 8% to none, and a reduction in fatigue from severe to none as the most important safety attributes. Physicians were willing to forego 9.1 and 6.6 months of OS, respectively, to reduce cognitive problems and fatigue from severe to mild-to-moderate. To reduce the risk of a serious fracture from 8 to 5% and 5% to none, physicians were willing to trade 3.9 and 5.3 months of OS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians were willing to trade substantial amounts of survival to avoid AEs between hypothetical treatments. These results emphasize the importance of carefully balancing therapies' benefits and risks to ultimately optimize the overall quality of nmCRPC patients' survival. Nonetheless, it is noted that the results from the study sample of 149 physicans may not be representative of the viewpoints of all nmCRPC-treating physicians.

Characterization of plant growth-promoting alkalotolerant Alcaligenes and Bacillus strains for mitigating the alkaline stress in Zea mays.

Intensification of sodic soil due to increasing pH is an emerging environmental issue. The present study aimed to isolate and characterise alkaline stress-tolerant and plant growth-promoting bacterial strains from moderately alkaline soil (pH 8-9), strongly alkaline soil (pH 9-10), and very strongly alkaline soil (> 10). Total 68 bacteria were isolated, and screened for multiple plant growth promoting (PGP) attributes. Out of total, 42 isolates demonstrating at least three plant growth promoting PGP traits selected for further assays. Then out of 42, 15 bacterial isolates were selected based on enhanced maize plant growth under greenhouse experiment, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed Bacillus spp. as a dominant genus. Furthermore, based on improved seed germination percentage and biomass of maize (Zea mays L.) under alkaline stress conditions Alcaligenes sp. NBRI NB2.5, Bacillus sp. NBRI YE1.3, and Bacillus sp. NBRI YN4.4 bacterial strains were selected, and evaluated for growth-promotion and alkaline stress amelioration under greenhouse condition. Amongst the selected 3 plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) strains, Bacillus sp. NBRI YN4.4 significantly improved the photosynthetic pigments and soluble sugar content, and decreased proline level in inoculated maize plants as compared to uninoculated control under stress conditions. Moreover, significantly enhanced soil enzymes such as dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase and betaglucosidase due to inoculation of Bacillus sp. NBRI YN4.4 in maize plants grown in alkaline soil attributes to its role in improving the soil health. Therefore, alkaline stress-tolerant PGPR NBRI YN4.4 can be useful for developing strategies for the reclamation of saline/sodic soils and improving the plant growth and soil health in sustainable manner.

Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia patients treated with once-monthly extended-release risperidone in a long-term clinical study.

PURPOSE: RBP-7000 (PERSERIS™) is a once-monthly subcutaneous extended-release risperidone formulation approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. The objective of this study was to describe the long-term impact of RBP-7000 on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), subjective well-being, treatment satisfaction and medication preference in patients with schizophrenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HRQoL was derived from a 52-week multicentre Phase III single-arm open-label outpatient study that assessed the safety and efficacy of RBP-7000 (120 mg) in patients with schizophrenia. HRQoL was measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L and Short-Form Survey SF-36 version 2; well-being using the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptic Treatment - Short Version (SWN-S); satisfaction using the Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire and medication preference using the Preference of Medication questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 482 participants at baseline, 234 remained through the end of study (EOS; week 52). Mean HRQoL and well-being scores remained stable between baseline (EQ-5D-5L index: 0.83; SF-36v2 Physical Component Score: 50; SF-36v2 Mental Component Score: 46; total SWN-S score: 89) and EOS (EQ-5D-5L index: 0.86; SF-36v2 Physical Component Score: 49; SF-36v2 Mental Component Score: 47; total SWN-S score: 90). The proportion of participants reporting satisfaction increased between week 4 (66%) and EOS (81%), with a similar trend for the preference of RBP-7000 over previous treatment (week 4: 66%; EOS: 72%). Sensitivity analyses suggested a minor effect of dropout on characterization of change over time in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures. CONCLUSION: Study participants attained mean HRQoL scores near that of the general US population. Over two-thirds reported high satisfaction with and preference for RBP-7000 across the study period. Additional research is needed to confirm whether these PRO translate into improved outcomes such as adherence and ultimately fewer relapses in patients with schizophrenia.

Cost-Effectiveness of Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and generic glatiramer acetate 20 mg among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Markov model with annual periods from payer perspective. METHODS: The modeled population represented pooled patients from the CARE-MS I and II trials. Therapies' comparative efficacy at reducing relapses and slowing disability worsening was obtained from network meta-analyses. Safety information was extracted from package inserts. Withdrawal rates, treatment waning, resource use, cost, and utility inputs were derived from published studies and clinical expert opinion. To project the natural history of disease worsening, data from the British Columbia cohort was used. RESULTS: Alemtuzumab dominated comparators by accumulating higher total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (8.977) and lower total costs ($421 996) compared with fingolimod (7.955; $1 085 814), natalizumab (8.456; $1 048 599), ocrelizumab (8.478; $908 365), and generic glatiramer acetate (7.845; $895 661) over a 20-year time horizon. Alemtuzumab's dominance was primarily driven by savings in treatment costs because alemtuzumab has long-term duration of response and is initially administered as 2 annual courses, with 36.1% of patients requiring retreatment over 5 years, whereas comparators are used chronically. In model scenarios where alemtuzumab's long-term duration of response was assumed not to hold and therapy had to be administered annually, probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that alemtuzumab remained cost-effective versus ocrelizumab at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY in 74% to 100% of model runs. CONCLUSIONS: Alemtuzumab was a cost-effective therapy. Model results should be used to optimize clinical and managed care decisions for effective RMS treatment.

Health State Utilities for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Time Trade-off Study.

OBJECTIVES: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is an aggressive haematological cancer associated with significant humanistic impact. The current study assessed how the general public in the United Kingdom (UK) values AML health states. METHODS: The composite time trade-off (cTTO) methodology was employed to elicit health state utilities in AML. Pertinent AML literature related to symptom and quality-of-life impact including physical, functional and emotional well-being, as well as the safety profile of AML treatments, were taken into consideration for drafting health state descriptions. Ten health states included in the study were newly diagnosed AML, induction, consolidation, maintenance, long-term follow-up, relapsed/refractory, stem-cell transplant (SCT) procedure, SCT recovery, SCT long-term follow-up with complications and SCT long-term follow-up without complications. The descriptions were validated by haematologists and nurse specialists for clinical accuracy and completeness. A total of 210 individuals from the general UK population participated in the cTTO interviews. Descriptive statistics were computed for health state utility values. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 44.0 years (standard deviation [SD] 14.9, range 18-81) and comprised 129 (61.4%) female participants. The utility values ranged from 0.94 (SD 0.13) for SCT long-term follow-up without complications to - 0.21 (SD 0.62) for the SCT procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides health utilities for a range of AML health states, with the SCT procedure health state being valued worse than death. The utilities obtained in this study can be employed as inputs in cost-effectiveness analyses of AML therapies.

Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization among patients with hereditary angioedema in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on usage and associated outcomes with hereditary angioedema (HAE)-specific medications introduced to the United States (US) market since 2009 are very limited. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate real-world treatment patterns of HAE-specific medications in the US and to assess their impact on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This analysis used IMS PharMetrics PlusTM database records (2006-2014) of patients with HAE, ≥1 insurance claim for an HAE-specific medication, and continuous insurance enrollment for ≥3 months following the first HAE prescription claim. RESULTS: Of 631 total patients, 434 (68.8%) reported C1-INH(IV) use; 396 (62.8%) reported using ecallantide and/or icatibant. There were 306 episodes of prophylactic use of C1-INH(IV) (defined by continuous refills averaging ≥1500 IU/week for ≥13 weeks) in 155 patients; use of ≥1 on-demand rescue medication was implicated during 53% (163/306) of those episodes. Sixty-eight (20.2%) of 336 C1-INH(IV) users eligible for the HCRU analysis were hospitalized at least once, and 191 (56.8%) visited the emergency department (ED). Eighteen patients (5.4%) had a central venous access device (CVAD); of these, 5 (27.7%) required hospitalization and 14 (77.7%) had an ED visit. The adjusted relative risk of hospitalization and/or ED visits for patients with a CVAD was 2.6 (95% CI: 0.17, 39.23) compared to C1-INH(IV) users without a CVAD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread availability of modern HAE medications in the US, we identified a subset of patients requiring long-term prophylaxis who continue to be burdened by frequent rescue medication usage and/or complications related to the use of CVADs for intravenous HAE medication.

Relationship between depression and physical activity, disability, burden, and health-related quality of life among patients with arthritis.

This study purports to examine the relationship of depression with physical activity, disability, arthritis-attributable burden (joint limitation, work limitation, social activity limitation, and joint pain), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among arthritis patients. Data from the 2011 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized adults in the United States, was used for the purpose of this study. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to address the study objectives. The final study sample included 167,068 arthritis patients, 45,459 of whom had comorbid depression. Arthritis patients with depression had lower odds of engaging in physical activity (odds ratio [OR]=1.070, confidence interval [CI] 1.006-1.139) and higher odds of being disabled (OR=1.411, CI 1.306-1.524). Arthritis patients with depression also had greater odds of arthritis-attributable joint limitations (OR=1.551, CI 1.460-1.648), work limitations (OR=1.506, CI 1.414-1.604), social activity limitations (OR=1.647, CI 1.557-1.742), and pain (OR=1.438, CI 1.364-1.517) as compared to those without depression. Arthritis patients with versus without depression had greater odds of poor general health status (OR=1.698, CI 1.586-1.819), physical HRQOL (OR=1.592, CI 1.486-1.704), mental HRQOL (OR=6.225, CI 5.768-6.718), and activity limitations (OR=2.345, CI 2.168-2.537). Study results indicate toward a negative functional impact of depression among arthritis patients. Policy makers should consider incorporating screening and management of depression into routine clinical care of arthritis patients.