Impact of Postprocedural Graft Flow on Outcomes Following Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention in Postcoronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients: A Detailed Angiographic Analysis.

Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are frequent in patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the usual revascularization strategy. Whether or not the presence of a graft on a CTO vessel and post-PCI graft patency impacts outcomes after CTO-PCI is unknown. We sought to evaluate the impact of post-PCI graft patency on the durability of CTO-PCI. In total, 259 patients with previous CABG who underwent CTO-PCI in 12 international centers in 2019 to 2023 were categorized into "grafted" and "ungrafted" groups based on the presence of graft on a CTO vessel. The grafted group was subdivided into "graft-occluded" and "graft-patent" groups, depending on graft patency. The primary end points were (1) technical success rate, (2) target vessel failure, and (3) CTO failure rates at 1 year. CTO failure was defined as target vessel revascularization and/or significant in-stent restenosis. A total of 199 patients (77%) were in the grafted group. Grafted CTOs showed higher complexity and lower technical success rates (70% vs 80%, p = 0.004) than nongrafted CTOs. Of the grafted CTOs, 140 (70%) were in the grafted-occluded group and 59 (30%) were in the grafted-patent group. The technical success was lower in the former group (65% vs 81%, p = 0.022). An occluded graft was an independent predictor of technical failure (odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 4.76, p = 0.049) and persistent post-PCI graft patency was a strong independent predictor of CTO failure at 1 year (hazard ratio 5.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 27.5, log-rank p = 0.033). In conclusion, in patients with previous CABG who underwent CTO-PCI, post-PCI graft patency was a significant predictor of CTO failure.

The impact of the bifurcation angle for the Nano-Crush two-stent coronary bifurcation technique on long-term outcomes in a real-world clinical population.

AIM: This study aims to assess the direct impact of bifurcation angle (BA) on immediate procedural outcomes and patient prognosis post-Nano-Crush stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for all consecutive patients treated with the Nano-Crush technique across two high-volume interventional centers from January 2020 to October 2022. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: comparison of target lesion failure rate in two cohorts based on bifurcation angle (<70° vs. ≥70°), with secondary endpoints including side branch ostium coverage, rate of successful final kissing balloon inflation (FKBI), need for conversion to another technique, and procedure length. RESULTS: Baseline demographics included 71 patients in the BA<70° group and 49 in the BA≥70° group, with well-balanced characteristics. Angiographic characteristics revealed similar trends, including anatomic and morphological lesion characteristics (referencing Syntax score, Medina classification, and presence of calcifications). Both groups predominantly had complex coronary disease, with a baseline mean Syntax score of 24.18 ± 8.19 in the BA<70° group and 23.91 ± 7.29 in the BA≥70° group, respectively. A dedicated debulking device for lesion preparation was used in 25.35 % of patients in the first group and in 28.57 % of patients in the second group. The primary endpoint occurred in 5.63 % of patients in the BA<70° group and in 4.08 % of patients in the BA≥70° group (P = 0.7014) after ≥ 2 years of clinical follow-up. Angiographic success was achieved in 100 % of both groups, with procedural time averaging 74.99 ± 25.55 min in the BA≥70° and 76.94 ± 27.81 min in the BA<70° (P = 0.6922). The rate of successful final kissing balloon inflation was 98.59 % in the BA<70° group and 95.91 % in the BA≥70° group (P = 0.3566). The mean contrast volume was 189.54 ± 73.74 ml in BA<70° and 168.9 ± 62.77 ml in BA≥70° (P = 0.1126). Clinical follow-ups at 30 days and 2 years revealed similar outcomes and complications for each group, as summarized in Table 3. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the bifurcation angle does not significantly impact long-term clinical outcomes or procedural parameters, such as side branch ostium coverage, conversion to a modified DK Crush technique, FKBI success rate, and procedure length. These findings suggest that the Nano-Crush technique can be a viable option for bifurcation lesions, irrespective of the bifurcation angle, achieving optimal side branch ostium coverage while preventing excessive protrusion into the main vessel.

Performance of the minimalistic hybrid approach algorithm versus other conventional algorithms in the percutaneous treatment of chronic total occlusions.

BACKGROUND: The "Minimalistic Hybrid Approach" (MHA) has been proposed to reduce the invasiveness of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: This study aims to assess whether MHA may also reduce the utilization of PCI resources (devices, radiations, and contrast) by comparing it with other conventional algorithms. METHODS: We aimed to assess the impact of MHA on device, radiation, and contrast usage during CTO-PCI analyzing data from the Belgian Working Group on CTO (BWG-CTO) registry. Patients were divided, depending on the algorithm used, into two groups: Conventional versus Minimalistic. Primary objectives were procedure performance measures such as device usage (microcatheters and guidewires), radiological parameters, and contrast use. At 1-year follow-up, patients were evaluated for target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, new myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Overall, we analyzed 821 CTO-PCIs (Conventional n = 650, Minimalistic n = 171). The Minimalistic group demonstrated higher complexity of CTO lesions. After adjusting for propensity score, the Minimalistic group had a significantly lower number of microcatheters used (1.49 ± 0.85 vs. 1.24 ± 0.64, p = 0.026), while the number of guidewires was comparable (4.80 ± 3.29 vs. 4.35 ± 2.94, p = 0.30). Both groups had similar rates of success and procedural complications, as well as comparable procedural and fluoroscopic times and contrast volume used. At the 1-year follow-up, both groups showed comparable rates of TVF (hazard ratio: 0.57; 95% confidence interval: 0.24-1.34, p = 0.195). CONCLUSION: The MHA may slightly reduce the number of dedicated devices used during CTO-PCI, without adversely affecting the procedural success or long-term outcome.