Risk factors for neurophysiological events related to intraoperative halo-femoral traction in spinal deformity surgery.

PURPOSE: This study identifies risk factors for neurophysiological events caused by intraoperative halo-femoral traction (IOHFT) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). METHODS: Neurophysiological integrity was monitored using motor evoked potentials (MEPs). IONM event was defined as a decreased MEP amplitude of more than 80% of baseline in, at least, one muscle. Time between application of IOHFT and event, affected muscles, surgical stage, and time between removal of IOHFT and recovery of MEPs were described. Characteristics (age, height, weight, diagnosis, Cobb angle, and flexibility of the curve) of patients with and without IOHFT-events were compared using analysis of variance. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors. RESULTS: The study included 81 patients (age 15.6 ± 2.4 years, 53 females, AIS: n = 47, NMS n = 34). IOHFT-events occurred in 11 patients (13%; AIS n = 4, NMS n = 7). IOHFTevents affecting all limbs occurred pre-incision in NMS. Events affecting only the legs occurred during all stages of surgery. Patients with IOHFT-events were smaller (p = 0.009) and had stiffer curves (p = 0.046). Height was a predictor (odds ratio, 0.941; 95% confidence interval = 0.896-0.988). All MEPs recovered after removing IOHFT. CONCLUSION: Neurophysiologic events due to IOHFT were common, with the majority in patients with NMS. A shorter stature was a risk factor, and larger Cobb angle and stiffer curve were associated with IOHFT-events. Events occurred at any stage of surgery and involved upper and lower limbs. With an adequate response on IOHFT events, none of the patients had postoperative neurological impairments due to IOHFT.

Influence of the Montage of Stimulation Electrodes for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Orthopedic Spine Surgery.

PURPOSE: In transcranial electrical stimulation, induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are influenced by the montage of stimulation electrodes. Differences are to be examined between coronal and sagittal stimulation. METHODS: Forty-five patients with idiopathic scoliosis were included. Coronal and sagittal montages were obtained by electrode placement at C3C4 and Cz'F using large contact electrodes. Corkscrew and short needle electrodes were additionally placed at C3C4 in five patients. Voltage motor thresholds (MTvoltage) and MEP amplitudes at 2 times MTvoltage (MEP2MTvoltage) were obtained of upper and lower extremity muscles. Differences of MTvoltage and MEP2MTvoltage at Cz'F and C3C4 and between electrodes were analyzed. RESULTS: MEP2MTvoltage benefits from coronal positioning. Correlations between MTvoltage and impedance were not significant for large electrodes at Cz'F, very low for C3C4, and high for short needles or corkscrew electrodes. MTvoltage of short needles and corkscrews was up to 200% higher compared with MTvoltage of long needles. MTcurrent is increased by 20% to 30% and 2% to 10% for the arm and leg muscles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic stimulation at C3C4 is advised when constant voltage stimulation is used to monitor the spinal cord during orthopedic spine surgery. MTvoltage of corkscrew and small needle electrodes are highly sensitive to electrode impedances.

The Percentage of Amplitude Decrease Warning Criteria for Transcranial MEP Monitoring.

Muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) became a standard technique for monitoring the motor functions of the brain and spinal cord at risk during spinal and brain surgery. However, a wide range of criteria based on the percentage of amplitude decrease is used in practice. A survey of the current literature on clinical outcome parameters reveals a variety of percentages in a range of 30% to 100% (50% to 100% spinal procedures) with no consensus. The interpretation of muscle MEPs is hampered by their sensitivity to many interfering factors. Trial-to-trial MEP variations may partly be reduced by controllable parameters of which TES parameters are in the hands of the neuromonitorist. We propose an operational model based on basic neurophysiologic knowledge to interpret the characteristics of MEP-TES voltage curves and predict the influences of the location on the sigmoid voltage curve on spontaneous MEP-variations and influences of factors affecting the voltage curve. The model predicts a correlation between the slope, expressed by a gain, and variations of muscle MEP amplitudes. This complies with two case examples. The limited specificity/sensitivity of warning criteria based on the percentage of amplitude reduction can possibly be improved by developing standards for set-up procedures of TES paradigms. These procedures include strategies for desensitizing MEPs for variations of controllable parameters. The TES voltage or current is a feasible controlling parameter and should be related to the motor threshold and the onset of the supramaximal level being landmarks of MEP-voltage functions. These parameters may offer a valuable addition to multicenter outcome studies.

Movement Along the Spine Induced by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Related Electrode Positioning.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, nonrandomized cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique quantifying movement induced by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) induced movement in relation to the positioning of electrodes during spinal deformity surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: TES induced movement may cause injuries and delay surgical procedures. When TES movements are evoked, muscles other than those being monitored any adjustments in stimulation protocols and electrode positioning may be expected to minimize movement whereas preserving quality of monitoring. In this study, seismic evoked responses (SER) induced through TES were studied at different electrode positions. METHODS: Intraoperative TES-motor evoked potentials were carried out in 12 patients undergoing corrective spine surgery. Accelerometer transducers recorded SER in two directions at four different locations of the spine for TES-electrode montage groups Cz-Fz and C3-C4. A paired t test was used to compare the means of SER and the relationship between movement and TES electrode positioning. RESULTS: SERs were strongest in the upper body. All mean SERs values for the Cz-Fz group were up to five times larger when compared with the C3-C4 group. However, there were no differences between the C3-C4 and Cz-Fz groups in the lower body locations. Both electrode montage groups showed a gradual stepwise reduction in all mean SER values along the spine from the cranial to caudal region. For the upper body locations, there were no significant associations between SER and both montages; in contrast, a significant association SER was demonstrated in the lumbar region. CONCLUSION: At supramaximum levels, movements resulting from multipulse TES are likely caused by relatively strong contractions from muscles in the neck resulting from direct extracranial stimulation. When interchanging electrode montages in individual cases, the movement in the neck may become reduced. At lumbar levels transcranial evoked muscle contractions dominate movement in the surgically exposed areas. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Transcranial electrical stimulation as indispensable rearview.

PURPOSE: To optimize intraoperative neuromonitoring during extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) by adding transcranial electrical stimulation with motor evoked potential (TESMEP) to previously described monitoring using spontaneous EMG (sEMG) and peripheral stimulation (triggered EMG: tEMG). METHODS: Twenty-three patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis had XLIF procedures and were monitored using sEMG, tEMG and TESMEP. Spontaneous and triggered muscle activity, and the MEP of 5 ipsilateral leg muscles, 2 contralateral leg muscles and 1 arm muscle were monitored. RESULTS: During XLIF surgery decreased MEP amplitudes were measured in 9 patients and in 6 patients sEMG was documented. In 4 patients, both events were described. In 30 % of the cases (n = 7), the MEP amplitude decreased immediately after breaking of the table and even before skin incision. After reduction of the table break, the MEP amplitudes recovered to baseline. In two patients, the MEP amplitude deteriorated during distraction of the psoas with the retractor, while no events were reported using sEMG and tEMG. Repositioning of the retractor led to recovery of the MEP. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring the complete nervous system during an XLIF procedure is found to be helpful since nerve roots, lumbar plexus as well as the intradural neural structures may be at risk. TESMEP has additional value to sEMG and tEMG during XLIF procedure: (1) it informed about otherwise unnoticed events, and (2) it confirmed and added information to events measured using sEMG.

Recovery of TES-MEPs during surgical decompression of the spine: a case series of eight patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to illustrate the recovery of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials during surgical decompression of the spinal cord in patients with impaired motor function preoperatively. Specific attention was paid to the duration of neurologic symptoms before surgery and the postoperative clinical recovery. METHODS: A case series of eight patients was selected from a cohort of 74 patients that underwent spine surgery. The selected patients initially had low or absent transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials followed by a significant increase after surgical decompression of the spinal cord. RESULTS: A significant intraoperative increase in amplitude of motor evoked potentials was detected after decompression of the spinal cord or cauda equina in patients suffering from spinal canal stenosis (n = 2), extradural meningioma (n = 3), or a herniated nucleus polposus (n = 3). This was related to an enhanced neurologic outcome only if patients (n = 6) had a short onset (less than ½ year) of neurologic impairment before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a short onset of neurologic impairment because of compression of the spinal cord or caudal fibers, an intraoperative recovery of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials can indicate an improvement of motor function postoperatively. Therefore, transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials can be considered as a useful tool to the surgeon to monitor the quality of decompression of the spinal cord.

The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in tethered cord surgery.

PURPOSE: The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) with surgical detethering in dysraphic patients has been questioned. A retrospective analysis of our series of 65 patients is presented with special focus on technical set-up and outcome. METHODS: All patients were diagnosed with a tethered cord (TC) due to spinal dysraphism. A high-risk group (HRG) was determined consisting of 40 patients with a lipomyelomeningocele and/or a split cord malformation sometimes in combination with a tight filum terminale. The surgical procedure was a detethering operation in all cases performed by a single surgeon during a 9-year period (1999-2008). A standard set-up of IONM was used in all patients consisting of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and electrical nerve root stimulation. In young patients, conditioning stimulation was applied in order to improve absent or weak MEPs. RESULTS: IONM responses could be obtained in all patients. Postoperative deterioration of symptoms was found in two patients of whom one patient belonged to the HRG. Mean maximal follow-up of all 65 patients was 4.6 years (median 4.1 years). Long-term deterioration of symptoms was found in 6 of 65 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years (median 5.3 years). CONCLUSION: The use of IONM is feasible in all TC patients. The identification of functional nervous structures and continuous guarding of the integrity of sacral motor roots by IONM may contribute to the safety of surgical detethering.

Cervical osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of new developments.

OBJECTIVES: Cervical osteotomy can be performed on patients with cervical kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis. This study reviews the role of two new developments in cervical osteotomy surgery: internal fixation and transcranial electrical stimulated motor evoked potential monitoring (TES-MEP). METHODS: From 1999 to 2004, 16 patients underwent a C7-osteotomy with internal fixation. In 11 patients, cervical osteotomy was performed in a sitting position with halo-cast immobilization (group S), five patients underwent surgery in prone position with Mayfield clamp fixation (group P). In group P, longer fusion towards T4-T6 could be obtained that created a more stable fixation. Therefore, post-operative immobilization protocol of group P was simplified from halo-cast to cervical orthosis. RESULTS: Consolidation was obtained in all patients without loss of correction. Post-operative chin-brow to vertical angle measured 5 degrees (range 0-15). TES-MEP was successfully performed during all surgical procedures. In total, nine neurological events were registered. Additional surgical intervention resulted in recovery of amplitudes in six of nine events. In two patients spontaneous recovery took place. One patient showed no recovery of amplitudes despite surgical intervention and a partial C6 spinal cord lesion occurred. CONCLUSION: We conclude that C7 osteotomy with internal fixation has been shown to be a reliable and stable technique. When surgery is performed the in prone position, distal fixation can be optimally obtained allowing post-operative treatment by cervical orthosis instead of a halo-cast. TES-MEP monitoring has been shown to be a reliable neuromonitoring technique with high clinical relevancy during cervical osteotomy because it allows timely intervention before occurrence of permanent cord damage in a large proportion of the patients.