RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In orthopaedics, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions are among the most common surgical interventions. Two methods are preferably used: autografts from the hamstring tendon (HT) or patella tendon (PT). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare these two methods when returning to sports. METHODS: Eleven studies were included based on a literature search conducted in PubMed. The primary outcome was return to preinjury sport level in athletes. Post-operative results such as the Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, the Tegner Activity Score and KT-1000 arthrometry and autograft re-rupture rates were analysed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The analysis showed no significant difference in return to preinjury sports level at a two-year follow-up between patients operated with hamstring or patella autograft. Considering the secondary outcomes, no significant differences were recorded in Lysholm score, IKDC score or re-rupture rate. The Tegner Activity Scale demonstrated a significantly higher activity level in the PT group than in the HT group (OR 0.79, p = 0.003). At the two-year follow-up, the KT-1000 arthrometer analysis also showed a significant difference in laxity, which was higher for the HT autografts (OR -0.31, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study showed no significant differences between hamstring and patella autografts. Even so, the choice of method when operated for ACL rupture remains crucial for the individual and should be a weighted decision made jointly by the patient and the physician.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Autoinjertos , Tendones Isquiotibiales , Ligamento Rotuliano , Volver al Deporte , Humanos , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Tendones Isquiotibiales/trasplante , Ligamento Rotuliano/trasplante , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review the preliminary results of an original fusionless method of treatment for progressive scoliosis in young children. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and radiographs of 23 children with progressive scoliosis who failed to respond to conservative treatment and underwent fusionless surgery using a single solid growing rod construct. All of them were ambulatory and had a follow-up of minimum 2 years. Sixteen patients were treated by consecutive distraction of a single intramuscular rod, and seven patients with rodding and anterior apical convex fusion. The etiology of the scoliosis included 11 idiopathic, 6 syndromic, 4 congenital, and 2 neurofibromatosis. At initial surgery, the average age was 9.3 ± 2.8 years, with a mean Cobb angle of 68° ± 32°. Six patients underwent progressive scoliosis correction in a Stagnara cast prior to surgery, and one patient with an external halo-pelvic Ilizarov device. RESULTS: Fusionless single rodding allowed to maintain scoliosis correction in all patients. At an average of 3.5 ± 0.9 years after initial surgery, the 23 patients showed a correction of 57 % in the magnitude of the original curvature. Trunk height increase was documented in all patients and ranged from 1.5 to 11.9 cm. Rod failure was found in three patients and two patients had hardware infection. Only four cases of proximal junctional kyphosis were found at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results from these series of patients show that the presented fusionless single growing rod technique allows to maintain correction of progressive early onset scoliosis while permitting spinal growth, with low complication rate. With this technique, lengthening procedures are used only once in every 10 months and patients are more comfortable as no brace is needed in most cases. This technique does not require any specific spine device. The procedure is simple and efficacious as long as some guidelines are respected.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Ortopédicos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Tornillos Óseos , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Columna Vertebral/crecimiento & desarrollo , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Malposition of the acetabular cup is the most common cause of total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation. The position of a total hip implant is usually analysed on computed tomography (CT) scan. We aim to prove it is possible to measure, with good accuracy, the position of an acetabular cup using the low-dose irradiation (EOS) imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We implanted an acetabular cup in a pelvic dry bone and measured cup anteversion and inclination with scanography. We performed 14 series of EOS acquisitions with different inclination, rotation and pelvic tilt, which were analysed by five observers. Two observers repeated angle measurements. We then calculated measurement inter- and intrareproducibility and accuracy. RESULTS: Using a confidence interval (CI) of 95 %, inter- and intra-observer reproducibility were ±1.6, and ±1.4°, respectively, for cup inclination; accuracy in comparison with CT was ±2.6°. Using a 95 % CI, inter- and intra-observer reproducibility for cup anteversion were ±2.5° and ±2.3°, respectively. Measurement accuracy compared with CT was ±3.9°. CONCLUSION: EOS imaging system is superior to standard radiography in terms of measuring acetabular anteversion and inclination.