Fournier's gangrene and fecal diversion. When, in which patients, and what type should I perform?

INTRODUCTION: Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a necrotizing fasciitis affecting the perineum and urogenital tissue. The mortality rate is high although early detection and aggressive debridement can reduce mortality by up to 16%. The prevalence of sequelae is very high and a colostomy is often necessary to control the perineal wound. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out to recruit all patients operated on by the General Surgery and Urology Departments with a diagnosis of GF at the University Hospital over 22 years. Mortality, the Fournier gangrene severity index (FGSI), and fecal diversion (either surgical (colostomy) or straight (Flexi-seal)) are collected. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients met the inclusion criteria. FG's most frequent cause was a perianal abscess (107 patients-72%). Eighteen patients (12%) died of a specific cause of FG. Age (p = 0.014) and patients with an oncological history (p = 0.038) both were the only mortality risk factors for mortality according to logistic regression. Fifty patients required some form of fecal diversion in the postoperative period (32 colostomies and 18 Flexi-seal). Neither the use of postoperative fecal diversion (surgical or Flexi-seal) nor the timing of its use had any effect on postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: One in eight patients died in the immediate postoperative period secondary to FG. Despite improved outcomes, 22% required a colostomy during admission. However, neither the performance of a colostomy nor the timing was associated with decreased FG-associated mortality. Non-invasive methods should be used first and surgical bowel diversion should be postponed as long as possible.

Breast metastases from non-primary breast malignancies: What should we know?

BACKGROUND: Metastases from extramammary malignant neoplasms are very rare, accounting for less than 2% of all breast malignancies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the clinicopathological features and prognosis of breast metastases from non-primary breast malignancies at our institution. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study, obtaining data from electronic medical records and pathology databases between January 1985 and December 2020 for patients diagnosed with breast metastasis from non-primary breast malignancies. Only patients diagnosed by biopsy were included. RESULTS: Fifteen patients diagnosed with breast metastases from non-primary breast malignancies were included, 13 women (86,67%) and 2 men (13,33%). The median age at time of initial diagnosis was 56 years (IQR 21-68). The most frequent primary malignancy was melanoma (9/15; 60%). The median time to diagnosis of breast metastases was 65 months (IQR 13-106). The most common diagnostic modality was CT-scan (10/15; 66,67%). The median follow-up was 96 months (IQR 29-136). Eight patients underwent surgery (53,3%), being the most common surgical intervention breast-conserving surgery (5/8; 62,5%). Mortality at the end of follow-up was 53,3% (8/15). On the survival analysis, we found no differences between patients undergoing surgery and those only receiving systemic treatment [41,5 months (IQR 17,5-57,5) versus 14 months (IQR 2-24), respectively; p = 0,161]. CONCLUSIONS: Breast metastases from non-primary breast malignancies are extremely rare and represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, due to the poor prognosis of these patients. Thus, arriving at the correct diagnosis is crucial to avoid unnecessary treatment in this population.

Intraoperative sentinel node biopsy, is it worth the wait?

INTRODUCTION: In our institution, the study of selective sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) is performed intraoperatively. The main objective of our study is to know the proportion of patients who benefits from the waiting of the results of SLNB. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients operated on our center between January 1st, 2018 and June 30, 2019 was carried out. We included women diagnosed with T1-T2 tumors, treated by lumpectomy and SLNB studied using OSNA method. RESULTS: Our study included 149 women. There were not statistically significant differences in terms of demographic data between the group treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and exclusively SLNB group. After analysis of SLN intraoperatively, there were performed 18 axillary lymphadenectomies. Only in six of this 18 cases, three or more sentinel nodes were founded. The location of the tumor, the presence of lymphovascular permeation and the total tumor load (TTL) showed statistically significant differences between groups. Only the TTL was established as the independent factor of the need for ALND. DISCUSSION: Obtaining a deferred result of the SLNB allowed reducing the time of anesthesia and occupation of the operating room, since in a high percentage of cases an additional procedure is not performed.