The impact of prediabetes and diabetes on endothelial function in a large population-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes and prediabetes are well-recognized risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and are marked by vascular endothelial dysfunction (ED). However, there is a scarcity of thorough population-based studies examining ED in individuals with diabetes/prediabetes free from manifest CVD. Here, we examined the association between ED assessed by reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) in the finger and diabetes/prediabetes in a large middle-aged population cohort. METHODS: Within the Malmö Offspring Study, following the exclusion of participants <30 years and participants with prevalent CVD, 1384 participants had complete data on all covariates. The RHI was calculated using pulse amplitude tonometry. ED was defined as RHI < 1.67. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were conducted to investigate associations between ED and RHI with diabetes and prediabetes. RESULTS: The study population had a mean age of 53.6 ± 7.6 years (53% women). In study participants with manifest diabetes (n = 121) and prediabetes (n = 514), ED was present in 42% and 25% respectively, compared to 23% in those with normal glucometabolic status. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, prevalent diabetes was significantly associated with ED (OR 1.95; 95%CI 1.57-3.39; p = 0.002), as well as with lower RHI (ß-coeff. -0.087; p = 0.002). However, prediabetes showed no association with neither ED nor RHI. CONCLUSION: In a population free from CVD, vascular endothelial dysfunction was primarily associated with manifest diabetes, but not with prediabetes, implying that finger ED may develop when diabetes is established, rather than being an early sign of glucose intolerance. Further research is needed to explore whether addressing glucose intolerance could potentially delay or prevent vascular ED onset.

What is the context?Diabetes and prediabetes are known to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) through a condition called vascular endothelial dysfunction (ED). However, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on ED in individuals with diabetes/prediabetes who do not already have CVD. In this study, we investigated the association between ED, assessed using the reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) in a finger, and diabetes/prediabetes in a large group of middle-aged individuals.What is new?We conducted this study within the Malmö Offspring Study, involving 1384 participants who were over 30 years old and did not have pre-existing CVD. The average age of the participants was 53 years, with 53% being women. Among those with diagnosed diabetes (121 individuals) and prediabetes (5141 individuals), 42% and 25% respectively showed signs of ED, compared to 23% in those with normal glucose metabolism. In our analyses, we found that established diabetes was significantly associated with ED, as well as with lower finger RHI values. However, prediabetes did not show any significant association with either ED or RHI.What is the impact? In a healthy population without pre-existing CVD, vascular endothelial dysfunction was predominantly linked to diagnosed diabetes, rather than prediabetes. This suggests that ED may develop once diabetes is established, rather than being an early indicator of glucose intolerance. Further research is necessary to investigate whether addressing glucose intolerance could potentially delay or prevent the onset of vascular ED.

The impact of age on endothelial dysfunction measured by peripheral arterial tonometry in a healthy population-based cohort - the Malmö offspring study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) assesses endothelial function, with a proposed cut-off of <1.67 for prevalent endothelial dysfunction (ED). However, uncertainties remain about whether this cut-off is age-dependent and applicable in healthy individuals. We aimed to explore ED in relation to age within a large population-based cohort of young to middle-aged, healthy individuals. METHODS: Within the Malmö Offspring Study, a total of 1812 subjects (50.9% women, mean age 48 ± 11 years) were included. Post-occlusion/pre-occlusion ratio of the pulsatile signal amplitudes in the non-dominant upper arm was used to calculate RHI by EndoPat®. ED was defined as RHI < 1.67. Multivariable regression models were used to explore associations between ED and age. RESULTS: Prevalent ED was found in 534 (29.5%) participants. In subjects aged ≤30 years, ED was present in 47.4% compared to 27.6% in subjects ≥30 years (p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, ED was associated with younger age (p < 0.001), higher BMI (p < 0.001) and current smoking (p < 0.001). No sex differences were observed. CONCLUSION: In a large healthy population, RHI < 1.67, an early marker of endothelial dysfunction, was more prevalent in younger individuals, implying that RHI might not be a suitable measure of endothelial function in individuals under 30 years of age. Our findings suggest that low RHI in young, healthy individuals may not necessarily indicate true ED but rather an artefact of the limited ability of young and healthy arteries to dilate post-occlusion. Therefore, the term "pseudo-ED" may be applicable to young individuals with low RHI values.

What is the context?The endothelium is a thin layer of cells that lines the inside of blood vessels, and its proper function is crucial for the maintenance of vascular health. Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is an early marker of cardiovascular disease and is characterised by impaired dilation of blood vessels, which can lead to reduced blood flow and increased risk of heart attacks and strokes. The reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) is a widely used non-invasive test that measures endothelial function by evaluating the dilation of blood vessels in response to temporary occlusion.What is new?This study aimed to investigate the relationship between age and ED in a large population-based cohort of young to middle-aged healthy individuals. The results showed that prevalent ED was more common in younger individuals, with 47.4% of participants aged ≤30 years having ED, compared to 27.6% in those ≥30 years. The study also found that ED was associated with higher BMI and current smoking, but no sex differences were observed.What is the impact?The findings suggest that the proposed RHI cut-off of <1.67 for prevalent ED may not be applicable to individuals under the age of 30, as young and healthy arteries may have limited ability to dilate post-occlusion, resulting in low RHI values that do not necessarily indicate true ED. Therefore, the term "pseudo-ED" may be more appropriate for young individuals with low RHI values.

Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) in a population-based cohort of middle-aged individuals: The STANISLAS cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data exploring normal values of different ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) parameters and their association with anthropometric and cardiovascular (CV) factors are scarce. We aim to report values of two different methods of VAC assessment according to age and sex and explore their association with CV factors within a large population-based cohort of middle-aged individuals. METHODS: For 1333 (mean age 48 ± 14) individuals participating in the 4th visit of the STANISLAS cohort, VAC was assessed by two methods [1]: arterial elastance (Ea)/end-systolic elastance (Ees) and [2] Pulse wave velocity (PWV)/Global longitudinal strain (GLS). RESULTS: The mean values of Ea/Ees and PWV/GLS were 1.06 ± 0.20 and 0.42 ± 0.12, respectively. The two methods of VAC assessment were poorly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.14 (0.08; 0.19)). Increased PWV/GLS was associated with older age and a higher degree of cardiovascular risk factors (i.e., BMI, blood pressure, LDL, diabetes, hypertension) in the whole population as well as in the parent generation. In contrast, higher Ea/Ees were associated with decreasing age, and lower prevalence of risk factors in the whole cohort but neutrally associated with risk factors in the parent generation. CONCLUSIONS: Higher PWV/GLS is significantly associated with CV factors regardless of age. In contrast, worse Ea/Ees is associated with a better CV risk profile when considering individuals aged 30 to 70 but neutrally associated with CV factors when considering only older patients. These results may suggest that PWV/GLS should preferably be used to explore VAC. In addition, age-individualized threshold of Ea/Ees should be used.